Yet Another Cycling Forum

Off Topic => The Pub => Topic started by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 08:32:57 pm

Title: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 08:32:57 pm
This is a thread for listing those people in the public eye that you absolutely can not abide.

I'll kick off with Bear Grylls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls#Criticism).

Bear Grylls - Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: toekneep on November 09, 2008, 08:36:13 pm
Jeremy Vine
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RichForrest on November 09, 2008, 08:36:41 pm
Jamie Theakston
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andygates on November 09, 2008, 08:40:16 pm
That Warburton lad.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on November 09, 2008, 08:41:27 pm
That Warburton lad.
He makes a fine loaf!  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Chris S on November 09, 2008, 08:44:46 pm
Jade Goody,

Well, someone had to say it, didn't they?

Oh - and Kerry Katona. Am I allowed two?

Oh Oh - and Sarah Kennedy. Am I allowed three?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: toontra on November 09, 2008, 08:45:25 pm
Bear Grylls = Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.

He's just the warm-up act.  Wait till Cameron and the rest of the Bullingdon Club are running the country.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Fab Foodie on November 09, 2008, 08:45:55 pm
Chris Moyles
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andygates on November 09, 2008, 08:47:29 pm
That Warburton lad.
He makes a fine loaf!  ;D

It's all laptops these days. :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: eck on November 09, 2008, 08:47:53 pm
Bill Oddie.

Before Noodley gets in first.  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on November 09, 2008, 08:49:22 pm
Chris Hoy!  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: eck on November 09, 2008, 08:53:04 pm
Mrs eck says please can she please add Heather the Weather to the list.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on November 09, 2008, 09:05:40 pm
That other Jeremy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Kyle)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on November 09, 2008, 09:13:23 pm
All Jeremies! Everywhere!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 09, 2008, 09:16:48 pm
Stephen Nolan off Radio 5...

Anita Anand off Radio 5...

Peter Allen off Radio 5...

John Humphrys off Radio 4.

d.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on November 09, 2008, 09:23:40 pm
All Jeremies! Everywhere!
Especially the C-one
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 09:26:20 pm
Right now I'm just reacting to whatever twat is presenting themselves on my TV screen. I'm going to have a good long sleep pretty soon, where these people can't bother me. It's interesting that right now I can't recall more names of personalities that I know I dislike with a passion. I'm sure it will come flooding back to me the minute I'm reminded of them.

In my conciousness right now is Jason Statham (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Statham)

Jason Statham - Super-Twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: annie on November 09, 2008, 09:27:54 pm
Right now I'm just reacting to whatever twat is presenting themselves on my TV screen. I'm going to have a good long sleep pretty soon, where these people can't bother me. It's interesting that right now I can't recall more of the names of personalities that I know I dislike with a passion. I'm sure it will come flooding back to me the minuted I'm reminded of them.

In my conciousness right now is Jason Statham (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Statham)

Jason Statham = Super-Twat
No, no, no. :o
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Fixedwheelnut on November 09, 2008, 09:32:37 pm
Stephen Nolan off Radio 5...

Anita Anand off Radio 5...

Peter Allen off Radio 5...

John Humphrys off Radio 4.

d.



Can I make a suggestion?  stop listening to Radio 5  ;D

 Ealy morning Chav Chat show hosts and their wannabee famous subjects  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on November 09, 2008, 09:35:57 pm
Right now I'm just reacting to whatever twat is presenting themselves on my TV screen. I'm going to have a good long sleep pretty soon, where these people can't bother me. It's interesting that right now I can't recall more of the names of personalities that I know I dislike with a passion. I'm sure it will come flooding back to me the minuted I'm reminded of them.

In my conciousness right now is Jason Statham (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Statham)

Jason Statham = Super-Twat

And the really thick-looking one who's in those movies.  I've no idea what his name is, but he was the thicko in Mean Machine and he's been in some other shite films.  God, he's annoying.

While I'm here, Gordon Ramsay should be nominated.  It's just food, FFS.  And Duncan Bannatyne and anyone else so tied up in their own self-importance.  Listen, Bannatyne, if everyone was a millionaire, that would defeat the purpose, wouldn't it?  Just admit you're flogging false hope and fcuk off back to whichever hole you frequented before you started appearing on the TV.  Argh!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 09:39:20 pm
Annie, please don't tell me you fancy Jason Super-Twat, I had you down as having good taste and intelligence! :P

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jezza on November 09, 2008, 09:42:31 pm
Hugh Foppish-Tosspot from River Cottage. And anyone else who talks like that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 09, 2008, 09:44:40 pm
This thread is largely beyond me.

I have ignored the meeja for so long that I no longer know who anyone is.

OK, I know Humphrys and recognise a few of the other names, but the vast majority have passed me by completely.

Am I on my way to nirvana?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 09:47:34 pm
John Humphrys off Radio 4.

SUPER-SUPER-ULTRA-TWAT! Don't you think the Today program is so much better when he's not involved? The BBC's Rottweiler? The BBC's twat-supreme more like!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on November 09, 2008, 09:49:44 pm
This thread is largely beyond me.

I have ignored the meeja for so long that I no longer know who anyone is.

OK, I know Humphrys and recognise a few of the other names, but the vast majority have passed me by completely.

Am I on my way to nirvana?

Ignorance is bliss.  ;D

I can't get that wound up by people in the public eye -  life's too short, and hate is not good for the digestion...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Noodley on November 09, 2008, 09:56:36 pm
Bill Oddie. 

Nobody on this page has mentioned him yet  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: annie on November 09, 2008, 10:06:33 pm
Annie, please don't tell me you fancy Jason Super-Twat, I had you down as having good taste and intelligence! :P



Don't be daft.

I prefer intellect, a cuppa and a good book or a brisk walk. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 10:19:20 pm
John Humphrys off Radio 4.

SUPER-SUPER-ULTRA-TWAT! Don't you think the Today program is so much better when he's not involved? The BBC's Rottweiler? The BBC's twat-supreme more like!

Saying that, I don't find him half so irritating on the Moral Maze program which he also hosts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 09, 2008, 10:27:09 pm
I'm still stuck with Thatcher, Tebbit, Parkinson, Baker et al. I used to spend hours wondering which of those I hated most.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 10:29:09 pm
Parkinson! There's one - you just reminded me, thanks for that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on November 09, 2008, 10:30:12 pm
John Humphrys off Radio 4.

SUPER-SUPER-ULTRA-TWAT! Don't you think the Today program is so much better when he's not involved? The BBC's Rottweiler? The BBC's twat-supreme more like!

Saying that, I don't find him half so irritating on the Moral Maze program which he also hosts.

Bzzt.  The Moral Maze is hosted by Michael Buerk.

The Moral Maze often features rabid frothing Melanie Philips, whom I'd like to nominate.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on November 09, 2008, 10:31:14 pm
I'm still stuck with Thatcher, Tebbit, Parkinson, Baker et al. I used to spend hours wondering which of those I hated most.
Likewise with Tony BLiar, Gordon Brown, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock, John Smith, John Prescot et al!!   :P :P
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: eck on November 09, 2008, 10:33:55 pm
]Likewise with Tony BLiar, Gordon Brown, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock, John Smith, John Prescot et al!!   :P :P
Chris Hoy.
You forgot Chris Hoy.  :P
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on November 09, 2008, 10:34:26 pm
Rosemary Leonard (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast/presenters/6173898.stm)

 :sick:

A significant contributing factor in my disillusionment with morning news on TV. Every time I switch it on, that patronising bitch is there, when what I want is The News.  

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on November 09, 2008, 10:35:28 pm
Anne Widdecombe.  The most odious woman ever to bestride the Countdown studio.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on November 09, 2008, 10:38:01 pm
I'm still stuck with Thatcher, Tebbit, Parkinson, Baker et al. I used to spend hours wondering which of those I hated most.
Likewise with Tony BLiar, Gordon Brown, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock, John Smith, John Prescot et al!!   :P :P

Michael Foot?  I s'pose, if you didn't like his politics...

But John Smith?  Really?  Given the calibre of Tories opposing him at the time, he would have to be a combination of Satan and Stig of the Dump to attract any real bile.  Seemed pretty inoffensive to me.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 10:38:12 pm
Bzzt.  The Moral Maze is hosted by Michael Buerk.

The Moral Maze often features rabid frothing Melanie Philips, whom I'd like to nominate.

It is, I get confused with who's who in the BBC's 'intellectual' bracket.

Melanie Philips can rot in Hell her own effluence.

Melanie Philips - Super-Twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 09, 2008, 10:41:43 pm
I'm still stuck with Thatcher, Tebbit, Parkinson, Baker et al. I used to spend hours wondering which of those I hated most.
Likewise with Tony BLiar, Gordon Brown, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock, John Smith, John Prescot et al!!   :P :P

I suppose Kenneth Baker brought a completely different meaning the the expression "peak oil". ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 10:54:51 pm
Gillian McKeith (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/feb/12/advertising.food) - I'm incandescent at the thought of this one.

Gillian McKeith - Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on November 09, 2008, 10:56:33 pm
Anne Widdecombe.  The most odious woman ever to bestride the Countdown studio.

OMG.

What an image.

Dandruff on the studio floor?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ibrahim on November 09, 2008, 11:11:55 pm
Gillian McKeith (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/feb/12/advertising.food) - I'm incandescent at the thought of this one.

Gillian McKeith = Super-Twat.

Having read that article, I must say that I do agree with you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 09, 2008, 11:12:52 pm
I'm still stuck with Thatcher, Tebbit, Parkinson, Baker et al. I used to spend hours wondering which of those I hated most.
Parkinson! There's one - you just reminded me, thanks for that.

It's just occured to me that that you were most likely talking about Cecil Parkinson (http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Parkinson), whereas I had in mind that twat-done-good from Yorkshire, Michael Parkinson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Parkinson).

Michael Parkinson - Super-Twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 09, 2008, 11:22:12 pm
You are right - I was referring to Cecil Parkinson.

Your link underlines what a consummate c*nt the man is.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Charlotte on November 10, 2008, 12:31:26 am
Jon "Gaunty" Gaunt.

The man's a maggot.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Che on November 10, 2008, 02:04:17 am
Bear Grylls winds me up of course, and all other climbers or mountaineers, for his hyperbole. As far as I can tell, the climbs he does, and the situations he puts himself in, are highly non-trivial to deal with, and would be very dangerous indeed -- nay likely fatal -- for the totally inexperienced. Nonetheless, they represent utterly manageable risks to the experienced mountaineer and outdoorsman, with none of the kind of acute danger that the program presents.

One slip and he's dead? Whatever.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on November 10, 2008, 06:39:40 am
Stephen Nolan off Radio 5...

Anita Anand off Radio 5...

Peter Allen off Radio 5...

John Humphrys off Radio 4.

d.



cant believe you missed out Nicky Campbell. 

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 10, 2008, 06:43:43 am
My father describes such people as having "punchable faces".

Mick Hucknall
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 08:03:55 am
John Humphrys off Radio 4.

SUPER-SUPER-ULTRA-TWAT! Don't you think the Today program is so much better when he's not involved? The BBC's Rottweiler? The BBC's twat-supreme more like!


Heresy!  Burn them!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on November 10, 2008, 08:19:52 am
I can't decide between Gordon (Swearing does not pass for a personality) Ramsay and Chris (I am not as funny as I think) Moyles.

Would it be possible to arrange a fight to the death between them to decide?

(Then kill the winner)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 10, 2008, 10:02:01 am
Anne Atkins

Melanie Phillips

David Starkey

Brian Sewell

Nicky Campbell

Jeremy Vine

Oh sod it, this could take hours:

Anyone who appears on TV

&

Anyone who appears in 'Celeb' mags.

That should just about cover it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 10:03:31 am
Sorry - I can't agree with you about David Starkey or Brian Sewell.  I'm not the greatest fan of either, but they both can be brilliant in their own ways.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 10:06:05 am
cant believe you missed out Nicky Campbell.

I'm not his biggest fan but I like Shelagh and they have a good double act going so I can tolerate him.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 10:06:14 am
Jimmy Carr  :sick:

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: blackpuddinonnabike on November 10, 2008, 10:06:31 am
Garth Crooks - there's something deeply smug and annoying about him.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 10, 2008, 10:13:01 am
Another Jeremy - that smug former England rugby player who appears on the BBC rugby programs. Can't remember his surname.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 10:15:22 am
Another Jeremy - that smug former England rugby player who appears on the BBC rugby programs. Can't remember his surname.

Guscott?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on November 10, 2008, 10:15:36 am
guscott.  He threatened me with a "good kicking" once in a pub in Bath for talking to one of the girls in his group on valentines day.  I decided cowardice was the best option, finished my pint and left.  


Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Julian on November 10, 2008, 10:17:46 am
Paul Dacre.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: blackpuddinonnabike on November 10, 2008, 10:26:28 am
Jeremy Guscott is almost single-handedly the reason Scots hate the English these days. At least when Brian Moore isn't on screen.

Paul O'Grady - his voice makes my ears bleed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 10, 2008, 10:28:27 am
Paul Dacre.

Oh yes.  Just to make sure, in case their appearances on TV somehow slip through the net of my previous categories, I have to make sure that:

Paul Dacre

Kelvin Mackenzie

Richard Littlejohn

and

Garry Bushell

are all included...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 10, 2008, 11:32:17 am
Garth Crooks - there's something deeply smug and annoying about him.

<mode HMHB=on>
There is surely nothing worse than washing sieves.
There is surely nothing worse than washing sieves.
With the possible exception
Of being Garth Crooks.
There is surely nothing worse than washing sieves.
<off>

Fortunately Terry Christian seems finally to have disappeared up his own arris, and Regulator has already nominated Jimmy Carr so it has to be James "The Cock" Allen.  Please please please please please please please please please can he be abandoned in a cupboard when the BBC takes over F1 coverage next year?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:39:41 am
Mark Lawson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:40:10 am
Germaine Greer
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:41:01 am
Tim Lovejoy
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:42:42 am
Frederick Forsyth
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:44:47 am
Andrew Lloyd Webber
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:45:51 am
Anne McElvoy
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:46:57 am
Giles Coren
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:47:46 am
Tim Lott
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:48:19 am
David Mellor

Sorry, I'll stop in a minute.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 11:48:58 am
Eamonn Holmes
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Flying_Monkey on November 10, 2008, 11:59:13 am
Tim Lott

I met him on a train once with his daughter, and we talked for a couple of hours. He's a very nice man, actually, and not remotely twattish.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 12:00:40 pm
Germaine Greer


Oi!  Leave the lovely Germaine alone.  She's a heroine of mine, I'll have you know.  She speaks a lot of sense.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 10, 2008, 12:10:01 pm
Germaine Greer


Oi!  Leave the lovely Germaine alone.  She's a heroine of mine, I'll have you know.  She speaks a lot of sense.

In between all the rest of the words that she spouts.

Female Eunuch's a great read, mind.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 12:14:16 pm
Oi!  Leave the lovely Germaine alone.  She's a heroine of mine, I'll have you know.  She speaks a lot of sense.

Once upon a time, maybe. It's all just pretentious self-regarding pseudo-intellectual tosh these days.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 10, 2008, 12:15:45 pm
Not all.  Her Guardian columns are worth reading.  There's always something intelligent & perceptive buried in there.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 10, 2008, 12:17:10 pm
Having seen the dramatic growth of this thread this morning, I've decided that the collective noun for Super-twats is a "smutchin".  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 10, 2008, 12:19:41 pm
My list was longer ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 10, 2008, 12:21:17 pm
Mine was of the highest quality and I doubt that any compares to the appalling Cecil Parkinson. :P
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 12:22:11 pm
Not even Robert Kilroy Silk?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 10, 2008, 12:22:56 pm
Frederick Forsyth

+1 :thumbsup: STFU and stick to the novels.

Actually, don't bother with that either.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 10, 2008, 12:24:06 pm
Not even Robert Kilroy Silk?

Read the Wiki biography of CP. I think RKS is a lightweight by comparison.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 10, 2008, 12:51:13 pm
Marti Pellow
Ally McCoist
Sarah Kennedy
Jodie Marsh
The entire team of Cosmopolitan magazine
Raj Persaud
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 10, 2008, 12:52:44 pm
Whoever it was at Murrayfield on Saturday who booed the All Blacks
Anne Moffat MP for East Lothian
Michael Portillo
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 10, 2008, 12:57:03 pm
Whoever it was at Murrayfield on Saturday who booed the All Blacks
Anne Moffat MP for East Lothian
Michael Portillo



Sorry - I quite like Portillo.  Together with Andrew Neil and Diane Abbot, he makes This Week quite an entertaining show.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 10, 2008, 01:07:55 pm
Jim Davidson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Si on November 10, 2008, 01:37:08 pm
Lowri Turner

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 10, 2008, 01:44:04 pm
Michael Gove
<shudder>
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 10, 2008, 07:23:42 pm
Have we had Richard Littlejohn yet?  Or Garry Bushell?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on November 10, 2008, 07:25:21 pm
Have we had Richard Littlejohn yet?  Or Garry Bushell?

Who cares?  Neither of those can be stressed enough.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 10, 2008, 07:45:18 pm
Stressed as in being hung by a burning rope over a swamp full of crocodiles?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 10, 2008, 08:03:34 pm
ooh, just thought of another!
Piers Morgan
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Dave on November 10, 2008, 08:06:02 pm
All Jeremies! Everywhere!

With the possible exception of Jeremy Hardy, surely? Despite regularly revelling in his own ignorance of science on the News Quiz, he should avoid the firing squad come the revolution.

Paul Dacre, definitely should go on the list. Anyone else read his poisonous article on press "freedom" in the Guardian today? Complete with obligatory dig at the Beeb. Ultra-twat.

Raj Persaud. Smug twat as well as super twat.

Richard Dawkins.

Amanda Platell.

George Galloway.

At least one Hitchens.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 10, 2008, 08:14:55 pm
Another Jeffrey:

Archer  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 10, 2008, 08:18:07 pm
James Whale
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 10, 2008, 08:24:22 pm
Another Jeffrey:

Archer  :sick:
Do you want Jeffrey from Rainbow too? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 11, 2008, 11:27:27 am
Giles Brandreth
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 11, 2008, 11:35:23 am
Kirst, he spells his name Gyles, which I only mention because makes him look even more twattish.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 11, 2008, 11:44:12 am
What a wonderful thread!  ;D

Geoffrey Boycott. You've ruined so many otherwise enjoyable days at the cricket when I was a kid with your boring, stale outlook on the game.

You talk shite. You invent ridiculous sayings. You beat up your girlfriends. You are a knob.

Watching you and Piers Morgan (sorry for the repetition) in a bare knuckle boxing match until you're both dead would give me more pleasure than shagging the girl who always gets the 8:23 train I've been fantasising about for years.....

MEGA- twat!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 11, 2008, 12:07:42 pm
the 8:23 train I've been fantasising about for years

"Look at the rolling stock on that!" ;)

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jacomus on November 11, 2008, 12:33:07 pm
Gethin Jones
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 11, 2008, 12:34:49 pm
the 8:23 train I've been fantasising about for years

"Look at the rolling stock on that!" ;)

d.


I thought about rewording that for a couple of seconds, but then realised it was several feet of potentially amusing rope  :P
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 11, 2008, 12:40:42 pm
Kirst, he spells his name Gyles, which I only mention because makes him look even more twattish.

I did think it didn't look right but he's such a twat I couldn't work up enough enthusiasm to check.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 11, 2008, 02:38:40 pm
What a wonderful thread!  ;D

Geoffrey Boycott. You've ruined so many otherwise enjoyable days at the cricket when I was a kid with your boring, stale outlook on the game.

You talk shite. You invent ridiculous sayings. You beat up your girlfriends. You are a knob.

Watching you and Piers Morgan (sorry for the repetition) in a bare knuckle boxing match until you're both dead would give me more pleasure than shagging the girl who always gets the 8:23 train I've been fantasising about for years.....

MEGA- twat!

And you used to run out entertaining batsmen like Graham Gooch and Derek Randall!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Julian on November 11, 2008, 02:43:31 pm
Ann Widdecombe.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 11, 2008, 02:45:12 pm
George Osborne.  I think he's been mentioned before, but I can only suspect his tax proposals are an attempt to get into this thread, so let's give him a special mention, eh? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 11, 2008, 03:50:04 pm
What a wonderful thread!  ;D

Geoffrey Boycott. You've ruined so many otherwise enjoyable days at the cricket when I was a kid with your boring, stale outlook on the game.

You talk shite. You invent ridiculous sayings. You beat up your girlfriends. You are a knob.

Watching you and Piers Morgan (sorry for the repetition) in a bare knuckle boxing match until you're both dead would give me more pleasure than shagging the girl who always gets the 8:23 train I've been fantasising about for years.....

MEGA- twat!

And you used to run out entertaining batsmen like Graham Gooch and Derek Randall!

Although I've played against both (admittedly in charity games  :P) I can't say I've ever run either of them out!

Edit: I completely read that arse about face!  Ho-hum.......
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 11, 2008, 03:56:30 pm
And you used to run out entertaining batsmen like Graham Gooch and Derek Randall!

He ran out our skool headmaster1 once as well.

1 - who had opened the batting for Derbyshire in a previous life
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Flying_Monkey on November 11, 2008, 03:58:06 pm
James Whale

I used to think he was a twat.

Then he interviewed me on his radio show once. He was, despite a tendency to hyperbole, a lot more thoughtful and serious about the issues, and took more time to expand on them, than anyone on Radio 4 who has interviewed me.

After that, I reconsidered his twattishness.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 11, 2008, 03:59:50 pm
That'll be the James Whale who's just got into bother again for bias...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 11, 2008, 06:16:46 pm
William Hague.  Look, you were never going to be PM because

(1) you come from Yorkshire, and therefore have a superiority complex.

(2) you look like a baked bean.

(3) you are less interesting than that really boring guy who replaced you, whose name I had to struggle with...Duncan-Smith, that's it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 11, 2008, 06:20:52 pm
Adrian Chiles.

You belittling knob.

Somebody comes on your show with AIDS or something and you're like "Boom boom - must be a bit tough that!"

GIGA-twat......
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rower40 on November 11, 2008, 06:30:24 pm
I can't believe we've made it to 8 pages without mentioning...

George W Bush.

Thank the hanging chad he's going.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on November 11, 2008, 11:07:40 pm
On the strength of what I've just watched on C4, Neil Morrissey. And his side kick, but I'm not sure he counts for the purposes of his thread.

Anyway, juvenile, overexposed knob jockeys the pair of them.  And I hope their pub goes bust.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on November 11, 2008, 11:10:42 pm
I can't believe we've made it to 8 pages without mentioning...

George W Bush.

I assume that's for the same reason that people get confused if you walk up to them in Trafalgar Square and ask where England is :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 12, 2008, 06:42:52 am
Have we had Robbie Williams yet?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Flying_Monkey on November 12, 2008, 09:40:06 am
That'll be the James Whale who's just got into bother again for bias...

Well, I am sure - but he's infinitely preferable to the snide hypocrites who inhabit much of Radio 4.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 12, 2008, 09:46:09 am
William Hague.  Look, you were never going to be PM because

(1) you come from Yorkshire, and therefore have a superiority complex.

(2) you look like a baked bean.

(3) you are less interesting than that really boring guy who replaced you, whose name I had to struggle with...Duncan-Smith, that's it.

Who was in turn once described as looking like a waxed cock in an undertaker's suit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 12, 2008, 10:05:11 am
Robert Kilroy Silk
Esther Rantzen
Brian Paddick
Carly Zucker
Martina Navratilova
Simon Webbe
Joe Swash
Nicola McLean
Dani Behr

But not George Takei!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 12, 2008, 10:13:44 am
William Hague.  Look, you were never going to be PM because

(1) you come from Yorkshire....

Bzzt! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Wilson)

Though this is all true.

Quote
(2) you look like a baked bean.

(3) you are less interesting than that really boring guy who replaced you, whose name I had to struggle with...Duncan-Smith, that's it.

Along with

(4)  you had a lot of the nasty corrupt Tories still hanging around (like Cameron does, but more quietly)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Charlotte on November 12, 2008, 10:15:08 am
Smutters, I really do think that Brian Paddick and possibly Martina Navratilova ought to come out of that list as well.  The rest of them can stay, though...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 12, 2008, 10:21:17 am
Not Sulu!  My first crush! :o :( :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 12, 2008, 11:23:55 am
Smutters, I really do think that Brian Paddick and possibly Martina Navratilova ought to come out of that list as well.  The rest of them can stay, though...

I'll give you Martina, but Paddick... I'm not convinced.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Charlotte on November 12, 2008, 11:33:33 am
I met him at the ITV London Mayoral Hustings.  He's a good chap, I promise.

One of those, of course
[/Major]
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 12, 2008, 12:05:42 pm
Those two dicks on Masterchef. Utter twats.

Melvyn Bragg.
Bruce Forsyth.
Horse racing.
Last of the summer wine.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Si on November 12, 2008, 12:11:34 pm
Could I make a bid for David Dickenson if not one has had him yet?  You know, bright orange antiques bloke.

whilst on Davids I'll have David Bellamy too.

And not a David, but definitely a twat that stands out among his fellow twats: the short arse licking Irish bloke of the X Factor. You know, the one that was being wound up by another pair of twats about the possibility of appearing in a new American version of the X Factor and agreed to fixing the results if they'd let him on.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on November 12, 2008, 12:15:20 pm
Talking of orange people - that twat who plays Rugby for Wales. Can't remember his name - knobing that chav who used to sing a bit. Probably spends 500 quid a month on getting his pubes trimmed. Suuuuuuper-twat...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 12, 2008, 12:35:04 pm
Gordon effing Ramsay
John McCrirrick (or wotevah his name is, the man's so excreble ICBA looking)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: blackpuddinonnabike on November 12, 2008, 04:23:54 pm
Those two dicks on Masterchef. Utter twats.

THAT WAS A GREAT PUDDING WASN'T IT?

WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING?

BECAUSE IT ADDS TO THE TENSION, JUST LIKE SAYING "AND THE WINNER IS..." THEN PAUSING FOR TEN SECONDS

FAAAAAAAAAAHKIN NARWHAL DUDE!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on November 12, 2008, 08:37:09 pm
The Channel 4 news has finished and lo and behold, there's a brand new Super-Twat on the tele - George Clarke (http://www.channel4.com/4homes/ask-the-experts/expert-panel/george-clarke-08-17-07_p_1.html).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Fixedwheelnut on November 12, 2008, 09:09:25 pm
Talking of orange people - that twat who plays Rugby for Wales. Can't remember his name - knobing that chav who used to sing a bit. Probably spends 500 quid a month on getting his pubes trimmed. Suuuuuuper-but very neat-twat...


 FTFY  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 15, 2008, 10:52:28 am
Have we had Jamie "Mockney" Oliver yet?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rob on November 15, 2008, 01:16:07 pm
Simon Cowell
Ainsley Harriott
Geri Halliwell

I'll be back with a few more in a minute.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on November 15, 2008, 01:31:43 pm
HAs anyone mentioned Ant and Dec?

And if not, why not? ;D

And Jordan, and Peter f*cking Andre

and Nick f*cking Berry*

And Rowan Atkinson as Mr sodding Bean

( this post seems to be heading for the rant thread ;D)




*Copyrite Paul Calf
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: chris on November 15, 2008, 02:13:53 pm

And Rowan Atkinson as Mr sodding Bean


Can't possibly agree with that. I don't like him, but the videos keep the kids out of mischief for hours.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jezza on November 15, 2008, 06:18:57 pm
Simon Cowell
Ainsley Harriott
Geri Halliwell

I'll be back with a few more in a minute.


Misread this thread as 'What are you listening to'?

So that's a relief. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mecwales on November 15, 2008, 06:30:02 pm
cant believe you missed out Nicky Campbell. 

My father describes such people as having "punchable faces".

Mick Hucknall

Been reading tvgohome? :P

Oh, and:

Catherine Tate: Super-twat.
Fern Cotton: Super-twat extraordinaire.
Kilroy Silk: Vomit-inducing-super-twat extraordinaire.
Everyone who has ever appeared in 'Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps': twats.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on November 16, 2008, 01:10:59 pm
THe mention of Melvyn Fecking-Bragg reminds me of the occasion that I spent some time watching him in Real Life. We were standing in the interminable queue for HIGNFY and who should come out of the London Television Centre but  MF-B. He ponced from one side of the road to another, then sauntered along the queue and did the same thing somewhere else. I reckon he must have wasted about 20 minutes of his valuable life just poncing about saying "Look at ME!" He reminded me of a bower bird - I think that's the once which builds some sort of structure and then ponces about trying to impress its potential mate. I could almost imagine David Attenborough doing the commentary.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Basil on November 16, 2008, 01:55:48 pm
In fact anyone in the entertainment industry who thinks that SHOUTING will cover for personal lack of talent or an inane, boring, badly produced show.

STOP SHOUTING AT ME YOU TALENTLESS MORONS.

Graham Norton.  Feck off, you're a Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on November 16, 2008, 04:59:06 pm
It was OK when he played the occasional role of Father Noel.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Really Ancien on November 16, 2008, 05:47:50 pm
Zsa Zsa Gabor.
Heidi Fleiss.
But you lot are probably thinking metaphorically.

Damon.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: border-rider on November 16, 2008, 05:49:43 pm
In fact anyone in the entertainment industry who thinks that SHOUTING will cover for personal lack of talent or an inane, boring, badly produced show.

STOP SHOUTING AT ME YOU TALENTLESS MORONS.


 ;D

That's what I seem to be shouting at the TV increasingly these days.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Zipperhead on November 16, 2008, 07:10:04 pm
Stupid, stupid, stupid 'kin software.

Theatre - you've gone to the trouble of writing a little java applet to allow me to select some seats, please though take the designers and coders of it outside and get medieval on their asses for ten minutes. They when they come round point out to them that as well as selecting seats it ought to be possible to deselect seats (if you want to select some others). Stupid. I've now got two seats that I can't deselect, if I clear the cookie I can't get either seat again 'cause their software thinks it's reserved for someone. Pucking Fillocks.

While I'm upset about software....
Activision. I was looking forward to spending some time this weekend killing people, lots of them, with lots of weapons an ammo and stuff. Wall to wall gore.

The day of the uk release (48 hours after the US, but I can live with that) there's already a patch - over 300Mb to download.

It's a pity though that it doesn't work, with or without the patch. At all. In the slightest. It just hangs.

I know that you've used the same game engine as the last game, and that worked happily on my machine. I've got an up to date graphics card that eats so much juice that my electricity supplier loves me. I've gone to the trouble to download the latest drivers for everything. Still it doesn't 'kin work.

Now how am I going to get rid of my bloodlust?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mattc on November 26, 2008, 08:46:37 pm
Bzzt.  The Moral Maze is hosted by Michael Buerk.

The Moral Maze often features rabid frothing Melanie Philips, whom I'd like to nominate.

It is, I get confused with who's who in the BBC's 'intellectual' bracket.

Melanie Philips can rot in Hell her own effluence.

Melanie Philips - Super-Twat
Tonight's Moral Maze: I've just heard a BNP chappie giving MP a right verbal kicking. They may not get my vote, but I would like to shake this guy's hand for this one favour.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Hot Flatus on November 26, 2008, 09:05:14 pm
Gok Wank

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: onb on November 26, 2008, 09:12:49 pm
Not been through all the thread  so apologies for any duplicates

Wayne Rooney

David Beckham

Trinny and Suzanah.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: onb on November 26, 2008, 09:24:24 pm
Not been through all the thread  so apologies for any duplicates

Wayne Rooney

David Beckham

Trinny and Suzanah.


The hamiltons

Mohd Fayed

Putin

Bush

and that corrupt twat who resigned as his secretary of state ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on November 26, 2008, 09:55:30 pm
Alan Sugar, who spent 1.8million to buy 4% of woolworths about a month ago.  Bwa ha ha ha ha......

Oi, shortarse beardy twat - Your Fired!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 26, 2008, 10:01:32 pm
Digby Jones.

Twat by name, twat by nature.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: goatpebble on November 26, 2008, 10:14:25 pm
Patrick Holford, the awful breakfast TV supplement quack, and an easier target, Gillian McPoo.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: artyfaharty on November 26, 2008, 10:34:30 pm
Most DJ's on mainstream radio esp.
Chris Moyles and that fecking twat on R1 between 4.00pm and 6.00pm.
Richard Allinson and Chris Evans from R2.
The woman on Radio 1 over lunchtime who's going out with some bloke in some band. (she always mentions it).
I mention these as I have to listen to their inane drivel at work.

Jeremy Clarkson and his toadying over-scripted acolytes (the audience and co-presenters).

I mention these because I have to listen to the inane drivel of workmates talking about them.

I could go on..............  And probably will.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: pcolbeck on November 27, 2008, 09:31:39 am
William Hague.  Look, you were never going to be PM because

(1) you come from Yorkshire....

Bzzt! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Wilson)

Though this is all true.

Quote
(2) you look like a baked bean.

(3) you are less interesting than that really boring guy who replaced you, whose name I had to struggle with...Duncan-Smith, that's it.

Along with

(4)  you had a lot of the nasty corrupt Tories still hanging around (like Cameron does, but more quietly)

I have a soft spot for Hague. A man with real intellect who is very good at speaking, probably the best in parliament these days. Unfortunately for him he is in  a party that was never going to let him be leader at a time when they had a real chance of winning an election as he isn't really their type.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jacomus on November 27, 2008, 10:37:32 am
Bear Frikkin-Grills

What a Super-Twat. His hammy presenting and "risk taking in extreme climates" are such utter Bullsh*t and besmerch the name of Ray Mears EVEN THOUGH THEIR PROGRAMS ARENT RELATED TO EACH OTHER!!!!!

TWAT!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on November 27, 2008, 11:21:38 am
Gary Herbert.  Shut Up You Little Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on November 27, 2008, 11:24:49 am
Gary Herbert.  Shut Up You Little Twat.
Don't! You'll make him cry again!!   ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on November 27, 2008, 11:27:24 am
I've never liked coxes.  Dead weight on a straight 2k course, if you ask me, but at least most of them have some dignity and dont ruin everyones bloody telly for years after.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 27, 2008, 11:30:36 am
Who is gary herbert?  Is he a cox, then?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on November 27, 2008, 11:31:55 am
Bear Frikkin-GrillsGryhls

What a Super-Twat. His hammy presenting and "risk taking in extreme climates" are such utter Bullsh*t and besmerch the name of Ray Mears EVEN THOUGH THEIR PROGRAMS ARENT RELATED TO EACH OTHER!!!!!

TWAT!

FTFY!

Twatty name for a start...

Mind you, I like the odd bear grill*.  ;)



*AKA a hairy roasting...  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bikepacker on November 27, 2008, 11:40:20 am
Alan Sugar, who spent 1.8million to buy 4% of woolworths about a month ago.  Bwa ha ha ha ha......

Oi, shortarse beardy twat - Your Fired!!

Perhaps he should seek out who persuaded him, that's the person he needs as his apprentice.

As anyone said Jonathan Ross?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: onb on November 27, 2008, 11:53:01 am
Not been through all the thread  so apologies for any duplicates

Wayne Rooney

David Beckham

Trinny and Suzanah.


The hamiltons

Mohd Fayed

Putin

Bush

and that corrupt twat who resigned as his secretary of state ???


Just Remembered Dick (by both name and nature) Cheney
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jacomus on November 27, 2008, 12:30:39 pm
Bear Frikkin-GrillsGryhls

What a Super-Twat. His hammy presenting and "risk taking in extreme climates" are such utter Bullsh*t and besmerch the name of Ray Mears EVEN THOUGH THEIR PROGRAMS ARENT RELATED TO EACH OTHER!!!!!

TWAT!

FTFY!

Twatty name for a start...

Mind you, I like the odd bear grill*.  ;)



*AKA a hairy roasting...  ;D


There was no need for the Asterisk there Reg, I was already there before I reached the full stop ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 27, 2008, 08:01:25 pm
Digby Jones.

Twat by name, twat by nature.

In fact a fat-cat-super-twat  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 28, 2008, 10:05:07 am
Edmund King - megatwat  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 28, 2008, 12:48:38 pm
Jonathan King - king of the twats.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on December 01, 2008, 01:51:47 pm
Germaine Greer

Oi!  Leave the lovely Germaine alone.  She's a heroine of mine, I'll have you know.  She speaks a lot of sense.

After reading her column in today's Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2008/dec/01/germaine-greer-gordon-ramsay-food), I feel utterly vindicated in my view that she is a super-twat of the first order.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mike on December 01, 2008, 01:54:49 pm
Digby Jones.

Twat by name, twat by nature.

In fact a fat-cat-super-twat  :demon:

or even a fat-fat-cat-super-twat.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 04, 2008, 09:26:54 am
Ruth Lee.  Yup.  Absolutely.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on December 05, 2008, 12:30:07 pm
John Humphreys
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 05, 2008, 12:34:55 pm
?  Why, in particular?  He has utterly twattish moments, but I think on balance he's OK.  Has he done something in particular?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on December 05, 2008, 01:03:35 pm
He got on my tits this morning during the eight-year-old-earrings-to-school 'debate'.

And he uses the phrase 'politically correct' without irony.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 05, 2008, 01:45:30 pm
OK.  I only caught the closing moments of that discussion.  And the second part, yes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on December 05, 2008, 01:48:42 pm
I only caught a bit of that this morning - was the mother refusing to send her child to school because they said she couldn't go out at playtime because she had her ears pierced and couldn't take the earrings out until they'd healed? And did they say why didn't she just wait till the start of the summer holidays to pierce them? I got the impression that's what it was and I thought the mother was a bit of an idiot.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on December 05, 2008, 01:57:01 pm
John Humphreys
Right on...
Super-Twat (http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10772.msg187959#msg187959)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: onb on December 05, 2008, 02:04:17 pm
Rumsfelt
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on December 05, 2008, 02:05:47 pm
A known known S-T for sure.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on December 05, 2008, 02:14:50 pm
John Humphreys
Right on...
Super-Twat (http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10772.msg187959#msg187959)

I didn't find that 'cos I did a search for John Humphreys, not Humphrys  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on December 05, 2008, 02:24:24 pm
Humphrys/Humphreys - mega-twat either way!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on December 05, 2008, 08:12:47 pm
I got to see the Jeremy Kyle show this morning. I am no less convinced that he is not a twat but is in fact evil.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Quisling on December 05, 2008, 09:07:36 pm
+5000 for Chris Moyles
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on December 06, 2008, 11:37:26 pm
Humphrys/Humphreys - mega-twat either way!

Yup, absolutely top-drawer twattery every time he opens his mouth. The idiot thinks he's a celebrity. I've got stronger words than twat that I'd like to use about him but not on a family forum.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on May 09, 2010, 05:22:19 pm
I was unfortunate enough to see Calum Best on TV this morning.

What have you ever done other than live on the back of your father's fame? Nothing. OK, he was a cunt, so if you're going to use the fact that you're his son to appear on shitty TV shows and in the sort of magazines that chimpanzees wipe their arses with, at least have the common decency to develop a chronic alcohol problem. Then die.

SUPER FUCKING BELL END TWAT!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on May 09, 2010, 05:38:10 pm
Has anyone yet mentioned, on this page, Jeremy Kyle? Or Piers Moron?

ButI will add Michael O'Leary
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Martin109 on May 09, 2010, 05:56:32 pm
That stupid weather man off BBC London - Michael Cockroft,

Super-Twat!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on May 09, 2010, 06:29:35 pm
Alex Ferguson.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on May 10, 2010, 12:08:39 am
Qoooooooooooh yes
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Basil on May 10, 2010, 12:11:49 am
Sorry, I'm late to this thread.  I'm not going to read through 13 pages to find out if he's been mentioned before.  (He's bound to have been)


Stephen Nolan

Fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckofff uckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on May 10, 2010, 12:21:43 am
Sorry, I'm late to this thread.  I'm not going to read through 13 pages to find out if he's been mentioned before.  (He's bound to have been)


Stephen Nolan

Fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckofff uckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff

He has been mentioned quite a few times before, but your post is still acceptable  :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on May 10, 2010, 12:38:21 am
Anyone who uses the term 'workshop' in any other situation than light engineering. . .

Anyone who uses the phrase 'going forward'.

Just fuck right off.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on May 10, 2010, 12:43:27 am
Gordon Brown. Twat.

Tony BLiar. Twat

Sarah ****ing Kennedy. TWAT.

Hazel Blears. Squirrel. Total complete and utter TWAT!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on May 10, 2010, 01:12:05 am
Has anyone yet mentioned, on this page, Jeremy Kyle? Or Piers Moron?

ButI will add Michael O'Leary
At least twice, but that's ok, he could use some more.

And being as everyone else is in bed and I'm bored...how about:
Michael Gove (yes I know I already had him, but he's still an S-T)
Odious Osbourne
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fred the great on May 10, 2010, 04:09:23 am
+1 for Gordon Brown and Tony Bliar.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 10, 2010, 06:40:41 am
Have we had Kate Hoey?


Get your minds out of the gutter...I'm sure none of us are that sick
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on May 10, 2010, 09:23:06 am
On BBC Midlands Today we have to endure Nick Owen. Can't you southerners keep your twats to yourselves? We have plenty of our own, thank you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 10, 2010, 10:24:28 am
Rod Liddle.

What a hateful animal fanny that man is.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Hot Flatus on May 10, 2010, 12:52:53 pm
Oh come on... Seeing him screaming "scallops for the wirkers" last Thursday was hilarious
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 13, 2010, 10:31:51 pm
Sorry, I'm late to this thread.  I'm not going to read through 13 pages to find out if he's been mentioned before.  (He's bound to have been)


Stephen Nolan

Fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckofff uckoff fuckoff fuckoff fuckoff

He has been mentioned quite a few times before, but your post is still acceptable  :)

Thank God he's still allowed. I'm late to this topic too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 13, 2010, 10:33:31 pm
Jimmy Carr.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 13, 2010, 10:33:49 pm
Jeremy Clarkson.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 13, 2010, 10:34:04 pm
James Martin.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 13, 2010, 10:36:08 pm
Terry Wogan.

(I'm enjoying this)  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: her_welshness on May 13, 2010, 11:06:00 pm
Russell Crowe

BBC - BBC Radio 4 Programmes - Front Row, Russell Crowe, Ashes to Ashes and the Archbishop of Canterbury (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00s8zd0)

I laughed a lot at this interview. Crowe is a tit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: sg37409 on May 13, 2010, 11:26:59 pm
Boris Johnson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 14, 2010, 11:18:18 am
I laughed a lot at this interview. Crowe is a tit.

Yeah, I heard that too. Made me cringe rather than laugh, though. Thing is, Mark Lawson is also a tit and it was a really poorly conducted interview.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 14, 2010, 11:18:46 am
Has anyone mentioned Brillo Neil yet?

Christ, he's a twat >:(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on May 14, 2010, 11:48:34 am
Anyone mentioned Mark Lamarr yet?

And yet another (possibly repeat) mention of the Jimmy 'Mysoginistic and Homphobic Unfunny Twat' Carr...  :demon:

*Reaches for STABBY thing*
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 14, 2010, 11:54:08 am
Jimmy Carr and his lawyer...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on May 15, 2010, 11:28:42 pm
Oaky: Super-Twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on May 16, 2010, 08:29:58 am
Everyone on the One Show.  Almost all Breakfast TV presenters, especially Bill Turnbull.  (I'm not singling out the BBC, I just don't seem to watch 'independent' channels (for long)).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: kevinp on May 16, 2010, 08:51:10 am
Jeremy Vine what is it with him

Those three tossers from top gear

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 16, 2010, 09:31:10 am
Clarkson - yes, the tosso di tutti tossi.

Hamster - yes, more so since he started doing his hair like a teenager.

May - well, he doesn't appear very interested in cars and loves his Brompton, so he's not in the same category.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SpaceBadger on May 16, 2010, 09:33:38 am
Lewis Hamilton
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on May 16, 2010, 02:30:47 pm
Clarkson - yes, the tosso di tutti tossi.

Hamster - yes, more so since he started doing his hair like a teenager.

May - well, he doesn't appear very interested in cars and loves his Brompton, so he's not in the same category.

Clarkson, obviously can be mentioned an infinite number of times here!

Hamster is a bit of a twat (I think his hair is cool though!) I read one of his books recently and he did come across as a bit of an aggressive little tool.

May is cool. He has quite a few bicycles and loves riding them. I always get the impression he's toeing the Clarkson line on Top Gear.

Although on occasions I find Clarkson funny, on recent viewings of him, I have to go with SUPER FUCKING TWAT!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: her_welshness on May 16, 2010, 04:24:03 pm
Carol McGiffin (sp) and all the rest of the she-hags from Loose Women.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 16, 2010, 08:51:55 pm
Jeremy Clarkson.

Stephen Nolan.

Because they really can't be mentioned too many times.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on May 16, 2010, 08:54:22 pm
the il tosso di tutti tossi.
I must remember that, so I can use it.

+1 for Jimmy Carr.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 16, 2010, 09:05:11 pm
While he's on my mind...

Mark Lawson

Ugh!

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on May 17, 2010, 04:59:41 pm
Everyone on the One Show.  Almost all Breakfast TV presenters, especially Bill Turnbull.  (I'm not singling out the BBC, I just don't seem to watch 'independent' channels (for long)).

OMFG! I simply can't risk seeing any TV in the morning because of this guy - I might explode with disgust.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on May 17, 2010, 07:27:01 pm
Willy Walsh
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 17, 2010, 08:49:57 pm
Nominative determinism?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on May 18, 2010, 07:55:00 am
Time to mention the world's biggest super twat again, the man most people want to punch the minute he opens his mouth, the one person you wouldn't pee on if he was on fire...


...Jimmy Carr
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 18, 2010, 09:23:12 am
Willy Walsh

+1

And Injustice McCombe too.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 18, 2010, 09:27:37 am
Mind you... Unite

Seen their full-page ad in today's Guardian? V.poor.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 18, 2010, 10:46:58 am
Michael McIntyre.  Industrial grade hyper-twat.
Ricky Gervais.  Stop believing your own PR droids and shut up.
Eyjafjallajokull.  A joke's a joke, but if you haven't stopped by September I shall be very cross indeed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on May 18, 2010, 08:06:22 pm
new transport minister, Phillip Hammond.  Quoted in the Sunday Times as saying that speed cameras are unnecessary because when motorists are reminded of the speed limit they slow down.  Just like little piglets are born with wings and will fly south for the winter.  First rate pratt.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 18, 2010, 08:20:00 pm
Oh shit.  That's what we're in for?  Bugger.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 18, 2010, 08:26:47 pm
new transport minister, Phillip Hammond.  Quoted in the Sunday Times as saying that speed cameras are unnecessary because when motorists are reminded of the speed limit they slow down.  Just like little piglets are born with wings and will fly south for the winter.  First rate pratt.
That'll be why they're normally flashing "30" every hour of the day or night?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on May 19, 2010, 04:27:40 pm
new transport minister, Phillip Hammond.  Quoted in the Sunday Times as saying that speed cameras are unnecessary because when motorists are reminded of the speed limit they slow down.  Just like little piglets are born with wings and will fly south for the winter.  First rate pratt.

Aye, the guy must be an uber Twat. He doesn't realise that the 'reminder' most folk need is a flashy fixed penalty generating reminder- either that or a Droid asking "Stirling Moss is it?"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Si on May 20, 2010, 11:31:41 am
Jeffrey Archer was on TV this morning, flogging a new book and flaunting his title.  Goes without saying that another mention in the super twat thread is called for.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 21, 2010, 06:42:16 am
As I was driving down the M1 yesterday I saw a sign for Hucknall, which reminded me that Mick hasn't had a mention for a long time.  Whiny voice, face like a slapped bum, serial band-sacker, yet also (presumably due to vast royalty income) a fanny magnet.  What's not to despise?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on May 21, 2010, 09:46:27 am
He brought his bike into a shop I worked in once?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 21, 2010, 09:48:33 am
Hmm.  What was the bike?  And how well did he ride it? ;D

He was a complete tw@ when I met him, and he was a nobody then.  He's still a nobody, of course, just a rather richer one.

Eric Clapton riding Condor bikes doesn't make him any less of a tw@
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 21, 2010, 11:19:10 am
As I was driving down the M1 yesterday I saw a sign for Hucknall, which reminded me that Mick hasn't had a mention for a long time.  Whiny voice, face like a slapped bum, serial band-sacker, yet also (presumably due to vast royalty income) a fanny magnet.  What's not to despise?

You forgot to add: Man United fan. ;)

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on May 21, 2010, 12:27:02 pm
Hmm.  What was the bike?  And how well did he ride it? ;D

He was a complete tw@ when I met him, and he was a nobody then.  He's still a nobody, of course, just a rather richer one.


Oh, he was a twat. He didn't ask if he could bring the bike in and just wheeled it up to a cashpoint and made to leave it there, as if we would watch it for him. It had gears and drop bars and everythin. I seem to recall we made him lock it to a lampost outside, but that could just be my wishful thinking.

<flashes diamond studded tooth>
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on May 21, 2010, 12:36:49 pm
*talk of Hucknall sparks memory*

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_tZtjNi-Cuwk/S_ZwK_p_17I/AAAAAAAAAoE/1KfMy1ZY0Zk/MHPP.jpg)

From TV Go Home (http://www.tvgohome.com/) ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gatlow on May 21, 2010, 12:38:23 pm
Chris Moyles and the bunch of super-c**ts who decided that ignorant loud-mouthed witless bloaters were the way forward in broadcasting.

And Clarkson.

And Glitter.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on May 21, 2010, 12:41:49 pm
*talk of Hucknall sparks memory*

Same here. I can't think of Mick Hucknall without immediately thinking of pink pancakes. TVGoHome was brilliant. Still one of the best things Charlie Brooker has done.

Talking of twats, TVGoHome also gave us the brilliant Nathan Barley (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0X6APGN1cAs), who may be a fictional character but perfectly captures the extreme twattishness of many real-life twats of my unfortunate acquaintance.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on May 21, 2010, 05:59:59 pm

Hamster - yes, more so since he started doing his hair like a teenager.


That's cruel.  He had a terrible car crash and damaged that part of the brain that controls the urge to "tease" hair, buy Harleys and wear cowboy boots.

I can't help wondering what his gorgeous doe-eyes would look like with my fingers jabbed in them.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on May 21, 2010, 08:31:38 pm

I can't help wondering what his gorgeous doe-eyes would look like with my fingers jabbed in them.

Is that a sexual thing?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on May 22, 2010, 06:48:35 am
I hate to say it... but I think the Hamster's quite hawt  :-[ - when he doesn't speak

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 22, 2010, 07:29:11 am
It's the ethnic beads round his neck, isn't it?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on May 22, 2010, 08:24:01 am
Would he look better with a pearl necklace?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gandalf on May 23, 2010, 07:59:39 am
Omid Djalili.  What an irritating git.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 23, 2010, 08:08:25 am
Have we had Jon Gaunt yet?

The Official Jon Gaunt Website (http://www.gaunty.com/)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Hot Flatus on May 23, 2010, 11:39:03 am
Anyone mentioned Paul Ross? (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canvas-Print-PAUL-ROSS-MirrorPrintStore/dp/B001N6W8U0)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 23, 2010, 07:32:48 pm
Anyone mentioned Paul Ross? (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canvas-Print-PAUL-ROSS-MirrorPrintStore/dp/B001N6W8U0)
There's a refurbished one for sale?  Presumably the refurbishers had to patch a fist-shaped hole in the face area?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Legs on May 24, 2010, 05:04:12 pm
Alastair Stewart.  Sanctimonious cock.

Super-Twat.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 25, 2010, 09:53:14 pm
Am I allowed to mention Noel Edmonds again?  Oh, I just did.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on May 25, 2010, 10:03:15 pm
Bear Grylls = Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.

He's just the warm-up act.  Wait till Cameron and the rest of the Bullingdon Club are running the country.

the waiting is at an end
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Zipperhead on May 28, 2010, 11:23:43 am
David Blunkett, just in case he hasn't already been mentioned here.

I will write no more, otherwise I will get all sweary.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 28, 2010, 11:51:02 am
What Big Helga said.  He was on the Toady prog this morning, crying into his tea about the abolition of ID cards, because he is a monumental fucking twat with knobs on.

The Home Secretary (Mr. David Blunkett): Mr. Speaker, I should like to give notice that I will be introducing the idea of foundation prisons in the near future to create centres of punishment excellence. Then in non-foundation prisons we can lump anyone we don't like in with molesters etc.

The Home Secretary's Guide Dog (Tuffers): Sausages!

Mr. Speaker (Fat Scottish): Order! Keep that fucking hoond quiet or I'll have it beheaded for sorcery!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on June 01, 2010, 01:37:18 pm
I just checked, and we already had this one a couple of pages back, but I still think he needs another mention.

Phillip "wing mirrors" Hammond - Super Twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 01, 2010, 01:54:51 pm
With the foopball World Cup fast approaching, it should be noted that the only people more twatty than the average foopballer is the average foopballer's wife / girlfriend, who is usually orange.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on June 01, 2010, 03:04:57 pm
With the foopball World Cup fast approaching, it should be noted that the only people more twatty than the average foopballer is the average foopballer's wife / girlfriend, who is usually orange.
What, he's married a footballer?
Wondered where Jason had gone....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on June 01, 2010, 03:46:01 pm

I can't help wondering what his gorgeous doe-eyes would look like with my fingers jabbed in them.

Is that a sexual thing?

To some Broadmoor residents possibly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on June 01, 2010, 03:55:39 pm
Does ANYONE like Piers Morgan?  Anyone at all?  Anyone, anywhere?  Even a tiny bit?
No.
Everyone despises him right?.  (Casully ruining lives of the innocent in his Mirror days).  He's like Little Lord Fauntleroy's spoilt brother.

So why is he on so many TV shows?  Who employs him?  Surely 5 minutes of market-research in any high-street would result in a 100% "Super Twat" rating.

The only reason I can think of to stop punching his pace would be the inevitable, and painful,  stress fractures to my arms after about 3 hours, just running out of energy, bonking if you will, or Piers running out of face to punch.





Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 01, 2010, 06:14:52 pm
My theory is that he spent his early career at The Scum collecting dirt on all the top TV execs...the affairs, the bungs, the goats etc.

Now it's payback time.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on June 29, 2010, 09:56:10 pm
Don't care if we've had him already:  Mark Lawrenson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on June 29, 2010, 10:00:36 pm
Ronaldo. The boy who cried foul. And now his reputation has caught up with him. The look on his face when the ref didn't give a free-kick after Capdevila took him down was priceless.

Serves you right, twat-boy.  ;D

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 29, 2010, 10:04:06 pm
I see this week's b3ta image challange features one R. Littlejohn.  Not a vintage week, but this one made me chuckle (NSFW due to language):

b3ta.com board (http://www.b3ta.com/board/10102116)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mikeitup on June 30, 2010, 06:16:03 pm
Toby Young.  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: longers on June 30, 2010, 06:19:18 pm
Ronaldo. The boy who cried foul. And now his reputation has caught up with him. The look on his face when the ref didn't give a free-kick after Capdevila took him down was priceless.

Serves you right, twat-boy.  ;D

d.


He spat in the general direction of a cameraman afterwards too. Unpleasant.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Woofage on June 30, 2010, 06:39:36 pm
OK, not a celeb as such but did anyone watch Come Dine with Me last night? The bloke (Alex? he was the only 1 against 3 women) was the biggest arsehole I have ever encountered on British television*. Not only that, but he cooked pasta bake for his guests! That's what I've just made for Mrs Woofage and the peeps as fuel for the ride I'm going on a bit later. It's not dinner party grub ::-).

* I don't watch Big Brother
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 01, 2010, 11:17:14 am
David Tredinnick

Michael Howard
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 01, 2010, 11:18:35 am
IDS

WH
(what is it about his voice? everytime I hear it, I want to punch him repeatedly.)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 01, 2010, 11:53:14 am
Kenneth Clarke (Torysaurus venerabilis).

The Williams sisters.  STFU.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on July 01, 2010, 12:21:49 pm
I don't think we've had the man whose name I cannot even type as it will make me explode.

That fat, little, coke snorting, cheating fuck who now manages the Argentina football team.

Ginormous - TWAT!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Riggers on July 01, 2010, 12:29:24 pm
Would a 'high-five' help here Bobbers?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 01, 2010, 12:35:00 pm
I don't think we've had the man whose name I cannot even type as it will make me explode.

That fat, little, coke snorting, cheating fuck who now manages the Argentina football team.

Ginormous - TWAT!

Who might, under certain circumstances, be on the receiving end of the Hand Of Bobb.

Joak shamelessly stolen from Bob Wilson Anchorman.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on July 01, 2010, 01:09:21 pm
Who might, under certain circumstances, be on the receiving end of the Hand Of Bobb.

Excellent!! I don't think Teh Hand of Bobb would be quite as useful as The Bear, but it's a start!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 06, 2010, 02:04:49 pm
Charles Moore.  Torygraph columnist, former editor of same and also The Spectator, constant dribbler about the BBC and twat of truly cyclopean proportions.

Except for the World Service, Mr Moore, the BBC is not publicly-funded.  Though it irks me that they apparently paid you fifty sovs to be on the Toady prog this morning.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on July 06, 2010, 05:59:39 pm
Don't care if we've had him before.

Alastair 'Just call me super fucking duper uber TWAT' Campbell.

For what he did for Tony B. Liar - TWAT

For appearing on Top Gear and failing to clock Clarkson was taking the piss - REAL TWAT

For what he did to Dr David Kelly - should be whipped and boiled and killed to death. - TOTAL AND UTTER TWAT ! ! ! !
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 06, 2010, 06:19:27 pm
But he did make mincemeat of Adam Boulton, and for that we should be thankful.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: itsbruce on July 06, 2010, 08:19:51 pm
I think it has been truly said that the British Press created Alastair Campbell and that they deserved what they got.  Basically, the Labour party looked at the way the press had treated Foot and Kinnock and decided that they were going to get their retaliation in first, from then on.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on July 07, 2010, 02:03:48 pm
Charles Moore.  Torygraph columnist, former editor of same and also The Spectator, constant dribbler about the BBC and twat of truly cyclopean proportions.


At least he is a cyclist then.  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: noisycrank on July 13, 2010, 09:44:32 pm
This is a thread for listing those people in the public eye that you absolutely can not abide.

I'll kick off with Bear Grylls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls#Criticism).

Bear Grylls - Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.

I came rather late to this and had to check 19 pages to see if this had been posted already but substantiation

http://www.bats.org.uk/news.php/82/bct_response_to_bear_grylls_born_survivor
 (http://www.bats.org.uk/news.php/82/bct_response_to_bear_grylls_born_survivor)
The Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) has been working with the international conservation and animal welfare community to investigate the footage of the TV presenter Bear Grylls smoking out, swatting and then stamping on bats in Asia. During the programme, several bats are killed deliberately and this was treated as a game.

nice man
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 13, 2010, 09:49:27 pm
Uber-twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: her_welshness on July 13, 2010, 10:11:26 pm
This is a thread for listing those people in the public eye that you absolutely can not abide.

I'll kick off with Bear Grylls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls#Criticism).

Bear Grylls - Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.

I came rather late to this and had to check 19 pages to see if this had been posted already but substantiation

http://www.bats.org.uk/news.php/82/bct_response_to_bear_grylls_born_survivor
 (http://www.bats.org.uk/news.php/82/bct_response_to_bear_grylls_born_survivor)
The Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) has been working with the international conservation and animal welfare community to investigate the footage of the TV presenter Bear Grylls smoking out, swatting and then stamping on bats in Asia. During the programme, several bats are killed deliberately and this was treated as a game.

nice man

We have his range of childrens books in our libraries where I work  :sick: Gives me more incentive to weed out his books.  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 13, 2010, 10:16:13 pm
Does he get bonus S-T points for the stupid name?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on July 13, 2010, 10:33:17 pm
Can we just declare him the winner and leave it at that?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on July 13, 2010, 11:26:05 pm

We have his range of childrens books in our libraries where I work  :sick: Gives me more incentive to weed out his books.  :demon:

IRTA "more incentive to wee on his books" AISMS.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biff on July 13, 2010, 11:58:11 pm

We have his range of childrens books in our libraries where I work  :sick: Gives me more incentive to weed out his books.  :demon:

IRTA "more incentive to wee on his books" AISMS.
Not wearing my specs I got it even more wrong. IRTA "more incentive to wee on his bollocks"  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 14, 2010, 09:52:54 am
Spotted on the Wireless With Pictures yesterday: Jimmy Buffett blaming all the world's ills on BP, in "song".

So, nothing to do with the USAnian public's insatiable thirst for fossil fuel, then, Jimbo?

Hyper-twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on July 15, 2010, 12:02:52 pm
Does he get bonus S-T points for the stupid name?
Yes - because he chose it. He's really Edward Michael Grylls.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 15, 2010, 12:03:29 pm
or 'Teddy'
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on July 15, 2010, 03:31:21 pm
Although his wiki article says his sister called him it when he was one week old. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on July 15, 2010, 10:16:58 pm
Mark Lawrenson

(No particular reason other than he's not mentioned on this page of the thread yet!)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on July 16, 2010, 01:40:49 am
Have there been anywhere near enough mentions of Jeremy arsing Kyle yet?

Nope, didn't think so. Nor of Nicholas Hoogstraaten.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on July 16, 2010, 01:47:40 am
Have there been anywhere near enough mentions of Jeremy arsing Kyle yet?

Nope, didn't think so. Nor of Nicholas Hoogstraaten.

Nope.

Not enough mentions of Mark Lawrenson yet, either!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 16, 2010, 06:40:32 am
I know this was supposed to be about entertainment celebrities, but as it seems to be spreading can I have Michael O'Leary?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on July 16, 2010, 09:57:52 am
Anyone in the public is eye is fair game, I say. And Michael O'Leary - Über-Twat. I'm so pleased that he's been forced to apologise to that nice man Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on July 16, 2010, 11:38:50 am
Nicholas Hoogstraaten.

Blimey. That's a blast from the past...

"Moving up into second place
Behind Nicholas van Wotsisface
At six foot six and a hundred tons
The undisputed king of the slums
More aliases than Klaus Barbie
The Master Butcher of Leigh-on-Sea
Just about to take the stage
The one and only
Hold the front page"

And in a similar vein, don't forget Peter Rachmann.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: bobb on July 16, 2010, 12:04:02 pm
Moving up into second place

*Moving on up to second base

Get it right  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on July 16, 2010, 12:07:25 pm
*Moving on up to second base

Of course. Sorry.  :-[

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on July 16, 2010, 12:20:20 pm
I know this was supposed to be about entertainment celebrities, but as it seems to be spreading can I have Michael O'Leary?
The dear man calledme a fucking cunt once. Nice to be recognised for my work ethic!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: onb on July 16, 2010, 12:25:23 pm
Michael Gove .I bet his kids(assuming hes up to it) wont be going to to some ramshackle fuckrot of a school.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on July 16, 2010, 12:31:33 pm
The dear man calledme a fucking cunt once. Nice to be recognised for my work ethic!

Tony, you've always been all right in my book, but if you hadn't been, you would be now.

Whatever it was you did to elicit that response, well done!  ;D

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tourist Tony on July 18, 2010, 02:06:44 pm
The dear man calledme a fucking cunt once. Nice to be recognised for my work ethic!

Tony, you've always been all right in my book, but if you hadn't been, you would be now.

Whatever it was you did to elicit that response, well done!  ;D

d.

YHPM
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 18, 2010, 02:15:41 pm
I suppose this (http://cdn.smosh.com/smosh-pit/4/picturethis17-1.jpg) is too much to hope for?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 19, 2010, 10:17:15 am
Michael Gove .I bet his kids(assuming hes up to it) wont be going to to some ramshackle fuckrot of a school.

Anyone else hear him being interviewed on the radio this morning? He's incapable of answering a simple question.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: itsbruce on August 04, 2010, 04:25:37 pm
Tim Westwood.

Tim Westwood.

Tim Westwood.

Amazed he isn't in here already.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 04, 2010, 04:27:11 pm
David Mellor.  I am sure anyone working at ports & airports would agree today.  SuperTwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 05, 2010, 09:49:27 am
That bloke who did "Thought For The Day" yesterday.  Fortunately I missed it for once.  Apparently he was slagging off people who have elaborate weddings.  He sounds like a miserable twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on August 05, 2010, 09:52:43 am
The Rev'd Canon Dr Giles Fraser, one of the few religious commentators with at least one foot in the twenty-first century. He's probably been doing two weddings a weekend for the last four months; it's no wonder he's a little jaded.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on August 05, 2010, 09:58:23 am
A A Gill

'nuff said.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 05, 2010, 10:02:48 am
I quite like Giles Fraser.

And yeah - elaborate weddings are over-rated. ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: newtoncap on August 05, 2010, 10:21:47 am
Hi, I'm new, will introduce myself later but in the meantime, just had to say.....


P.Diddy
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 05, 2010, 10:28:47 am
Absolutely.  The biggest ego and most monumental lack of self-awareness in the business.*

Hi.





* Mr Diddy, that is, not you ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rafletcher on August 05, 2010, 10:30:29 am
A A Gill

'nuff said.

And his editor at the Sunday Sun.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 05, 2010, 10:47:20 am
Wot Clarion said.  Anyone who covers Every Breath You Take is automatically a capybara's clunge of the first water.  Doubly so when you don't realise that far from being a love song, it's the second-creepiest1 piece of audio stalking in the history of popular music.

1 - Obsession by Punishment of Luxury is even creepier, as the narrator comes right out and says he'll kill the girl rather than let her go out with anyone else.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LindaG on August 05, 2010, 10:57:54 am
That bloke who did "Thought For The Day" yesterday.  Fortunately I missed it for once.  Apparently he was slagging off people who have elaborate weddings.  He sounds like a miserable twat.
I agreed with pretty much every word he said.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 05, 2010, 10:58:21 am
What about Delilah, Mr L?  Just cause it's belted out by a bloke with tight pants and a big hairy chest don't mean it's anything short of creepy...

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: wafflycat on August 05, 2010, 11:36:15 am
Has anyone mentioned on this page yet...

Bill Oddie
Jeremy Vine
John Humphreys
Jon Snow
Jeremy Clarkson (spit, spit, spit...)
James May
'The Hamster'
Liz Jones
Richard Littlejohn
Peter Hitchens
Janet Daley
Julie Birchill
Dominic Lawson
Rod Liddle
Anne wot's her name that gets dragged out to pontificate on religious/moral stuff as she's married to a vicar-type
Christopher Monckton

I'm sure I can think of more...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 05, 2010, 11:42:01 am
What about Delilah, Mr L?  Just cause it's belted out by a bloke with tight pants and a big hairy chest don't mean it's anything short of creepy...

Ah, but that's based on a true story.

FSVO "true", obv.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on August 05, 2010, 12:55:25 pm
Has anyone mentioned Robbie Savage yet?  I'd be able to put up with his stupidity, or his ignorance, or his cockiness, if it wasn't for his stupidity, and his ignorance, and his cockiness, and his appalling narcissism.  What a cock. 

He spent the entire radio 5 coverage of the New Zealand vs Italy game wittering on about the frigging England team and how the players get bored cos the life of a footballer is so hard, a whole raft of pathetic insights which he offered as if they were rare glimpses into a secret kingdom.  Not only was I listening to the game to try to escape the endless, tedious examination of the England team, but all the while, a football match was happening in which the world champions were being defeated by a pack of sheep-shearers from the arse end of the planet.  Something interesting was actually happening!  Shut the fuck up, Robbie!  Argh!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 05, 2010, 12:59:22 pm
I wondered why, after all this time, Savage was an irritant.

I hadn't realised he was being used as an 'expert' :-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on August 05, 2010, 01:04:56 pm
Even Savage's co-commentator was audibly annoyed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on August 05, 2010, 01:05:18 pm
 
I wondered why, after all this time, Savage was an irritant.

I hadn't realised he was being used as an 'expert' :-)

Definition of "expert"...
 "ex"= has been
"spert"= a drip under pressure
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 05, 2010, 01:30:16 pm
Well, in any game involving a lot of unnecessary shoving, hoofing or reckless tackles, he'd be able to advise...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on June 07, 2011, 09:14:21 am
Super-Twat DJ - Steve Wright.

Very occasionally I find I've accidentally tuned into Radio 2 when this bag of sh1t is spilling over the microphone. I can't dwell on it for too long or I'll explode with contempt, but there are two main things he does which have me scrambling to turn him off: Singing over the end of crappy songs, badly. Who the f*ck does he think he is that the listening public would actually enjoy hearing his stupid voice render a bad song even worse. Then, he'll make some half-arsed attempt at a witticism, but not without rounding it off with the phrase "Did you see what I did there?". YOU JUST ADDED TO THE SUM OF YOUR TWATISHNESS YOU UTTER, UTTER C*NT!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 07, 2011, 07:13:46 pm
Ryan Giggs must now be in this category.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 30, 2011, 06:16:01 pm
Do we have Danny Alexander yet?  If so, excellent but he deserves another mention because he's so po-faced, chinless and obviously evil.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on June 30, 2011, 09:18:03 pm
Francis Maude  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 30, 2011, 09:53:54 pm
Francis Maude  :sick:

+ 1*10^6

He's a crap liar as well as a supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on June 30, 2011, 11:12:52 pm
While we're at it...

(http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rhys.llangefni/lluniau/MICHAEL_GOVE.ashx.jpeg)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 30, 2011, 11:13:49 pm
I think he's popped up at least three times already.

But he is a massive supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on July 01, 2011, 09:43:25 am
I wish the news bods would stop putting Gove on while I'm eating my dinner. That's twice I've nearly puked it back on to my plate.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on August 04, 2011, 09:39:10 pm
Paul Staines (Guido Fawkes)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on August 04, 2011, 11:52:51 pm
Paul Staines (Guido Fawkes)

;D

I was going to add him, after seeing his performance on Channel 4 News and hearing his vile opinions on Radio 5 this morning. Even Nicky Campbell went "Whoah, that's a bit much!"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Psychler on August 05, 2011, 02:20:40 am
Nigel Starmer-Smith, Uri Geller, Esther Rantzen, Cannon and Ball, Dotun Adebayo, Chatty twat - Alan Carr, David Eyke, Simon Cowell, The Chuckle Brothers, David Dickinson, Cleggandcameron, Jodie Marsh, Peter Andre, Ken Livingstone, Kate Moss, Pete Docherty, Nicky "Three Bells" Gavron, the cast of "The Only Way is Essex", Brian Harvey, Stuart Barnes, Geoffrey Boycott, Ketty Katona, Noel Edmonds, Timmy Mallett, the whole cast of Time Team, Robbie Savage, Little and Large, Linford Christie, Tom Cruise, Will Carling, Danielle Westbrook, golfers, Donny Osmond, Jimmy Osmond, Marie Osmond, The Osmonds, Jordan, Gerry Adams, Stacy Solomon [for that matter anyone who's been on Britains got Talent, X Factor, Pop Idol etc], Australian rugby referees, Kiwi rugby referees, South African rugby referees, Steve Walsh, Stuart Dickinson, Andre Watson, Alex Higgins, Arlene Phillips, Bob Geldorf, every football commentator, various Murdoch's, Eastenders, Rick Stein, Bay City Rollers, anybody who's ever kicked a football professionally, Ken Dodd, Eric Pickles, Eddie Waring, Janet Street-Walker, Lily Savage/whatever the twat's real name is, Cameron Diaz, Seb Coe, George Galloway, Cheryl Tweedy-Cole, Jack Tweedy-Twat,  Ann Widdecombe, Donald Trump, Patsy Palmer, Phillips Idowu, all the British heavyweight boxers since Lennox Lewis, John Redwood,  Take that, Boys Zone, boy bands in general and Robbie Williams in particular, Margaret Thatcher, Neil Kinnock, Rene Zellweiger,  Corrie, Michael Winner, Paul McCartney, Barry Manilow, Peter Jackson, Andy Murray, Tim Henman, Andy Murray, Greg Rusedski, Andy Murray, Jocky Wilson, Bruce Forsyth, Anthony Beke, Chuck Norris, Andy McNab / Chris Ryan  .....................

I'm bored now - I'm gonna stop!

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 05, 2011, 12:38:15 pm
Oi!  Leave Cameron Diaz out of this  :hand:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clifftaylor on August 05, 2011, 12:40:16 pm
And Chuck Norris, if you know what's good for you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 05, 2011, 03:59:47 pm
And I like the Chuckle Brothers. Would you swap them for the Krankies?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Psychler on August 05, 2011, 08:38:50 pm
And I like the Chuckle Brothers. Would you swap them for the Krankies?

No, but the Krankies are going on the list as well.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 06, 2011, 06:25:03 pm
And I like the Chuckle Brothers. Would you swap them for the Krankies?

No, but the Krankies are going on the list as well.

Fair enough.

 I've pre-empted myself; I was saving The Krankies for when I get round to starting a Comedy Hall of Shame thread.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rower40 on August 07, 2011, 12:16:45 am
Anyone who gets paid for playing golf.

scrub that...

Anyone who plays golf.  Bunch of hand-penis-interfacers, the lot of them.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Red on August 07, 2011, 02:00:15 pm
Derek Acorah.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RW on August 07, 2011, 03:26:52 pm
Francis Maude  :sick:

+ 1*10^6

He's a crap liar as well as a supertwat.

My MP  :-[ :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biff on August 08, 2011, 11:27:19 am
Francis Maude  :sick:

+ 1*10^6

He's a crap liar as well as a supertwat.

My MP  :-[ :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick:

You should have voted for Kenneth Cranham instead. He looks almost the same but is definitely not a twat.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Francis_Maude,_Minister_for_the_Cabinet_Office.jpg)  (http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/ActorsC/3805.gif)

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on August 09, 2011, 06:19:16 pm
All the looting scum in London.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 11, 2011, 10:20:13 am
The following should apologise for existing:

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RW on August 12, 2011, 07:32:33 pm
Francis Maude  :sick:

+ 1*10^6

He's a crap liar as well as a supertwat.

My MP  :-[ :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick:

You should have voted for Kenneth Cranham instead. He looks almost the same but is definitely not a twat.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Francis_Maude,_Minister_for_the_Cabinet_Office.jpg)  (http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/ActorsC/3805.gif)

Of course what I meant was he's the MP for the constituency in which I happen to live.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on August 12, 2011, 09:01:57 pm
Well - that's the beauty of FPTP  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on August 14, 2011, 02:06:22 pm
"Big tailbacks on A3 and A3 approaches to M25 and in other direction to Wimbledon. Due to flamin Olympic bikes. Keep sport in a stadium"

- Eamonn Holmes
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 14, 2011, 02:09:54 pm
The quote is redundant - it's a fairly well known fact that Eamonn Holmes is a bell-end of considerable magnitude.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: AndyK on August 14, 2011, 02:29:03 pm
"Big tailbacks on A3 and A3 approaches to M25 and in other direction to Wimbledon. Due to flamin Olympic bikes. Keep sport in a stadium"

- Eamonn Holmes


I'm not too worried about what that fat, sofa-munching twat says.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 14, 2011, 02:34:50 pm
What does Holmes know about sport?  What hashe ever done in that direction?  The 20yds dash to the doughnut shop?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 14, 2011, 02:43:53 pm
What does Holmes know about sport?  What hashe ever done in that direction?  The 20yds dash to the doughnut shop?
Freestyle pie-shifting?
All-comers salad dodging?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SiD on August 14, 2011, 03:19:34 pm
I see Stephen Nolan's name pop up a lot here. 
I'm assuming this on the back of his weekend 5 Live show?

I know you may not believe this but he actually tones it way down for the National airwaves.

He does a morning show on Radio Ulster (regional radio). It's toxic.
 Think "everyone who is mentioned in this thread encompassed in one body" and you're sort of on the right track.


Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on August 14, 2011, 05:33:19 pm
Roger's Profanisaurus gives us

Holmophobia - an entrely rational urge to punch Eamonn Holmes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on August 19, 2011, 12:26:27 pm
The following should apologise for existing:

  • The "creative brains" behind the current Celebrity Big Brother trailers on 5.  You are a tragic waste of blood.
  • The prancing cocks and she-cocks, and John McCririck, who appear in said trailers.  Anyone who can stand in a field holding up a placard reading "Marry me Alex" ought, in a sane Universe, to have been drowned at birth.
  • Anyone involved in the decision to pull the stake out of the undead corpse of the programme in the first place.

Going by what I have read - and I pity the reviewers who have had to watch this so that we don't have to - Mr. Desmond and Channel 5 have achieved what had been hitherto considered impossible, and found even more Stygian, foetid depths to plumb.

We can add the z-list nonentities who were dumb enough to agree to appear on the show, thus validating its existence.

I almost feel sorry for the Speaker of the House of Commons.  :-\
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 19, 2011, 02:17:20 pm
(Googles)

Christ, that barrel's getting very thin at the end.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: AndyK on August 19, 2011, 09:30:08 pm
The following should apologise for existing:

  • The "creative brains" behind the current Celebrity Big Brother trailers on 5.  You are a tragic waste of blood.
  • The prancing cocks and she-cocks, and John McCririck, who appear in said trailers.  Anyone who can stand in a field holding up a placard reading "Marry me Alex" ought, in a sane Universe, to have been drowned at birth.
  • Anyone involved in the decision to pull the stake out of the undead corpse of the programme in the first place.

Going by what I have read - and I pity the reviewers who have had to watch this so that we don't have to - Mr. Desmond and Channel 5 have achieved what had been hitherto considered impossible, and found even more Stygian, foetid depths to plumb.

We can add the z-list nonentities who were dumb enough to agree to appear on the show, thus validating its existence.

I almost feel sorry for the Speaker of the House of Commons.  :-\

I quite like the Big Fat Gypsy wedding fella. When asked what he thought of Jedward he said ' Oi'd fockin' droyn 'em'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 06, 2011, 05:57:36 pm
http://www.amshold.com/social_media/piers_book.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on September 06, 2011, 09:50:54 pm
Clarkson, again:

Quote
I think we are fast approaching the time when the United Nations should start to think seriously about abolishing other languages.

What’s the point of Welsh for example? All it does is provide a silly maypole around which a bunch of hotheads can get all nationalistic.

 >:(

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 06, 2011, 10:35:20 pm
Clarkson, again:

Quote
I think we are fast approaching the time when the United Nations should start to think seriously about abolishing other languages.

What’s the point of Welsh for example? All it does is provide a silly maypole around which a bunch of hotheads can get all nationalistic.

 >:(
Pen dafad ydy o!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 06, 2011, 10:35:42 pm
Clarkson, again:

Quote
I think we are fast approaching the time when the United Nations should start to think seriously about abolishing other languages.

What’s the point of Welsh for example? All it does is provide a silly maypole around which a bunch of hotheads can get all nationalistic.

 >:(
Pen dafad ydy o!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 06, 2011, 10:37:01 pm
Clarkson is big enough to be insulted twice.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 13, 2011, 11:41:58 pm
At risk of "twat" being too good a word for...

Sir David Scholey
(http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01373/SNN1015AA---lion_1373642a.jpg)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3806600/Whos-the-bigger-beast.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 14, 2011, 09:59:12 am
OMG.  :sick:

Utter Supertwat.  But for being a Tory donor as much as anything else ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on September 14, 2011, 10:06:10 am
Holy crap! I didn't realise this spoof (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/environment/tory-donor-kills-lion-but-still-fails-to-get-full-erection-201109124291/) had such an element of truth in it.  :o
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 19, 2011, 09:36:27 pm
You're on live morning telly, twat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6tC5b0CRnc
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 19, 2011, 09:54:42 pm
You're on live morning telly, twat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6tC5b0CRnc

I don't like the look of him, but who is he?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 19, 2011, 09:55:43 pm
Who was that particular fool?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 19, 2011, 09:57:42 pm
I don't like the look of him, but who is he?

A film director, I think.  I don't know or care more than that.

Do Super-Twats have to be famous?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 19, 2011, 09:59:49 pm
No.  But I think he is only a twat.  He's said one gormless thing on the tellybox.  He's got a long way to go before he comes close to the sheer torrent of ignorant inanity which constitutes the oeuvre of Morgan or Clarkson.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 19, 2011, 10:06:01 pm
Agreed.  But I didn't think it was worth starting a thread for mere twats.  :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on September 19, 2011, 11:01:46 pm
It's the critically-acclaimed but often hapless Nicholas Winding Refn. I was watching that absent-mindedly and didn't notice it, only Bill's grovelling apology at the end. Quite funny really.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 27, 2011, 10:43:16 am
Have we had Gyles, I can't spell my name, Brandreth?
If not, I'll nominate him.
If we have, I'll nominate him again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 27, 2011, 10:47:51 am
He's such an irksome twat that I'm putting him in again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 27, 2011, 10:48:16 am
Gyles Brandreth
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 27, 2011, 10:51:44 am
Gyles Brandreth
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 27, 2011, 10:53:44 am
Gyles Brandreth
I clicked post too soon

Yep, that's the one.
At this rate, he's going to be Super Twat of the Year.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: AndyK on September 27, 2011, 11:01:51 am
You're on live morning telly, twat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6tC5b0CRnc

It was worth it just to see the beeb's talking heads lay a couple of pineapples immediately after.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 27, 2011, 11:05:19 am
At least Gyles Brandreth (who is, incidentally, a supertwat, in case anyone was still unaware) was candid about his complete contempt for his former constituents on Just A Minute last night.  I get the feeling that is a more common view than we might hope.

Which reminds me: that venerable broadcasting institution Nicholas Parsons should be put on the Supertwat list, not least for saying that Gyles Brandreth was 'the most literate and intelligent person'  he knows.  Either that is unwarranted sycophancy to an already dangerously overinflated ego, a subtle pisstake, he has a very narrow circle of acquiantances, or else Parsons truly is thicker than three short planks.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Woofage on September 27, 2011, 11:13:31 am
He's not famous but he is a twat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqN3amj6AcE&sns=fb
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 27, 2011, 11:29:41 am
Hugh Porter.  Who the hell is Toomas Voockler, Hugh?  Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on September 28, 2011, 08:32:44 pm
At the risk of repeating myself...

Donald Fucking Trump^1010000000000000000
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 28, 2011, 08:41:08 pm
Giles Coren
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on September 28, 2011, 08:55:49 pm
No, sorry, mine wins.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 28, 2011, 09:55:56 pm
Sure.  But Coren is definitely in the category too.  I heard him on 'I've Never Seen Star Wars' being a Supertwat and thinking himself oh so clever.

Sorry mate.  Victoria got all the brains.

And the wit.

And the looks.

And the charisma.

In fact, Giles, what exactly is it you can offer?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on September 28, 2011, 10:44:04 pm
Giles Coren

Parasite - obvious candidate for the B Ark.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 29, 2011, 01:40:29 pm
Sure.  But Coren is definitely in the category too.  I heard him on 'I've Never Seen Star Wars' being a Supertwat and thinking himself oh so clever.

Sorry mate.  Victoria got all the brains.

And the wit.

And the looks.

And the charisma.

And the stated intention to shag her tutor in return for a better degree.  And the coke.

Allegedly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 29, 2011, 07:58:39 pm
After listening  to the news on Radio 4, Tiff Needle. I can't be arsed to find out the correct spelling.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 29, 2011, 08:18:57 pm
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 29, 2011, 08:57:34 pm
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.

 I get the impression that you are not keen on him. In fact, that you pick on him just because he's an irritating stupid little shitbag.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 30, 2011, 08:12:06 am
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.

 I get the impression that you are not keen on him. In fact, that you pick on him just because he's an irritating stupid little shitbag.
Well, fooooor-giiiiiiive me.   ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Woofage on September 30, 2011, 02:34:41 pm
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.

 I get the impression that you are not keen on him. In fact, that you pick on him just because he's an irritating stupid little shitbag.

Isn't that enough? ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 30, 2011, 02:42:20 pm
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.

 I get the impression that you are not keen on him. In fact, that you pick on him just because he's an irritating stupid little shitbag.

Isn't that enough? ;D


Oh, all right then.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on September 30, 2011, 07:45:12 pm
Cllr Harry Phibbs (who was on Jonsnonews tonight)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on September 30, 2011, 07:53:45 pm
Whatever fuck-haired imbecilic cockwomble it was on Question Time last night made me shout at the telly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spindrift on September 30, 2011, 08:04:52 pm
W-A-N-K-E-R, I believe.

Have we had Philip Hammond yet?  If not, I bagsy him.

In The Times today about speed limits Hammond said we should "police by consent", so if a large number of people break a law, it's the law that needs looking at.  Like with, say, cannabis or prostitution? I could never tire of punching Hammond's complacent stupid face and weird schoolboy haircut. I would punch his haircut over and over, it would start crying and I wouldn't stop.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 30, 2011, 09:31:49 pm
We need to reinstate the You Must Choose threads.

Hammond or Gove for a lifetime of punchbag fun? 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on September 30, 2011, 09:35:08 pm
We need to reinstate the You Must Choose threads.

Hammond or Gove for a lifetime of punchbag fun?

Why not use one as a club with which to hit the other? When that gets boring they can change places.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 01, 2011, 09:53:51 pm
Eddy Mair. Smug, patronising, facetious, flippant. Some day I'll list his defects.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on October 02, 2011, 03:52:22 pm
http://twitter.com/#!/dannycare

"I hate Cyclists!!!!! #getacar"

My reply: "I hate Rugby Players!!!!! #getaroundball"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on October 02, 2011, 08:12:22 pm
Mr Care(less) later tweeted:

"My last comment wasn't meant to offend. I didn't realise cyclists were so passionate. I'm sorry. #cyclesafe"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on October 02, 2011, 10:36:04 pm
Mr Care(less) later tweeted:

"My last comment wasn't meant to offend. I didn't realise cyclists were so passionate. I'm sorry. #cyclesafe"
Well that's one twat dealt with, for the time being.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 03, 2011, 12:24:00 pm
Mark Littlewood.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 03, 2011, 12:54:22 pm
Jason Plato.  Hypertwat.  Note to Matt Neal: if you're going to thump him one, please do it properly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 03, 2011, 08:45:10 pm
Mark Littlewood again Just seen it on the telly. It really is a sack of shit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 03, 2011, 09:10:41 pm
What's he done?  He has form on foot-in-mouth.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 03, 2011, 10:16:33 pm
He was on Panorama making his "case" for the abolition of the Minimum Wage.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 03, 2011, 10:27:56 pm
And he'll be the first to volunteer for a wage below the current minimum, I take it?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 03, 2011, 10:40:21 pm
He could come and work for me. I would charge him a fair rate for the privilege.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 04, 2011, 10:46:01 am
Is he the twat I heard on R5 yesterday morning arguing the same? His case seemed to be that some jobs are "worth only £5.50 an hour" to employers, so they can't afford to employ someone to do the job, ergo the minimum wage is causing unemployment. A particularly specious line of reasoning. It made me really annoyed - not just because they were giving him the oxygen of publicity but because his cretinous argument was going largely unchallenged by that thicko woman they've got in to replace Shelagh.

And she's another one for the list. Thicko Woman, not Shelagh. I love Shelagh.

They had some bloke on talking about luxury speedboats the other day. He was going through some of the features on such vessels and Thicko Woman was befuddled by his mention of "Bombay doors". I felt compelled to write in to point out that the feature in question was actually "bomb-bay doors".

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 04, 2011, 12:47:24 pm
Yes, that's the twat.

If we apply the logic of "free" market economics, if a business cannot afford to employ people, then it shouldn't.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 04, 2011, 04:03:49 pm
Theresa May. See POBI.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 04, 2011, 07:35:29 pm
Eddy Mair. Smug, patronising, facetious, flippant. Some day I'll list his defects.

and Carolyn Quinn. She said catgate on PM this afternoon.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 05, 2011, 01:26:16 pm
Lord Foster

(Don't get me started - oh you have)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 05, 2011, 01:38:11 pm
This ^^^^.  Especially for the crime against humanity that is LHR Terminal 5.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 05, 2011, 10:37:20 pm
Matthew bloody arsehole Wright.  Would ya?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on October 06, 2011, 12:09:56 am
Matthew bloody arsehole Wright.  Would ya?

I presume that in this instance, the usage of "would ya?" refers to devising an amusing demise for him, que no?  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 06, 2011, 09:21:26 am
One can only hope.  Otherwise one would despair.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 06, 2011, 09:55:00 am
Stephen Bayley, arrogant elitist ponce for hire.  Just fuck off.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 06, 2011, 11:29:10 am
I had forgotten about him; I had always thought of him as a knob but now I realise I was mistaken. Apologies.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on October 06, 2011, 11:15:28 pm
Jack Whitehall.

Trustafarian twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 06, 2011, 11:36:12 pm
Jack Whitehall.


And the bollock-brained fuckwit who designed his website.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 07, 2011, 09:18:45 am
Never heard of him, but, having read his Wikipedia entry, I am not inspired to seek him out.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 07, 2011, 08:02:57 pm
It may be a complete coincidence and I admit that I wasn't wearing my specs but I am sure that I saw him at lunchtime today outside the RFH as I passed on my Friday run. He was texting while picking his nose and despite this impressive display of multi-tasking still looked a twat. It could have been some other twat of course.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on October 08, 2011, 09:01:21 am
He's on Mock The Week quite regularly. When he's on I put the telly on mute when he's speaking.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clifftaylor on October 08, 2011, 09:22:04 am
In the unlikely event that he hasn't been mentioned previously, I'd like to name Wayne Rooney (particularly after last nights display)  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on October 08, 2011, 02:49:22 pm
In the unlikely event that he hasn't been mentioned previously, I'd like to name Wayne Rooney (particularly after last nights display)  ::-)

He's not a super twat.He's not that good.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 09, 2011, 11:29:50 pm
Steve Jobs's death got me thinking about other business heroes. Specifically those that are/have been (reputedly) able to walk on water.

Therefore, I nominate as Super Twats, Richard Branson, Alan Sugar and Clive Sinclair.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 10, 2011, 01:31:22 pm
I know we've had Lewis Hamilton in this thread before, but he's worth re-stating after spending most of the 2011 season behaving like a big twatty twatter.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 10, 2011, 03:41:46 pm
I accidentally watched 2.6 seconds of a documentary about U2 last night. Bono.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 11, 2011, 12:31:13 pm
Have I offended someone? Come now, perhaps Mr Bono is a difficult man to despise but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try.

J
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 11, 2011, 12:49:45 pm
I deliberately missed that U2 documentary as I feared for the integrity of my television.  Bonio takes the (dog) biscuit in the twattery stakes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 11, 2011, 12:53:12 pm
More than the Right Honourable Dr Liam Fox, MP?  Or 'Knocksy Foxy', if you will...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 11, 2011, 01:10:59 pm
I deliberately missed that U2 documentary as I feared for the integrity of my television.  Bonio takes the (dog) biscuit in the twattery stakes.

Splendid! For a moment I wondered whether it was just me.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on October 11, 2011, 02:34:01 pm
I deliberately missed that U2 documentary as I feared for the integrity of my television.  Bonio takes the (dog) biscuit in the twattery stakes.

Splendid! For a moment I wondered whether it was just me.

Yeah, but they're so like, Rock and Roll y'know?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on October 11, 2011, 02:43:54 pm
I am afraid that I cannot view Rock and Rollery as a mitigating circumstance.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 11, 2011, 05:12:53 pm
More than the Right Honourable Dr Liam Fox, MP?  Or 'Knocksy Foxy', if you will...

Rarely has the word "honourable" seemed less appropriate.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on October 11, 2011, 06:50:25 pm
Paxman. Another Jeremy I'm afraid but definitely a twat big time.

 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 11, 2011, 09:47:28 pm
Tory Councillor Tony Shields (http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Council-cyclists-claim-expenses-drivers/story-13501665-detail/story.html#comments)

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 12, 2011, 01:23:54 pm
Mike Penning (http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=52491.msg1066480#msg1066480)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 14, 2011, 12:58:11 pm
Oliver TwaLetwin (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/oct/14/oliver-letwin-investigation-documents-bin?newsfeed=true).

Those bins aren't for recycling, twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 14, 2011, 01:39:51 pm
That workplace performance is definitely worth £65k per year.  Just think what morons we might get if we didn't pay enough.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 19, 2011, 10:54:18 am
David King, spokesdroid for Human Genetics Alert, has a black belt in twattery, as his performance on the Toady prog this morning demonstrated all too clearly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on October 20, 2011, 10:52:59 pm
Jacob Rees-Mogg.

(Yes, I'm watching Question Time right now).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 23, 2011, 10:25:34 pm
Louise Mensch  :hand:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Frere on October 23, 2011, 11:47:43 pm
Jacob Rees-Mogg.

(Yes, I'm watching Question Time right now).

If ever the almighty (however you perceive him/her/it to be) ever had in mind a Ur Tory, this man certainly qualifies. 

I recall reading from somewhere that his nanny helped her charge canvassing in a hopeless scottish seat.

Frere
Title: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 24, 2011, 09:27:48 am
Louise Mensch  :hand:

I take it you saw Have I Got New For You? Love Ian Hislop.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 24, 2011, 09:38:08 am
Two twats for the price of one. In an amazing bit of ubertwattery, "Pierce" actually has me agreeing with him!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQx3YIImvjk
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: border-rider on October 25, 2011, 11:01:31 pm
Jacob Rees-Mogg on Newsnight at the mo

 :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 26, 2011, 01:06:55 pm
The people responsible for adapting Peter Robinson's Inspector Banks novels for the electrick television.  Stephen Tompkinson is Damien Day.  End of.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on October 26, 2011, 01:21:23 pm
Eamonn Holmes, the obnoxious knacker, particularly related to his remarks on This Morning yesterday.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: токамак on October 26, 2011, 01:30:38 pm
Eamonn Holmes, the obnoxious knacker, particularly related to his remarks on This Morning yesterday.

Oh yes, he's been a Super-Twat since at least 2008...

Eamonn Holmes
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 26, 2011, 11:00:18 pm
He called co-presenter Jonathan Wilkes "retarded" on This Morning a couple of weeks ago. What now? Has he topped that?

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 26, 2011, 11:07:57 pm
Ray Comfort, the banana man.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on October 27, 2011, 07:39:00 am
He called co-presenter Jonathan Wilkes "retarded" on This Morning a couple of weeks ago. What now? Has he topped that?

d.
They had a woman on the other day who was abducted and raped in his car when she was 18. She had the presence of mind to tear her hair out by the roots and shove it between the seats, and to spit several times, so that her DNA was present in the car. She said she tried to cut her finger open with her earring to leave blood too, but it hurt too much. Anyway, he was caught and convicted of that attack and several other abductions and rapes. Eammon Holmes finished the piece with "well, I hope you take taxis now."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on November 01, 2011, 02:11:20 pm
Me. I am taking everything far too seriously. Stoppit, stoppit stoppit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 07, 2011, 05:27:03 pm
It's that time again: Eddie Mair.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 16, 2011, 11:36:51 pm
After seeing a BBC trailer ( I don't know when it was broadcast; it may have been recorded with something else, as we rarely watch programmes at scheduled transmission times) Ricky Gervais. He's an obnoxious little shitbag.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Simonb on November 16, 2011, 11:42:36 pm
Gotta be Sepp Blatter.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 21, 2011, 11:18:31 pm
Bob Diamond.
I think that charging customers to look after money, that you then use as the stake for your gambling, is a "flawed model".

And Evan Davies, who sucks up to such pigfuckers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 22, 2011, 10:48:50 am
Heather McGregor, who was on the Toady prog this morning arguing that it should only be shareholders, and not workers, who determine The Boss' compensation package and sounded like a twat of epic proportions while doing so.

Edit:
Interviewer:  They have worker representation in such matters in Germany
Super-Twat:  This is not Germany!
Interviewer:  Perhaps it should be.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Marco Stefano on November 22, 2011, 05:52:25 pm
Heather McGregor, who was on the Toady prog this morning arguing that it should only be shareholders, and not workers, who determine The Boss' compensation package and sounded like a twat of epic proportions while doing so.

If that was the shrill, shouty woman who got even more shrill & shouty when anyone dared to question her point of view, then:

 +1.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 22, 2011, 08:51:21 pm
Have we had Dermot O'Leary yet?  He doesn't really do a lot but he wears too-tight shiny suits and is insufferably smug.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on November 23, 2011, 02:20:41 pm
Heather McGregor, who was on the Toady prog this morning arguing that it should only be shareholders, and not workers, who determine The Boss' compensation package and sounded like a twat of epic proportions while doing so.

Edit:
Interviewer:  They have worker representation in such matters in Germany
Super-Twat:  This is not Germany!
Interviewer:  Perhaps it should be.

IIRC she said something like: "It's not 70 years ago* and we're not part of Germany".  At which point (given that it followed on from "Anyone over the age of 7 who says 'It's not fair' needs to grow up") I spontaneously redecorated the kitchen  >:(.

* - precisely the attitude that sustains the German view of Brits as "island monkeys"  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 24, 2011, 01:08:47 am
The cast of The Moral Maze (the antidote to radio).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 29, 2011, 01:06:12 pm
Some recent or ongoing twats:

Aaaah!  That's better :P
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on December 01, 2011, 11:32:34 am
I am sure he's featured on here before, but Danny Alexander needs a good slap for being so smug about bending over and taking it from the Tories.  Apart from the fact that he looks like a student union sabbatical officer, he has a shit-eating grin that makes me gingercidal.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oscar's dad on December 01, 2011, 11:47:50 am
I know we've had Lewis Hamilton in this thread before, but he's worth re-stating after spending most of the 2011 season behaving like a big twatty twatter.

And he's even more of a twat for dumping that Pussy Cat Doll - muppet!  I gather they might be trying to make up but even if he gets her back he's still a twat for getting rid of her in the first place.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 01, 2011, 01:43:58 pm
I know we've had Lewis Hamilton in this thread before, but he's worth re-stating after spending most of the 2011 season behaving like a big twatty twatter.

And he's even more of a twat for dumping that Pussy Cat Doll - muppet!  I gather they might be trying to make up but even if he gets her back he's still a twat for getting rid of her in the first place.

Are you sure she didn't dump him, on account of his being a twat?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 01, 2011, 02:00:12 pm
Clarkson. Again. You all know why.

I hope his next job is cleaning pig slurry pits with his own toothbrush.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oscar's dad on December 01, 2011, 02:29:07 pm
I know we've had Lewis Hamilton in this thread before, but he's worth re-stating after spending most of the 2011 season behaving like a big twatty twatter.

And he's even more of a twat for dumping that Pussy Cat Doll - muppet!  I gather they might be trying to make up but even if he gets her back he's still a twat for getting rid of her in the first place.

Are you sure she didn't dump him, on account of his being a twat?

Possibly.  Who cares about the detail, he shouldn't of let it happen, she is ... well ... a Pussy Cat Doll and he's a super twat!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oscar's dad on December 01, 2011, 02:30:40 pm
Clarkson. Again. You all know why.

I hope his next job is cleaning pig slurry pits with his own toothbrush.

I quite like the chap, in small controlled doses, with my shit filter turned up to the max but even I was appalled last night.  What a twat!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on December 01, 2011, 02:32:52 pm
Is this something about PubSec strikers should be shot?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oscar's dad on December 01, 2011, 02:40:36 pm
Is this something about PubSec strikers should be shot?

Public sector strikers should be executed in front of their families. And this at about 7:10pm on primetime telly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on December 01, 2011, 02:47:50 pm
In addition to Clarkson, I will throw the following collectiev into the mix-

Just about anybody harping on about the disparity between public and private sector pensions.

Your average public sector worker is paid an annual salary or weekly wage a long way short of what the corresponding grade/ job etc. would attract in the private sector. Plus working for public sector employers can be absolute shit. I do not include the higher ranks in this category. I know a few public sector Grand High Mucky Mucks who have spent several years raking it in in the public sector before getting senior public sector positions.

Public sector workers put up with 30 years or so of crap pay and crap work for the benefit of being reasonably comfortable in their old age.

Don't want public sector pensions to be "better" than private sector?

Pay a decent wage for the 30 years that they do the job then.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Feanor on December 02, 2011, 09:28:08 pm
I saw someone submitting lord Bragg of Bragg on here a while back.
Actually, I quite like him.

Consider 'In Our Time', a flagship mostly-arts-and-history program.
He hosts this very well, in that he invites expert guests, has arranged what questions need to be asked to allow the guests to reveal their knowledge and basically lets them do the talking.   He even gamely takes on some science topics, in which he is clearly out of his depth, but that doesn't matter, because he lets the expert guests do the talking.

Contrast this to 'Material World', a supposed flagship science program, hosted by the insufferable Quentin Cooper.   He just can't Shut The Fuck Up.   He constantly rabbits on with a stream of pun-based drivel, asking his guests questions and not STFU for long enough to let them answer.   When they do answer, he constantly interrupts with 'humerous' puns etc, and the sniggers to himself on-mic at his own 'cleverness' like beavis and butthead hearing the word 'boobie',  over the top of the guest who tries to continue through gritted teeth.

So:
Quentin Cooper: Super-Twat.
I commend this to the house.

--
R


Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Feanor on December 02, 2011, 10:03:05 pm
Since I'm here ( and I don't come here often ), am I allowed more than 1?
They are not in the 'normal' Media, but infest Usenet.

I humbly submit:
'The Medway Handyman', who posts reasonable stuff on uk.d-i-y, but turns into 'Dave - Cyclist VOR' on u.r.c , an absolute worst example of White Van Man that you can imagine.

There are very few people who annoy me so much that I actually wish I could perform a Cruciatus Curse, but he's as close as it comes.
And 'Judith' a close second.

So, Dave: Super-Twat.


--
R

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on December 02, 2011, 11:25:41 pm
Seconded.

<waves order paper vigorously in the air>
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on December 03, 2011, 01:01:48 pm
David Luiz
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 22, 2011, 08:34:18 pm
Eric Pickles.

Utter utter utter Supertwat par excellence

Man should have done to him what he did to Bradford.

And no, I don't want to watch :o
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 22, 2011, 11:35:38 pm
Eric Pickles.

What's he done now?

However, I'll second your nomination (on the grounds of Mr Wobbly's very existence).

Should we start a Yorkshire Hall of Shame? Godzone has spawned some real stars.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 11:26:58 am
Yorkshire Supertwats include (but are not limited to):

Jeremy Clarkson
Paul Daniels
Bernard Ingham
Ted Hughes
Goeffrey Boycott
Eric fucking Pickles
Branwell Bronte
Harvey Smith
Judi Dench
Melanie Brown
Phil Oakey
Kimberley Walsh
Brian Clough
David Hockney
Marcus Fox
etc
etc
etc

I was going to say Fabian Hamilton, as he is a Megatwat, but it turns out he was born in London.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on December 23, 2011, 11:33:48 am
who is etc & his/her relative's?

 ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 12:00:07 pm
Nay, Clarion lad, tha forgot William Hague.

I can't remember the source (it was either my Dad or a friend) of "There's nowt more toxic than a Yorkshire Tory".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 12:29:56 pm
Oh yes - William Hague, along with Fox, Ingham, Pickles et al.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on December 23, 2011, 02:21:56 pm
What's wrong with Brian Clough? I think he was grand.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 02:51:37 pm
You aren't a Leeds fan, are you? ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on December 23, 2011, 02:55:45 pm
Judi Dench?   ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 03:05:21 pm
Ohhhhhh yes!  Dame bloody Judi bitchcow Dench.  She's the only one on the list with whom I have had professional dealings.  And she belongs on the list.

She was born in York, ftr, even though she used to try denying it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on December 23, 2011, 03:09:38 pm
Ohhhhhh yes!  Dame bloody Judi bitchcow Dench.  She's the only one on the list with whom I have had professional dealings.  And she belongs on the list.

She was born in York, ftr, even though she used to try denying it.

 Judi Dench's father was my MILs doctor. He was supposedly quite nice.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 03:12:36 pm
Peter Stringfellow
Mike Tindall
Ashley Jackson
John Braine
and
Chris Moyles
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 03:13:56 pm
Dunno who Mike Tindall is, but he is in soundly disreputable company in your list.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on December 23, 2011, 03:18:58 pm
You aren't a Leeds fan, are you? ;D
I'm more like the anti-Leeds fan.  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 03:20:48 pm
He reckons to laik rugby. (the southern code FFS). He was one of Englands Finest in the recent pii-up World Cup competition.

May I ask what you have against David Hockney?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 03:22:06 pm
Letters page, Guardian, passim.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 03:32:33 pm
I haven't read those contributions to the public discourse, but if they are similar to the crap he's spouted on Radio 4 recently, I agree. He comes across as the sort of old fart that whinges about (among other things) "poofs" and "modern art", as well as all his other vacuous ramblings.

He's on Radio 4 on Monday morning. I think I'll have a lie-in.

I like his paintings, though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 03:41:49 pm
Oh, I love his paintings, and his photography.  But his constant whinging about smoking gets on my tits.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on December 23, 2011, 05:49:35 pm
Yorkshire Supertwats include (but are not limited to):

Jeremy Clarkson
Paul Daniels
Bernard Ingham
Ted Hughes
Goeffrey Boycott
Eric fucking Pickles
Branwell Bronte
Harvey Smith
Judi Dench
Melanie Brown
Phil Oakey
Kimberley Walsh
Brian Clough
David Hockney
Marcus Fox
etc
etc
etc

I was going to say Fabian Hamilton, as he is a Megatwat, but it turns out he was born in London.

It's my understanding that there are no s/tees in Yorkshire.I have been told that they were relocated to neigh other counties :demon:

dons tin hat & awaits sh$tstorm ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 23, 2011, 06:00:08 pm
Worth noting how many of Yorkshire's Supertwats actually live in the county.

We're well rid of them.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on December 23, 2011, 06:05:49 pm
Peter Stringfellow
Mike Tindall
Ashley Jackson
John Braine
and
Chris Moyles
I think this thread was actually invented for Chris Moyles.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 09:01:47 pm
Peter Stringfellow
Mike Tindall
Ashley Jackson
John Braine
and
Chris Moyles
I think this thread was actually invented for Chris Moyles.

The first nomination was Bear Grylls, but I know what you mean.

Bear Grylls sounds like something that Vladimir Putin (another nominee!) would eat to make himself seem dead butch.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 23, 2011, 09:09:06 pm
I wanted to add Eric Treacy (Bishop of Wakefield) and Wilf Proudfoot (supermarket/pirate radio/trading stamps boss) to the Godzone Country SuperTwats Hall of Shame, but they were foreign.

So I'll go for David Hathaway, god squadder, MI6 agent, smuggler and slum landlord (it was alleged).

Edit: he's foreign, too! (born in london). I knew him when I lived in Dewsbury; I'd always assumed he was local.

 He's still  a SuperTwat.         
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on January 07, 2012, 07:03:11 pm
Keith Peat. He looks bad enough in "On The Road", but a quick Web search gives me the impression that he's an obnoxious, stupid, arrogant, proto-fascist fuckwit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on January 10, 2012, 11:42:27 pm
Keith Peat. He looks bad enough in "On The Road", but a quick Web search gives me the impression that he's an obnoxious, stupid, arrogant, proto-fascist fuckwit.

I came across him purely by chance in the comments to a link posted here. As others have said, he is clearly channeling the spirit of the late pony-tailed geeklord and speedophile.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spindrift on January 10, 2012, 11:47:46 pm
We know 'Nigger in the woodpile' is wrong but Is 'elephant in the room' still OK? Will the word 'looter' be banned next?

http://twitter.com/BogTrotter1

WTF? Cos those words have all the same connotations?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 23, 2012, 08:19:28 am
Pretty sure he's been mentioned before, but, following his interview on Today, perhaps we need a new category of Smug, callous, ignorant Megatwat for Ian Duncan Smith.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 23, 2012, 08:54:00 am
And Gill Kirby sp?

No, I hadn't heard of her either, but she was on Today too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on January 23, 2012, 10:46:28 am
Pretty sure he's been mentioned before, but, following his interview on Today, perhaps we need a new category of Smug, callous, ignorant Megatwat for Ian Duncan Smith.

I concur. He wants to inflict his ex-military self-flagellatory masochism and Catholic guilt on the rest of us. And all this tiresome preaching about "getting people back into work" - hasn't he seen the unemployment figures?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 23, 2012, 02:36:20 pm
Pretty sure he's been mentioned before, but, following his interview on Today, perhaps we need a new category of Smug, callous, ignorant Megatwat for Ian Duncan Smith.

I concur. He wants to inflict his ex-military self-flagellatory masochism and Catholic guilt on the rest of us. And all this tiresome preaching about "getting people back into work" - hasn't he seen the unemployment figures?
This is not a government that believes in making evidence-based decisions.

I heard the interview. Quite, quite unbelieveable. So his government directly sacks hundreds of thousands, then bangs on about needing to "get people back into work". What an complete and utter smeghead.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on January 26, 2012, 09:33:43 pm
Phil Flanders, Director of the Road Haulage Association in Scotland, for services to spouting anti cyclist bollocks.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 26, 2012, 09:44:51 pm
The aptly named Capt AK Burki,  headmaster of the proposed Phoenix free school in Oldham, and the similarly aptly Tom Burkard who had the idea.  The plan is to have an entire staff of former military, and no trained teachers.  Idiots.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 26, 2012, 09:49:41 pm
And, also on World At One, seemingly a nutter special, Peter Moskos the author of In Defence Of Flogging.

OK, in private between consenting adults...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on January 26, 2012, 09:52:16 pm
Phil Flanders, Director of the Road Haulage Association in Scotland, for services to spouting anti cyclist bollocks.

Yebbut, over on Cyclechat there's a thread about said anti cyclist bollocks. And one of the cyclechatters has a day job as fleet manager for a large (like seven thousand) fleet of lorries. And when he got back from his Christmas hollibibs, he terminated their RHA membership , citing Flanders' anti cyclist bollocks as a reason. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 26, 2012, 09:55:29 pm
Cool.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Buzz on January 27, 2012, 05:07:50 pm
Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall.

The exact reason why only being available via PM as it could well be actionable even if it is true.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 27, 2012, 05:25:08 pm
Nick Herbert.

Or should this be in the Nominative Determinism thread?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on February 19, 2012, 09:37:22 pm
Is Jamie Oliver already nominated? If so, I've seconded him. His oh so funny "Cock in Cider" mobile pub. His general gittishness. His use of the words "bad boy" "real" (as in keeping it real). I could go on. Wiki claims his children are called Poppy Honey Rosie Oliver,  Daisy Boo Pamela Oliver, Petal Blossom Rainbow Oliver and Buddy Bear Maurice Oliver.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on February 20, 2012, 10:00:44 pm
Surely those names are the victims of subtle Wiki vandalism?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 20, 2012, 10:07:10 pm
Surely those names are the victims of subtle Wiki vandalism?
Apparently not ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on February 20, 2012, 10:52:36 pm
The girls' names are pretty typical cutesy trendy-parents fare, but Buddy Bear?That's beyond embarrassing and comes out the other end sounding ludicrously cool. Poor guy will never be taken seriously as an adult though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 20, 2012, 11:17:26 pm
Poor guy will never be taken seriously as an adult though.
Like father, like son ....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 21, 2012, 10:05:14 am
We'll find that out if Oliver ever becomes an adult.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 21, 2012, 10:06:14 am
Oh - I know he's in already, but he's earned another mention:

Michael Gove.

And honorable mentions for Chris Grayling and Iain Duncan Smith.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on February 22, 2012, 03:44:19 pm
Have we had James Corden yet?  He appears to be fat, boorish, smug and not much else.  and I'm not even an Adele fan  ;D

Did anyone else think George Michael was a bit stoned at the Brits?  Mastercard must have been well annoyed when he half said "the Barclays Brit award".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 22, 2012, 03:47:00 pm
tbf, it wouldn't have been Corden's decision to cut Adele's squawking off early.  He'd have had a Director yelling in his ear...

George Michael?  Stoned?  It seems hardly possible.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on February 22, 2012, 06:56:11 pm
I actually love George Michael.  He's the real queen of England, and a national treasure.  That's why everyone forgives his cottaging and his little stoner incidents.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 01, 2012, 11:02:47 am
Baroness Warsi.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on March 01, 2012, 03:35:36 pm
Baroness Warsi.

Oh yes indeed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on March 01, 2012, 03:40:11 pm
Have we had James Corden yet?  He appears to be fat, boorish, smug and not much else.  and I'm not even an Adele fan  ;D
You missed out 'desperately unfunny'
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 02, 2012, 08:40:39 am
Have we had James Corden yet?  He appears to be fat, boorish, smug and not much else.  and I'm not even an Adele fan  ;D
You missed out 'desperately unfunny'
Your Honour, I would also like "completely talentless" to be taken into consideration.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Quisling on March 02, 2012, 11:05:29 am
Is Jamie Oliver already nominated? If so, I've seconded him. His oh so funny "Cock in Cider" mobile pub. His general gittishness. His use of the words "bad boy" "real" (as in keeping it real). I could go on. Wiki claims his children are called Poppy Honey Rosie Oliver,  Daisy Boo Pamela Oliver, Petal Blossom Rainbow Oliver and Buddy Bear Maurice Oliver.

What's the difference between Jamie Oliver and a long distance rural runner?

One has a big pant in the country....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on March 02, 2012, 11:08:46 am
Is Jamie Oliver already nominated? If so, I've seconded him. His oh so funny "Cock in Cider" mobile pub. His general gittishness. His use of the words "bad boy" "real" (as in keeping it real). I could go on. Wiki claims his children are called Poppy Honey Rosie Oliver,  Daisy Boo Pamela Oliver, Petal Blossom Rainbow Oliver and Buddy Bear Maurice Oliver.

What's the difference between Jamie Oliver and a long distance rural runner?

One has a big pant in the country....

Jamie Oliver has a big **** in the pantry?

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 02, 2012, 06:18:43 pm
Is Jamie Oliver already nominated? If so, I've seconded him. His oh so funny "Cock in Cider" mobile pub. His general gittishness. His use of the words "bad boy" "real" (as in keeping it real). I could go on. Wiki claims his children are called Poppy Honey Rosie Oliver,  Daisy Boo Pamela Oliver, Petal Blossom Rainbow Oliver and Buddy Bear Maurice Oliver.

What's the difference between Jamie Oliver and a long distance rural runner?

One has a big pant in the country....

Jamie Oliver has a big **** in the pantry?
The lovely Jules, one presumes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 02, 2012, 11:39:23 pm
Eric Fucking Piggles.

And to save work for my compatriot, Michael Gove.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 07, 2012, 01:24:36 pm
Peter Lilley

Quote from: Lilley on WATO
It's unthinkable that the Prime Minister would have introduced changes which would victimise (children with cerebral palsy)

No.  It isn't.  It's happened.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on March 07, 2012, 01:28:56 pm
Because he can afford them!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 07, 2012, 02:36:50 pm
I seem to recall Peter Lilley being permanent "Slimiest Git of the Week" in Drop The Dead Donkey...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 07, 2012, 02:42:42 pm
I thought he was dead and gone, along with all those other awful old skool Tories.  I recall he was a particularly vicious and uncaring social security secretary of state in his time.

That's probably enough politics.  Don't want this moved.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 07, 2012, 03:12:20 pm
I thought he was dead and gone, along with all those other awful old skool Tories.  I recall he was a particularly vicious and uncaring social security secretary of state in his time.

That's probably enough politics.  Don't want this moved.

I'd forgotten about this particular bastard!

There are threads about zombies elsewhere on this forum. Maybe PL is one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 13, 2012, 10:41:05 pm
Steve Hilton.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 15, 2012, 10:27:31 pm
And Perez Hilton. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on March 16, 2012, 09:47:19 am
Tom Winsor

That is all.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 16, 2012, 09:50:28 am
Scared you wouldn't pass the fitness test? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on March 16, 2012, 11:16:24 am
Oh No. I'm all for an annual fitness test. I have been supporting that idea for the last 22 1/2 years. I'm just not looking forward to the constant whinging of the fat c**t opposite that this will ferment.

Also not looking forward to the prospect of poor young recruits getting paid £19,000 a year to be led into battle by Sergeants with less than 3 years in the job, or put in harms way by Inspectors with 3 years maximum in the job so minimal street experience, who is taking his or her lead from Superintendants and above who had absolutely fuck all experience of doing themselves what they are ordering done >:(

A recipe for disaster.

What was he beforehand- Rail Regulator or something?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 16, 2012, 11:35:39 am
What was he beforehand- Rail Regulator or something?

Started as a solicitor, Rail Regulator 1999-2004 where he presided over the fuck-up that was Railtrack, then back into legal practice.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on March 16, 2012, 11:53:14 am
What was he beforehand- Rail Regulator or something?

Started as a solicitor, Rail Regulator 1999-2004 where he presided over the fuck-up that was Railtrack, then back into legal practice.

Where he is presiding over the fucking up of an arm of the practice.....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 25, 2012, 11:33:26 am
As this is one of my favourite threads, I'd like to keep it on page one.

This morning I heard an interview with a contender for Best in Show.

Peter Cruddas.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 28, 2012, 07:04:29 pm
Francis Maude.

BOOOOOOOM!!!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 28, 2012, 07:09:28 pm
Since The Apprentice is on again, any of the contestants.  The recruitment consultant (ugh)/amateur body builder looks punchable enough to be this year's Baggs The Brand.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 29, 2012, 12:32:14 am
Francis Maude.

BOOOOOOOM!!!!!

Francis Molotov, surely?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Peter on March 29, 2012, 07:55:35 am
And now Francis Mauled.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 29, 2012, 09:20:29 am
He's a Firestarter.  Twisted Firestarter... ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tigerrr on March 29, 2012, 10:09:27 am
This is a thread for listing those people in the public eye that you absolutely can not abide.

I'll kick off with Bear Grylls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls#Criticism).

Bear Grylls - Super-Twat

I won't substantiate this opinion, I just believe it to be true.

Bear Grylls could kick your arse in almost any activity you choose. Just because he has a silly name, is an old etonian, and looks a bit gay does not mean he is not actually well hard.  He eats worms and roadkill when he is hungry. That is seriously hard. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 29, 2012, 10:11:29 am
And goes to five star hotels when he's tired.  That's not so hard.  Quite soft, really.  Downy, if you like...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 29, 2012, 10:17:40 am
Jens Voigt could turn Bear Grylls inside-out using only his eyebrows.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 29, 2012, 10:28:49 am
Eddy Merckx would have him for a snack.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fboab on March 29, 2012, 10:58:31 am
Ray Mears did, and that's why he looks a bit porky.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tigerrr on March 29, 2012, 01:15:14 pm
Ray Mears has got moobs.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 29, 2012, 01:16:10 pm
Only on the outside.  Bear Grylls is a fathead.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Chris S on March 29, 2012, 06:23:02 pm
One day, I'd like to cycle tour/camp a summer away in the Boreal Forest of Canada. Assuming I don't get eaten by a bear or midges, I'd have Ray Mears to thank for that adventure.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: microphonie on March 29, 2012, 06:31:23 pm
A sweary song for a sweary thread - NSFW obviously...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDM-kCQkarw
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 30, 2012, 12:01:21 pm
Francis Maude (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-17560534) >:(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on March 30, 2012, 03:01:40 pm
Only on the outside.  Bear Grylls is a fathead.

I met a bloke in the Royal Armoured Corps on holiday once. Dead nice he was,  involved in teaching people how to sail - the RAC has its own yacht. Better than driving tanks I guess.

Anyway, he'd met Mr Grylls on a survival/escape and evasion course when the Ursine one was in the Territorial SAS. He (Grylls) allegedly had an alarming trick of hiding Mars Bars about his person, so he'd have something to eat when on the run.  From the description of where he hid them, I hope they were securely wrapped.   
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 30, 2012, 03:02:23 pm
Rather more than I wanted to know.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on March 30, 2012, 03:14:51 pm
Only on the outside.  Bear Grylls is a fathead.

I met a bloke in the Royal Armoured Corps on holiday once. Dead nice he was,  involved in teaching people how to sail - the RAC has its own yacht. Better than driving tanks I guess.

Anyway, he'd met Mr Grylls on a survival/escape and evasion course when the Ursine one was in the Territorial SAS. He (Grylls) allegedly had an alarming trick of hiding Mars Bars about his person, so he'd have something to eat when on the run.  From the description of where he hid them, I hope they were securely wrapped.

AIUI condoms are used
sometimes :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on April 03, 2012, 10:17:34 pm
Only on the outside.  Bear Grylls is a fathead.

I met a bloke in the Royal Armoured Corps on holiday once. Dead nice he was,  involved in teaching people how to sail - the RAC has its own yacht. Better than driving tanks I guess.

Anyway, he'd met Mr Grylls on a survival/escape and evasion course when the Ursine one was in the Territorial SAS. He (Grylls) allegedly had an alarming trick of hiding Mars Bars about his person, so he'd have something to eat when on the run.  From the description of where he hid them, I hope they were securely wrapped.

Would it not melt?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 10, 2012, 01:23:27 pm
Have we had Danny Alexander yet?

If not, then I nominate him.

If we have, I'll nominate him again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 17, 2012, 01:20:52 pm
Stewart Jackson, MP for Peterborough. A right-wing RentaGob.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on April 17, 2012, 02:24:48 pm
Have we had Danny Alexander yet?

If not, then I nominate him.

If we have, I'll nominate him again.

He disproves the popular idea that there are less Tory MPs in Scotland than Pandas.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 17, 2012, 03:46:28 pm
Michael Gove has earned himself another mention.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 17, 2012, 06:41:05 pm
Tom Bursnall.  Not that I'd heard of him before.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on April 17, 2012, 07:06:51 pm
I've resisted naming the S.T. but it's the architect who f$c$ed me about last August to the extent that I terminated my RRTY attempt & I'm still bloody  >:( about it
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 28, 2012, 07:39:00 pm
Maybe Clarion hasn't been listening to the radio this week.

Michael Gove was on twice, which makes him a Double Super-Twat.

By way of consolation, Eddie Mair gave him a bit of stick the other night.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on April 29, 2012, 07:56:59 am
I know it's old news but can I have Michael O'Leary (The Beast Of Ryanair) for registering his chauffeur-driven Merc as a taxi so he can use Dublin bus lanes?

Oh, and Clarkson again, since he's mentioned in another thread right now.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 29, 2012, 08:59:56 am
Did the Addison Lee Supertwat not get nominated?  Or did we just assume that he would take his natural place anyway?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on April 29, 2012, 02:51:08 pm
I know it's old news but can I have Michael O'Leary (The Beast Of Ryanair) for registering his chauffeur-driven Merc as a taxi so he can use Dublin bus lanes?


The last part of your sentence was unnecessary.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 30, 2012, 01:55:43 pm
Did the Addison Lee Supertwat not get nominated?  Or did we just assume that he would take his natural place anyway?

I assumed that someone else would.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on April 30, 2012, 05:50:39 pm
I know they've all been mentioned before but...

Cameron, Osborne, Gove, Hunt, May, Duncan Smith, Rees-Mogg, Pickles, Warsi, Maude... I could go on but I won't. Just the whole fucking sorry lot of them.

d.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 30, 2012, 05:58:43 pm
I know they've all been mentioned before but...

Cameron, Osborne, Gove, Hunt, May, Duncan Smith, Rees-Mogg, Pickles, Warsi, Maude... I could go on but I won't. Just the whole fucking sorry lot of them.

d.

After listening to WATO today, I must second Warsi. What a clown.

An afterthought; if I chuck in Hague, we've got a Triple Score of Yorkshire Super-Twattery. There's nowt more toxic than a Yorkshire Tory.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on April 30, 2012, 10:20:23 pm
I know they've all been mentioned before but...

Cameron, Osborne, Gove, Hunt, May, Duncan Smith, Rees-Mogg, Pickles, Warsi, Maude... I could go on but I won't. Just the whole fucking sorry lot of them.

d.
You would have to combine them to get one decent super-twat out of the lot of them. How has politics in our country got so pathetic?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on May 01, 2012, 09:11:08 pm
Patrick Kielty.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 01, 2012, 09:27:55 pm
Any particular reason?  Has he recently excelled himself in the field of twattery?  Or just his superbly consistent twattishness?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on May 01, 2012, 09:57:31 pm
He's covering for Steve Wright In The Afternoon just now and I had the misfortune to hear some of it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 01, 2012, 10:09:10 pm
Well, Steve Wright is a bit of a twat, so it's a small step up.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on May 01, 2012, 10:14:23 pm
Who keeps letting that awful Mensch on the telly? And why do they always put these arseholes on when I'm eating my dinner?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on May 01, 2012, 11:05:36 pm
Damon Albarn (Blur)

I keep forgetting what a too-cool-for-school-music-is-a-serious-business twat he is.  Fortunately he keeps appearing on "Later" to remind me.

He's right down there with look-at-my-new-lute Sting
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 02, 2012, 06:36:21 am
Who keeps letting that awful Mensch on the telly? And why do they always put these arseholes on when I'm eating my dinner?
She's foxy, in an Eva Braun kind of way.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 26, 2012, 11:04:47 pm
Christine Lagarde.

I mean, WTF?  What on earth was she thinking?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: FatBloke on May 27, 2012, 08:34:58 am
Damon Albarn (Blur)

I keep forgetting what a too-cool-for-school-music-is-a-serious-business twat he is.  Fortunately he keeps appearing on "Later" to remind me.
I think you've only got yourself to blame for that!!!

I'd like to add Jools Holland to the list.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on May 31, 2012, 02:07:46 pm
Can I mention Louise Mensch again?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 14, 2012, 03:27:34 pm
Theresa May (Theresa most definitely is?)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 14, 2012, 03:33:57 pm
Andrew Lansley (again)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gandalf on June 20, 2012, 06:39:22 pm
Jimmy Carr

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jun/20/jimmy-carr-tax-david-cameron (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jun/20/jimmy-carr-tax-david-cameron)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on June 20, 2012, 06:42:15 pm
People actually pay Jimmy Carr to tell jokes?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 20, 2012, 07:25:09 pm
David Cameron said Jimmy Carr is "morally wrong" on tax.

I could have shortened that sentence by two words and it would have made equal sense.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on June 20, 2012, 08:01:00 pm
Sepp Blatter

if there were only two twats on the planet he would be both of them
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on June 20, 2012, 08:15:00 pm
 ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 20, 2012, 08:42:39 pm
Andrew Lansley.

Again.

Utter utter utter ignorant cocking supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on June 20, 2012, 09:46:56 pm
I have to confess that I find Jimmy Carr quite funny. But even if I didn't, he does seem to annoy po-faced Guardian readers for some reason, which super un-twatifies him. So there.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 20, 2012, 09:53:34 pm
He got off a driving ban by using Mr Loophole (Arsehole, more like).

Dangerous driver still allowed to drive round like the arrogant cock he is.

Still find him funny?  I don't.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 21, 2012, 12:58:45 pm
Michael Gove, just because he's an utter dickhead.

Louise Mensch, again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on June 21, 2012, 01:05:16 pm
Louise Mensch, again.

It seems that Mensch has started a Twitteresque microblogging thingummy called Menschn  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 21, 2012, 01:09:10 pm
Michael Gove, just because he's an utter dickhead.

Yes, that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on June 21, 2012, 02:28:39 pm
I concur, him again.

(http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rhys.llangefni/lluniau/MICHAEL_GOVE.ashx.jpeg)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 22, 2012, 05:48:14 pm
To celebrate Super-Twat's new and more inclusive home, may I have the Syrian military?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18554246
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Illegal Combat Ant on June 22, 2012, 08:52:39 pm
And again

(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/6/21/1340294645470/Michael-Gove-at-the-Woodp-008.jpg)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 22, 2012, 08:55:18 pm
I think he's out of his intellectual depth there.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on June 22, 2012, 10:44:22 pm
A picture paints a thousand words. That made I larf ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on June 22, 2012, 10:45:01 pm
Is Ramsay on this list? ICBA to wade through it all, but on the off chance he isn't, lets add him.  Did you hear that bit on Front Row about his latest wheeze? Reality TV chef in Brixton Prison.  Gah!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on June 22, 2012, 11:19:14 pm
To celebrate Super-Twat's new and more inclusive home, may I have the Syrian military?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18554246
If it really was shot down by the Syrians, then whoever took the decision is indeed a twat of the first order. Small bullies really shouldn't pick fights with big bullies.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on June 23, 2012, 08:23:15 am
I can't believe a would-be EU country is still flying an old shed like the F-4.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on June 23, 2012, 06:19:59 pm
Germany & Greece are still flying the F-4.

Like the Germans, Greeks & Japanese, the Turks have some of the last F-4s built, & they've been considerably improved. The best airframes in the fleet were rebuilt in the late 1990s: complete set of new avionics (including radars), completely rewired, replacement of the structural components most likely to fail, made capable of carrying a wide range of precision ground attack weapons. Their air-air abilities were not improved to the same degree, unlike German & Greek F-4s. They're now dedicated ground attack & reconnaissance aircraft.

The upgraded F-4s are expected to stay in service until at least 2015. The non-upgraded aircraft were retired.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on June 23, 2012, 09:27:51 pm
Buck stops here. Take it out of his bonus.

(http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rhys.llangefni/lluniau/RBS_bonus.jpg)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Dewi on June 23, 2012, 10:16:54 pm
The upgraded F-4s are expected to stay in service until at least 2015. The non-upgraded aircraft were retired.
Not bad when you consider it was designed in the 50's. Just shows a brick can fly if you strap on big enough engines :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Illegal Combat Ant on July 01, 2012, 12:45:23 pm
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8164/7478104278_d0b0f19eca.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/81657088@N06/7478104278/)

Yesterday, in the VIP tent at Poshstock. We were only 10' away. My missus called him a fucking wanker when he walked past us. To his face. He heard. I was so proud.
He was holding on very tightly to his kids. Spot the 'casual' MiB behind.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on July 01, 2012, 08:41:58 pm
The Scrote that did this gets my vote

'On a sour note we may have to reconsider giving access to our house and the use of it's facilities, as we had a bottle of whisky stolen from our kitchen'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on July 12, 2012, 11:04:37 pm
Mark Littlewood of the Institute of Economic Affairs.

Who is this right-wing, free-marketeer thatcherite arsewipe? He's just been on Newsnight arguing for the abolition of the minimum wage. He boasted of being in the country's top 5% earners then said that the company he runs can't afford to pay its workers more than the minimum wage. I have the same opinion of him as Wiggo has of doper-doubters.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: nicknack on July 12, 2012, 11:06:53 pm
Mark Littlewood of the Institute of Economic Affairs.

Who is this right-wing, free-marketeer thatcherite arsewipe? He's just been on Newsnight arguing for the abolition of the minimum wage. He boasted of being in the country's top 5% earners then said that the company he runs can't afford to pay its workers more than the minimum wage. I have the same opinion of him as Wiggo has of doper-doubters.

+1

It's not often I shout, "Shut up you cunt" at the tele.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 13, 2012, 12:56:31 pm
While on the subject of right-wing free-marketeers, I should like to nominate for Super-Twat status the entire Adam Smith Institute.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 13, 2012, 02:30:02 pm
And there was me thinking all this time that ASI stood for Absolute Supertwats Indeed.

Tchah!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on July 13, 2012, 04:38:55 pm
Here's an apolitical nomination for a change - the door-to-door chugger who knocked on my front door with today's TdF stage at a critical juncture.

Good thing I finally made him take the hint before the breakaways hit 2km to go...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 17, 2012, 01:29:00 am
Niall Ferguson, Professor of Sophistry, for his attitude to those who are so wilfully stupid as to dare to disagree with him.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on July 22, 2012, 02:29:59 pm
Here's an apolitical nomination for a change - the door-to-door chugger who knocked on my front door with today's TdF stage at a critical juncture.

Good thing I finally made him take the hint before the breakaways hit 2km to go...
Why answer the door
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 22, 2012, 04:25:24 pm
Sebastian Coe.

Again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 22, 2012, 07:43:45 pm
Lesley Garrett.  Sorry love, I'm sure you're a nice person but that was appalling.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 22, 2012, 07:52:45 pm
Theresa May.  Foul and evil-hearted mendacious witch.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on July 22, 2012, 11:26:37 pm
Lesley Garrett.  Sorry love, I'm sure you're a nice person but that was appalling.

Wiggo's face was a picture - he looked badly in need of some mind-bleach. (http://twitter.com/TelegraphSport/status/227081999691706369/photo/1/large)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on July 25, 2012, 07:16:01 pm
Surrey roadies - which part of "no you can't ride down Box Hill today" don't you understand?  ::-)

http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/534086/box-hill-closed-after-local-riders-give-security-the-slip.html

Quote
The National Trust and LOCOG security had to shut Box Hill today after some leisure cyclists verbally abused security guards who had tried to stop them riding down the road.

A one-way system was enforced in the morning so that national teams and local cyclists could enjoy riding up the road, free of all traffic except some service vehicles working on the venue. But just after midday the road was closed completely leaving Tom Boonen and Philippe Gilbert stuck at the bottom having only ridden a couple of laps.

Pillocks...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: +paul on July 25, 2012, 08:03:56 pm
Lesley Garrett.  Sorry love, I'm sure you're a nice person but that was appalling.

Wiggo's face was a picture - he looked badly in need of some mind-bleach. (http://twitter.com/TelegraphSport/status/227081999691706369/photo/1/large)

Great photo!  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 26, 2012, 11:18:31 am
Philip Tartaglia (http://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/world/2012/jul/25/archbishop-of-glasgow-gay-mp)

Disgusting.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 19, 2012, 06:52:22 pm
William Hague. 

Elder statesman, master tactician, political genius.

All these are descriptions which do not come close to describing his astonishing abilities.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: madcow on August 28, 2012, 10:24:16 pm
Tim Yeo- for reducing transport planning to a name calling game.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 28, 2012, 10:47:46 pm
Formerly Environment Minister, current Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee, FFS, as well as an adulterer, of course.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: madcow on August 29, 2012, 08:47:28 am
I forgot the Climate change bit of his current job.
So he is Chair of Climate change committee which suggests that he accepts climate change as a real event not just a conspiracy theory, and he wants to encourage more air travel.
Hypocrit as well as Super twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 31, 2012, 08:12:44 pm
Edwina Currie. She's currently on Any Questions. Somebody's been looking under stones!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 04, 2012, 08:48:06 am
Michael Nazir-Ali.  Hasn't he got anything better to do with his time?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on September 10, 2012, 10:51:36 am
No.1 Son.

Next time, follow advice about arrival time at the airport. You won't then miss check in and have to pay $170 for the pleasure of being allowed to fly home 24 hours late ::-)

Supertwat of my own making :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on September 10, 2012, 11:48:29 am
Jeremy Hunt...  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 10, 2012, 03:55:14 pm
You can repeat that one every day until he is replaced.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: madcow on September 10, 2012, 05:43:06 pm
+1.  Cameron has missed a chance to improve his Cabinet , and promoting Hunt is an own goal, IMO.
Hunt is not fit to be in the cabinet, let alone in charge of the NHS. His job will be  to put a positive PR spin on the changes.
With hindsight,  Lansley was probably too honest and to nice for the job.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: slohill on September 10, 2012, 06:09:37 pm
With hindsight,  Lansley was probably too honest and to nice for the job.
And just possibly incompetent!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on January 10, 2013, 08:18:28 pm
Quentin Tarantino
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: gibbo on January 10, 2013, 09:01:50 pm
Terry Wogan
Clare Balding
Nicky Campbell
+ numerous others.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wobbly John on January 10, 2013, 09:53:27 pm
James Delingpole. >:(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on January 10, 2013, 11:02:56 pm
Sorry, but that's wrong. There are categories below (as in worse than) super-twat, & he belongs in one of them.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 11, 2013, 09:37:37 am
Michael Gove (again)

For wanting to remove all mention of Mary Seacole from the curriculum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Seacole).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on January 11, 2013, 12:53:27 pm
Michael Gove (again)

For wanting to remove all mention of Mary Seacole from the curriculum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Seacole).

This is the perfect example of a campaign whipped up by the media over something that wasn't planned or proposed anyway.  All the articles published about this reference each other - the Independent quotes Operation Black Vote, who quote The Voice, who quote the Guardian, whose article is written by someone from Operation Black Vote (and so it goes on) - and not one has produced any evidence of proposals to remove Mary Seacole from the curriculum.

There has never been any plan by the Department for Education to "remove Mary Seacole from the curriculum", as the DfE does not get involved in dictating which individuals are covered in subjects.  DfE defines which areas will be covered, which will include subjects such as the abolition of slavery and the suffragettes.

(We were discussing this at the equality leads meeting yesterday.  One of the people at the meeting is linked with the Mary Seacole Centre and has some interesting insights).

Doesn't mean that Gove isn't a super-twat - but let's give him that accolade for what he has actually done or said...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on January 11, 2013, 01:01:00 pm
James Delingpole. >:(
Sorry, but that's wrong. There are categories below (as in worse than) super-twat, & he belongs in one of them.

Agreed. On both counts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on January 29, 2013, 12:38:12 pm
Martin Clunes

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2013/jan/29/martin-clunes-road-rage-media-monkey
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on January 29, 2013, 01:11:44 pm
Martin Clunes

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2013/jan/29/martin-clunes-road-rage-media-monkey

ISTR Vic Reeves was dropped for the same reason.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on January 29, 2013, 01:28:21 pm
Wasn't that drink driving?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on January 29, 2013, 01:35:18 pm
Harold Hewitt
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on January 29, 2013, 03:54:59 pm
Wasn't that drink driving?

Yes.  Duh.  Didn't read the Clunes article article closely enough coz he's a big-=eared super-twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 29, 2013, 04:58:14 pm
Harold Hewitt

You might need to expand on that one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on January 29, 2013, 05:09:12 pm
Google James Hewitt and see the results...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 29, 2013, 05:16:45 pm
Ah yes.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on January 29, 2013, 05:22:14 pm
In that case, ITYM Henry Hewitt.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on January 29, 2013, 06:28:47 pm
Ah yes, I believe I do.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 11, 2013, 06:42:06 pm
http://m.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/mar/11/tories-reverse-socialist-coup-liam-fox

Dr. Liam Fox, far-right twunt who wasted taxpayers' money by taking his "friend" to junkets.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on March 11, 2013, 06:51:03 pm
Ray Winstone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ferret on March 11, 2013, 07:37:52 pm
1st minister for Wales carwyn jones mega super twat
Russell Brand
Jonathan Ross
99% of all football players
that'll do for now:)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Marco Stefano on March 14, 2013, 05:42:57 pm
Any bloody apologists for Chris Huhne & Vicky Pryce.

Oh, and Chris Huhne & Vicky Pryce.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Littlesox on March 14, 2013, 09:56:38 pm
Any Premiereship footballer that :

Takes drugs/drink drives/crashes a Bentley/roasts a girl in a hotel with his mates/racially abuses another player/wears bling/wears anything that resembles rap threads/gets sent off/releases a chart single/beats up his girlfriend/writes his life story at the age of 20/refuses to play for his club/resigns from international duty at the age of 26/misses training and worst of all. treats Cheryl Cole like dirt.

(I think that's about most of them then).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Littlesox on March 16, 2013, 06:28:37 am
Jonathon bloody Ross

How has me managed to weasle his way back into the BBC after the Andrew Sachs affair ?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wascally Weasel on March 16, 2013, 07:29:41 am
Piers Morgan.  A million deaths were not enough for Yueh Morgan.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on March 16, 2013, 12:03:14 pm
Jonathon bloody Ross

How has me managed to weasle his way back into the BBC after the Andrew Sachs affair ?

because the BBC are an organisation with low morale fibre.

Next up will be Andy Gray&his'oppo om MotD doing post match critique of referee & linesmens performance :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Littlesox on March 16, 2013, 05:44:17 pm
The bloody idiot in the black Audi convertible on the A49 in Hadnall today that decided to overtake the cars overtaking me cycling when there were cyclists coming in the other direction.

4 a breast on an A road, cyslists on both outsides and this knob comes through the middle well in excess of the village 40 mph speed limit.

Not much room for error, or a pot-hole wobble

I couldn't get his number or I would have reported him to the Police.

TWAT of the highest order
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on March 17, 2013, 04:46:48 pm
Giles Coren.

http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/esmagazine/giles-corens-my-london-8532950.html

Quote
What’s your biggest extravagance?

Traffic fines. London is my city and I will drive where I like in it: down Oxford St, pedestrian zones, bus lanes, right turns regardless of signs, wrong way down one-ways, then I park and walk, and if they tow me I think of it as valet parking. Then sometimes you get a letter with a little photo of yourself in your car doing something naughty and they want £80. But mostly you get away with it.

Knob-end.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 04, 2013, 06:43:55 pm
Has anyone nominated Gorgeous "George" Osborne yet? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on April 04, 2013, 07:35:57 pm
I think he was given a lifetime's achievement award by page 2 of this thread.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 04, 2013, 09:48:47 pm
I think he was given a lifetime's achievement award by page 2 of this thread.

because I'm a sad bastard, I've checked; he wasn't.

But he has now!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on April 04, 2013, 10:20:17 pm
I think his twattishness was taken as given, without any need for it to be made explicit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on April 14, 2013, 10:41:46 pm
John Sweeney
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 14, 2013, 10:47:09 pm
David bloody lying Mellor!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on April 14, 2013, 10:49:48 pm
The BBC for political censorship.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 14, 2013, 10:50:56 pm
That.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on April 14, 2013, 10:57:10 pm
David bloody lying Mellor!

Always a safe choice, but has he done something specific?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on April 14, 2013, 10:59:56 pm
David bloody lying Mellor!

Always a safe choice, but has he done something specific?

He's a Tory - as far as forum political orthodoxy goes, just existing is probably more than enough.  ;)

As a break from the party-political nominations, may I commend Justin Bieber for a lifetime uber-twat award?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22146859
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on April 15, 2013, 06:33:50 am
Have we had Harry Styles yet?  Described by Charlie Brooker as "git-haired One Direction sex minnow".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/14/thatcher-ding-dong-bbc-charlie-brooker
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 15, 2013, 07:02:25 am
David bloody lying Mellor!

Always a safe choice, but has he done something specific?

He repeated the lies about Hillsborough, asserting them as fact.  Blaming drunken fans (as the late, unlamented Irvine Patnick MP did) against all the evidence in the report of the Commission is just sickening.

So not a party political nomination at all.  More a question of common decency.

Mind you, since it was the Tories who started spreading the lies, and reinforced them, Bernard Ingham and the sainted Margaret included, and attempted to quash the protests of such as IIRC Chris Mullin and others (more to the left than the right) who sought the truth, it seems to have been made a partisan issue by the liars in the Tory party and the Murdoch press, and Mellor continues that shameful tradition.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on April 15, 2013, 07:33:34 pm
Grant fucking Shapps again  :hand: :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on April 15, 2013, 08:04:13 pm
And now fucking yadda yadda Gove  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on April 23, 2013, 07:04:43 pm
Have we had Andrew Lloyd-fucking-Webber yet, the donkey dong who permanently looks like he's about to stick up your local branch of $BANK with a sawn-off and a stocking over his head before making off in a Mark 2 Jag, only to be apprehended by DI Regan, DS Carter and assorted hardcases shouting "Don't, Guv, 'ee's not wurf it!"?

And also that twat in the UKIP party election broadcast.  Twat.  No, the beardy speccy one1, not the rather cute, if clearly deranged. blonde</sexist_oinker>

I have, as you may have guessed, got a bit of a snot on tonight...

1 - Before anyone  rushes in with accusations of beardism, specism, etc., I should point out that I possess both :D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on April 25, 2013, 11:52:05 am
I'll see you a Lloyd-Webber & raise you an Alan Twatmarsh. For no other reason than he exists.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on April 25, 2013, 11:58:27 am
Gyles Brandreth, obv.

I'm listening to his Wordaholics programme on iplayer at the moment. I only have myself to blame.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on April 25, 2013, 12:33:34 pm
Gyles Brandreth, obv.

I'm listening to his Wordaholics programme on iplayer at the moment. I only have myself to blame.

+1.  Christ, he was annoying on HIGNFY the other day.  Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on April 26, 2013, 10:14:24 pm
Peter Burkinshaw (http://road.cc/content/news/81887-ukip-cambridge-candidate-if-everybody-cycled-there-would-be-no-roads-ride)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on April 26, 2013, 11:03:03 pm
Katie Hopkins  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on April 29, 2013, 08:33:27 pm
Katie Hopkins  :sick:

Have you seen her Wiki entry (if you pardon the expression)?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Hopkins:
Quote
Katie Hopkins (born 31 May 1975) is a British reality television contestant, homewrecker, businesswoman, and journalist, best known for her 2007 appearance on the third UK series of TV reality programme The Apprentice, in which contestants compete for a £100,000-a-year job working for British businessman Sir Alan Sugar.

;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 29, 2013, 08:35:12 pm
I had to look her up.  Still baffled as to what she is for.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on April 29, 2013, 08:39:37 pm
Katie Hopkins is for TV producers when they want a young-ish old-fashioned right-winger.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 05, 2013, 09:57:23 am
Niall Ferguson.  Even before the latest furore, he was a super-twat, and wrong about almost everything.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 06, 2013, 08:36:19 pm
I had to look her up.  Still baffled as to what she is for.
I thought she'd vanished into the "where are they now" file.   Once famously described as a "horsy-faced (sic) sex fiend".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: David Martin on May 06, 2013, 08:47:43 pm
Niall Ferguson.  Even before the latest furore, he was a super-test, and wrong about almost everything.

I thought his book on the Dundee and Newtyle railway was regarded as the closest thing to a definitive work one is likely to get. Or is that a different Niall Ferguson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on May 07, 2013, 09:11:15 am
Cody Wilson.

What an utter dick.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 07, 2013, 09:26:20 am
*Googles*

Yup.  Supertwat and utter dick.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Adrian on May 07, 2013, 10:34:57 pm
*Googles*

Yup.  Supertwat and utter dick.

Doesn't Google. Takes Clarion's word for it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 09, 2013, 01:12:15 pm
Nigel Lawson.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 09, 2013, 06:40:50 pm
Has Bono appeared in here yet?  I had a quick shufti but couldn't find the sanctimonious hyper-twat...

Norman Lamont.  Less badgery these days but still a high-end tub of cuntspam.

Boris Johnson.  Can't be repeated often enough.  Clowning around on horseback while wearing his bike h+lm+t is all very well, but if the mega-twat ever gets to be leader of the Daily Mail Party then most of this community will be in the camps by the following Christmas.

The Manchester Eyebrow Monsters aka Liam & Noel Gallagher.  Because they're twats.

My Kindle.  Come out of hiding, you utterly twatty electric dope!

LloydsTSB.  Making people move to fucking Chelmsford.  Twats.

Bad mood again...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Graymee on May 11, 2013, 12:22:06 pm
Anyone and everyone with any connection whatsoever with TOWIE, made in Chelsea or similar "Reality TV" shows.
I don't watch them, I've had the misfortune to see too many trailers for them.

Multiple Super Twats.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on May 11, 2013, 12:32:14 pm
Any Cleveland police force I have ever heard of:

Police Visit Cleveland Horror House Many Times, Fail to Note Horrors (http://jezebel.com/police-visit-cleveland-house-of-horrors-several-times-494824408)

Cleveland Police in huge damages payout to lawyer (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22452157)

Quote
The force admits falsely imprisoning Mr Watson and his family when the lawyer was arrested in 2009, wrongful interference with his belongings and trespass.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 20, 2013, 06:23:39 pm
The 'aggressive' Gerald Haworth MP
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Littlesox on May 20, 2013, 06:31:17 pm
The Slovakian truck driver that brushed past me on the A49 today.

Was only inches away from me.

Nothing coming the other way - could have given me loads more room.

Probably watching porn on his lap-top whilst driving (not unheard of).

What's Slovakian for Twat ?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on May 20, 2013, 07:01:43 pm
The 'aggressive' Gerald Haworth MP

Is this the Supertwat who I heard briefly on the radio referring to the aggressive homosexual community, or something?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 20, 2013, 08:44:28 pm
Aye.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on May 20, 2013, 09:24:49 pm
He's totally misunderstood the term "gay bashing" hasn't he?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 21, 2013, 06:54:20 am
He's totally misunderstood just about everything.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on May 21, 2013, 09:06:44 pm
Tim Cook.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/21/apple-wants-single-digit-corporate-tax
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on May 23, 2013, 11:35:43 am
Tim Cook.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/21/apple-wants-single-digit-corporate-tax
We've seen invasions driven by the desire to control the production of oil. I wonder how long before 'military intervention' is driven by the desire to chase missing tax revenues?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on June 24, 2013, 09:29:40 pm
Boris fucktard Johnson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: David Martin on June 24, 2013, 10:55:08 pm
Have you ever seen Boris Johnson and Donald trump in the same place? Just saying, like..
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on July 08, 2013, 06:02:37 pm
Gove - utter utter  twat
CMD - Murray deserves a knighthood , really? Twat!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 08, 2013, 07:28:12 pm
Katie rentagob homewrecker face like a horse's arse Hopkins.  No, dear, of course "India" isn't a chavvy location-based child's name like Brooklyn.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/katie-hopkins-branded-an-insufferable-snob-after-this-morning-debate-on-childrens-names-8690468.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 25, 2013, 08:44:20 pm
As I'm depressingly predictable, I would like to nominate Danny Alexander again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2013, 09:58:21 pm
Lynton Crosby seems to be creating a new category of Mega-twat right now.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on July 25, 2013, 09:59:09 pm
Raise you giga ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2013, 10:03:06 pm
Fair.  Very fair.

But RJ never lobbied me on the issue. ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on July 25, 2013, 10:05:04 pm
No need - clarion's vote was safely in the bag already  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on July 25, 2013, 10:38:30 pm
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Greenbank on July 26, 2013, 01:15:21 am
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Speaking of Wonga.

Papiss Cisse.

Classy.

For those that don't know; he refused to go on a club tour wearing a football shirt with the sponsor "Wonga" because he claims that, as a Muslim, he's against gambling and shouldn't be seen promoting it.

Fair enough.

Photos of him then surface of him at a casino gambling. Oh....he's a regular. Oh.

Funnily enough; it's "resolved" now: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23455637

Wonderfully understated BBC article.

Here's the other bit (also on the BBC):- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-23424012
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 26, 2013, 07:30:44 am
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Strictly speaking they don't invest in Wonga.  They invest in a capital fund which has provided funding to Wonga.

It's almost impossible to invest totally 'ethically' and good on the C of E for at least trying.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on July 26, 2013, 08:21:24 am
But Wonga are Super-Jizzbadgers though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 26, 2013, 08:22:37 am
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Strictly speaking they don't invest in Wonga.  They invest in a capital fund which has provided funding to Wonga.

It's almost impossible to invest totally 'ethically' and good on the C of E for at least trying.
I thought that too. There is no what the archbishop could have known.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on July 26, 2013, 08:31:08 am
Paul "Vagina Monologue" Dacre.

And another vote for the Rt Hon Jeremy mis-spelled surname MP
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 30, 2013, 09:36:21 am
Astonishingly, Eric Pickles seems to have avoided mention in this thread for a year or so.

Not sure how.

But now, in an attempt to re-assert his pre-eminent supertwattery in a constellation of supertwats, he has put forward a proposal aimed securely at the shopkeeper and motorist vote, which has been instantly rejected by a Transport Minister, all the major motoring organisations, shopkeepers, and even minor supertwat and professionally obnoxious controversialist Quentin Willson! 

Good shot, sir!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on July 30, 2013, 04:48:32 pm
Have you ever seen Boris Johnson and Donald trump in the same place? Just saying, like..

No, but if I ever do, I'll call in an immediate Air Strike.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on July 30, 2013, 10:57:04 pm
Toby Young - the thinking man's twat. On Newsnight now.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on July 31, 2013, 09:39:14 pm
+1 to that ^^^
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 07, 2013, 04:43:30 pm
Godfrey Bloom.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 07, 2013, 04:48:30 pm
I knew what name would be added before I opened the thread. ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 08, 2013, 09:24:47 am
Given the epithets directed at him, should we refer to him as "Private" Godfrey?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on August 08, 2013, 09:52:45 am
Those not subscribing to POBI will have missed the other epithet bestowed, though it's anatomically equivalent.

Can I repeat myself? Pretty please? Can I? Can I?
He promised to write to the ambassador of Bongo-Bongo land to apologise personally, if anybody was offended.

Quote from: me on Twitter
What a cunt @GoddersUKIP is. And if anyone's offended by that I promise to write to his cunt and apologise to it personally. #r4today (https://twitter.com/htfb/status/365005522824474625)

Yes, that's three repetitions for one joke. I've got to write a best man's speech, too. You can guess it's not going well.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 09, 2013, 12:24:22 am
Those not subscribing to POBI will have missed the other epithet bestowed, though it's anatomically equivalent.

Can I repeat myself? Pretty please? Can I? Can I?
He promised to write to the ambassador of Bongo-Bongo land to apologise personally, if anybody was offended.

Quote from: me on Twitter
What a cunt @GoddersUKIP is. And if anyone's offended by that I promise to write to his cunt and apologise to it personally. #r4today (https://twitter.com/htfb/status/365005522824474625)

Yes, that's three repetitions for one joke. I've got to write a best man's speech, too. You can guess it's not going well.


Thanks for the clarification. i had misremembered that not everyone reads POBI. And you may repeat yourself as much as you like: I do. Go ahead, repeat yourself.

Good luck wiht the speech.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on August 28, 2013, 06:53:25 pm
Jamie Oliver - slavedriving super-twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 28, 2013, 07:06:41 pm
Jamie Oliver - slavedriving super-twat.
One of the above words is redundant ... or could be replaced with 'Mockney'
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 28, 2013, 07:08:36 pm
Godfrey Bloom.
Hie thee to the York Press website and check out some of his letters.

And the responses to same ;)

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 28, 2013, 07:11:41 pm
William 'Bomber' Hague
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 28, 2013, 07:18:05 pm
William 'Bomber' Hague
Ah, Wee Willie Winkie.

Someone wants to put the odious little scrote on a C130 and boot him out over Damascus ... although part of me thinks that not even a psychotic fuckwit like Bashar al-Assad deserves that
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: The_Mikey on August 28, 2013, 08:15:31 pm
This thread is largely beyond me.

I have ignored the meeja for so long that I no longer know who anyone is.

OK, I know Humphrys and recognise a few of the other names, but the vast majority have passed me by completely.

Am I on my way to nirvana?

I am much the same, I recognise a few names but largely I don't know who anyone is these days, not even Hollywood types.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Basil on August 28, 2013, 08:38:30 pm
Oh good, not just me then.
I used to sometimes Google the names, but when I read the result I found that I just didn't care anyway.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 02, 2013, 02:28:38 pm
Jamie Oliver - slavedriving super-twat.

Jamie Oliver.
For deciding to support UKIP. For producing 'Save with Jamie', a cookery book for saving money.
   
Jamie, you little twerp, people who are really short of money don't have fillet steak and teriyaki sauce.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 02, 2013, 03:11:38 pm
And for talking crap on Womans Hour this morning.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on September 02, 2013, 03:15:15 pm
And for talking crap on Womans Hour this morning.

So I wasn't the only one thinking he was talking petit baulleux
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 02, 2013, 03:16:11 pm
His rant about the outrageous allegations of misogyny against 'the ladies' was priceless.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: her_welshness on September 02, 2013, 03:58:33 pm
The Alliance of British Drivers (@ABD) - collective group of twats.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on September 03, 2013, 12:25:38 am
Jamie Oliver - slavedriving super-twat.

Jamie Oliver.
For deciding to support UKIP. For producing 'Save with Jamie', a cookery book for saving money.
   
Jamie, you little twerp, people who are really short of money don't have fillet steak and teriyaki sauce.
A £26 cookery book for saving money . . . using £360 of equipment, & £150 of food 'staples' . . .
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 03, 2013, 12:38:03 am
Jamie Oliver's shows are free to watch and he's doing meals for less than £1.80 per head.

I wonder if he'd get so much stick if he looked and sounded different?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CrinklyLion on September 03, 2013, 07:51:02 am
We always have beanzontoast Monday round here.  Because Monday is a rush, and it's quick.  It is probably the EldestCub's least favourite of the meals we commonly eat.  The argument that wins him over every time is that it feeds _all_ of us for £1.80....

My mate who is also a single parent of 2 had a grocery budget of about 40 quid a week for a while.  £1.80 a head for evening meals would have left her less than a fiver for all other meals, cleaning stuff, bog roll etc....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on September 03, 2013, 08:39:56 am
Jamie Oliver's shows are free to watch and he's doing meals for less than £1.80 per head.

I wonder if he'd get so much stick if he looked and sounded different?

Seriously, people don't get that Jamie Oliver isn't producing a book for actual poor people, but rather the middle-class-but-go-Lidl-and-tell-people-about-it demographic? If you're living off ready meals and fried ratchicken, I expect you're not in often found browsing the book aisle in Waitrose for Jamie's latest.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on September 03, 2013, 12:07:23 pm
No, but you're watching his cooking programmes on the telly while you eat, which is why he's now so fabulously wealthy and with a pulpit to sound off from.

It's probably one of those absurdly big-screen TVs, too. If you want a new 40" TV this week it's £249 from Tesco (or anywhere online). Second-hand the going rate for 40"-42" is £150. Counting the licence if the box only lasts a year that's entertainment for the whole family for a pound a day, which wouldn't upgrade you very far from value chicken. And then you can spend the evenings staring at a blank wall.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 03, 2013, 12:11:22 pm
His chain of restaurants is mind-bogglingly-large. His company (mostly) owns the entire supply chain, from farms upwards.
The York restaurant cost 600k for the kitchens alone. That cost is recouped in about 12 weeks. Staff are paid a bit above minimum wage and mostly on zero-hours contracts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 03, 2013, 02:05:41 pm
I once spent a New Year's eve in a very right-on lesbian household (don't ask) eating veggie stuff from one of Mr Oliver's books.

It was shite.  I've never liked him since.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on September 03, 2013, 02:07:47 pm
His (and Jules') children's names might not pass the playground test.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CrinklyLion on September 03, 2013, 02:40:49 pm
Seriously, people don't get that Jamie Oliver isn't producing a book for actual poor people, but rather the middle-class-but-go-Lidl-and-tell-people-about-it demographic? If you're living off ready meals and fried ratchicken, I expect you're not in often found browsing the book aisle in Waitrose for Jamie's latest.


Yes. I'm a skint, benefits-dependant but middle-class Aldi fan, and of course I get that I'm his target market.

I'd just rather that he didn't line up The Poor as entertainment and pronounce judgementally, Daily-Wail-stylee, about flatscreen tellies in order to promote his stuff to me. 

Smug Victorian-paternalistic patronising nonsense.  Which is what makes him a super-[insert-gender-neutral-insult-of-choice-here*].


*ever since someone otp pointed out on a thread that using twat and cunt as insults is effectively comparing the insultee to a warm and welcoming part of the female anatomy, or words to that effect, I just can't see them in the same light.  They just don't _work_ as an insult for me these days :D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 03, 2013, 02:53:10 pm
These days I'm working on introducing 'frack' as a replacement

'frack off'
'fracking awful'
'you really are a dreadful frack'
'Jamie Oliver; what a fracking frack'

Such a versatile word.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on September 03, 2013, 02:54:39 pm
Twat 'em all, let Cowell sort them out... :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on September 03, 2013, 03:10:55 pm
These days I'm working on introducing 'frack' as a replacement

'frack off'
'fracking awful'
'you really are a dreadful frack'
'Jamie Oliver; what a fracking frack'

Such a versatile word.

From which of The 12 do you hail Sir?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 03, 2013, 03:49:45 pm
Battlestar Galactica got there before you, Fuzzy, you fracking ignoramus ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on September 03, 2013, 03:52:44 pm
One of the bands that I follow on BookFace posted a pic at the weekend of a band member and said idiot Essex boy at a festival somewhere down south (I think it was Brownstock).

A strange reversal of role in the picture, said band member looked like the bored 'sleb*, J.O. looked like the starry eyed fan-boy.

*Said band are not a big band, no hit singles, although they have had a number greater than zero of their singles as record of the week on Radio 1**
**If you like to use that as a measure of a bands popularity/ability
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on September 03, 2013, 06:15:29 pm
Seriously, people don't get that Jamie Oliver isn't producing a book for actual poor people, but rather the middle-class-but-go-Lidl-and-tell-people-about-it demographic? If you're living off ready meals and fried ratchicken, I expect you're not in often found browsing the book aisle in Waitrose for Jamie's latest.


Yes. I'm a skint, benefits-dependant but middle-class Aldi fan, and of course I get that I'm his target market.

Except that makes you not his market. The Jamie Oliver brand wants affluent middle-class folk who can pony up the cash for whatever he's selling this week. The admiration or disdain of skint people whatever their class probably isn't much use to him other than as publicity for his latest televisual adventure. And surely as the sun is a big yellow thing that you shouldn't stare at, he'll be wheeled out on telly to flap his mouth whenever he's got something to promote. He is the brand, after all, and it's that brand that sells, otherwise it wouldn't be a Jamie Oliver saucepan, it'd just be a saucepan. Who knows, downstream there maybe money in a JO TV that farts out tasty and nutritious falafel at regular intervals for the delight of the more discerning poor.

Do a lot of poor people eat badly? I expect so. Do they care what Jamie Oliver thinks about their diet? I expect not. I think the only people who get hot and bothered by his opinions are middle-class people. I'm not expecting a line of angst-stricken teens outside the Morley's at the top of my street later, suspended outside the door as  they existentially debate 'what would Jamie think?' or 'shall I ask for mange-tout as a side?'. Oh, I know, there's that Loachian view of poverty as being a state of strange austere virtue.

He gets a lot of stick, but he seems like a decent and successful bloke. Sure, it's the British way to knock our successes, we seem to get a odd kick out of it. Of course he's out of touch, he's probably rich enough to get helicoptered to the toilet to dispose of falafelly excess and has a man to polish his aubergines to retina-burning lustre. That's no bad thing. A man who polishes his own aubergines is no man at all. Fuck it, I'm not even going in the kitchen without the support of my robot (JO branded) butler and the full logistical support of the entire Waitrose chain.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on September 03, 2013, 06:24:02 pm
His chain of restaurants is mind-bogglingly-large. His company (mostly) owns the entire supply chain, from farms upwards.
The York restaurant cost 600k for the kitchens alone. That cost is recouped in about 12 weeks. Staff are paid a bit above minimum wage and mostly on zero-hours contracts.

And the service is poor and the food overpriced and mediocre in my experience
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 03, 2013, 06:38:10 pm
And to think it all started because he was marginally less repulsive than AWT and had "naked" in the title of his programme, so lots of impressionable women tuned in hoping to see his hot buns and jumbo sausage,  Pukka.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CrinklyLion on September 03, 2013, 07:01:54 pm
Except that makes you not his market.

Well.... I do own three, I think, of his cook books.  Someone once bought me the utterly pointless 'flavour shaker' gizmo once.  Quite enjoyed some of his broadcasts, when I used to watch telly.  Thought the school dinners campaign, on the whole, was a good thing.  And, acksherly, I've seen an difference in primary school dinners since all that hoo ha.  Not least because the prices have gone up, quite a bit, because the ingredient cost has.  Guess what - it's much easier to make nourishing food with a few more pennies in the pot.  Who'd a thunk it.

But...
Quote
The Jamie Oliver brand wants affluent middle-class folk who can pony up the cash for whatever he's selling this week. The admiration or disdain of skint people whatever their class probably isn't much use to him other than as publicity for his latest televisual adventure. And surely as the sun is a big yellow thing that you shouldn't stare at, he'll be wheeled out on telly to flap his mouth whenever he's got something to promote. He is the brand, after all, and it's that brand that sells, otherwise it wouldn't be a Jamie Oliver saucepan, it'd just be a saucepan. Who knows, downstream there maybe money in a JO TV that farts out tasty and nutritious falafel at regular intervals for the delight of the more discerning poor.
That is the obnoxious thing.  It's not about knocking success and it's not about whether the people he is talking about give a flying fuck what he thinks.  His judgemental inaccurate bollocks is indeed a marketing tool.  And yet contributes to the drip drip drip of falafel-scented media shite, to mix one's metaphors, that I reckon actually makes a difference to our society.  Which makes him a pissweasel.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on September 03, 2013, 09:33:33 pm
Or he's genuinely passionate about teaching people how to cook and get better quality for money, while he happens to make money from what he enjoys.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 04, 2013, 11:32:30 am
Or he's genuinely passionate about teaching people how to cook and get better quality for money, while he happens to make money from what he enjoys.
He still supports UKIP
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on September 04, 2013, 01:00:02 pm
Are we talking about the Jamie Oliver who says poor people should shop at local markets, many of which have been forced out of existence by the supermarkets who sell the ready meals he designed and says people shouldn't eat?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on September 04, 2013, 01:06:22 pm
Are we talking about the Jamie Oliver who says poor people should shop at local markets, many of which have been forced out of existence by the supermarkets who sell the ready meals he designed and says people shouldn't eat?

That'll be the one
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 04, 2013, 05:30:43 pm
Appropriate initials.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on September 05, 2013, 12:51:31 pm
Battlestar Galactica got there before you, Fuzzy, you fracking ignoramus ;D

You calling me an ignoramus you fracking toaster?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 06, 2013, 09:14:35 pm
Liam twatbadger Fox (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24420681)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 06, 2013, 09:21:45 pm
Or he's genuinely passionate about teaching people how to cook and get better quality for money, while he happens to make money from what he enjoys.
He still supports UKIP
And he's still a Mockney twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 09, 2013, 02:19:10 pm
Owen 'Badgers Moved The Goalposts' Paterson  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 09, 2013, 08:46:57 pm
Owen 'Badgers Moved The Goalposts' Paterson  :facepalm:

He was on C4 News tonight - what an odious piece of cloaca effluent he is  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on October 09, 2013, 08:56:42 pm
Mark Constantine, founder of Lush. The man is pure evil.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 09, 2013, 10:05:03 pm
Is he?  I had the impression (possibly carefully cultivated) that the Constantines were progressive, campaigning folk, against animal testing etc.

I'm interested to hear what you know about him.  Other than that he owns shops which make me sneeze badly whenever I go near.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Biggsy on October 10, 2013, 01:57:39 pm
He nicked the name "Lush" from one of my favourite bands (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lush_%28band%29).  Just that puts him in my bad book.  :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 10, 2013, 02:00:26 pm
Owen "Gas them" Paterson

I know who should be gassed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 10, 2013, 02:02:05 pm
Owen "Gas them" Paterson

I know who should be gassed.
http://toys.usvsth3m.com/owen-patersons-badger-penalty-shootout/

You kids have fun, now ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 27, 2013, 05:35:35 pm
Grant Shapps again  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 27, 2013, 08:04:08 pm
Do you mean Michael Green? ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 27, 2013, 09:25:22 pm
Who knows  ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on October 27, 2013, 10:37:38 pm
Glad to see somebody beat me to it again. Who does he think he is?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 29, 2013, 02:03:21 pm
Roads Minister Robert Goodwill (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/26-billion-expected-taxpayers-savings-from-road-agency-reforms)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 08, 2013, 11:25:19 am
Paul Massara (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24861448) (or indeed any other chief robbing bastardCEO of the energy cartel)

There's nothing gimmicky about fuel poverty you smug, arrogant fucker.

Despite being an avowed pacifist I'd quite happily plant my fist in his face.
Repeatedly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 08, 2013, 11:26:47 am
Peter Bone
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: kombokim on November 10, 2013, 07:18:58 pm
1. The entire cast of Eastenders
2. The entire cast of Coronation Street.

Is that too many?
I'm sure I could just go on and on. Chris Evans = Super Twat
Can I nominate myself?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on November 10, 2013, 07:30:25 pm
Nadhim Zahawi.

Will these fucking greedy, self-serving cunts never learn?   >:(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 10, 2013, 08:30:27 pm
Dermot O'Leary and his tight suits. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 13, 2013, 06:12:15 pm
Edward 'I want a scapegoat' Timpson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 13, 2013, 09:50:44 pm
Can I nominate fraudster Grant Green or Michael Shapps again?

http://blogs.channel4.com/michael-crick-on-politics/constitute-offence-fraud-police-drop-case-shapps/3588
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 26, 2013, 01:46:50 pm
Godfrey Bloom
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 26, 2013, 01:51:37 pm
Godfrey Bloom
On behalf of the people of Yorkshire and the Humber with two braincells to clash together, can I just say that we're really, really sorry?

Meanwhile, I will nominate the following:

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on November 26, 2013, 02:00:08 pm
John Major. Yes, I know he's been stirring things up in a sort-of good way recently, but I just discovered that he refused to grant pardons in 1993 for the 300+ "cowards" who were executed in WW1.

And he shagged Edwina Currie.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2013, 02:03:28 pm
Godfrey Bloom

Again?  What's he done this time?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 26, 2013, 02:05:46 pm
Godfrey Bloom

Again?  What's he done this time?
He continues to exist, but I suspect Roger may be referring to this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25104611
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on November 26, 2013, 02:10:52 pm
Godfrey Bloom

Again?  What's he done this time?
He continues to exist, but I suspect Roger may be referring to this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25104611

He also recently said some stuff on LBC about eligibility to vote:
Quote
generational unemployed and public sector workers could be banned from voting
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2013, 02:52:58 pm
Godfrey Bloom

Again?  What's he done this time?
He continues to exist, but I suspect Roger may be referring to this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25104611
Oh.  :(

He also recently said some stuff on LBC about eligibility to vote:
Quote
generational unemployed and public sector workers could be banned from voting

Oh. :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 26, 2013, 03:09:16 pm
Too right.  Mega-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2013, 03:10:47 pm
I think Bloom is pioneering a new category.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 26, 2013, 03:13:44 pm
I think Bloom is pioneering a new category.
Blooming twat?

The man is a swivel-eyed lunatic even by the lax standards of UKIP and, judging by his various outbursts, an attention whore of Gaga-esque magnitude.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2013, 03:50:53 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he?  They won't have swivel-eyed lunatics in their party.  Ohhhhh no!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 26, 2013, 03:51:46 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he?  They won't have swivel-eyed lunatics in their party.  Ohhhhh no!
erm, sorry I have to disagree with you.

I'm related to one of them  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 26, 2013, 03:59:02 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he? 
Apparently not.

Quote
They won't have swivel-eyed lunatics in their party.  Ohhhhh no!
Nigel Farage. 'Nuff said - still the UKIP leader and a twat of Bloom-level proportions.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 26, 2013, 07:50:23 pm
Andrew Mitchell.
For the love of god give it a rest already?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 26, 2013, 08:29:36 pm
 Donald "McRug" Trump. It is alleged that he tweeted that climate change is a Chinese plot to impoverish the USA (or words to that effect).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on November 26, 2013, 08:57:26 pm
He is a fucking nutter though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on November 27, 2013, 01:56:24 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he? 
Apparently not.


I thought I recognized the name, and his constituency.

He's the guy who, at the UKIP party conference, called a group of female delegates "Sluts", isn't he?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 27, 2013, 02:15:14 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he? 
Apparently not.


I thought I recognized the name, and his constituency.

He's the guy who, at the UKIP party conference, called a group of female delegates "Sluts", isn't he?
That's the guy.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 27, 2013, 02:23:54 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he? 
Apparently not.


I thought I recognized the name, and his constituency.

He's the guy who, at the UKIP party conference, called a group of female delegates "Sluts", isn't he?

All this and more besides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Bloom
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on November 27, 2013, 02:24:40 pm
Ah, but he isn't UKIP any more, is he? 
Apparently not.


I thought I recognized the name, and his constituency.

He's the guy who, at the UKIP party conference, called a group of female delegates "Sluts", isn't he?

All this and more besides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Bloom

I guess he learnt all that from the "How to be Popular with your Voters 101".

What a dick.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on November 27, 2013, 02:50:01 pm
I think Bloom is pioneering a new category.

I posted this in hatler's thread in vroom, it sort-of wrote itself ..... https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=78136.msg1601181#msg1601181
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 27, 2013, 02:53:09 pm
Worthy of re-posting :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 27, 2013, 06:10:15 pm
Charles Saatchi.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on November 28, 2013, 09:53:47 am
Charles Saatchi.

On so so many levels, not just because of his violence towards the Domestic Goddess....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: nicknack on November 28, 2013, 09:57:17 am
Boris Johnson (again)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 28, 2013, 09:58:52 am
Charles Saatchi.

On so so many levels, not just because of his violence towards the Domestic Goddess....
As I pointed out on Facebork, if I was married to a bell-end like him I'd be wanting to spend my time coked up to the eyeballs too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 28, 2013, 10:30:24 am
Npower (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25135247) with particular emphasis on the smug bastard in charge.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on November 28, 2013, 11:08:21 am
Charles Saatchi.

On so so many levels, not just because of his violence towards the Domestic Goddess....
As I pointed out on Facebork, if I was married to a bell-end like him I'd be wanting to spend my time coked up to the eyeballs too.

I guess all those who wondered how she managed to lose so much weight, so quickly, need wonder no more :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Andrew Br on November 28, 2013, 11:56:32 am

I guess all those who wondered how she managed to lose so much weight, so quickly, need wonder no more :)

As a weight loss programme, it's not to be sniffed at.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 28, 2013, 11:58:21 am
*snort* ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 28, 2013, 11:59:43 am
I tried snorting coke once.

The bubbles made me sneeze ....

.... oh you mean the other sort of coke ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on November 28, 2013, 04:00:30 pm
Phillip Davies. He's also a contender for the title of The Toxic Tory's Toxic Tory.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 05, 2013, 11:53:04 am
Osbo. I wanted to be the first today… he's bound to come out with some horrible loony claptrap.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on December 20, 2013, 02:16:31 pm
The Ugandan Parliament, with particular emphasis on the MP  David Bahati (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25463942 refers) - remind me, what century is this?  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on January 04, 2014, 01:44:18 pm
Owen Paterson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on January 05, 2014, 02:34:38 pm
Michael Gove - http://www.newstatesman.com/media-mole/2014/01/michael-gove-defends-deaths-37-million-people-just refers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on January 09, 2014, 08:50:10 pm
Fergus and Judith Wilson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 10, 2014, 02:39:58 pm
Fergus and Judith Wilson

Perspective on this lovely couple
Quote
At the time of writing (29 August 2013) the Wilsons have not paid £3000 court costs awarded to a gas engineer after they summonsed him for issuing an 'At Risk' notice on a flue at one of their properties that was dangerous and not in line with British Standards. They had tried to claim £5000 from him for making the property unrentable.[13]

So they sued someone for carrying out their professional duty.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on January 10, 2014, 03:03:01 pm
Fergus Wilson - the very same nice compassionate and caring chap who owns nearly a thousand rental properties in Kent and is evicting all tenants on benefits, even those not in arrears.

Very nice chap indeed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on January 10, 2014, 07:12:10 pm
Have we had Tulisa Constantdross yet?  Apparently she was once voted FHM's Sexiest Woman Of The Year, which tells you all you need to know about FHM's current readership.  I wouldn't touch her with yours.

As the joke goes,  "Tulisa: sexiest woman in the world?  She wasn't even the sexiest woman in N-Dubz."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on January 10, 2014, 08:21:07 pm
Have we had Tulisa Constantdross yet?  Apparently she was once voted FHM's Sexiest Woman Of The Year, which tells you all you need to know about FHM's current readership.

Said like someone who admits to being a keen FHM reader in the past.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 12, 2014, 03:00:06 pm
Jeremy Clarkson (yet again)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on January 12, 2014, 03:05:55 pm
Have we had Tulisa Constantdross yet?  Apparently she was once voted FHM's Sexiest Woman Of The Year, which tells you all you need to know about FHM's current readership.

Said like someone who admits to being a keen FHM reader in the past.
When it competed with GQ, not Nuts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on January 12, 2014, 03:42:42 pm
Jeremy Clarkson (yet again)

I'll probably regret asking, but what has he done now?

I had a quick look at t'web via a search engine: I typed Jermy Clarkson. A bit of a Freudian Slip.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on January 12, 2014, 04:15:18 pm
Efrogwr - see https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=79067.msg1624862#msg1624862
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on January 12, 2014, 05:04:54 pm
Efrogwr - see https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=79067.msg1624862#msg1624862

Thanks.

Ultra Twat would be more appropriate.  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 12, 2014, 05:10:43 pm
Yes.  I do think he probes the outer limits of twattishness.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on January 12, 2014, 11:25:00 pm
Yes.  I do think he probes the outer limits of twattishness.
From the outside, trying to get in!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on January 13, 2014, 12:43:19 am
Efrogwr - see https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=79067.msg1624862#msg1624862

So how is he any different from Emma Way?  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on January 13, 2014, 09:57:00 am
William Hague - just answer the questions, you odious little runt.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on January 13, 2014, 05:55:28 pm
He didn't, did he? Stupid thing was that he'd have looked much better by giving an honest answer about what's happened so far, & then following that up with his bit about the future.

Amazing how often politicians don't realise that obvious & clumsy evasiveness is bad for their image, even among any of their supporters who aren't brain-dead.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on January 13, 2014, 06:11:38 pm
And now, a (dis)honourable mention for Call Me Dave - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25705550

Clearly, he's obviously added bribery to his skill set.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on January 15, 2014, 07:49:28 pm
Yet again; Osbo.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on January 15, 2014, 09:01:28 pm
I think we should give Gove, Osborne and Clarkson lifetime twatchievement awards to free up the thread for new nominations.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 16, 2014, 09:37:45 am
Similarly: Arthur Scargill
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on January 17, 2014, 09:32:59 pm
Owen Paterson, a lying little shit. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25766564)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on January 25, 2014, 02:16:19 pm
Vince Cable.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/23/royal-mail-sale-vince-cable

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ferret on January 26, 2014, 12:39:16 am
in my opinion the bloke who called in to radio 4 to complain that he can't get super fast fibre optic broadband, he has to make do with 3 or 4 mbps
poor bloke, we're lucky to get 1mbps and most of the time it's slower and there's no hope of it getting any faster IMO he is a super twat 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on January 29, 2014, 09:37:50 pm
Michael Fabricant (http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/tories-challenged-over-mps-suggestion-6640369).

Quote
It’s difficult enough to find in England people who are good maths and physics and chemistry teachers. To ask them to be bilingual as well is a nonsense.

I've known many good maths, physics and chemistry teachers who were bilingual before they were teachers. Hell, most of them, like me, were bilingual before they started school. Ignorant, arrogant Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on January 30, 2014, 07:12:56 am
Jackson Carlaw
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 30, 2014, 07:21:41 am
Had to google him, but now agree.

In a relsted note, the stupid, offensive* and (allegedly) mendacious Aidan Burley, MP SS





* Both adjectives official, according to his own Party.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on January 30, 2014, 07:42:44 am
Jackson Carlaw

Nope - I actually agree with his wider point. 

Quote
Mr Carlaw said the robin would be a better national bird, but wondered why another national symbol was needed at all and where such thinking would end.

"Do we have a national domestic animal, a national wild animal, a national grievance?" he asked.

As for the issue of the eagle, I would agree with this comment:

Quote
"It has been a symbol of imperial power of which Scotland is emphatically not, never has been, and hopefully never will be."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on January 30, 2014, 10:23:20 am


Quote
"It has been a symbol of imperial power of which Scotland is emphatically not, never has been, and hopefully never will be."

Shows poor knowledge of Scots' contribution to the expansion and running of the - err - British empire. 

Strange perhaps for a unionist, but on a par with Carlaw's equal lack of knowledge of German and European history, and the widespread adoption of eagles as national birds.  His comments are particularly insulting to Germany, whose eagle has been thoroughly de-Nazified, and retained as a national symbol (as it was during the Weimar republic) - and Poland, whose national bird is also an eagle.

"Why bother with a national {thing}" is a valid enough point of view that I happen not to agree with - but I'd expect Godwin's law not to apply to parliamentary committees.  I suppose that''s what comes of electing failed used-car salespersons ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 31, 2014, 10:58:48 am
Nicholas Bourne, Baron Bourne of Aberystwyth in the County of Ceredigion, and of Wethersfield in the County of Essex, Liar, Idiot and Supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 03, 2014, 05:46:12 pm
Mark Thompson - saying 'sorry' won't change the fact that £100m of taxpayers money was pissed up the wall on your watch.

EDIT: also Tim Yeo - a detestable specimen of humanity even by Tory standards.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 03, 2014, 05:50:11 pm
Michael Gove.  Again! :o
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 03, 2014, 05:56:47 pm
Michael Gove.  Again! :o
I think Gove is now an implicit super-twat.
Never has so much complete and utter bullshit been spouted by a single person.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on February 03, 2014, 06:07:56 pm
So I open this thread with a specific person in mind, only to find clarion has beaten me to it...

Every time that fucking imbecile opens his mouth, my blood pressure goes into the red zone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 03, 2014, 06:10:54 pm
So I open this thread with a specific person in mind, only to find clarion has beaten me to it...

Every time that fucking imbecile opens his mouth, my blood pressure goes into the red zone.
He was on the talking wireless-type thing whilst I was on the turbo - about the best session I've had for a while; all the anger had to go somewhere.

Maybe I should use his misguided bletherings as a training aid.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on February 03, 2014, 11:05:26 pm
Perhaps a 'Hyper-Twat' thread for Michael Gove?

I suspect that Gove, Hunt, Shapps, et al just exist to make CMD look intelligent and statesmanlike
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 03, 2014, 11:12:57 pm
Katie Gobshite Hopkins.  I think this nomination is uncontroversial.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on February 03, 2014, 11:35:46 pm
Katie Gobshite Hopkins.  I think this nomination is uncontroversial.

<Wowbagger>I'd never heard of her </WB>

But have now looked her up on the intertubes. I feely grubby now.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 04, 2014, 09:59:03 am
Can I nominate Simon Jack, BBC technology 'reporter'?1

GOOGLE IS NOT 'BASICALLY THE INTERNET' you clueless fucknugget.


1 - And Michael Gove, of course.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 04, 2014, 10:08:41 am
But a commendation to his interlocutor for refraining from lamping him when asked a barrage of stupid questions and not being allowed to answer.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Auntie Helen on February 04, 2014, 11:09:44 am
I am one of the few people who has been watching The Jump on Channel 4. We missed the first episode though so don't know who the Essex-sounding brainless bimbo is who refused the ski jump (don't blame her for that, mind) so was relegated. But they've kept her around for soundbites of inanity. Who is she? She MUST be playing the extra-dim card, surely???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 08, 2014, 02:37:47 pm
'Lord' Chris Smith - a fucking waste of oxygen when he was an MP, and clearly nothing has changed since he finagled a cushy job at the top of the Environment Agency. Anyone else who failed as completely as he has would have had their marching orders so bloody quick that their heads would be spinning.

Had I been one of the residents of the Somerset Levels whom he visited, I think I'd have temporarily 'forgotten' that I'm a pacifist and decked the clueless fucker and held his head underwater until the bubbles stopped.

Also, since the environment is involved, Owen 'Badgers Moved The Goalposts' Paterson gets a nomination merely for existing.

Also^2, Michael 'Specky Twat' Gove. Y'know, just because.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on February 08, 2014, 02:54:10 pm
To be fair to Smith, I'm not sure what he could have done about the Somerset Levels.  Even given historic levels of maintenance of sluices and pumps, this rain would probably have overwhelmed them.  The land is below sea level and has no natural drainage; the water has to be pumped *up* into the rivers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 08, 2014, 03:04:40 pm
To be fair to Smith, I'm not sure what he could have done about the Somerset Levels.  Even given historic levels of maintenance of sluices and pumps, this rain would probably have overwhelmed them.  The land is below sea level and has no natural drainage; the water has to be pumped *up* into the rivers.
It would appear that the current debate centres on dredging, or rather the lack of it in this case - I'm not familiar with the area, so can't really comment any further on that score but it would appear that the Environment Agency has been lurching from one crisis to the next with the results that we're now seeing. Conditions notwithstanding, the handling of the whole thing has been utterly shocking (IMO, of course) and am disgusted that the people at the top will not be brought to account because, let's face it, they won't be.

That said, the same debate rages up here with depressing regularity when large bits of central York disappear underwater for a few days every now and again - I'm given to understand that the Ouse was dredged fairly regularly back in the day (well before I moved up here, anyway) and whilst York still flooded on account of the catchment area of the Ouse being pretty huge, it was far less severe than it was after regular dredging stopped. That said, the floods we had in 2000 were bad even by York's usual standards and I doubt any amount of dredging etc. would have changed that.

Title: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on February 08, 2014, 03:51:12 pm
Just another example of how "austerity" is a counter-productive policy, innit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 08, 2014, 03:54:18 pm
Just another example of how "austerity" is a counter-productive policy, innit.
Politicians wouldn't know 'austerity' if it jumped up and gave them a haircut - it's something that only happens to the little people, don'tcherknow.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 08, 2014, 04:02:37 pm
Mark Harper (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26101442)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 08, 2014, 04:14:21 pm
Met Police Roadsafe Team, I'm afraid:

https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=80052.msg1638054#new
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on February 08, 2014, 04:33:26 pm

Just another example of how "austerity" is a counter-productive policy, innit.
Politicians wouldn't know 'austerity' if it jumped up and gave them a haircut - it's something that only happens to the little people, don'tcherknow.

"They talk about thriftiness, and it just means that poor people are expected to practise a self-denial that the rich can't even imagine, much less carry out."

George Gissing.

1889.

Nothing changes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on February 08, 2014, 07:16:32 pm
Mark Harper (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26101442)

(http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110623042519/simpsons/images/4/40/Picture0003.jpg)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on February 08, 2014, 09:20:31 pm
The Institution of Civil Engineers is in favour of the current EA approach to the Somerset Levels. Additional dredging would not improve things to any significant degree. Local farmers paid to manage the land in ways that actually worsen flooding and loudmouth politicians do not have the answers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on February 09, 2014, 03:51:44 pm
Eric Pickles  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on February 09, 2014, 10:07:02 pm
I saw him on Andrew Marr this morning and he apologised "undeservably".

(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/3657135360/hE8404AA3/)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wombat on February 10, 2014, 08:26:05 am
Pickles is indeed an unmitigated twat, for the crap he spouts about local authorities and otehr agencies who he has starved of the cash needed to operat eproperly.  He's a "Daily Mail" polition, i.e. its always someone else's fault, and "someone" should do something about it.

As for the Somerset levels, when I used to drive across them regularly, my initial thought was "why do people live here, its obviously not viable?"  Living on land below sea level is just plain silly, unless you have a massively expensive and complex infrastructure to manage it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gus on February 13, 2014, 11:19:23 am
http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/article2217239.ece (http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/article2217239.ece) The idiot burglar that tries to escape on a stolen bike in front of a cameracrew interviewing police officers
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on February 13, 2014, 07:34:03 pm
Was that Nigel Lawson on Today this morning?  Blimey.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on February 13, 2014, 09:25:47 pm
Sod it.  Donald Trump.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on February 13, 2014, 10:54:32 pm
Was that Nigel Lawson on Today this morning?  Blimey.

Yes it was. I didn't get round to nominating him. In reply to one point he said "That's just speculation".Thereby moving the "discussion" to something that he's familiar with.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on February 17, 2014, 11:45:20 am
http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/02/15/climate-change-denier-lord-lawson-is-an-expert-he-once-wrote-a-book-about-dieting/
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 17, 2014, 11:58:00 am
Misses out financial interests...
Title: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on February 19, 2014, 01:08:43 pm
T*ny Bl**r

What a scumbag.

Nothing new about that but the latest revelations from the Brooks woman (assuming they're true) just serve to lower him still further in my estimation.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 19, 2014, 01:30:58 pm
Ooh.  Not heard them yet, but I shall be interested to hear.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on February 19, 2014, 01:47:15 pm
T*ny Bl**r

What a scumbag.

Nothing new about that but the latest revelations from the Brooks woman (assuming they're true) just serve to lower him still further in my estimation.

My reactions were an equal measure of "W T actual F" and "I'm not at all surprised". Fucker.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 19, 2014, 02:23:01 pm
Ooh.  Not heard them yet, but I shall be interested to hear.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26259956
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 19, 2014, 03:53:15 pm
Paul Dacre.  I've seen today's Mail headline.  The man is scum, and I have no idea how he sleeps at night.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on February 21, 2014, 10:09:16 pm
Bernie Ecclestone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on February 25, 2014, 03:49:34 pm
Rebekah Brooks - apparently she "didn't think phone hacking was illegal."  :facepalm:

What.
The.
Everloving.
FUCK?!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26337845 refers - she's a bigger failure as a human being than she evidently was as a newspaper editor, and I'm pretty sure that in the league table of legal defences, 'ignorance' is barely hovering above the relegation zone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 25, 2014, 05:03:15 pm
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat???????????????? :o :o :o

That does, at least, sound like a straw being clutched.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 25, 2014, 05:12:48 pm
Simon Wolfson

http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/millionaire-in-a-cheap-suit-next-ceo-simon-wolfson-has-big-plans-for-london-9151672.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on February 25, 2014, 08:44:54 pm
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat???????????????? :o :o :o

That does, at least, sound like a straw being clutched.

I thought recent GCHQ findings were that it was not illegal?  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on February 25, 2014, 09:00:18 pm
Rebekah Brooks - apparently she "didn't think phone hacking was illegal."  :facepalm:

What.
The.
Everloving.
FUCK?!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26337845 refers - she's a bigger failure as a human being than she evidently was as a newspaper editor, and I'm pretty sure that in the league table of legal defences, 'ignorance' is barely hovering above the relegation zone.

To be fair, it was standard newspaper journalism (well delegated to seedy ex-police officers, along with sorting through bins etc.), so she might reasonably feel aggrieved. That doesn't mean I'm sympathetic. We need a robo-Nelson to iteratively ha-Ha them.

Simon Wolfson

http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/millionaire-in-a-cheap-suit-next-ceo-simon-wolfson-has-big-plans-for-london-9151672.html

Good god, he's a moron. I like the way he 'worked his way up' from the bottom at Next, the retail chain his father just happened to be chairman of at the time.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 26, 2014, 10:47:45 am
Chris 'book ban' Grayling
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on March 26, 2014, 10:59:04 am
Ah, you caught up with this.

My take is that the monkey-felching cockroach-nobbler saw it as a way of forcing prisons to buy books from an 'efficient private industry source'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on March 26, 2014, 11:58:43 am
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat???????????????? :o :o :o

That does, at least, sound like a straw being clutched.

I thought recent GCHQ findings were that it was not illegal?  :demon:
Only when it's *us* doing it :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 08, 2014, 11:08:53 am
*sigh*

Eric Pickles

again
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on April 08, 2014, 11:11:37 am
Maria Miller.

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

In my particular universe, apologising for defrauding the taxpayer out of several tens of thousands of pounds does not make everything all right and magically go away.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on April 08, 2014, 01:07:56 pm
*sigh*

Eric Pickles

again

 There's nowt more toxic than a Yorkshire Tory.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on May 02, 2014, 11:19:14 am
Constance Briscoe...


...who has now got her comeuppance (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27254145).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Lordy on May 02, 2014, 04:26:35 pm
Max Clifford

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on May 02, 2014, 04:35:39 pm
Max Clifford
You mean Mr I-Didn't-do-it/they-were-asking-for-it?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on May 02, 2014, 04:38:26 pm
Y'see, the likes of Briscoe, Clifford, and us if we were that stupid, go to prison.   Why is it then that politicians get off with a repayment not even equal to the gain and with a job still, albeit for just sixty odd grand per year?

Super-twats?   Poli-fucking-greedy-eleven-percent-self-entitled-ticians!!!     >:(  >:(  >:(

Patrick Mercer... *

Maria Miller...

etc., etc., etc., etc...

*  Took as long as a tory candidate list to fall on his sword.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 11, 2014, 09:32:45 am
Conor Burns

You fucking epic twat. Piss off down the rathole where you came from.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27783331 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27783331)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on June 11, 2014, 10:10:46 am
Conor Burns

You fucking epic twat. Piss off down the rathole where you came from.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27783331 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27783331)

Yep, good advice.  He should just do it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 11, 2014, 12:08:15 pm
Yup.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on June 11, 2014, 11:11:41 pm
Owen Patterson  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 20, 2014, 12:03:36 pm
Michael 'Violence against Women' Fabricant.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on June 20, 2014, 12:27:52 pm
Michael 'Violence against Women' Fabricant.
Agreed, although I strongly suspect that quite a few people probably feel the same way towards Tory MPs ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 20, 2014, 04:13:27 pm
Michael 'Violence against Women' Fabricant.

[Googles]

By the Lord Harry, 'tis the mutant child of William Roache and Boris Johnson.

And a Twat of the first water, obv.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on June 20, 2014, 06:29:31 pm
Michael 'Violence against Women' Fabricant.

[Googles]

By the Lord Harry, 'tis the mutant child of William Roache and Boris Johnson.
That, or he's wearing a syrup of truly Trump-esque magnitude.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 20, 2014, 06:35:07 pm
Must be his own hair.  No one would pay for a toupe that bad.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on June 20, 2014, 08:17:20 pm
And on the same thread..... James Dellingpole
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 20, 2014, 08:33:13 pm
Just googled.  Revolting man.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 21, 2014, 08:32:13 am
Piggles. Again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jaded on June 21, 2014, 08:51:04 am
Presumably for this
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27952341

What a fucking quarter-wit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 21, 2014, 12:03:07 pm
Presumably for this
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27952341

What a fucking quarter-wit.

You are absolutely correct.

The Wikipedia article about him states that he joined the Conservative Party after the Soviet Union invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. I realise that this may be a coincidence, and that Wikipedia is not necessarily accurate. If the two events are linked, then I have to challenge your "fucking quarter-wit" as an excessively generous assessment.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 21, 2014, 03:05:50 pm
I object to those CCTV cars.  Not because they clobber people for parking illegally but because round here they themselves are driven by people who park like fuds.

Double-parking opposite a bus stop, anyone?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 21, 2014, 03:56:44 pm
I object to those CCTV cars.  Not because they clobber people for parking illegally but because round here they themselves are driven by people who park like fuds.

Double-parking opposite a bus stop, anyone?

That's a valid objection. The "Stealth Tax"/"spying" argument isn't.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on June 21, 2014, 03:57:58 pm
The ensuing chaos will be interesting to watch.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on June 21, 2014, 04:04:53 pm
Must be his own hair.  No one would pay for a toupe that bad.
I believe it's a syrup. He and Fatty Soames used to have ill-tempered and barbed exchanges in the commons (sic) regarding each other's physical shortcomings.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 22, 2014, 11:48:33 am
The BBC
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on June 22, 2014, 02:38:28 pm
The BBC

That wasn't for this piece of sub-Daily-Mail, victim blaming, disablist, ageist, patronising, pathetic attempt at sensationalism (http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b047h98w/the-trouble-with-mobility-scooters) was it? To save the ordeal of having to watch it, here's more reasoned critique of why the BBC really should know better. (http://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/the-trouble-with-our-physical-environment/).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 22, 2014, 02:58:34 pm
No, it was for the total failure to report the Austerity march.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 22, 2014, 05:16:37 pm
The BBC

That wasn't for this piece of sub-Daily-Mail, victim blaming, disablist, ageist, patronising, pathetic attempt at sensationalism (http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b047h98w/the-trouble-with-mobility-scooters) was it? To save the ordeal of having to watch it, here's more reasoned critique of why the BBC really should know better. (http://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/the-trouble-with-our-physical-environment/).

Thank you for the links. I looked at the first, then took your advice and read the second. That sort of crap beggars belief.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on June 23, 2014, 09:22:08 am
At least it reminded me to stop paying the licence fee. Au revoir, BBC.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gattopardo on June 23, 2014, 09:58:06 am
I object to those CCTV cars.  Not because they clobber people for parking illegally but because round here they themselves are driven by people who park like fuds.

Double-parking opposite a bus stop, anyone?

Got nicked by one, from a former employer.  Yes, I had stopped on a single yellow line, but was still in the car just answering the telephone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Gattopardo on June 23, 2014, 09:59:18 am
No, it was for the total failure to report the Austerity march.

Yeah, was amazed at that. Still don't get why. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 23, 2014, 10:30:24 am
No, it was for the total failure to report the Austerity march.

Yeah, was amazed at that. Still don't get why.
They either failed to notice 50 000 people outside their window, or somewhere, someone decided to keep quiet about it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 23, 2014, 11:04:39 am
Is the BBC covered by FoI?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 23, 2014, 11:42:14 am
I dunno, but their charter obliges them to be unbiased.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 23, 2014, 11:52:23 am
That'll be the BBC where a former Tory Cabinet Minister is likely to be replaced by a former Tory MP  - one Tory peer for another - as Chairman.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 23, 2014, 12:17:51 pm
Whatever one thinks of the BRITONS' Broadcasting Corporation, the Daily Mail thinks that it's a hotbed of revolutionary Trots.  Surely an institution which make the Daily Mail cry is a Good Thing.

And if the alternative is USAnian-stylee TV...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 23, 2014, 01:29:34 pm
That is a tad like being grateful for the Tories, since they aren't the Tea Party...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on June 25, 2014, 06:21:04 am
The ensuing chaos will be interesting to watch.
Been done. Safe and experienced drivers (copyright you know who) were recently allowed to park where they liked in Aberystwyth due to a dispute over whose job parking enforcement was and resulting removal of all penalties.

Result? Gridlock.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-16337908
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on June 25, 2014, 07:14:41 pm
That'll be the BBC where a former Tory Cabinet Minister is likely to be replaced by a former Tory MP  - one Tory peer for another - as Chairman.
Well, as long as they don't call him or her a chair (spit!).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 09, 2014, 10:11:45 pm
Our Glorious Democratically Elected Leader and Representative of All Hard-Working Families Ever, the one and only, Cam the Sham.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Dibdib on July 09, 2014, 10:21:33 pm
Quote from: BBC News
Mr Gove said they should "stand up for education" rather than "standing up for their own pay and pensions".
(link) (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-28226643)

(http://theplastichippo.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/militant-tendancy.jpg)
(link) (http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/tory-minister-michael-gove-who-1088200)


"No further questions, m'lud..."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on July 09, 2014, 10:45:54 pm
Any tory who whines pathetically about how they will be terribly inconvenienced by the strike. Hard-working families just want to go to work blah blah blah. That's the point, twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 10, 2014, 09:27:32 am
Any tory who whines pathetically about how they will be terribly inconvenienced by the strike. Hard-working families just want to go to work blah blah blah. That's the point, twat.

In that case, may I add Dominic Raab and Francis Maude to this self-serving pack of Tory motormouths?

I saw on FarceBook that Leanne Wood supports the strike. Da iawn, Leanne!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on July 10, 2014, 12:22:47 pm
Any tory who whines pathetically about how they will be terribly inconvenienced by the strike. Hard-working families just want to go to work blah blah blah. That's the point, twat.

The weather hereabouts is nice for a strike.
I'd like a job from which I could decide to strike or otherwise.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 10, 2014, 12:25:38 pm
Cameron and Clegg, of course:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28237111

Cameron doubly so for playing a modified version of the "won't someone think of the children" card, to whit: PM asks if we want paedophiles and extremists to communicate without it being possible to intercept communications (no I don't, but I object to the dragnet-style approach that the gubbishment obviously prefers)

And someone needs to remind Spineless Nick about this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22719810
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 10, 2014, 07:23:45 pm
I thought paedophiles communicated at Monday Club meetings.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 10, 2014, 07:26:09 pm
I thought paedophiles communicated at Monday Club meetings.
Nobody knows - they're too busy 'mislaying' documents.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on July 10, 2014, 08:38:27 pm
Bit like HMS Conqueror's log book like .......
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 10, 2014, 10:01:31 pm
Bit like HMS Conqueror's log book like .......

Was that water damaged as well?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on July 10, 2014, 10:29:22 pm
That ghastly twat Grant Shapps was on C4 News tonight  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on July 11, 2014, 01:16:21 pm
Bit like HMS Conqueror's log book like .......

Was that water damaged as well?

    The Secretary of State for Defence (Mr. Michael Heseltine)

    During the Falklands campaign, HMS Conqueror kept an account containing detailed operational information which was used to compile the submarine's formal report of proceedings. This is a classified document and is in the possession of the Ministry of Defence.

    The submarine's navigating officer also kept a "control room log" which records the latitude and longitude, distance run, course, speed and depth of the submarine at hourly intervals together with other routine readings. This document contains no tactical information. It has been mislaid and as it, too, is classified, a board of inquiry' is being held.

    § Mr. Davies

    I am grateful to the Secretary of State for answering the question. His astonishing admission that he, his Department and the Navy, apparently, have lost—some unkind souls might say conveniently lost — the navigation log book not of some cross-channel ferry but of HMS Conqueror, is another extraordinary episode in the Government's pathetic attempts to explain away all the circumstances surrounding the sinking of the General Belgrano.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 11, 2014, 01:34:49 pm
Canardly, thanks for that. I was aware of the controversy over the sinking of the General Belgrano, but not of the possibility that the MoD was/is/always will be archivally accident prone.

I was having a pop at the Foreign Office, which seems to be burdened with similar bad luck; documents relating to American use of the Diego Suarez base to facilitate "extraordinary rendition" seem to have been "lost", due to "water damage"


Beware of the leopard!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 11, 2014, 01:36:30 pm
Luis Suarez - obviously being a racist biter is a lucrative line of work.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jogler on July 11, 2014, 02:42:18 pm
Bit like HMS Conqueror's log book like .......

Was that water damaged as well?

    The Secretary of State for Defence (Mr. Michael Heseltine)

    During the Falklands campaign, HMS Conqueror kept an account containing detailed operational information which was used to compile the submarine's formal report of proceedings. This is a classified document and is in the possession of the Ministry of Defence.

    The submarine's navigating officer also kept a "control room log" which records the latitude and longitude, distance run, course, speed and depth of the submarine at hourly intervals together with other routine readings. This document contains no tactical information. It has been mislaid and as it, too, is classified, a board of inquiry' is being held.

    § Mr. Davies



I simply do not believe that.
It's all tosh.Such things are not lost.
It's politics-speak for F uckOff,we ain't showing to nobody innit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 12, 2014, 11:13:48 am
Whilst we're on the subject of foot-the-ball players, Mario Balotelli: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28270240  ::-)

The classic example of an overpaid prima-donna who gives the impression of having an IQ considerably less than his shoe size (UK or European)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 12, 2014, 11:47:10 am
Whilst we're on the subject of foot-the-ball players, Mario Balotelli: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28270240  ::-)

The classic example of an overpaid prima-donna who gives the impression of having an IQ considerably less than his shoe size (UK or European)

Quote
"I have my own ideas about social networks and I've tried many times but our lawyer has always stopped me, saying that it would violate individual rights," he (manager) said.

Lawyer is talking utter bullshit. People who working professions such as nursing are restricted as to their behaviour in social networks.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 12, 2014, 11:50:58 am
James Delingpole.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 14, 2014, 01:10:07 pm
Berkeley Germy Jeremy Hunt. Let's bash foreigners; there's a General Election next year...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 15, 2014, 12:45:07 pm
Michael Gove. I nominate him now, because he may be less noticeable for a while. It would be a pity not to recognise his contribution to society.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 15, 2014, 12:51:05 pm
Berkeley Germy Jeremy Hunt. Let's bash foreigners; there's a General Election next year...

Has Hunt done something notably twatty lately?  Le Tour has been restricting my news-acquisition habits.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 15, 2014, 12:52:40 pm
Berkeley Germy Jeremy Hunt. Let's bash foreigners; there's a General Election next year...

Has Hunt done something notably twatty lately?  Le Tour has been restricting my news-acquisition habits.
Apart from existing, you mean?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 15, 2014, 01:05:54 pm
Berkeley Germy Jeremy Hunt. Let's bash foreigners; there's a General Election next year...

Has Hunt done something notably twatty lately?  Le Tour has been restricting my news-acquisition habits.
Apart from existing, you mean?

Yes.  Hunt is a 24/7 twat with extended opening hours, so he doesn't really merit a mention in this thread unless he's launched something utterly twatacular, the twat equivalent of a manned mission to Mars.  And if the first man on Mars was Jeremy Hunt I wouldn't mind at all, provided the ESA/NASA/the Russians ensured there was no way he could come back.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 15, 2014, 01:55:01 pm
His plan to surcharge foreigners* for medical treatment in the NHS, and to fine Trusts for non-collection of fees.

* Including EU citizens, even when they hold EHICs.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 15, 2014, 02:13:11 pm
His plan to surcharge foreigners* for medical treatment in the NHS, and to fine Trusts for non-collection of fees.

* Including EU citizens, even when they hold EHICs.

Wondrous twattery.  Throw him to the Pariah Dogs.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 15, 2014, 05:20:39 pm
Michael Gove.  For spouting complete and utter bollocks on PM.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 15, 2014, 05:23:41 pm
Michael Gove.  For spouting complete and utter bollocks on PM 24/7.

FTFY :D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on July 15, 2014, 11:47:12 pm
Michael Gove.  For spouting complete and utter bollocks on PM.

Oh, I don't know - I found listening to him remarkably reassuring.

He's going to be in charge of discipline and unity among the Party, for which he'll need to deploy his listening and influencing skills. He's also going to be appearing on the media a lot, for which he'll need to deploy his communicating and speaking to the general public skills.

If they're all exercised to the extent he displayed them tonight, we have little to fear.







Yes, I realise that this may be fearful optimism.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 15, 2014, 11:48:01 pm
Michael Gove.  For spouting complete and utter bollocks on PM.

"...demotion, emotion, locomotion..." Do you think he'd been on the pop?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 16, 2014, 12:49:38 am
I wish they'd stop showing that clip of Gove addressing a class of Smalls.  "Hello.  My name is Michael" he says, keeping his teeth clenched to conceal his forked tongue.  It terrifies me, so $DEITY knows what effect it would have on the average Tiny.  In any case, his name isn't really "Michael", it's something like "Ecankha of the Blood Pyramid" or "Prostetnic Jeltz".  Or something.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on July 16, 2014, 08:11:52 am
Mark Regev.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 16, 2014, 10:29:27 am
If you start typing "Mark Regev" in the Chrome address wossname, Google's first suggestion is, unsurprisingly, "Mark Regev".

The second is "Mark Regev liar" ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on July 16, 2014, 09:01:41 pm
He's spouting his awful stuff on C4 News again  :hand:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on July 16, 2014, 10:22:56 pm
I had to look this guy up, never heard of him. You'd never guess he's an Aussie!

Quote
Regev began his career as a lecturer on International Relations and Strategy at the Israel Defense Forces Staff College.

I bet that course contains a range of balanced political viewpoints.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on July 20, 2014, 10:13:20 pm
Owen twat badger Paterson (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/20/owen-paterson-sacked-cabinet-appease-green-lobby?CMP=twt_fd)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 21, 2014, 09:05:13 am
Owen twat badger Paterson (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/20/owen-paterson-sacked-cabinet-appease-green-lobby?CMP=twt_fd)
wow. Just wow. It's like he's invented a new smegma-twat-bosun particle and is anxious to demonstrate how it behaves.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 21, 2014, 10:06:11 am
The best thing about his comments on the green lobby is that it's part of a speech to Lord Lawson's interestingly-funded climate change denying group.

That's chutzpah!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 21, 2014, 10:33:29 am
Vladimir Putin.

The deafening silence vis-a-vis the recent goings on in eastern Ukraine speak volumes, as it were. I'm sorry if I've offended any Russians reading this, but your dear leader is acting like a bell-end of quite extraordinary magnitude. As for the 'separatists', they're utterly beneath contempt.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 21, 2014, 11:29:55 am
That festering ball of slime Mark Regev was on the WWP just now.  Consumer electronics are expensive, and take a long time to set up, otherwise the iPad would have been frisbeeing through the WWP before the smeg-faced clowning dope fuck had even got halfway through blaming Hamas for all the DETHiness.

Seems Hamas are forcing the inhabitants of Gaza to live in, er, Gaza.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 22, 2014, 10:09:08 am
Standard BBC script:

"Mr Regev, sir, is there any message you wish to share with the British nation?"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 24, 2014, 12:21:22 pm
Gordon Gillick. He talks bollocks because he enjoys it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 24, 2014, 12:50:30 pm
Gordon Gillick. He talks bollocks because he enjoys it.

(Googles)

Belgium!  What an utter Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 24, 2014, 01:11:46 pm
Gillick?  Gillick?  Not related to that Gillick, surely?

*Googles*

Ohh!  Yes, indeed.  Not only but also.  He has form:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ukip-councillor-gordon-gillick-deeply-sorry-over-claims-he-called-children-in-care-takers-from-the-system-9259180.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/28/ukip-cllr-gordon-gillick-lights-payment_n_5048689.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PBFpc1r5U4

As my Honourable Friend puts it:

Belgium!  What an utter Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 24, 2014, 03:51:43 pm
His plan to surcharge foreigners* for medical treatment in the NHS, and to fine Trusts for non-collection of fees.

* Including EU citizens, even when they hold EHICs.

Not that I hold a flame for Jeremy CHunt but just for clarification...

NHS trusts can already be fined for non-collection of fees - that measure was introduced under the previous administration.

There is no plan to surcharge EU citizens (as that would be unalwful).  What the Department of Health will be doing (or actually expecting CCGs to do from diminished funds) is paying trust's 25% extra for the treatment of EU citizens when they pass on the details of the patient to the relevant body (in this case the DWP).  The UK is entitled to recalim the costs of care from the relevant members state - but a lot of trusts don't bother collecting and passing on the data  and the UK loses money.

In case you're wondering, yes other EU countries do reclaim the costs of treating Brits in their systems from the UIK government.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 24, 2014, 03:59:06 pm
Gillick?  Gillick?  Not related to that Gillick, surely?

*Googles*

Ohh!  Yes, indeed.  Not only but also.  He has form:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ukip-councillor-gordon-gillick-deeply-sorry-over-claims-he-called-children-in-care-takers-from-the-system-9259180.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/28/ukip-cllr-gordon-gillick-lights-payment_n_5048689.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PBFpc1r5U4

As my Honourable Friend puts it:

Belgium!  What an utter Twat.

I have told Gordon Gillick to 'piss off'...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 24, 2014, 04:00:48 pm
I suspect you're not alone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 24, 2014, 04:03:25 pm
He doesn't like email - but he does encourage people to phone him (http://www2.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/CommitteeMinutes/Committees/member.aspx?ID=198)...  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 24, 2014, 06:14:55 pm
Forty pages in and no nomination for sanctimonious war criminal fuckpuppet Benjamin Netanyahu (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28461045)?  UN condemnation a "travesty of justice and fairness".  And then the Israeli military blows the shit out of a UN school being used as a shelter.

If that's your idea of "justice and fairness", Mr Twatanyahu, then for the good of humanity could I suggest you head for Zürich and jump off the roof of Dignitas?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 24, 2014, 06:17:14 pm
Gosh, I think we just took him as read. didn't we? 

I think they targetted the UN school shelter to divert attention from the hospital they bombed the crap out of (with 'surgical precision', natch) and the journalists they attacked.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 24, 2014, 06:27:08 pm
But d'you know what's really fucking annoying?

Nothing will get done - Sweet. Fuck. All.

Go through the UN? The Septics will veto it.
Speak out against the Israeli offensive? Congratulations, you're an anti-Semite.
Show any support for the poor fuckers in Gaza/the West Bank/wherever? Bingo, you're now viewed as supporting terrorists.

You can't win and as a result everybody loses and as a result shit like this is happening: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28468526 - THIS, Mr. Netenyahu, is your "travesty of justice, fairness and common sense".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 24, 2014, 06:29:52 pm
His plan to surcharge foreigners* for medical treatment in the NHS, and to fine Trusts for non-collection of fees.

* Including EU citizens, even when they hold EHICs.

Not that I hold a flame for Jeremy CHunt but just for clarification...

NHS trusts can already be fined for non-collection of fees - that measure was introduced under the previous administration.

There is no plan to surcharge EU citizens (as that would be unalwful).  What the Department of Health will be doing (or actually expecting CCGs to do from diminished funds) is paying trust's 25% extra for the treatment of EU citizens when they pass on the details of the patient to the relevant body (in this case the DWP).  The UK is entitled to recalim the costs of care from the relevant members state - but a lot of trusts don't bother collecting and passing on the data  and the UK loses money.

In case you're wondering, yes other EU countries do reclaim the costs of treating Brits in their systems from the UIK government.


Thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 24, 2014, 06:31:12 pm
Gillick?  Gillick?  Not related to that Gillick, surely?

*Googles*

Ohh!  Yes, indeed.  Not only but also.  He has form:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ukip-councillor-gordon-gillick-deeply-sorry-over-claims-he-called-children-in-care-takers-from-the-system-9259180.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/28/ukip-cllr-gordon-gillick-lights-payment_n_5048689.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PBFpc1r5U4

As my Honourable Friend puts it:

Belgium!  What an utter Twat.

I have told Gordon Gillick to 'piss off'...

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 24, 2014, 06:49:32 pm
People like Netanyahu and Regev make me sometimes question my pacifist views and my opposition to assassination.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 24, 2014, 06:50:03 pm
People like Netanyahu and Regev make me sometimes question my pacifist views and my opposition to assassination.
This, oh so much.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 24, 2014, 07:41:25 pm
He doesn't like email - but he does encourage people to phone him (http://www2.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/CommitteeMinutes/Committees/member.aspx?ID=198)...  :demon:

I've just realised he has invented a new concept - Gillick incompetence!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on July 25, 2014, 02:19:00 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2014, 02:35:44 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.

What a Twat!  Set Brian Cox on him!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 25, 2014, 02:42:40 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.
Obviously destined for a role heading up some science/technology subcommitte then  ::-)

Wonder if he'll be able to predict his probable demise at the next election ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on July 25, 2014, 02:55:20 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.
Obviously destined for a role heading up some science/technology subcommitte then  ::-)

Wonder if he'll be able to predict his probable demise at the next election ...

Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: billplumtree on July 25, 2014, 03:21:38 pm
Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>

And says he is
Quote
absolutely convinced that those who look at the map of the sky for the day that they were born and receive some professional guidance will find out a lot about themselves and it will make their lives easier

<double boggle>
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 25, 2014, 03:26:49 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.
Obviously destined for a role heading up some science/technology subcommitte then  ::-)

Wonder if he'll be able to predict his probable demise at the next election ...

Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>

I've dealt with him professionally.  He's a whole loaf, never mind a sandwich, short of a picnic.

Look up 'raving mad cockwomble' in the dictionary and his picture is there.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2014, 03:32:47 pm
Quote from: Google
No results found for "raving mad cockwomble".

 :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on July 25, 2014, 03:57:41 pm
David Tredinnick (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28464009). Blimey.
Obviously destined for a role heading up some science/technology subcommitte then  ::-)

Wonder if he'll be able to predict his probable demise at the next election ...

Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>
Fuck it. I'm emigrating ....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2014, 04:44:54 pm
Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>

It was probably his turn.  How else can we account for an Equalities Minister who doesn't believe in equality or a Health Minister who believes in homeopathy?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2014, 04:45:38 pm
Was he science adviser to Owen Patterson?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2014, 04:46:06 pm
Stuff me! He's on the Health Select Committee. And The Science and Technology Select Committee. <boggle>

It was probably his turn.  How else can we account for an Equalities Minister who doesn't believe in equality or a Health Minister who believes in homeopathy?

Kill me.  Kill me now.  Preferably by fatal underdose.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 25, 2014, 09:30:18 pm
Let's hear it for Michael Shrimpton*, conspiracy theorist, climate change denier and ace bullshitter.

The term "sack of shit with a hole in it" springs to mind.

Look him up on you search engine of choice. You will need a capacity for self-restraint and a strong stomach.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2014, 09:45:47 pm
They're only prosecuting him to silence TEH TRUTHS!!!!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2014, 10:18:30 pm
Doesn't even have comedy value :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 25, 2014, 10:25:26 pm
Doesn't even have comedy value :(


I agree; it's unpleasant and depressing.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 29, 2014, 01:21:22 pm
Iain Duncan Smith, for his performance as spokestwat for  Cam the Sham, who also deserves a dishonourable mention.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on July 29, 2014, 08:51:07 pm
That festering ball of slime Mark Regev was on the WWP just now.  Consumer electronics are expensive, and take a long time to set up, otherwise the iPad would have been frisbeeing through the WWP before the smeg-faced clowning dope fuck had even got halfway through blaming Hamas for all the DETHiness.

Seems Hamas are forcing the inhabitants of Gaza to live in, er, Gaza.
I feel bad about bringing the thread back to Regev---I feel bad about mentioning him in the first place---but here, watch this.  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqBTtXKKT_8&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on July 29, 2014, 09:02:48 pm
That festering ball of slime Mark Regev was on the WWP just now.  Consumer electronics are expensive, and take a long time to set up, otherwise the iPad would have been frisbeeing through the WWP before the smeg-faced clowning dope fuck had even got halfway through blaming Hamas for all the DETHiness.

Seems Hamas are forcing the inhabitants of Gaza to live in, er, Gaza.
I feel bad about bringing the thread back to Regev---I feel bad about mentioning him in the first place---but here, watch this.  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqBTtXKKT_8&feature=youtu.be)
Wow. I'd always thought of Emily Makepeace as a bit of a lightweight. No more.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 30, 2014, 04:11:13 pm
Richard Dawkins being an arrogant knob... (http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/07/30/richard-dawkins-rape-tweets-atheist-admits-mistake-quotation-marks_n_5633059.html?utm_hp_ref=uk)  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 30, 2014, 04:42:32 pm
I know he should have had a lifetime achievement award by now, but after avoiding it for a decade I am watching Noel Edmonds on "Deal Or No Deal" in absolute horror.  I don't know why I hate him so much...he's a smug rich bastard exploiting desperate poor people (let's be accurate: chavs)  in an amazingly bored and casual manner, his beard is increasingly ridiculous, he must spend more time on his hair than the average catwalk model (and spend the GDP of Burkina Faso on Just For Men products) and he is trying to look about 40 years younger thn he is, and failing miserably..

No...I think it's the way he's dressed.  Tweed jacket woith red leather collar and elbows, fuckingredtrousers and a cravat.  Why isn't he a Bond villain?  He wouldn't even need acting lessons.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Kim on July 30, 2014, 04:44:57 pm
Why isn't he a Bond villain?  He wouldn't even need acting lessons.

Because an array of orbital gunge delivery satellites isn't a credible threat to world peace.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on July 31, 2014, 03:04:47 pm
And Dawkins shows himself to be an even bigger Super Twat by penning a rambling self-justifcation, rather than simply saying sorry for being such a Twitter Twat... (https://richarddawkins.net/2014/07/are-there-emotional-no-go-areas-where-logic-dare-not-show-its-face/)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 04, 2014, 12:08:18 pm
Benjamin Netanyahu and Mark Regev...

It simply needs repeating.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on August 04, 2014, 01:31:42 pm
The more often Mark Regev appears on the news, the more he resembles a lizard.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 04, 2014, 01:32:26 pm
Perhaps the conspiracy nutters have a point...?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 04, 2014, 06:34:18 pm
Lt Col Peter Lerner.

The Israeli Defence Force's* Mark Regev...  :sick:






*How inaptly named.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 05, 2014, 07:17:11 am
Roman Shapiro
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 05, 2014, 05:37:58 pm
Douglas Murray (the Spectator blogger)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 06, 2014, 06:27:37 pm
It's a toss-up between the German legal system and Bernie fucking Ecclestone.

If, as he seemed to suggest all along, the odious little twerp was innocent of any wrongdoing why did he feel the need to by himself out of trouble? Utterly shameful.

Sepp Blatter has competition in the 'loathesome twat running a professional sport' stakes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on August 06, 2014, 08:02:21 pm
'Sorry I nicked that loaf in Tesco's guv, will a tenner cover it? Oh bugger, I don't have a tenner'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on August 11, 2014, 10:48:44 pm
I think Mark Simmonds (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/11/tory-foreign-office-minister-quits-intolerable-expenses-rules) has just earned himself a mention.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 11, 2014, 10:51:14 pm
He has indeed.  Perhaps we cold have a whip-round to see if we can convince him to stay and continue to provide his insights, compassion and understanding of ordinary people's way of life to our political system?

No takers?

Oh.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 11, 2014, 10:55:52 pm
(http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/legacy_images/stories/Feb201392/hypocrisy-7718811-300x293.jpg)

Sorry, I got sidetracked by the loose coalescence of blithering loonery that forms davidicke.com
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on August 12, 2014, 05:03:21 pm
One of today's 'most read' stories on the site. Historical interest lies in the comments...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on August 12, 2014, 05:23:43 pm
I think Mark Simmonds (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/11/tory-foreign-office-minister-quits-intolerable-expenses-rules) has just earned himself a mention.
My, what a repellent little pustule - sense of entitlement much?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 12, 2014, 05:32:15 pm
One of today's 'most read' stories on the site. Historical interest lies in the comments...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374
I'd like to read the many deleted posts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on August 12, 2014, 05:37:47 pm
Ooooooooh yes!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 12, 2014, 08:51:31 pm
Vince 'Enabler'  Cable

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/12/israel-arms-embargo_n_5671921.html?1407862971
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 29, 2014, 09:05:26 pm
For his services to Ebola Virus related fuckwittery, Donald "Rugboy" Trump.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on August 29, 2014, 10:19:50 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-28979459
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on August 29, 2014, 11:13:50 pm
John Bishop.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on August 31, 2014, 11:14:51 am
Will Self-publicist
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28971276
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: nicknack on August 31, 2014, 06:29:18 pm
Will Self-publicist
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28971276

I'm with Mr Self on that one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on August 31, 2014, 07:10:35 pm
I am inclined to agree, but then the 'twat' in question is Self.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on August 31, 2014, 07:23:08 pm
Stansted airport.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 04, 2014, 01:49:38 pm
Brooks Newmark.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on September 05, 2014, 07:26:41 am
The ex-Joan Rivers.  I'm not shedding any tears for the demise of a vile person...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 05, 2014, 03:54:46 pm
Giro Bebb.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Rhys W on September 05, 2014, 08:07:27 pm
I was at university with Guto, seemed an ok bloke at the time, what the hell has happened to him I dunno.

His grandfather must be spinning in his grave - he was one of the founders of Plaid Cymru.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 05, 2014, 09:15:21 pm
I am descended from Bebbs, so I'm probably distantly related to this wazzock.

Sorry.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on September 11, 2014, 04:09:06 pm
Stupid Name from USAnia

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-29146045

"Do you know who I am?"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on September 15, 2014, 06:16:13 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-29205418
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 15, 2014, 08:09:15 pm
I suspect he's not the only one riding that lucrative bandwagon.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on September 15, 2014, 08:17:15 pm
Parents witnessed street bucket collectors helping themselves to cash for booze. Not good.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on September 20, 2014, 06:49:23 pm
David fingers-crossed-behind-my-back Cameron
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on September 20, 2014, 09:01:22 pm
I know he's an easy target but Shapps really is a twat

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/grant-shapps-makes-beautifully-awkward-twitter-typo-9737590.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 21, 2014, 03:37:44 am
Gordon Ramsay.  No particular reason save that I walked into this motel after ten hours of (mostly) driving and thes weary twatster was the first person I saw.

No, on the telly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on September 22, 2014, 12:00:21 pm
Who else but Teflon Tony "Middle East Peace Envoy" Bliar

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29305840

How about leading by example, you odious, war-mongering fuckhead. Give him desert kit, an SA-80 and boot the smarmy fucker out of a C-130 somewhere over Syria ... see what he thinks about deploying ground troops then.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 22, 2014, 12:08:40 pm
How about leading by example, you odious, war-mongering fuckhead. Give him desert kit, an SA-80 and boot the smarmy fucker out of a C-130 somewhere over Syria ... see what he thinks about deploying ground troops then.
I'd vote for that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 22, 2014, 03:41:13 pm
Give him an SA-80 by all means, but don't give him any ammunition.  We can't afford it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on September 22, 2014, 03:48:56 pm
Give him an SA-80 by all means, but don't give him any ammunition.  We can't afford it.
The mental image I have doesn't even afford him the luxury of a parachute. An anvil, perhaps, but not a parachute.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on September 27, 2014, 07:07:44 pm
Brooks Newmark.

Resigned, hooray! No more spoiling my dinner on Jonsnownews.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on September 27, 2014, 07:42:17 pm
Brooks Newmark.

Resigned, hooray! No more spoiling my dinner on Jonsnownews.

Really? He's my MP. What's he been up to?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on September 27, 2014, 07:50:22 pm
Brooks Newmark.

Resigned, hooray! No more spoiling my dinner on Jonsnownews.

Really? He's my MP. What's he been up to?

Sending explicit selfies, apparently. There are suggestions that it's a tabloid sting, however.

Quote
Sources told The Telegraph that Mr Newmark had sent the pictures to someone he believed was a woman using a social networking website, as part of a tabloid newspaper sting operation.

In a statement, Mr Newmark said: "I have decided to resign as Minister for Civil Society having been notified of a story to be published in a Sunday newspaper.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11125919/Conservative-minister-resigns-over-sex-scandal.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on September 27, 2014, 08:05:35 pm
Berk!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on October 01, 2014, 05:21:21 pm
Have we had David "imperial-non-metric-bill-of-rights" Cameron yet?

 >:(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 01, 2014, 05:33:36 pm
Have we had David "imperial-non-metric-bill-of-rights" Cameron yet?

 >:(

You beat me to it!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 01, 2014, 08:01:29 pm
Nick Tory-boy Robinson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 02, 2014, 08:40:20 pm
Matt Hancock, MP, Poet in Residence, Conservative Party.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on October 02, 2014, 09:34:35 pm
Oh you are a hard man it was a mistake.  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on October 02, 2014, 09:46:35 pm
Off to the M Hancock MP hall of shame ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on October 02, 2014, 10:19:31 pm
Brooks Newmark.
That's the in-house brand for the men's polyester blend suits from C&A*, isn't it?

*other high-street retailers are available.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 03, 2014, 10:33:54 am
Chris Grayling
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 03, 2014, 10:36:21 am
Jeremy Clarkson, supertroll.  Yet again!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 03, 2014, 10:45:47 am
Brooks Newmark.
That's the in-house brand for the men's polyester blend suits from C&A*, isn't it?

*other high-street retailers are available.

This is a candidate for Post of the Week.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on October 03, 2014, 06:22:23 pm
Jeremy Clarkson, supertroll.  Yet again!
Just for once, this one looks accidental. It seems to be the original registration from over 20 years ago, & nobody noticed the rather tenuous connection which could be made to the Falklands war if one was sufficiently obsessed. That they'd seek & find a car with such a number is a bit far-fetched. Too subtle for Clarkson et al.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 03, 2014, 10:17:20 pm
I think we need to designate a new level of twattery for Cameron and co. Even Thatcher would have balked at repealing human rights legislation.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 03, 2014, 11:24:49 pm
Surely Thatcher would not have allowed BRITAIN to be party to the Convention in the first place?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 04, 2014, 01:41:06 pm
Except she did, albeit indirectly and regretted it later. But of all the Bad Things she did in the name of security, she never went as far as repealing universal human rights.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 04, 2014, 02:00:30 pm
Except she did, albeit indirectly and regretted it later. But of all the Bad Things she did in the name of security, she never went as far as repealing universal human rights.

Only because Keith Joseph didn't think of it :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on October 10, 2014, 12:09:01 am
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=iB-FQRjd6b_9PM&tbnid=LvnU7NuQ6GLI5M:&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmariamuir.com%2Fdavid-cameron-a-son-hitler-wouldve-been-proud-of-needs-to-be-stopped-as-he-jumps-into-bed-with-monsanto%2F&ei=SBU3VOvpMofe7AbVsoGwAw&psig=AFQjCNFDyUFXWEMgnjIHkNZW9lJepy31kw&ust=1412982486404810
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 10, 2014, 01:31:46 am
So who's the tw@, David Cameron or Maria Muir?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on October 10, 2014, 11:17:19 am
Seeing as this is the Official yACF Two Minute Hate thread, need you ask? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 11, 2014, 10:55:57 pm
Brooks Newmark.

Resigned, hooray! No more spoiling my dinner on Jonsnownews.

Really? He's my MP. What's he been up to?

Sending explicit selfies, apparently. There are suggestions that it's a tabloid sting, however.

Quote
Sources told The Telegraph that Mr Newmark had sent the pictures to someone he believed was a woman using a social networking website, as part of a tabloid newspaper sting operation.

In a statement, Mr Newmark said: "I have decided to resign as Minister for Civil Society having been notified of a story to be published in a Sunday newspaper.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11125919/Conservative-minister-resigns-over-sex-scandal.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29585203  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on October 13, 2014, 07:35:36 pm
David Tredinnick, again. Why give health workers a pay rise when you could spend it on fairy woo instead.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 14, 2014, 04:31:30 am
At this time of year it is traditional for me to nominate serial whinge fountain, big-nosed Friend to the Panel-Beating Industry, racing motor-ist and twat Mr Jason Plato of Monaco, Oxon.  No Sunday afternoon of BRITISH Touring Car Championship racing upon the anbaric wireless-with-pictures has been complete this year without the BRDC's tame proboscis monkey blathering on about how unfair it is that the laws of physics permit the rear-wheel drive BMWs to accelerate from a standing start more effectively than his poxy front-wheel drive MG.

On Sunday this shockingly biased state of affairs forced Mr Plato to attempt to overtake the Beemer of a Mr Colin Turkington by taking to the wet grass on the approach to Paddock Hill Bend, which manoeuvre saw the motor-car of Mr Turkington end the race shortly thereafter, backwards and in the crash barrier.  After the drivers' title had been decided in Mr Turkington's favour.  I therefore suggest that Mr Plato gets some first-hand experience of the acceleration of a souped-up 1-Series by being firmly strapped into one which is then pushed out of the back door of a Lockheed C-130 Hercules, somewhere over territory occupied by IS(IS).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3949/15345628508_efc2cfb11c_c.jpg)
Jason Plato learns of his demotion to the back of the Brands Hatch grid, yesterday Sunday
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 14, 2014, 03:46:05 pm
Judy Finnigan.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on October 15, 2014, 02:54:30 pm
"Lord" Freud (http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/tory-minister-suggests-disabled-people-not-worth-the-minimum-wage--x1-AH7-XUl)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 15, 2014, 03:29:47 pm
"Lord" Freud (http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/tory-minister-suggests-disabled-people-not-worth-the-minimum-wage--x1-AH7-XUl)
Shameful.
I'd be happy to introduce my 'honourable' friend to a cricket bat with the words 'Sorry does not make things magically better' written on it. Repeatedly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 15, 2014, 07:56:58 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 15, 2014, 09:19:30 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
sparrows weep in silence . . .

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 15, 2014, 09:27:18 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
sparrows weep in silence . . .

Quote
The court had to calculate the value of the work carried out by the girl when she was being exploited and also the sum of benefits claimed fraudulently in her name.

The judge based it on the minimum wage, assuming she worked for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

Lawyers for the couple argued a deduction should be made for board and lodging accrued by the girl when she was with them.

Can I suggest those lawyers are taken outside in a public place and beaten by an angry mob?

I mean really, is "Royally taking the piss" a punishable crime?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 15, 2014, 09:28:11 pm
"Lord" Freud (http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/tory-minister-suggests-disabled-people-not-worth-the-minimum-wage--x1-AH7-XUl)
Shameful.
I'd be happy to introduce my 'honourable' friend to a cricket bat with the words 'Sorry does not make things magically better' written on it. Repeatedly.

I can think of one particular group of people who certainly are not worth a tenth of what they are paid, Lord Freud...   

The vile and unthinking idiot should immediately resign.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 15, 2014, 09:30:02 pm
"Lord" Freud (http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/tory-minister-suggests-disabled-people-not-worth-the-minimum-wage--x1-AH7-XUl)
Shameful.
I'd be happy to introduce my 'honourable' friend to a cricket bat with the words 'Sorry does not make things magically better' written on it. Repeatedly.

I can think of one particular group of people who certainly are not worth a tenth of what they are paid, Lord Freud...   

The vile and unthinking idiot should immediately resign.

You mean resign from the party who secretly agree with his views?  Why would he do that?  The Tories voted against the minimum wage, so why would he resign?  re-sign maybe.

It's like a member of the green party resigning for plotting to save some trees.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 15, 2014, 09:33:25 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
sparrows weep in silence . . .

Quote
The court had to calculate the value of the work carried out by the girl when she was being exploited and also the sum of benefits claimed fraudulently in her name.

The judge based it on the minimum wage, assuming she worked for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

Lawyers for the couple argued a deduction should be made for board and lodging accrued by the girl when she was with them.

Can I suggest those lawyers are taken outside in a public place and beaten by an angry mob?

I mean really, is "Royally taking the piss" a punishable crime?

I had read that, and wanted to give myself time to wind my neck in. I submitted the link as an example of multiple twattery, and you have indeed identified one of the things that made me want to scream.

All I would add re the lawyers is the suggestion that the claim may not have been their idea but have emanated from the central pair of slaver twats.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 15, 2014, 09:33:42 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
sparrows weep in silence . . .

Quote
The court had to calculate the value of the work carried out by the girl when she was being exploited and also the sum of benefits claimed fraudulently in her name.

The judge based it on the minimum wage, assuming she worked for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

Lawyers for the couple argued a deduction should be made for board and lodging accrued by the girl when she was with them.

Can I suggest those lawyers are taken outside in a public place and beaten by an angry mob?

I mean really, is "Royally taking the piss" a punishable crime?

I would really rather you reconsidered first.   Don't shoot the lawyer who has a legal and professional responsibility to do their utmost for their client, however vile it might appear to the layperson.   After all, you'd want your lawyer to try their best for you should you ever find yourself in the dock.

IIRC, people convicted who serve time and are later found not guilty have a deduction from their compensation for 'board and lodgings' at her maj's pleasure.     
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Paul on October 15, 2014, 11:19:45 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29559771
sparrows weep in silence . . .

Quote
The court had to calculate the value of the work carried out by the girl when she was being exploited and also the sum of benefits claimed fraudulently in her name.

The judge based it on the minimum wage, assuming she worked for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

Lawyers for the couple argued a deduction should be made for board and lodging accrued by the girl when she was with them.

Can I suggest those lawyers are taken outside in a public place and beaten by an angry mob?

I mean really, is "Royally taking the piss" a punishable crime?

I would really rather you reconsidered first.   Don't shoot the lawyer who has a legal and professional responsibility to do their utmost for their client, however vile it might appear to the layperson.   After all, you'd want your lawyer to try their best for you should you ever find yourself in the dock.

IIRC, people convicted who serve time and are later found not guilty have a deduction from their compensation for 'board and lodgings' at her maj's pleasure.   

It's not the same thing. She had no trial before her incarceration. No defence. No appeal. Her keepers raped her.

Moral considerations aside (yeah - lawyers can do this), the law is pretty clear that an illegal contract (how else could she be liable for board & lodging?) is unenforceable*.

I wouldn't be the lawyer arguing that she should be liable for rent and board to her kidnappers/rapists. Sometimes you just have to do what's right.

(*I guess they weren't arguing that there was anything like a contract, but discussing loss on a tortious basis, but I don't think that the tortfeasor in these circumstances gets to do so. I might be wrong, but the judge didn't seem to think so)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 15, 2014, 11:33:04 pm
A real, actual, human being would have refused to stand up and utter the sick request. 

Professional responsibilities to their client or otherwise.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 16, 2014, 12:07:14 am
Lee. I understand your point of view. I have given evidence in a lot of trials, and I have used that in several novels. In one of them*, I wrote about a barrister defending the repeated rape of a child. Said barrister asks the victim if (one of) the rapists is an attractive man

Confronted outside the court, following the guilty verdict, the lawyer explains, as Polar Bear suggests, that he has been passed a very shitty stick. He either deals with it, passes it on to some other poor bastard, or the REAL twat gets off on appeal.



*Ride On
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 16, 2014, 07:26:38 am
John Grisham
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 16, 2014, 10:04:59 am
A real, actual, human being would have refused to stand up and utter the sick request. 

Professional responsibilities to their client or otherwise.


Everyone is entitled to a defence, which means that lawyers often have to take cases that perhaps they'd rather not. It's no reflection on the individual lawyer; they're just doing their job. Though some do seem to relish being on the side of the crim!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 16, 2014, 01:52:24 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-29644124
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 16, 2014, 02:00:44 pm
A real, actual, human being would have refused to stand up and utter the sick request. 

Professional responsibilities to their client or otherwise.


Everyone is entitled to a defence

Asking for rent from the slave they repeatedly raped in their dungeon is not a defence.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 16, 2014, 02:08:49 pm
No, but it is a very clear window into what passes for their soul.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 19, 2014, 07:43:54 am
Oh dear, Jeremy Clarkson again  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 19, 2014, 11:40:32 pm
Liz Truss doesn't seem to be any better than Owen Patterson  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on October 20, 2014, 02:33:27 pm
Mike Read, always a twat, now qualifies for Supertwat to the power of lots
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 20, 2014, 02:51:42 pm
Oh yes.  he does that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: barakta on October 20, 2014, 06:16:49 pm
Liz Jones with her FAKE hearing dogs for the deaf that she's been asked to STOP writing about as if they're genuine: http://limpingchicken.com/2014/10/20/jones-fake-hearing-dogs/

Lord Fraud can fuck right off. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 20, 2014, 09:53:00 pm
:facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 20, 2014, 09:53:49 pm
Does Nigel Farage need adding?  For allying himself with fascists this time.  Nice to have his allegiances out in the open.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 20, 2014, 09:57:35 pm
Liz Jones with her FAKE hearing dogs for the deaf that she's been asked to STOP writing about as if they're genuine: http://limpingchicken.com/2014/10/20/jones-fake-hearing-dogs/

Lord Fraud can fuck right off.

Sounds like she's the sort of person that parks in a disabled parking spot.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 21, 2014, 12:53:13 am
Liz Jones certainly has plenty of previous in Premier-League twattery.  Was she the one who racked up a bazillion quid of debt and then wrote numerous newspaper columns on how it Wasn't Her Fault?  Or am I thinking of some other twat?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on October 21, 2014, 01:41:33 am
I believe she also expounded upon the travails of the poor, put-upon middle classes who could scarcely be expected to cope with a mere four houses to choose from, the difficulties in dealing with domestic help, and the tragedies involved in romancing, marrying, quarrelling with and divorcing a significantly younger man.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 21, 2014, 09:44:05 am
Liz Jones certainly has plenty of previous in Premier-League twattery.  Was she the one who racked up a bazillion quid of debt and then wrote numerous newspaper columns on how it Wasn't Her Fault?  Or am I thinking of some other twat?
The banking industry as a whole, perhaps?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on October 26, 2014, 08:41:15 pm
Michael Fallon

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29776970 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29776970)

One of his colleagues once described him to me as "a thoroughly unpleasant sh*t", which is saying something for a Tory MP.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on October 26, 2014, 08:48:42 pm
Back when Fallon was MP for Darlo, my dad told him to fuck off and made him run away.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 27, 2014, 09:58:49 am
Back when Fallon was MP for Darlo, my dad told him to fuck off and made him run away.
Shouldn't this be in the tenuous claims to fame thread? It's worth boasting about.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on October 27, 2014, 10:48:23 pm
I'm pretty sure I already have - but the search function doesn't look as though it works on that board, and I'm not reading the whole thing again!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 28, 2014, 02:15:53 am
For repeated and dedicated services to arch-twattery I nominate Google searching as implemented in this 'ere forum ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 28, 2014, 09:22:52 am
For repeated and dedicated services to arch-twattery I nominate Google
FTFY.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 28, 2014, 11:14:21 am
FruitCo MegaCorp of Cupertino, Leftpondia - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/27/icloud_data_grab_irks_privacy_conscious/ refers.

Out-snooping even the Chocolate Factory - that's pretty impressive going.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 28, 2014, 12:36:08 pm
Michael Fallon

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29776970 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29776970)

One of his colleagues once described him to me as "a thoroughly unpleasant sh*t", which is saying something for a Tory MP.

And now David Blunkett.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/28/david-blunkett-praises-michael-fallon-swamped-migrants
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 28, 2014, 12:46:13 pm
Yes, well immigration is one of those topics we dare not talk about for fear of being labelled fascist. However, it's very real issue for many people and it will be talked about, however much you condemn the messengers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 28, 2014, 12:47:44 pm
Yes, an important issue.  Got to keep these Jews down.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 28, 2014, 12:58:07 pm
I don't know what you mean by that, but I'm sure it's not complimentary! However, it's a fact that ever since Enoch Powell's overblown and distasteful speech it's been extremely difficult to discuss immigration in a grown-up and dispassionate way, to the extent that successive governments have either ignored the issue or exacerbated it by removing oversight rather than engaging in constructive debate. The result has been that anyone who questions immigration is, more or less instantly, labelled at the very least a reactionary and often considerably worse. Yet it is a fact that net immigration to this country is proceeding at a rate that is uncomfortable for many and they wish to see some control exercised over it. Surely the debate can be had without accusing everyone who engages in it of occupying the extreme right or left of the stage?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 28, 2014, 04:09:15 pm
Indeed. An example:
Why are the people sleeping rough in Calais not claiming their refuge in France?
(A question with multiple and complicated answers)

Answer, as immediately given above, FASCIST!


People will discuss it. It is an important and emotive subject. Immediately making an obvious accusation of racism is not helpful. I have said many times that as long as the immediate reply to any comment about immigration is to label the questioner a fascist, people will find themselves drifting to extremes. UKIP is one good example.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 28, 2014, 04:18:37 pm
Don't get me wrong, Steph, I'm not promoting (or looking for) any easy answers - migration within the EU is not particularly significant, works in several directions at once, and is subject to fashion and the variability of local economies (as it is equally within, say, the US). Blocking any one of them will have knock-on effects that aren't desirable. Asylum is a different issue, but - as you imply - the answer isn't any unilateral action on the part of the UK. But there is a perception that the UK has borne more than its fair share of immigration, and a suspicion that the reason is a Welfare State that is more generous than elsewhere. Both the assessment of the problem - if there actually is one - and the search for a solution rely on the ability to openly discuss the issues and the acceptance that there are different points of view. Pejoratively labelling anyone simply for raising the question is akin to censorship.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 28, 2014, 04:27:17 pm
But there is a perception that the UK has borne more than its fair share of immigration,
It took me about 15s to find the figures that show that that perception is absolute bollocks.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 28, 2014, 04:29:40 pm
But there is a perception that the UK has borne more than its fair share of immigration,
It took me about 15s to find the figures that show that that perception is absolute bollocks.
Really? Do share....?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 28, 2014, 05:03:06 pm
And now David Blunkett.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/28/david-blunkett-praises-michael-fallon-swamped-migrants

May his guide dog bite him on the arse.

If the "economic migrants "in for e.g. Wisbech were Scousers1 instead of Bulgarians, would the likes of Fallon, Blunkett and Farrago be making a fuss?

Edit
1 - yes, I know it's unlikely...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 28, 2014, 08:52:24 pm
Natacha Bouchart.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 28, 2014, 09:29:39 pm
FFS!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on October 28, 2014, 09:52:11 pm
FruitCo MegaCorp of Cupertino, Leftpondia - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/27/icloud_data_grab_irks_privacy_conscious/ refers.

Out-snooping even the Chocolate Factory - that's pretty impressive going.

Julian Assange* has a new book out about that lot http://www.newsweek.com/assange-google-not-what-it-seems-279447?piano_d=1 (http://www.newsweek.com/assange-google-not-what-it-seems-279447?piano_d=1)

*probably has an mention in the Super Twat thread of his own....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 29, 2014, 10:44:25 am
FruitCo MegaCorp of Cupertino, Leftpondia - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/27/icloud_data_grab_irks_privacy_conscious/ refers.

Out-snooping even the Chocolate Factory - that's pretty impressive going.

Julian Assange* has a new book out about that lot http://www.newsweek.com/assange-google-not-what-it-seems-279447?piano_d=1 (http://www.newsweek.com/assange-google-not-what-it-seems-279447?piano_d=1)

*probably has an mention in the Super Twat thread of his own....
I dunno about Asshatange, but Eric Schmidt has certainly elevated twattery to epic levels over the years - I'd very much like to see a circle of Hell set aside for him, Page and Brin.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on October 29, 2014, 01:32:07 pm
Natacha Bouchart.

I thought she did rather well and some of our MPS were gratuitously rude to her, given that her national government's failure to deal with illegal immigrants is not her responsibility. 

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on October 29, 2014, 02:42:31 pm
Natacha Bouchart.

I thought she did rather well and some of our MPS were gratuitously rude to her, given that her national government's failure to deal with illegal immigrants is not her responsibility. 

I agree. And I think she made a very good point that £36 a week quite probably seems like a fortune to people who have no idea how much it costs to live here, and simply relate it to the cost of living in their own country. However, I presume the French (and other EU countries) have some kind of similar payout? I just don't get why so many people would risk everything to get here!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SteveC on October 29, 2014, 07:34:39 pm
I just don't get why so many people would risk everything to get here!
I've always assumed it's the language. Most people learn English as a second language and if you're desperate enough to want to risk everything, you might as well try to end up somewhere where you'll be able to communicate.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 29, 2014, 08:58:26 pm
One explanation I heard from someone who already had 'status' in Germany was "Because I'll get more money"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Paul on October 29, 2014, 09:37:44 pm
I just don't get why so many people would risk everything to get here!

I think you would have to be them, there, to 'get' it.

I'm glad I'm not.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 30, 2014, 12:09:18 am
Andrew Lawrence, alleged comedian.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 30, 2014, 01:18:49 am
Definitely with Frankie Boyle on this one.  Also I've never heard of Andrew Lawrence, probably because he's not funny enough to be on TV.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 30, 2014, 09:58:18 am
Apparently there are ivory towers in west London. Populated undoubtedly by the metropolitan elite. Now I know the location I'm thinking of an anthropological expedition to find the lost tribe of the metropolitan elite in their native ivory towers.

I can't remember who, but he was a twat, some batshit crazy tory dipshit rambling on about out-of-touch Westminster elite with a reference to the Praetorian guard. Getting down with the language of the street, innit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on October 30, 2014, 05:54:13 pm
I don't know why you lot are accusing Andrew Lawrence of not being a Comedian. I thought his Facebook response was hilarious:

Quote from: Andrew 'if you're in a hole, keep digging furiously' Lawrence
Here are a few clarifications of what I meant in my October 25th post- 'Can't help but notice increasingly...'.
-A post which has attracted a level of attention I neither wanted, nor courted.
Firstly, here is what I intended by the term 'ethnic comedian':
A comedian from a minority background who uses their own ethnicity as a foundation for the whole of their act, rather than looking at wider aspects of society and exploring outside of their own personal experience.
Now, here is what I intended by the term
'Women-posing-as-comics':
Director of BBC television Danny Cohen's aggressive diversity politics are well documented.
Quotas have been introduced, whereby every panel show must book a certain number of female and ethnic comedians, regardless of ability or merit.
Objectively then, there are comedians on panel shows who are there first and foremost because of their gender or ethnicity.
Some of these comedians are very good.
Because there is currently not a sufficiently large enough pool of female comedians with the requisite experience and ability to fill the quota, there are females who've been booked for these shows who are either poor comedians, not comedians at all, or aspiring female comedians that are still learning their craft, but have not yet reached a decent professional standard.
These females I have described as 'women-posing-as-comedians'.
The upshot of all that is that there are still many women coming across incredibly badly on panel shows, which is helping to perpetuate the myth that women aren't funny.
The hope is that women currently on panel shows, will further legitimise stand-up comedy as a career for women and encourage other women to take up comedy. Which is an admirable aim.
Unfortunately for every female who gets on a panel show, there are very many male comedians with more ability and experience who are not and will never get the opportunity to be on one. I think that's a great shame for TV audiences.
There are also male comedians who've been doing these shows for far too many years and have become incredibly stale, too lazy to move on to other things.Some of them are fat and balding.
Oh, and I don't have a problem with properly regulated immigration and I don't have a problem with immigrants.
I do have a great deal of concern about the lack of border controls in this country and subsequent gross overpopulation as a result of EU legislation, which I believe adversely affects all our quality of life.


Something needs to be done about that BBC quota that requires every panel show to have a 'certain number* of comedians' who 'use their own ethnicity as a foundation for the whole of their act, rather than looking at wider aspects of society and exploring outside of their own personal experience'. Although thinking about it, that does explain Jeremy Clarkson.

And I love his 'for every female who gets on a panel show, there are very many male comedians with more ability and experience who are not and will never get the opportunity to be on one'. How he managed to resit not following that with 'Me! Me!' I don't know.



* Andrew, I think you'll find that number is '0'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: sooper8 on October 31, 2014, 09:30:08 am
Simon Mayo Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 31, 2014, 09:41:43 am
David Coburn.  He's UKIP, so it goes without saying that he's a Supertwat, but he's gone the extra mile.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 31, 2014, 09:44:15 am
Simon Mayo Super-Twat.
What's he done now?  ::)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on October 31, 2014, 09:57:00 am
Simon Mayo Super-Twat.
What's he done now?  ::)
He exists. Surely that's bad enough?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 31, 2014, 10:05:17 am
Yup.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on November 05, 2014, 09:34:42 am
"Sir" Andrew Green  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 05, 2014, 12:44:35 pm
I have just edited his Wikinaccurate page so it now reads "Sir Andrew Green, KCMG (born 6 August 1941) is a British former diplomat, the founding chairman of the organization MigrationWatch UK and a massive fucking twat."

Lie ^^^^. Though I did change "former British diplomat" to "British former diplomat".  The word "unfortunately" may have appeared in the edit summary.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 06, 2014, 02:41:58 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29931463#

The land owner has not condemned the actions nor said if he knew. Make that two super-twats, and in addition I rather suspect that neither a grand in costs (probably paid by his employer) nor a suspended sentence is going to deter him from similar future offences.

I am also NOT holding my breath waiting for him to lose his job permanently. About time E and W followed the Scottish lead on this one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on November 07, 2014, 11:12:33 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29931463#

The land owner has not condemned the actions nor said if he knew. Make that two super-twats, and in addition I rather suspect that neither a grand in costs (probably paid by his employer) nor a suspended sentence is going to deter him from similar future offences.

I am also NOT holding my breath waiting for him to lose his job permanently. About time E and W followed the Scottish lead on this one.

The pudding's not yet proven:
https://raptorpersecutionscotland.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/first-vicarious-liability-prosecution-part-3/

... though prosecution is at least an option.  And Scottish Ministers are at least talking the talk.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 08, 2014, 12:53:20 pm
"Dapper" "Laughs."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on November 08, 2014, 01:02:29 pm
"Dapper" "Laughs."

Think he goes well beyond super twat!

Hyper twat thread anyone? ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 08, 2014, 08:50:21 pm
Yep.  I was only vaguely aware of this 'phenomenon' until this week, when I was appalled by more information.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on November 09, 2014, 10:18:56 am
"Dapper" "Laughs."

Has Wowbagger moment.  Googles.  Goes off to wash hands.... :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 09, 2014, 01:21:42 pm
"Dapper" "Laughs."

Has Wowbagger moment.  Googles.  Goes off to wash hands.... :sick:
Er... I had just assumed EG was referring to Dappy, who is indeed a supertwat in his own right, so didn't check. Just have. Ugh.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 09, 2014, 04:09:37 pm
In a similar vein, Julien Blanc

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/julien-blanc-is-a-racist-sexual-predator-teaching-men-to-prey-on-women-like-me--he-must-be-stopped-9843939.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on November 10, 2014, 11:11:09 pm
"Dapper" "Laughs."

Doubt he's laughing now. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/10/itv-drops-dapper-laughs-criticism-daniel-oreilly-misogyny (http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/10/itv-drops-dapper-laughs-criticism-daniel-oreilly-misogyny)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 11, 2014, 09:03:22 am
Although why the hell ITV commissioned him in the first place is a disgrace.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 11, 2014, 09:32:08 am
"Dapper" "Laughs."

It's only taken me three days to work out what this is about.

I need to stay in more ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on November 11, 2014, 10:00:59 am
Has Wowbagger moment.

I have the slight opposite problem. I thought people had moved on from being interested in this idiot two years ago. Didn't realise he'd been given his own TV series until this story came up. What a twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 11, 2014, 04:11:30 pm
Sorry, but Katie Hopkins, yet again *sigh* :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 11, 2014, 05:36:05 pm
First Bus get a collective supreme twattery award for this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-30010126

and Unilever run them a close second: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30004158
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on November 12, 2014, 01:25:41 am
First Bus get a collective supreme twattery award for this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-30010126

While I don't disagree, I reckon we'd also be offering them as a sacrifice on the twattery altar if the driver had turfed a passenger with a child in a pushchair off the bus ...

Quote
and Unilever run them a close second: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30004158

Hmmm. From that story, I'd be more inclined to nominate Hampton Creek: making an egg-free faux-mayo is all very well; marketing it as Just Mayo and putting a picture of an egg on the packaging less so.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 12, 2014, 04:30:51 pm
Redfoo.

If you don't know who this dick-clown is, don't bother Googling.  He's seen what sexism did for Robyn Thicke's profile, and decided to be in on the action.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 16, 2014, 09:01:55 pm
Whoever came up with that Sainsbury's Christmas ad.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on November 19, 2014, 11:37:21 pm
David Cameron yet again (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2014/11/prime-minister-david-cameron-on-pensions?_ga=1.168760743.70909162.1375831515) pension stealing twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 20, 2014, 12:08:23 am
Whoever came up with that Sainsbury's Christmas ad.

FTFY
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 20, 2014, 06:39:06 am
David Cameron yet again (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2014/11/prime-minister-david-cameron-on-pensions?_ga=1.168760743.70909162.1375831515) pension stealing twat
Whatever else he might have done, I see nothing in that article (or elsewhere) to justify calling him 'pension stealing'. Have I missed something? What are you referring to?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 20, 2014, 09:49:39 am
David Cameron yet again (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2014/11/prime-minister-david-cameron-on-pensions?_ga=1.168760743.70909162.1375831515) pension stealing twat
Whatever else he might have done, I see nothing in that article (or elsewhere) to justify calling him 'pension stealing'. Have I missed something? What are you referring to?
Nothing in the article. He just nicked the extra amount people would get if they'd contracted in. Hits in 2016 with the flat rate pension.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 20, 2014, 06:53:14 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-30134107

"#rapetruck"

Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Juan Martín on November 20, 2014, 08:41:25 pm
Spotted on the TV: Jay Rayner. Jay. Rayner. Evening ruined.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on November 20, 2014, 09:06:46 pm
David Cameron yet again (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2014/11/prime-minister-david-cameron-on-pensions?_ga=1.168760743.70909162.1375831515) pension stealing twat
Whatever else he might have done, I see nothing in that article (or elsewhere) to justify calling him 'pension stealing'. Have I missed something? What are you referring to?

About £250k out of mine.
But we're all in this together
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on November 20, 2014, 09:10:49 pm
Don't worry chaps.   He gave it to the needy higher rate taxpayers in the guise of a 5% tax cut.    Somebody has to get rich during a recession.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on November 20, 2014, 10:37:53 pm
I am increasingly frustrated by seeing banks fined etc for maladministration, but not bankers. What price accountability? We are, and will be, paying for this lots f'ups in 50 years time.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on November 21, 2014, 10:01:13 am
I am increasingly frustrated by seeing banks fined etc for maladministration, but not bankers. What price accountability? We are, and will be, paying for this lots f'ups in 50 years time.

It always puzzles me too, it's not the bank that pays the fines, it's the customers. So the bank screws its customers and then passes on the fine for being caught doing so. That'll learn them.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on November 21, 2014, 11:44:43 am
Technically, it's the shareholders that pay the fine although, of course, like any business the bank can then recoup its costs through higher charges to its customers, but those customers are free to move their business.

On the bankers themselves, IANAL, but as I understand it, there is no law against incompetence or deliberately making a complete hash of everything in a privately-owned company.  (I think there may be something on maladministration in a public office.)  Where these has been genuine fraud, there may be a chance of prosecution, but I don't think you can (or should be able) to throw someone in jail simply for being spectacularly bad at their job.  However, in most significant financial roles, the regulator can determine that you are not fit and proper, which makes you pretty much unemployable, except by Wonga.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 21, 2014, 01:41:55 pm
David Cameron yet again (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2014/11/prime-minister-david-cameron-on-pensions?_ga=1.168760743.70909162.1375831515) pension stealing twat
Whatever else he might have done, I see nothing in that article (or elsewhere) to justify calling him 'pension stealing'. Have I missed something? What are you referring to?

About £250k out of mine.
But we're all in this together

There's a backstory here I'm not privy to, I think. I get what MrC is talking about, though I have to say that I think the flat rate pension was inevitable whoever was in government (and is the quid pro quo for sticking with unfunded pensions when we could have sorted that out many, many years ago). Was your contracted-in 2ndSP worth £250k? Following advice that was pretty common in the '80s, I contracted out way back then and rolled it all up once pension providers no longer had to account it separately a year or two ago. It wasn't worth anything like that much, and (in my case) it wouldn't have been had I remained contracted in for all that time. If you got stung for that much, ouch - I can see where you're coming from!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 23, 2014, 04:17:57 pm
No, Eddie Jordan, there at at least three sports in Italy.  Ever heard of the Giro d'Italia?

Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 24, 2014, 03:37:33 pm
Theresa "The time is right for more terror powers" May.

No. It. Fucking. ISN'T

We do not need yet more knee-jerk legislation rubber-stamped through Parliament under the guise of protecting us from Terry Wrist and his mates - they won the battle years ago. The biggest threat the the UK's national security is it's own sodding government - emigration is starting to look like a seriously tempting proposition.

Irrespective of whichever circle of Hell Osama bin-Liner is currently occupying, he's probably laughing his arse off and "1984" was a work of fiction, not a fucking policy manual.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 24, 2014, 03:45:46 pm
emigration is starting to look like a seriously tempting proposition.


But where would you go that isn't worse?  New Zealand seems a bit better but I have serious moral quibbles about living in an occupied country.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 24, 2014, 03:54:17 pm
emigration is starting to look like a seriously tempting proposition.


But where would you go that isn't worse?  New Zealand seems a bit better but I have serious moral quibbles about living in an occupied country.
Russia would be a good bet, if only because Vlad the Mad doesn't hide the fact that he's a totalitarian basket-case.

But seriously ...

Given the number of jobs in Das Vaterland I've had punted in my direction recently, it's very tempting to pursue those opportunities further although anything long-term would require a bit of work on my language skills.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Auntie Helen on November 24, 2014, 08:11:09 pm
That's why I'm here - safe in the Fatherland. Where people seem to have just a bit more idea about their history, how it happened and how in the future to avoid it. Although there are still some dodgy people.

The economy here is maybe not as good as people think though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 24, 2014, 08:42:35 pm
emigration is starting to look like a seriously tempting proposition.


But where would you go that isn't worse?  New Zealand seems a bit better but I have serious moral quibbles about living in an occupied country.

You live in an occupied country now. At what point does the occupation become old enough to not be your moral responsibility?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 24, 2014, 08:59:20 pm
When the occupiers have a different skin colour to the occupiers who occupied the place first?  This is why UKIP aren't racist.

Except when they're being racist, obv.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on November 24, 2014, 09:05:21 pm
The Maoris fought the Brits to the point that they signed the Treaty of Waitangi. Can't think of any other native folk that managed that. The treaty means that NZ could be described as 'less occupied' than most other former colonies.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 25, 2014, 08:20:22 am
Then the brits ignored the treaty . . .
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 25, 2014, 11:40:51 am
David "Do you know who I am?" Mellor.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30188899
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 25, 2014, 02:58:08 pm
Stone me, what a tool!

I'm almost ashamed to say that I was amused by Kelvin McKenzie's comment.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on November 26, 2014, 12:25:02 am
Stone me, what a tool!

I'm almost ashamed to say that I was amused by Kelvin McKenzie's comment.
If he was a tool, he might have been useful for something, getting a Marc Almond out of a schoolboy or something!

Quote Mark Lamar " Marc Almond, the only start known to have gagged on a fruit"!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on November 26, 2014, 12:01:30 pm
Jeremy "I've gone to A&E rather than wait to see a GP" Hunt

About the only good thing I can take from this is that he might have seen first-hand some of the carnage his privatisation by stealth (and other, less stealthy, methods) is doing to the NHS.

Other than that, he's a chinless cunt of the highest order.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on November 26, 2014, 07:40:48 pm
Jeremy "I've gone to A&E rather than wait to see a GP" Hunt

About the only good thing I can take from this is that he might have seen first-hand some of the carnage his privatisation by stealth (and other, less stealthy, methods) is doing to the NHS.

Other than that,
he's a chinless cunt of the highest order.

FTFY :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on November 28, 2014, 05:52:50 pm
The Maoris fought the Brits to the point that they signed the Treaty of Waitangi. Can't think of any other native folk that managed that. The treaty means that NZ could be described as 'less occupied' than most other former colonies.
Not quite. The wars between Maori & British settlers & troops were after the treaty.

The Maori did fight damned well, though, & when the wars stopped, there were still sizable areas effectively under Maori rule. They were gradually absorbed into the colony by peaceful integration into the economy & administration of the colony.

The Maori honed their skill at using firearms, & devised tactics for countering them, in the Musket Wars between Maori tribes, from the early 1800s up to about 1840. They got rather good at building fortifications able to withstand artillery, for example. They also built up quite a stock of guns, bought from European traders.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on November 29, 2014, 09:26:31 am
Not for the first time, Norman Tebbitt

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30257544 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30257544)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 29, 2014, 10:24:07 am
He hasn't thought this through, as it allows special privileges to the descendants of Communists and socialists.

And, conversely, suggests we should deport most of the aristos.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on November 29, 2014, 12:42:44 pm
Not for the first time, Norman Tebbitt

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30257544 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30257544)
He hasn't thought this through, as it allows special privileges to the descendants of Communists and socialists.

And, conversely, suggests we should deport most of the aristos.
And precludes reconciliation (something I feel very strongly about, particularly in the context Tebbs has just invoked - oh so extremely simplistically)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on December 05, 2014, 01:04:11 pm
Nigel Farage (again)

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on December 05, 2014, 01:08:14 pm
Nigel Farage (again)

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
Bit hypocritical coming from a tit like Farage ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on December 06, 2014, 03:30:42 pm
Mr Farage. Please could you perhaps sit in a corner and shut up. You are embarrassing us and making us feel awkward.

Breastfeeding doesn't get much more British and ostentatious than this. (https://twitter.com/HistoryNeedsYou/status/540970151672545280/photo/1)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on December 06, 2014, 03:42:28 pm
Nigel Farage (as a pre-emptive strike.  Let's face it, it can't be long until he says something twattish again).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on December 07, 2014, 01:48:01 pm
Clintons Cards http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/clintons-faces-backlash-over-shameful-christmas-card--why-santa-claus-must-live-on-a-council-estate-9908540.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/clintons-faces-backlash-over-shameful-christmas-card--why-santa-claus-must-live-on-a-council-estate-9908540.html)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on December 07, 2014, 05:55:09 pm
Nigel Farage (as a pre-emptive strike.  Let's face it, it can't be long until he says something twattish again).

Something like this, perhaps:

Quote
"That is nothing to do with professionalism, what it does have to do with is a population that is going through the roof chiefly because of open-door immigration and the fact that the M4 is not as navigable as it used to be."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-30370570

Ask and the Xenophobe-in-Chief will deliver. Whatever shit he's smoking, I want some.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: RJ on December 07, 2014, 10:32:30 pm
Has his chauffeur not heard of AA Route Planner? (No point at all in asking whether Nige knows anything about the M4 relief road saga - streuth, it's not even in England)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on December 07, 2014, 10:59:03 pm
He told LBC radio: “You look at all the other leaders of political parties. They, of course, all have the state provide them with, you know, the means to get around and with security. The state doesn’t provide Ukip with anything.

He said the government has previously refused his request for help with his security bills.

“I’m not having an argument over it, the fact is we don’t get help. Do I need a security? Yes. And do I need to be driven around from place to place? I think I probably do,” he said.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: loadsabikes on December 07, 2014, 11:05:40 pm
Well come on, he can't be expected to drive himself, he's usually pissed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 08, 2014, 10:22:16 pm
In the few short moments in between NF asserting his right to be SuperTwat In Perpetuity, we have one to slip in:

Nigel Mills MP
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 09, 2014, 01:32:35 pm
Another long-term resident of this thread returns: The vile James Delingpole (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/09/How-Nigel-Farage-outfoxed-the-breast-Nazis)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 09, 2014, 02:04:21 pm
Another long-term resident of this thread returns: The vile James Delingpole (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/09/How-Nigel-Farage-outfoxed-the-breast-Nazis)
Quote
It simply wasn't done in the old days

What's that famous victorian statue in london? Victoria memorial
With the breastfeeding mother . . .

Delingpole isn't just a super twat, he's an ignorant stupid super twat. More of a syphilitic bellend, really.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 09, 2014, 02:08:33 pm
He's a...he's a...a Delingpole!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 09, 2014, 02:34:00 pm
I'll be honest, I think babies should be kept in sealed boxes and fed biscuits and money through a slot until they're 18. It's the only way. Mind you, I find the entire breast-feeding thing a bit odd. I've never been offended. There's plenty of men willing to spend good money just to see breasts. I expect most women can get the same for free. All the rather odd comparisons with public urination and sex. Really, they think feeding a baby is akin to taking a piss? It must make dinner an odd experience for them.

I think on the subject of good manners, Mr Delingpole, that it ought to be good manners not to make such a cunt of yourself in public.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 09, 2014, 02:36:33 pm
I do wonder what goes on at mealtimes at public school.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 09, 2014, 05:21:56 pm
I do wonder what goes on at mealtimes at public school.

Think "chimps' tea party" but with less emphasis on the gourmet aspect.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 09, 2014, 05:26:56 pm
I'm trying hard not to think about it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 09, 2014, 05:36:38 pm
Another long-term resident of this thread returns: The vile James Delingpole (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/09/How-Nigel-Farage-outfoxed-the-breast-Nazis)

We've known for years that Delingpole is a Twat of Homeric proportions but I hadn't realised that there were so many Twats who agree with him.  Reading the comments on that piece of ill-informed Twattery made me want to don a balaclava and a pair of heavy boots and commit an arson attack on the offices of the Daily Heil.

Bit like a normal Tuesday, in fact.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 09, 2014, 05:52:16 pm
Sorry, I thought was a daily activity for you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on December 09, 2014, 05:52:51 pm
He also scores extra points on the Twat bingo card for "places like Africa". Shorthand for "If you've not stopped reading this already, probably best to stop now as I am not competent to hold an informed opinion on this subject".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 09, 2014, 08:37:55 pm
He also scores extra points on the Twat bingo card for "places like Africa". Shorthand for "If you've not stopped reading this already, probably best to stop now as I am not competent to hold an informed opinion on this subject".

I've just made the mistake of Googling him. Good god, I've done shits that are more lucid and better informed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on December 10, 2014, 09:46:11 am
I do wonder what goes on at mealtimes at public school.

Just watch 'The Riot Club' (http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/27/tory-mps-bfi-posh-bullingdon-club).  It's a docudrama about the Bullingdon Club.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on December 10, 2014, 08:28:49 pm
Another long-term resident of this thread returns: The vile James Delingpole (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/09/How-Nigel-Farage-outfoxed-the-breast-Nazis)

Interesting.

Trouble is, his core point is probably correct

Quote
Farage, in other words, got his response spot on. It is, I think, the greatest of all his strengths, this ability he has to shoot from the hip (as opposed to ducking the issue, which is what most of his career-safe political contemporaries would have done in the same situation) and say what the man or woman in the street actually thinks, as opposed to what the metropolitan elite think they ought to think.

It so happens that Claridges doesn't (?) have a dress code about ladies breast feeding, but they do about a host of other things - I couldn't get in there in shorts for example. I'm rather pleased that the whole thing became an issue and probably brings the day when breastfeeding in public doesn't warrant a mention anywhere. But, to suggest that a media savvy person was surprised to be asked to desist (ETA or more particularly to cover her breast and continue) is stretching credibility beyond breaking point. Good luck to her an'all, and as posted elsewhere I love the cafe that offered to cover UKIP supporters with a cloth so that people didn't have to look at a tit, but that quote tells it like it is.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on December 10, 2014, 09:45:11 pm
Trouble is, his core point is probably correct

Quote
Farage, in other words, got his response spot on. It is, I think, the greatest of all his strengths, this ability he has to shoot from the hip (as opposed to ducking the issue, which is what most of his career-safe political contemporaries would have done in the same situation) and say what the man or woman in the street actually thinks, as opposed to what the metropolitan elite think they ought to think.

Therein lies the great confidence trick of UKIP. The people whose sensibilities he claims was protecting were dining at an exclusive Mayfair hotel where afternoon tea for two will set you back over £100. Yet those who object to requiring a woman to cover herself up in public (oh, the irony) are labelled the metropolitan elite. I note also that in the latest 'bad apple' general secretary Roger Bird, thought it appropriate to "interview" Natasha Bolter at his Pall Mall club, the Oxford and Cambridge. I wonder how many men or women in the street are allowed to use its elite metropolitan facilities.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on December 10, 2014, 10:55:34 pm


Therein lies the great confidence trick of UKIP. The people whose sensibilities he claims was protecting were dining at an exclusive Mayfair hotel where afternoon tea for two will set you back over £100. Yet those who object to requiring a woman to cover herself up in public (oh, the irony) are labelled the metropolitan elite. I note also that in the latest 'bad apple' general secretary Roger Bird, thought it appropriate to "interview" Natasha Bolter at his Pall Mall club, the Oxford and Cambridge. I wonder how many men or women in the street are allowed to use its elite metropolitan facilities.

Sorry, I don't agree. He doesn't claim to be protecting sensibilities, instead he accurately senses that the Man On The Clapham Omnibus will say "Oh, I'm broad minded but I wouldn't want my mum/daughter/aunt to be offended". Which is polite speak for someone who doesn't know what he should think until the Daily Mail tells him. I'm being over caustic, but you know what I mean. Also, there is something deep in the psyche - not just of the English, but that's who we are talking about - that has foreskin tugging forelock tugging as a proper state of affairs. Anyone who is in an expensive joint deserves to be there, respect flows to them just for existing. So, the irony is completely absent.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 11, 2014, 03:02:02 pm
Ian Gordon, a previously obscure banker:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30426245
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 11, 2014, 04:50:26 pm
Back with James Delingpole: James Delingpole is a bit of a tit (http://crispian-jago.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/james-delingpole-hockey-stick.html).

Thanks to Dr Larrington for sending me the link to Crispian Jago's webby SCIENCE.  I have spent a fair amount of this afternoon laughing immoderately.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on December 11, 2014, 08:37:57 pm
Nina Myskow, this evening on PM. Summary: it's bad of women to change their babies in the disabled loos, but OK for able bodied people to use them, if there isn't a queue.

Julie Fenandez kicked her arse.

(43:42 in here (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04tlk9b) )
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 11, 2014, 09:53:42 pm
Nina Myskow, this evening on PM. Summary: it's bad of women to change their babies in the disabled loos, but OK for able bodied people to use them, if there isn't a queue.

Julie Fenandez kicked her arse.

(43:42 in here (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04tlk9b) )

Didn't she just?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on December 11, 2014, 09:58:53 pm
Nina Myskow, this evening on PM. Summary: it's bad of women to change their babies in the disabled loos, but OK for able bodied people to use them, if there isn't a queue.

Julie Fenandez kicked her arse.

(43:42 in here (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04tlk9b) )

Further thoughts; where does the BBC get these pointless wobblygobs? Does it keep them under the studio desk?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 11, 2014, 10:19:04 pm
Nina Myskow is a former editor of "Jackie" which clearly make her ideally qualified to comment on the Proper Uses of disabled bogs.

Or something.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on December 15, 2014, 03:37:36 pm
Ian Gordon, a previously obscure banker:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30426245

And another
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30475232
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on December 17, 2014, 07:47:48 am
This company for corporate twattery
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30509906
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 30, 2014, 10:31:14 am
I've never heard of Milo Yiannopoulos before, but he was on Womans Hour just now, suggesting that feminists need to 'calm down, dear' or some such.  Utter supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on December 30, 2014, 10:13:14 pm
Katie fucking Hopkins has surpassed her levels of super-twattery today and gone into a whole new realm of obergruppentwattery.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Redlight on December 31, 2014, 02:41:23 pm
I don't understand why people get so worked up about Katie Hopkins. Yes, she seems to be a publicity-seeking pub bore who delights in saying things that are calculated to offend, but that's the point. She\s just another version of Richard Littlejohn, Melanie Phillips, Sarah Vine or any of the so-called "controversial" commentators that have disgraced the media through the years.  A generation ago, we had John Junor (who really was obnoxious) and Patricia Boxall. In another decade, we'll have some new upstart, groomed to seek notoriety.

By getting worked up, people give Hopkins the attention she so obviously craves. As is often said, why feed a troll?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on December 31, 2014, 03:21:20 pm
By getting worked up, people give Hopkins the attention she so obviously craves. As is often said, why feed a troll?

The inability of people to refrain from feeding the trolls makes more sense if you accept that the internet is as much - if not more - a masturbatory aid for the ego as it is for genitalia.

There's nothing quite like the warm and fuzzy afterglow engendered by some furious self-affirmation - $troll gets off on getting a reaction, everyone else gets off on their own self-righteous indignation/having their prejudices confirmed. It's mental crack cocaine...  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 06, 2015, 03:35:55 pm
No name for this one (yet), but I think we can all agree he has earned his place in this thread.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 06, 2015, 04:58:50 pm
His name is Rayhan Qadar.  Now he's had his fifteen minutes of fame, he can piss off.

And he no longer has a job.  Whether he gets a prosecution in his future is still being looked into.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11327788/Motorist-in-crash-with-cyclist-tweets-Im-late-for-work-so-had-to-drive-off.html

Sorry for Torygraph link.  Bet they're conflicted:  Bad brown man; Good capitalist; Bad lawbreaker; Good hater of lycralouts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on January 06, 2015, 08:39:57 pm
Not entirely sure that his Ray Pew online identity is in particularly good taste, either.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on January 06, 2015, 09:16:36 pm
Have we had the disgusting Philip Drury?

Quote
A councillor who claimed a rape victim was too ugly to be assaulted has resigned as party leader.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30687263 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30687263)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 06, 2015, 11:27:53 pm
Not entirely sure that his Ray Pew online identity is in particularly good taste, either.

That had gone straight over my head.  Particularly classy.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 12, 2015, 08:19:28 am
I'm not sure if he is a super-twat or IdiotOfTheDay

Steven Emerson http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30773297 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30773297)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on January 12, 2015, 08:57:59 am
I'm not sure if he is a super-twat or IdiotOfTheDay

Steven Emerson http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30773297 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30773297)
It was on FauxNews, so both are kind of implicit.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on January 12, 2015, 01:01:39 pm
#foxnewsfacts has been the highlight of a very poor week.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on January 12, 2015, 03:02:03 pm
Jan Mortier (http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/10/thinktank-interns-charged-300-pounds-job-reference)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on January 12, 2015, 03:06:02 pm
I don't understand why people get so worked up about Katie Hopkins. Yes, she seems to be a publicity-seeking pub bore who delights in saying things that are calculated to offend, but that's the point. She\s just another version of Richard Littlejohn, Melanie Phillips, Sarah Vine or any of the so-called "controversial" commentators that have disgraced the media through the years.  A generation ago, we had John Junor (who really was obnoxious) and Patricia Boxall. In another decade, we'll have some new upstart, groomed to seek notoriety.

By getting worked up, people give Hopkins the attention she so obviously craves. As is often said, why feed a troll?

Agreed.

1) Ignoring them is the only sensible approach.  Pity them if necessary.

2) Never, ever read "below the line" on the Internet.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on January 13, 2015, 03:15:19 pm
In fairness to Steven Emerson, while he may have got the ethnic make-up of Birmingham completely wrong - it's actually 100% Klingon (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/birmingham-now-100-percent-klingon-2015011394318)* - his super-twattery was merely non-enriched compared the weapons-grade effort by Faux "News" host Jeanine Pirro:

http://www.vox.com/2015/1/12/7533159/fox-news-pirro-rant



*  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on January 15, 2015, 11:49:53 pm
David Starkey...

If you're not sure why, watch the repeat of tonight's Question Time.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 16, 2015, 05:29:32 pm
That programme is such a joke.  Why invite a bilious pillock like Starkey on?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 21, 2015, 07:04:55 pm
Leader of anti-muslim group Pegida, Lutz Bachmann

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germanys-pegida-chief-lutz-bachmann-poses-as-hitler-with-the-caption-hes-back-9992387.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on January 21, 2015, 09:22:27 pm
He's stepped down from the position of Führer. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30920086)

Quote from: The BBC

But the German government condemned it. Vice-Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel told Bild: "Anyone in politics who poses as Hitler is either a total idiot or a Nazi. Reasonable people do not follow idiots, and decent people don't follow Nazis."

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 21, 2015, 10:13:50 pm
Sadly, he has served to Godwinise this thread.

Git.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: noisycrank on January 22, 2015, 10:37:37 am
David Starkey...

If you're not sure why, watch the repeat of tonight's Question Time.

How about extending this to anyone who appears on Question Time
Jeremy Vine for the middle class. Bunch of people without proper jobs  expressing opinions on topics they have no knowledge about. A recipe for hypertension.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 22, 2015, 11:06:56 am
Oh dear.  Someone I'd never heard of before his emergence as a fully-fledged Super-Twat: Commentator Ian Cohen (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920538/Canadian-tennis-star-Eugenie-Bouchard-embarrassed-old-guy-TV-presenter-asks-outfit-Australian-Open.html?ito=social-facebook)

Alert: Daily Heil link.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Riggers on January 22, 2015, 11:45:42 am
Some chap from UKip (can't be any more specific than that at present) who was quoted as suggesting that, cars should rule the roads, cyclists shouldn't be allowed to use the road any longer, and be moved to using the pavements, with pedestrians being given priority. A spokesman for UKip said the usual: "He was only expressing his personal views and not those of UKip." Surprise, surprise.

I think we just get a good a good idea of what a knobber he his old chap, and what he REALLY thinks, that's all.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SteveC on January 22, 2015, 01:00:12 pm
Some chap from UKip (can't be any more specific than that at present) who was quoted as suggesting that, cars should rule the roads, cyclists shouldn't be allowed to use the road any longer, and be moved to using the pavements, with pedestrians being given priority. A spokesman for UKip said the usual: "He was only expressing his personal views and not those of UKip." Surprise, surprise.

I think we just get a good a good idea of what a knobber he his old chap, and what he REALLY thinks, that's all.
He also suggested that people on benefits shouldn't be allowed to drive to reduce congestion.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Riggers on January 22, 2015, 01:29:08 pm
Oh, yes. I forgot that part.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jakob W on January 22, 2015, 09:07:42 pm
The Sun and its editorial staff.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on January 22, 2015, 09:21:31 pm
Some chap from UKip (can't be any more specific than that at present) who was quoted as suggesting that, cars should rule the roads, cyclists shouldn't be allowed to use the road any longer, and be moved to using the pavements, with pedestrians being given priority. A spokesman for UKip said the usual: "He was only expressing his personal views and not those of UKip." Surprise, surprise.

I think we just get a good a good idea of what a knobber he his old chap, and what he REALLY thinks, that's all.
He also suggested that people on benefits shouldn't be allowed to drive to reduce congestion.

Linton Yates.   
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on January 23, 2015, 07:56:38 am
Lynton yates (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-30931266)

IMO,grand twat fascist scum and social engineer.

What a bag of shite.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rafletcher on January 23, 2015, 08:30:47 am
Someone I had been blissfully unaware of until yesterday, one Josie Cunningham.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/30928875
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on January 23, 2015, 01:48:05 pm
Ye Glods, how much sausage poison do you have to have forced into your face to end up looking like that?

Teethgrinder may have to alter his snacking habits...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on January 23, 2015, 05:37:28 pm
Ye Glods, how much sausage poison do you have to have forced into your face to end up looking like that?

Teethgrinder may have to alter his snacking habits...

Au contraire - by subsisting on a diet of produce that even C.M.O.T. Dibbler would have second thoughts about selling, he has - like the Dread Pirate Roberts - been building up his immunity.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on January 23, 2015, 05:46:53 pm
Lynton yates (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-30931266)

IMO,grand twat fascist scum and social engineer.

What a bag of shite.

He seems to be in favour of transportation as well, though it's unclear whether or not he's actually found any overseas gaols that would be willing to accept our prisoners. No doubt he's relying on market forces.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 26, 2015, 08:47:06 am
Lynton yates (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-30931266)

IMO,grand twat fascist scum and social engineer.

What a bag of shite.

He seems to be in favour of transportation as well, though it's unclear whether or not he's actually found any overseas gaols that would be willing to accept our prisoners. No doubt he's relying on market forces.
On that theme, Tony Abott, Australian Prime Minister. Without any shade of irony whatsoever, he has decided that the way to deal with <possibly> illegal people is to resettle them in another country.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on January 26, 2015, 09:22:39 am
My Aussie tweeps say that today Abbott has finally jumped the shark. And that's more or less the national pastime of the Australian coasts, so they ought to recognise it when they see it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wowbagger on January 26, 2015, 01:10:07 pm
Having skim-read the past two pages of this thread, I considered googling the name "Katie Hopkins" but then, having understood the content of the posts, felt that it is in my own interests that I remain ignorant of what those two words, in juxtaposition with one another, represent.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: arry_b on January 26, 2015, 10:19:15 pm
Renown cheat whines about harsh punishment.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/30981609

Lance Armstrong, Super-Twat.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on January 27, 2015, 08:35:20 am
CMD. Again.

An extended interview on the Today programme, and he was simply odious. Uggh.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 29, 2015, 06:29:59 pm
Jeffrey Graham, Mayor of Watertown, New York (http://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/01/06/upstate-ny-mayor-people-who-bike-in-the-winter-should-be-arrested/)

Quote
I know I’m gonna get in trouble for this: People who are on bicycles out on streets like this — they should be arrested. I mean, that is a clear and present danger that is being created and if you’re gonna sit there and make the argument that texting while driving is reckless, doing that is reckless and it creates a danger for them and the motorists.

Unfortunately, they’ve got their — quote — rights, so they can do it
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on January 29, 2015, 08:34:33 pm
Sorry about the Hate link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2928163/Estate-agent-25-repeatedly-raped-Australian-twice-age-sent-naked-pictures-friends-captioned-Lol-Left-cougar-wounded.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on January 30, 2015, 12:02:05 am
Michael Gove yet again for his latest movement of the school goal posts.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on January 30, 2015, 12:13:40 pm
Dr Barry Wratten

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-31035847 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-31035847)

Teen gets head shaved to raise money for Macmillan, school academy puts them in isolation for breaking school rules.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on January 30, 2015, 02:51:24 pm
My choice of barnet style is a #2 all over. I try to have it done every 6-8 weeks.

By this moron's 'standards' I wouldn't be able to get onto the school grounds . . .
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on January 30, 2015, 10:54:44 pm
In light of the first outbreak of measles in the USA for 15 years (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31034379), the spread of which is being blamed on parents who have chosen not to give their children the MMR vaccine, Dr. Jack Wolfson can take one for the anti-vaccine team:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/01/30/amid-measles-outbreak-anti-vaccine-doctor-revels-in-his-notoriety/
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on January 31, 2015, 10:24:33 am
(Dis)honourable mention for Andrew Wakefield, too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 05, 2015, 10:02:15 pm
Sir John Arnitt

http://londonist.com/2015/02/londons-cyclists-danger-unto-themselves-says-tfl-board-member.php
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 05, 2015, 10:05:10 pm
And Steve McNamara. odious head of the LTDA

http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/05/london-taxi-boss-cyclists-are-the-isis-of-london-5051443/
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 05, 2015, 10:10:58 pm
Coming in thick and fast (particularly thick in this case) today.  Mark Spencer (no, seriously, his parents hated him that much) MP

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/02/05/tory-mp-mark-spencer-starve-dark_n_6622468.html?1423157891
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on February 11, 2015, 01:25:19 pm
Kayne West

Keeps on keeping on (being a S-T)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on February 12, 2015, 11:03:12 am
Kayne West

Keeps on keeping on (being a S-T)

Both Sniff Petrol (http://sniffpetrol.com/2015/02/10/tomtom-announces-kanyenav/#.VNyHiOj46rU) and Scaryduck (http://scaryduck.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/david-bowie-prophet.html) have noted the ST-ness of Mr West this week.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 21, 2015, 04:37:13 pm
Glenn the Big Game Hunter McGrath
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on February 22, 2015, 12:27:11 pm
Rozanne "I have a problem with negroes" Duncan

No prizes for guessing which political party she represents.

Had to laugh at her esteemed leader's choice of phrasing: "I'm not defending Rozanne Duncan but..."

Beyond parody.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on February 22, 2015, 01:54:34 pm
UKIP must run out of twats eventually.  Or have they found a rich seam of twattery buried deep in the former coalfields of Kent, like Max Boyce's Outside Half Factory?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on February 22, 2015, 02:43:26 pm
Rozanne "I have a problem with negroes" Duncan

You're being a little unfair there. Her first four words make perfect sense to me.

Interesting to see NF distance himself from her by saying she was a Conservative defector to UKIP. He may have a point though. The out-and-out racists and xenophobes who formerly had a comfortable space in the Tory party may feel that UKIP provide a welcoming alternative. The very slightly smarter ones can maintain their views but are a little bit wiser about airing them in public.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on February 22, 2015, 03:17:38 pm
What was NF's route into UKIP, btw? ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steve GT on February 26, 2015, 12:43:42 pm
This bell end.

I wonder if he has the balls to say what he does to a bloke.

http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest-news/cyclists-deserve-to-die-they-are-incompetent-says-london-man-video-159325 (http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest-news/cyclists-deserve-to-die-they-are-incompetent-says-london-man-video-159325)

Apologies if this has been discussed in another thread. I had a quick look but could not find anything.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on February 26, 2015, 11:14:59 pm
Grant Shapps (not going by another name tonight) is on Question Time.

To be honest, he has a lot of competition, but he remains the most punchable person on the panel.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on February 27, 2015, 12:21:46 am
Every single greedy one of the 287 MP's who voted to keep paid directorships etc. alongside their MP's jobs.   All MP's are paid very well indeed and has a very generous severance package, pension and expenses regime.   

My view has been for a very long time that if you don't like the pay, stay away.

Grant Shapps (not going by another name tonight) is on Question Time.

To be honest, he has a lot of competition, but he remains the most punchable person on the panel.

Indeed.  Especially when the twat tried to justify not giving nurses a 1% pay rise and denied that MP's were going to get a very large pay rise after the next election.   He is another of the slimeball greedy cocks of the highest order.

To have Shapps and Reckless on together competing to be the biggest tosser in the room made for nauseating listening in the bath.   :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on February 27, 2015, 09:38:02 am
Plus there was that rentagob columnist woman who makes me want to Throw Things at the screen, who seems to pop up on QT every third week.  Because I have embraced the principles of honesty, open-mindedness and willingness* I have not yet had to buy a new anbaric distascope.

* - The recording of "Charlie Brooker's Weekly Wipe" awaiting my attention may also have had something to do with it.  He really doesn't like Cameron, does he?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on March 06, 2015, 07:39:44 am
Pickles - what an idiot that man is.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31759767 (http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31759767)

Does he have a clue at all?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on March 06, 2015, 08:07:41 am
The average stupid fool will believe somehow that Pickle has helped the beleagured motorist.   Fools ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on March 06, 2015, 10:02:34 am
Pickles is like the neutron star of stupid.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 06, 2015, 12:40:03 pm
I look forward to further announcements on the end of the needless wars on burglars, pill dealers and professional assassins.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 06, 2015, 07:36:36 pm
I always get Stephen Glaister and Philip Glenister confused.  Fire up the Quattro!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on March 10, 2015, 07:36:13 am
Teh Babylon (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-31805312).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on March 10, 2015, 08:07:18 am
Teh Babylon (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-31805312).

It doesn't help that Geffen once again gets it wrong though.  The fact that she's too young to be held liable doesn't mean it isn't an offence.

They really shouldn't let him do press stuff.  He's not up to it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on March 10, 2015, 08:37:22 am
Indeed but that's CTC for you.   :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on March 13, 2015, 10:23:14 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31864218
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on March 13, 2015, 11:56:07 am
Rhyming slang.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on March 14, 2015, 11:48:06 pm
Rhyming slang.
;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on March 15, 2015, 11:38:25 pm
Grant Shapps Michael Green.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Coffee Snob on March 15, 2015, 11:44:39 pm
Jeremy clarkson
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on March 16, 2015, 10:47:37 am
Grant Shapps Michael Green.
Anyone else looking at his photos on today's Guardian website and thinking Jez from Peep Show?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: itsbruce on March 17, 2015, 09:17:49 pm
Oh, hai, Krishnan Guru Murthy. So you're interviewing the amazing Kim Gordon and the first thing you ask her is "what is it like to be a woman in a male-dominated industry?". And she tells you she hates that question, as do most female artists. But you don't shut up. You keep on with that question and then ask a couple of different variations of it, ending up with "What's it like to be a feminist icon?" A question she also, unsurprisingly, hates.

You're a cock, aren't you?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on March 21, 2015, 09:31:09 pm
Four for the price of one http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/edinburgh-pegida-march-had-only-four-participants-1-3724963
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 21, 2015, 10:09:32 pm
You can add their caption writer for being unable to spell "Pegida".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on March 23, 2015, 07:49:09 pm
Ted Cruz.  $DEITY on a bike, he's a fascist nutter.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 23, 2015, 07:59:49 pm
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 23, 2015, 08:13:26 pm
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???


I think (and fervently hope) not.  Rogerzilla was a bit conciliatory in his description. Cruz is a southern orifice of the worst kind.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on March 23, 2015, 10:19:19 pm
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???

His mother was, alas, a US citizen.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on March 23, 2015, 10:57:33 pm
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???

His mother was, alas, a US citizen.

And, according to wikipedia, he renounced his Canadian citizenship a few years back, so he's only got the one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 24, 2015, 10:42:55 am
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???

His mother was, alas, a US citizen.

I thought both parents had to be USAnian citizens ???

Anyway, I look forward to the Tea Party fruitbats who previously took up cudgels against that nice Mr Obambi for having allegedly been born in Indonesia or Tau Ceti or somewhere doing the business...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on March 24, 2015, 10:51:58 am
Can I nominate John Humphrys on the Today Programme this morning for his patronising anti-intellectual interview of a mathematician on six unsolved problems in mathematics?

Humphrys: So, can you explain in layman's terms one of these problems? Keep it really simple! (snigger, snigger).
Mathematician: Blah, blah, blah, conjecture, blah, blah, blah Riemann [Humphys clearly wasn't listening]
Humphrys: So, do you basically go and sit in a lecture theatre somewhere and think about these problems with a wet towel wrapped around your head?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on March 24, 2015, 12:05:47 pm
Is he allowed to be President?  He was born in Canuckistan and his father only became naturalised in 2005 ???

His mother was, alas, a US citizen.

I thought both parents had to be USAnian citizens ???

Anyway, I look forward to the Tea Party fruitbats who previously took up cudgels against that nice Mr Obambi for having allegedly been born in Indonesia or Tau Ceti or somewhere doing the business...

It's complicated on accounted the Constitution says 'natural born citizen' but conspiciously fails to define 'natural born'. Further complicated that the majority of the early presidents (with the exception of van Buren) had been British Subjects and I imagine they didn't want to disqualify themselves.

Provided his mother met the residency requirements (if I recall, 10 years on actual US soil), then any child born to her would be considered a 'natural born' US citizen. Contrary to popular belief you don't have to be born on US soil, but you do have to be born a US citizen (and not be naturalised as a US citizen later, sorry Arnie) and then have lived in the US for fourteen or so years. It's always been a bit of a hot pickle, there's been quite a few arguments about candidates born in pre-state territories (the last mainland territory to become a state was Arizona in 1912), John McCain was challenged on the fact that he was born in the Panama Canal Zone, and even Al Gore has issues because he was born in Washington DC, which isn't a US state, hark the licence plate cry of 'Taxation Without Representation').

There are two primary fruitbat arguments about Obama, one is that he cunningly faked his birth in Honolulu, something which requires a grand conspiracy, or more interminably one of the above arguments, that his father was a British Subject (or whatever category was afforded to Kenyans pre-independence). Despite much digging, no fine legal mind had discovered anything that says both parents have to be US citizens (both Obama and Chester A Arthur have demonstrated this). Of course, Cruz complicates it by being born outside the US.

In other news, whatever his status, he's a nutjob. Protests about his ineligibility would perhaps result in a mutual nutjob annihilation.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: billplumtree on March 24, 2015, 01:30:30 pm
Can I nominate John Humphrys on the Today Programme this morning for his patronising anti-intellectual interview of a mathematician on six unsolved problems in mathematics?

Seconded.  And let's indite Mishal Hussein and whoever was reading the weather, together with Humphrys, since they seemed quite happy to go along with the giggling.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on March 24, 2015, 01:57:09 pm
It's complicated on accounted the Constitution says 'natural born citizen' but conspiciously fails to define 'natural born'. Further complicated that the majority of the early presidents (with the exception of van Buren) had been British Subjects and I imagine they didn't want to disqualify themselves.
Van Buren was a British Subject, & had no nationality other than British/USian. He was born in 1782 in New York state, to New Netherlands Dutch parents - i.e. they'd both been born on British territory, & so had their parents, etc. The community he was born into had come under British rule 118 years before he was born, & apart from a brief interlude in 1673-4, had remained so until the American rebellion, but was in territory governed by rebels when he was born.

All the presidents before him, & his immediate successor, were born in British North America as British Subjects. Technically, so was he, but born in rebel-governed territory during the rebellion.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on March 24, 2015, 02:49:52 pm
It's complicated on accounted the Constitution says 'natural born citizen' but conspiciously fails to define 'natural born'. Further complicated that the majority of the early presidents (with the exception of van Buren) had been British Subjects and I imagine they didn't want to disqualify themselves.

Van Buren was a British Subject, & had no nationality other than British/USian. He was born in 1782 in New York state, to New Netherlands Dutch parents - i.e. they'd both been born on British territory, & so had their parents, etc. The community he was born into had come under British rule 118 years before he was born, & apart from a brief interlude in 1673-4, had remained so until the American rebellion, but was in territory governed by rebels when he was born.

All the presidents before him, & his immediate successor, were born in British North America as British Subjects. Technically, so was he, but born in rebel-governed territory during the rebellion.

Hmm, my understanding is that Martin van Buren was the first US president to born a US Citizen, he was born five years after the State of New York endorsed the Declaration of Independence, at which point anyone born within its claim was considered a US Citizen (though citizenship was vaguely defined). You could argue that everyone born in the British American territories was a de facto British Subject until the Treaty of Paris, but it's generally accepted that those born on claimed territory post-declaration were US Citizens unless they opted to leave by 1783.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on March 24, 2015, 04:20:27 pm
Van Buren was born British - technically - & would have been born under British rule if his mother had popped down the Hudson a bit, to the part of New York still controlled by Great Britain. Along with everyone else born in the 13 colonies, his status wasn't settled until the peace treaty, a few months after his birth, when his parents stayed put in Kinderhook. It wasn't surprising they stayed behind, as his father was a supporter of independence, but about 30000 others left via New York.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on March 24, 2015, 04:41:26 pm
Can I nominate John Humphrys on the Today Programme this morning for his patronising anti-intellectual interview of a mathematician on six unsolved problems in mathematics?

Seconded.  And let's indite Mishal Hussein and whoever was reading the weather, together with Humphrys, since they seemed quite happy to go along with the giggling.


May I submit further evidence of Jovial Johnny's fuckwitery?

In an interview with some rentagob political commentator about the Cameron Succession he asked whether or not this fascinating political conundrum would be of interest to anyone "…not inside the Westminster Beltway…"

Westminster WHAT?

I am under the impression that The Beltway is a road round Washington DC, which is in the USA, which is not very near Westminster.

I suppose that he thought it was a frightfully clever metaphor.

I thought that it made him sound like a twat. Possibly a super one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on March 24, 2015, 05:15:08 pm
Van Buren was born British - technically - & would have been born under British rule if his mother had popped down the Hudson a bit, to the part of New York still controlled by Great Britain. Along with everyone else born in the 13 colonies, his status wasn't settled until the peace treaty, a few months after his birth, when his parents stayed put in Kinderhook. It wasn't surprising they stayed behind, as his father was a supporter of independence, but about 30000 others left via New York.

Like I say, you could argue that everyone born in the American colonies was a British Subject until Britain relinquished her claim to the Colonial territories in the Treaty of Paris (the fledgling American republic almost got Quebec too), but it's generally accepted that American 'citizens' were being manufactured from Loyalists from the declaration of independence onwards, regardless of who controlled the actual piece of territory. Kinderhook fell within the claim of New York. As such, van Buren is cited as the first US citizen to be president. Of course, most Americans don't appreciate that the war of independence was mostly a civil war, rather than fulsome Americans conjured de novo to fight their colonial and nattily dressed British oppressors.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on March 24, 2015, 08:25:39 pm
Ted Cruz.  $DEITY on a bike, he's a fascist nutter.

To which you just have to add the charge, too stupid to register a URL

http://www.tedcruz.com/

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TheLurker on March 24, 2015, 08:56:32 pm
"…not inside the Westminster Beltway…"

Westminster WHAT? ...
The M25 old boy, the M25.  :)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on March 24, 2015, 10:41:15 pm
BBC Business Irritant and scruffy oik Robert Peston should take elocution lessons, get a haircut and fuck the fuck off.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on March 24, 2015, 10:53:22 pm
BBC Business Irritant and scruffy oik Robert Peston should take elocution lessons, get a haircut and fuck the fuck off.
FTFY
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 08, 2015, 11:20:43 am
Hardly needs saying, but Terry Richardson!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on April 08, 2015, 03:00:39 pm
He looks worryingly like a badly-shorn Lemmy in trendy glasses :sick:

As for:

Quote from: Kate Upton
I was like “that was disrespectful, you could have told me!

I am minded of the scene in Carl Hiaasen's Star Island, in which Chemo gets busy with a cattle prod every time Cherry Pye speaks like an S-T:

Quote from: Carl Hiaasen
“Cattle prod,” Chemo said. He’d bought it at a farm-supply store in Kissimmee, the same week he was paroled from prison. It was a Sabre-Six Hot-Shot, with a fiberglass shaft and nickel-plated contacts. He used it for jobs that were too dainty for the weed whacker.
“Looks sorta kinky. How’s it work?” She was slurping another Red Bull, painting her toenails.
“I’ve been making a list in my head,” Chemo said.
They were outside, on the balcony terrace of her suite, Cherry wearing a DOG THE BOUNTY HUNTER T-shirt and a sky-blue string bikini bottom. The sun was intense so Chemo had smeared his face with 70 SPF sunblock, which made him look like a seven-foot mime. He was waiting for his meeting with Maury Lykes.
“Like, what kinda list?” Cherry asked, and he touched the end of the cattle prod to her bare thigh. She made a noise like a chicken going under the wheels of a truck, and pitched over sideways in the patio chair.
“Every time you say like, I prod your ass,” he explained. “Also on the list: awesome, sweet, sick, totally, and hot. Those are for starters.”
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on April 09, 2015, 01:07:44 pm
Katie "Troll For Hire" Hopkins.
Again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on April 10, 2015, 03:23:47 pm
George 'respect' Galloway
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-32233892 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-32233892)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on April 10, 2015, 04:35:33 pm
BBC Business Irritant and scruffy oik Robert Peston should take elocution lessons, get a haircut and fuck the fuck off.

He has, or rather speach therapy sessions because of his severe stammer.

Rest still stands though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on April 10, 2015, 06:37:27 pm
No excuse for sounding like a hideous mashup of Lard Greaseman and the Hon. Member for Rural Neptune.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on April 14, 2015, 07:39:53 pm
David Cameron
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on April 14, 2015, 08:50:40 pm
Surely not, now that we're all guaranteed the good life...?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on April 16, 2015, 11:43:13 pm
Supertwat special on Question Time tonight? Grant Shapps and Piers Morgan.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on April 17, 2015, 10:36:03 am
I thought that was Michael Green.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on April 17, 2015, 10:42:06 am
Surely not, now that we're all guaranteed the good life...?

Ah yes, the Good Life.

Couple A living hand to mouth, working 16 hours plus a day, every day simply to put turnips on the table.  The modern era minimum wage / zero hours contract couple.   Couple B living the life of the entitled, one partner not working, the society and champagne lifestyle, the perks of position.   The modern era life of the former public school politician or company executive.

Which couple do you most align with?     :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on April 17, 2015, 02:52:37 pm

Which couple do you most align with?     :demon:
You are asking me to choose between Felicity Kendal and Penelope Keith?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on April 17, 2015, 05:49:03 pm
Of course, most Americans don't appreciate that the war of independence was mostly a civil war, rather than fulsome Americans conjured de novo to fight their colonial and nattily dressed British oppressors.
True.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SteveC on April 17, 2015, 07:07:30 pm
Indeed. The late Richard Holmes, military historian and highest ranking territorial officer in the army, said that the Americans had three civil wars, the 'War of independence ', the 'Civil War' and the struggles over civil rights in the 60s and 70s.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 17, 2015, 07:10:21 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-32346835
Salauds
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on April 17, 2015, 08:45:27 pm
Good grief.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on April 17, 2015, 09:03:04 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-32346835
Salauds
Wow - and they thought that wouldn't harm the quokkas? What utter fucking bellends.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 18, 2015, 02:14:13 pm
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/page/pic/?o=Sh&pic_id=253986&size=large&v=1H

My leg and a quokka.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on April 19, 2015, 07:05:43 pm
"Amphibian-faced politician" (thanks b3ta) Nigel Farage, for calling a carefully- selected and representative BBC audience "left wing" because they don't want to send all the darkies and gyppos home.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on April 19, 2015, 07:22:36 pm
In another break from the TwoMinutesHatery, I'd like to nominate the so-called electrician (https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2177.msg1848072#msg1848072) who originally installed the insufficiency of sockets in my kitchen. Not only for breaking all the way through the inner leaf of a cavity wall when chiselling out the hole for the back box, but also for the bodge he'd perpetrated afterwards.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on April 19, 2015, 08:43:12 pm
Texan vet Kristen Lindsey. Don't google it; it's upsetting.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 19, 2015, 11:45:48 pm
Katie Hopkins :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 20, 2015, 07:40:08 am
Bzzzt! Repetition!

If it isn't, it should be.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on April 20, 2015, 07:43:49 am
Nigel Farage is actually Agent X-2-0 from Stingray...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on April 20, 2015, 10:22:56 am
Texan vet Kristen Lindsey. Don't google it; it's upsetting.

(Googles it)

I'm not sure who's the twattiest, Lindsey or the S-T Shannon Stoddard:

Quote
However, one of the vet's clients Shannon Stoddard said: "She's a good vet, so maybe her bad choice of posting something on Facebook was not good. But I don't think she should be judged for it."

Texas seems to be overstocked with idiots; they even sent one to the White House.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 20, 2015, 11:34:27 am
I glogotha'd it as well. Another case of someone so thick they don't think the internet is visible to people other than their friends.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on April 20, 2015, 11:54:06 am
To be a vet in the UK: roundabout fifteen A* A levels, having spent every school holiday cleaning up poo at your local vets, following by a willingness to spend the first ten-plus years of your post-qualification career working unsociable hours for unfeasibly small sums of money.

To be a vet in the US: be given a picture of a cat or dog and be able to successfully complete the following exam:

[ ] cat
[ ] dog
[ ] bear
[ ] Canadian
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 20, 2015, 10:53:07 pm
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jurek on April 20, 2015, 11:00:26 pm
To be a vet in the UK: roundabout fifteen A* A levels, having spent every school holiday cleaning up poo at your local vets, following by a willingness to spend the first ten-plus years of your post-qualification career working unsociable hours for unfeasibly small sums of money.

To be a vet in the US: be given a picture of a cat or dog and be able to successfully complete the following exam:

[ ] cat
[ ] dog
[ ] bear
[ ] Canadian
I suspect Feline would prolly back you on this. (Mostly)
I stand to be corrected.....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 21, 2015, 10:14:33 am
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.

Was he a policeman, off duty, 'testing a new police vehicle', as was acdcepted by a certain judge of our acquaintance?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on April 21, 2015, 04:21:27 pm
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.

The majority of Sulby Straight (the A3), including Ballacrye Bend, is derestricted - ie there is no speed limit. You can argue the wisdom of Martin doing 180mph there, but not the legality.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on April 21, 2015, 04:44:01 pm
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.

The majority of Sulby Straight (the A3), including Ballacrye Bend, is derestricted - ie there is no speed limit. You can argue the wisdom of Martin doing 180mph there, but not the legality.

Ballacrye Bridge, where he admitted to being airborne, is a 30mph zone.  He wasn't doing 180 thru Ballacrye for sure but neither will you get airborne at 30mph.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on April 21, 2015, 07:23:04 pm
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.

The majority of Sulby Straight (the A3), including Ballacrye Bend, is derestricted - ie there is no speed limit. You can argue the wisdom of Martin doing 180mph there, but not the legality.

Ballacrye Bridge, where he admitted to being airborne, is a 30mph zone.  He wasn't doing 180 thru Ballacrye for sure but neither will you get airborne at 30mph.

Not how I read it:

Quote
Martin added: ‘About 17 miles into the lap there’s a corner called Ballacrye, a fast left out of the village of Ballaugh.

‘On this Sunday morning I just got around it with the accelerator flat to the floor. There’s a jump after the corner, and the car was off the ground, all the lights flashing on the dash telling me everything was dropping off. It fishtailed when it landed,’

Read more: http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html#ixzz3Xy9kD4qo

Ballaugh Bridge is certainly in a 30 limit, but that's not what he's talking about. There's no Ballacrye Bridge as far as I'm aware, and Ballacrye Bend, which is where he claims to have got airborne, is in a derestricted zone.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on April 22, 2015, 08:54:04 am
Grant Shaps, again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 23, 2015, 03:48:08 pm
Julie Bindel. Yet again.

Old stuff:
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/01/10/guardian-columnist-julie-bindel-the-trans-cabal-are-running-a-witch-hunt/comments/#disqus_thread

New stuff
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2015/apr/22/julie-bindel-i-m-a-lesbian-but-i-wasnt-born-this-way-video

Just STFU.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on April 28, 2015, 10:21:27 pm
Arjun Seth

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/are-you-beach-body-ready-backlash-protein-world-boss-labels-campaigners-terrorists-10207440.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on April 29, 2015, 09:42:06 pm
What utter and complete bollocks.

ETA: And the same to the commenters who sum it up as "Oh, it's just porkers whining"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on April 29, 2015, 09:57:43 pm
Guy Martin.  A man trying to be twattish enough to replace the Twatfather on Top Gear:

http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-news--general-news/guy-martin-in-police-probe-after-admitting-to-180mph-speeds-on-public-roads/26568.html

180mph in a 40mph zone?  Cockwomble.

The majority of Sulby Straight (the A3), including Ballacrye Bend, is derestricted - ie there is no speed limit. You can argue the wisdom of Martin doing 180mph there, but not the legality.

Ballacrye Bridge, where he admitted to being airborne, is a 30mph zone.  He wasn't doing 180 thru Ballacrye for sure but neither will you get airborne at 30mph.
I've been airborne in a Nissan Micra at that sort of speed here: https://goo.gl/maps/qhepz

The height of the Google camera car disguises the nastiness of this particular humpbacked bridge.  In the dark you can miss the sign and suddenly WHUMP!

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Illegal Combat Ant on May 02, 2015, 06:23:03 pm
If you take the view of most of the online media today, it appears to be the one that belongs to that Windsor woman.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on May 06, 2015, 08:19:21 pm
Niall Ferguson  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on May 06, 2015, 08:55:52 pm
Sorry it's not tribal politics-derived :demon: ;), but this one's worth bringing to the forum's attention:

Quote
An overachieving bigot in Nebraska reached an impressive new level of intolerance this week, filing a lawsuit against “Homosexuals”—as in all of them, everywhere—in a U.S. District Court on Friday, NBC News reports (http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nebraska-woman-sues-all-homosexuals-liers-thieves-n354301).

In the handwritten petition, 66-year-old Sylvia Driskell claims to be acting as ambassador for the plaintiffs, “God, and His, Son, Jesus Christ.” Appropriately titled Driskell v. Homosexuals, it asks U.S. District Judge John M. Gerrard to rule whether homosexuality “is a sin, or not a sin.”

Source: http://gawker.com/ambitiously-homophobic-nebraska-woman-sues-every-gay-on-1702486002
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 06, 2015, 11:10:56 pm
Don't the other plaintiffs need to sign the documents?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on May 07, 2015, 12:06:59 am
Don't the other plaintiffs need to sign the documents?

Would a miracle do in lieu of a written signature?  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on May 07, 2015, 10:23:37 am
Niall Ferguson  :sick:
Ah, so you saw that too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on May 11, 2015, 11:27:17 pm
Whoever came up with this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-32690534
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 13, 2015, 08:51:45 am
Jim Davidson, it seems.

Who knew?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 13, 2015, 02:35:16 pm
He's not decided to come back to BRITAIN, has he?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 14, 2015, 09:36:40 am
He told our Mikey to Bugger off!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: pcolbeck on May 14, 2015, 09:46:44 am
Whoever came up with this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-32690534

I nearly choked on my coffee when I saw that one reported on some news site or other. I can't believe anyone thought they wouldn't get in trouble for that one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on May 14, 2015, 07:58:22 pm
Whoever came up with this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-32690534

I nearly choked on my coffee when I saw that one reported on some news site or other. I can't believe anyone thought they wouldn't get in trouble for that one.

You think that they might have done it on purpose? An evil friend of mine works in PR and dedicates her days to making people angry about stuff on social media. I'm not joking when I say her job title is something like 'social media engineer'.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on May 14, 2015, 09:52:01 pm
Whoever came up with this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-32690534

I nearly choked on my coffee when I saw that one reported on some news site or other. I can't believe anyone thought they wouldn't get in trouble for that one.

You think that they might have done it on purpose? An evil friend of mine works in PR and dedicates her days to making people angry about stuff on social media. I'm not joking when I say her job title is something like 'social media engineer'.

"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." ~ Oscar Wilde

"There's no such thing as bad publicity except your own obituary." ~ Brendan Behan
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: contango on May 15, 2015, 11:25:39 pm

Graham Norton

Ant and Dec

Justin Bieber

anyone with the last name Kardashian

Jeremy Kyle

and the woman with the Indian accent who called me today claiming my computer was infested with viruses, again.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on May 16, 2015, 01:19:15 am
"White Twat Phone for Mr Twathead Sparrow in the hall."" will Mr Sparrow report to the Twat phone and list Amends to be made!"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on May 16, 2015, 06:34:18 am

...... is derestricted - ie there is no speed limit. You can argue the wisdom of Martin doing 180mph there, but not the legality.

FYI, "derestricted" means National speed limits apply, ie 60mph or 70 on dual carriageway. Check your highway code if you don't believe me.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on May 16, 2015, 06:53:00 am
The Isle of Man is a little different though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Ham on May 16, 2015, 07:01:50 am
Maybe I should read old threads more carefully, or be less interested in my tea. Nah, what a radical idea. I'll stick with being wrong.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on May 17, 2015, 01:40:12 pm
Raspberry coming your way, Ham, along with a 'na-na-ner-na-na'! ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on May 18, 2015, 02:56:08 pm
Nick 'keep your knickers on to avoid being raped' Conrad wins super-twat of the year.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 18, 2015, 03:21:39 pm
Oh gosh.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 18, 2015, 03:28:12 pm
Nick 'keep your knickers on to avoid being raped' Conrad wins super-twat of the year.

(Googles)

Mummy!  It's the Twattyman, Mummy!

NFN, though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rafletcher on May 18, 2015, 03:32:02 pm
That would be last year then..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nick-conrad-bbc-dj-who-said-women-should-keep-their-knickers-on-accuses-campaigner-of-inciting-rape-against-him-and-his-family-9896844.html
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on May 21, 2015, 04:24:16 pm
Nick Freeman, Solicitor, serial SuperTwat and waste of oxygen.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on May 21, 2015, 04:27:23 pm
… and arising from Lee's latest post in POBI, David Chameleon.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on May 23, 2015, 07:11:50 pm
This announcer

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-32857408
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on May 24, 2015, 11:17:08 am
Alistair Carmichael
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on May 24, 2015, 12:19:45 pm
And the idiots who decided not to discipline him, thereby lending the party's support to smear tactics (not for the first time).
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 26, 2015, 10:44:50 pm
Based on the evidence of last night's HIGNFY, Jon Ronson is an S-T nonpareil.  Shut up, you tedious div.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on May 26, 2015, 11:02:36 pm
Based on the evidence of last night's HIGNFY, Jon Ronson is an S-T nonpareil.  Shut up, you tedious div.

I got the impression that Merton P wasn't ever so impressed with him either.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TonyJames on May 29, 2015, 11:54:15 am
Based on the evidence of last night's HIGNFY, Jon Ronson is an S-T nonpareil.  Shut up, you tedious div.

Will watch it on iPlayer but really wish musicians would stick to what they know best and leave the news/comedy programmes alone.
You wouldn't want to see Nicholas Witchell jamming on stage with The Killers.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 29, 2015, 12:58:52 pm
I take it you're not the Tony James who was in Gen X and Sigue Sigue Sputnik then ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on May 29, 2015, 01:08:29 pm
Was Tony James any relation to Wendy James?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on May 29, 2015, 01:15:10 pm
Things I didn't know, or care about, until just now #28948: Wendy James was adopted.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: interzen on June 02, 2015, 05:48:37 pm
Alex Salmond.
Dear God, Alex Salmond.

My opinion of him was pretty low to begin with, even taking into account the fact that he's a politician, but he's managed to pull off some epic twattishness today - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/11645853/Anger-at-Alex-Salmonds-shameful-Charles-Kennedy-comments-hours-after-his-death.html refers.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on June 02, 2015, 09:02:12 pm
Quote
Mr Salmond later insisted he had not insinuated Mr Kennedy was a nationalist or SNP supporter.

He added: "I only mentioned the Better Together campaign at all because I was asked a direct question about it. As early as the beginning of last year, Charles was one of the first Unionist politicians to realise that the result would be close and said publicly that he felt that the actions of the No campaign were contributing to this."

My bold.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on June 05, 2015, 02:06:12 pm
Quote
Mr Salmond later insisted he had not insinuated Mr Kennedy was a nationalist or SNP supporter.

He added: "I only mentioned the Better Together campaign at all because I was asked a direct question about it. As early as the beginning of last year, Charles was one of the first Unionist politicians to realise that the result would be close and said publicly that he felt that the actions of the No campaign were contributing to this."

My bold.

Classic backpedalling from Wee 'Eck there...  ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on June 05, 2015, 02:10:14 pm
Eh?  :o ??? ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on June 05, 2015, 02:46:50 pm
Rod Liddle

(article in The Sun referring to the ranty man in the Discovery entitled "If Cyclists Behaved We'd Stop Having a Go at Them")
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: pumpkin on June 05, 2015, 03:10:26 pm
Rod Liddle

(article in The Sun referring to the ranty man in the Discovery entitled "If Cyclists Behaved We'd Stop Having a Go at Them")

Paywall?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on June 05, 2015, 05:05:26 pm
Rod Liddle

(article in The Sun referring to the ranty man in the Discovery entitled "If Cyclists Behaved We'd Stop Having a Go at Them")

Paywall?

I believe so. There's a scan of the article in a thread on Cyclechat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Vince on June 10, 2015, 10:42:02 am
Robert Peston. Mostly for being Robert Peston. He was bad enough on Radio 4, but seems to have found new levels of snide now he is on TV.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 10, 2015, 11:01:38 am
Pesto was a revelation when he did HIGNFY the other week, though, in that he was:

The tristram responsible for the running order of last night's TT highlights programme, though, is an S-T of the highest order, with golden oak leaves, swords and diamonds.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on June 10, 2015, 11:39:31 am
Robert Peston. Mostly for being Robert Peston. He was bad enough on Radio 4, but seems to have found new levels of snide now he is on TV.
I don't mind the snide. I think it comes out because he's not allowed to refer to MPs as a bunch of mindless amoeba.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on June 17, 2015, 06:18:04 pm
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gay-rights-row-rainbow-flag-5895660
Toys out of pram tantrum twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on June 17, 2015, 10:23:40 pm
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gay-rights-row-rainbow-flag-5895660
Toys out of pram tantrum twat

Who, The Wrong Hammond or the people complaining about the removal of the flag?

I see the article has a photo showing the fate of Bobb's hat.  Citizen's Arrest time.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on June 18, 2015, 09:16:42 pm
The twot who today parked his mercedes across two disabled bays in Lidl car park. Selfish non thinking Git.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on June 19, 2015, 12:24:10 pm
Have we had Sarah Vine yet?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 19, 2015, 01:06:17 pm
Have we had Sarah Vine yet?


You beat me to it!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on June 19, 2015, 01:12:34 pm
Have we had Sarah Vine yet?


You beat me to it!

<googles> Ah, I see.

I think she should quote her inspiration though:
https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/the-terrible-journalists-guide-to-writing-an-article-about-bicycles/ (https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/the-terrible-journalists-guide-to-writing-an-article-about-bicycles/)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on June 19, 2015, 05:08:27 pm
Have we had Sarah Vine yet?


You beat me to it!

<googles> Ah, I see.

I think she should quote her inspiration though:
https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/the-terrible-journalists-guide-to-writing-an-article-about-bicycles/ (https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/the-terrible-journalists-guide-to-writing-an-article-about-bicycles/)




I've just read it. Vines article looks like plagiarism!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Oaky on June 19, 2015, 05:24:19 pm
The only thing she said that's missing from the aseasyasridingabike article is "if cyclists want to wear cameras and act like vigilantes - why don't they go and catch some real criminals"...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on June 22, 2015, 09:18:58 pm
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/12/08/american-pastor-who-helped-uganda-create-kill-the-gays-law-will-be-tried-for-crimes-against-humanity/
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: sg37409 on July 06, 2015, 09:58:07 pm
Kyrgios your not a character or a firebrand, your a twat
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 07, 2015, 10:14:12 am
Aaaand Dawn Fraser joins him in the Super-Twat league by finding the only way to make people feel sympathetic towards him.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 07, 2015, 10:51:50 am
I though this had something to do with the Greekish Referendum until Google told me otherwise.  Dawn Fraser bears few of the characteristics of Australian aboriginality so should perhaps fuck off back to wherever it was her antecedents came from, and join UKIP.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on July 07, 2015, 11:00:19 am
You triggered me looking that up. I wish I hadn't now. Dawn Fraser has irredeemably  disgraced herself in my eyes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 07, 2015, 04:07:28 pm
It's sad.  Someone who should definitely have kept her mouth shut and kept her dignity.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on July 09, 2015, 12:52:49 am
Take a bow, Vitaly Churkin and Tomislav Nikolic.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33445772
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on July 09, 2015, 01:05:45 am
Apropos of that^, there's an interesting discussion (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-11108059) about definitions of genocide - not a term to be used lightly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on July 09, 2015, 08:49:16 pm
Lest we forget what a bunch of super-twats the Tories are:

(https://vice-images.vice.com/images/content-images/2015/07/08/emergency-budget-323-body-image-1436376578.png?resize=*:*&output-quality=75)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 10, 2015, 12:55:59 pm
Mr Speaker: Next on Radio Parliament, The Birdie Song!
IDS: Oh goody, my favourite!  Reminds me of the fun we had in the Hitler Jugend!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 13, 2015, 09:54:10 pm
Rod Stewart and his stupid sealskin jacket.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mrs Pingu on July 13, 2015, 11:11:47 pm
Rod Stewart and his stupid sealskin jacket.

Where?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 14, 2015, 12:09:43 pm
Rod Stewart and his stupid sealskin jacket.

Where?
Newfoundland

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/activist-paul-watson-attacks-rod-stewart-s-sealskin-coat-fitting-1.3150278
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on July 15, 2015, 07:58:33 pm
Maybe those famous Do Ya Think I'm Sexy trousers were REAL leopard skin?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on July 15, 2015, 08:34:55 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-33535890
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 15, 2015, 08:41:37 pm
The fraudster or the victims?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 16, 2015, 08:23:35 am
Boris Johnson (yet again)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on July 16, 2015, 09:42:40 am
The fraudster or the victims?

I may be wrong, but I supposed the purpose of the title of the thread was to identify idiots to despise rather than fools to pity.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on July 17, 2015, 08:49:36 pm
David Cameron - civil servants must communicate with clarity. Will " fuck off you lying, thieving slick of smugness" do?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 18, 2015, 01:45:31 pm
Blast from the past: Jack Straw.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: madcow on July 21, 2015, 01:08:28 pm
Rob Wilson M.P.- still hasn't quite got it about M.P's expenses and the reason that the public think they are all shysters.
352 fucking yards-you lazy,arrogant, grasping  toad.

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33606908  (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33606908)

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 21, 2015, 01:19:38 pm
Rob Wilson M.P.- still hasn't quite got it about M.P's expenses and the reason that the public think they are all shysters.
352 fucking yards-you lazy,arrogant, grasping  toad.

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33606908  (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33606908)

Nay, lad, call it 321.73 fucking meters; it makes him look even lazier.

Part of his excuse is that he's a Hardworking MP, so he needs to save time… the journey's so short that he probably spends more time parking than he saves.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: madcow on July 22, 2015, 12:03:24 pm
Exactly. If he stopped using his car for such pathetically short journeys (I would question whether he actually did use his car) it wouldn't need replacing so often.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 22, 2015, 12:07:13 pm
Anthony Charles Lynton Blair.

Again ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Riggers on July 22, 2015, 12:14:28 pm
2nd-ed.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on July 22, 2015, 12:38:12 pm
Isn't he just considered a permanent feature here?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 22, 2015, 12:56:28 pm
He does have an impressive palmares :(
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 24, 2015, 10:25:33 pm
Amber Rudd.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2015, 08:06:41 am
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 25, 2015, 11:18:55 am
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.

Christ! Did they reproduce? If so, would the spawn be 2ST or ST2?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on July 25, 2015, 03:56:19 pm
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.

IRTA "A A Milne" and boggled somewhat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on July 25, 2015, 04:56:41 pm
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.
One would have to be a massive S-T to do something like that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on July 25, 2015, 06:10:17 pm
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.
One would have to be a massive S-T to do something like that.



Should we have a Right-Wingers Who Have (at least) Equally Unpleasant Partners thread?

For starters we have the Gove/Vine axis of fuckwittery.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 25, 2015, 06:57:20 pm
Amber Rudd.

Used to be married to A.A. Gill, who is something of an S-T in his own right.

Christ! Did they reproduce? If so, would the spawn be 2ST or ST2?

(Googles)

Yes.  Yes, they did.  Poor little sods.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on July 28, 2015, 06:09:08 pm
Walter Palmer (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/11767119/Cecil-the-lions-killer-revealed-as-American-dentist.html)     >:(     

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on July 28, 2015, 09:00:32 pm
What a plank! and illegal.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on July 28, 2015, 10:05:34 pm
According to a magazine cover I saw in the horriblemarket this afternoon, Premier League S-T Katie Hopkins is to undergo "open brain surgery".

Good luck with that, Mr Branes Surgeon.  I hope they give you a map.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wombat on July 29, 2015, 10:16:03 am
According to a magazine cover I saw in the horriblemarket this afternoon, Premier League S-T Katie Hopkins is to undergo "open brain surgery".

Good luck with that, Mr Branes Surgeon.  I hope they give you a map.
And a magnifying glass...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on August 08, 2015, 03:15:41 am
After all these years, Derek Acorah seems to have finally spotted a ghost.  Who knew he was still plying his seedy, deceitful trade?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: benborp on August 08, 2015, 03:08:23 pm
Only because I've finally realised he reminds me of Dr Evil.

https://youtu.be/BFBW4SE5ECE
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on August 12, 2015, 07:02:33 pm
Toby Young.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jakob W on August 17, 2015, 11:17:46 pm
The tossers mentioned in this blog post: https://thelonelycyclist.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/skinny-cyclist-not-likely/

(Wasn't sure whether to post this in the Oiks Shouting Things at Cyclists thread, but decided that super-twats was more appropriate.)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on August 22, 2015, 09:38:38 am
Louise Mensch is probably an ex officio member of this thread, but I feel this (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/22/louise-menschs-bid-to-smear-jeremy-corbyn-backfires) deserves a supertwat mention as she demonstrates twatishness in both its malign, shit scraping sense as well as plain incompetent embarrassing twatdom.

*points and laughs*
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on August 22, 2015, 02:12:56 pm
Louise Mensch is probably an ex officio member of this thread, but I feel this (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/22/louise-menschs-bid-to-smear-jeremy-corbyn-backfires) deserves a supertwat mention as she demonstrates twatishness in both its malign, shit scraping sense as well as plain incompetent embarrassing twatdom.

*points and laughs*

Oh dear.  I hope Dr Larrington is regretting ever having taught the former Ms Bagwash.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on August 23, 2015, 10:01:10 pm
*fnark*

Amusing what she searches for in her spare time.  There's probably another terrible chick-lit book coming.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on August 25, 2015, 07:10:21 pm
According to a magazine cover I saw in the horriblemarket this afternoon, Premier League S-T Katie Hopkins is to undergo "open brain surgery".

Good luck with that, Mr Branes Surgeon.  I hope they give you a map.

Would it be wrong to hope the neurosurgeon is an alcoholic with the DTs?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on August 25, 2015, 08:43:40 pm
According to a magazine cover I saw in the horriblemarket this afternoon, Premier League S-T Katie Hopkins is to undergo "open brain surgery".

Good luck with that, Mr Branes Surgeon.  I hope they give you a map.

Would it be wrong to hope the neurosurgeon is an alcoholic with the DTs?

So the personification of 'I'd rather have a full bottle on front of me than have to perform a full frontal lobotomy!'?**









**You have NO IDEA how long I have waited to use that!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on August 26, 2015, 09:35:24 am
I think scientists have recently identified the supertwattothalumus and are hoping to remove it, after which she will just be an inoffensive, if rather horse-faced, airhead.  The Sun will replace her with Liz Jones and KH will move over to the problem pages in Take A Break.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on August 30, 2015, 05:36:41 pm
Theresa May.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: CAMRAMan on September 03, 2015, 05:39:48 pm
Viktor Orbán, with bar...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: HTFB on September 03, 2015, 06:15:47 pm
It's quite hard at the best of times to describe the Hungarian ruling party without invoking Godwin. The wrong Godwin.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 03, 2015, 06:44:48 pm
Viktor Orbán, with bar...

He does appear to be a massive dick on a number of levels.

Quote from: Mr Tw@
nobody would like to stay in Hungary, neither in Slovakia nor Poland nor Estonia.

Translation: my country is a shithole, and so is yours unless it signs its mail "Deutschland".

You'd never guess he used to be a professional foopballer, would you.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Tim Hall on September 09, 2015, 07:37:55 pm
Councillor John Dyer. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-34188718 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-34188718)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on September 09, 2015, 08:00:49 pm
Jesse Norman (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/34195672)


Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: benborp on September 10, 2015, 09:49:54 am
Adam Holloway MP.

Bringing the country's attention to what matters about the refugee crisis.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on September 10, 2015, 06:20:48 pm
A group submission for every Republican candidate for POTUS?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 11, 2015, 03:07:50 pm
Dave "Yorkshire people hate everyone else and each other" Cameron
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on September 11, 2015, 03:24:24 pm
Dave "Yorkshire people hate everyone else and each other" Cameron

There's a grain of truth in that....   :P ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on September 11, 2015, 10:47:43 pm
redirect to Alt Flame............ ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Thor on September 11, 2015, 11:01:00 pm
Frederick Forsyth

(most recently on today's Today programme)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on September 12, 2015, 11:49:50 am
Dave "Yorkshire people hate everyone else and each other" Cameron

There's a grain of truth in that....   :P ;D
You're confusing hate and pity.

We fucking hate David Cameron though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on September 12, 2015, 12:13:24 pm
All those NuLabor apparatchiks who tried their level best to undermine Corbyn.

All those tory twunts who will now be very very concerned that what happened in Scotland with the SNP is gong to happen in England with Corbyn and Labour.    You'll get what you finally deserve, hopefully!!!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 13, 2015, 05:18:20 pm
Perennial Super-Twat Donald Trump is criticising Carly Fiorina for her face, thereby proving that his syrup is by far the more intelligent partner in their symbiotic relationship.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on September 13, 2015, 07:18:47 pm
Perennial Super-Twat Donald Trump is criticising Carly Fiorina for her face, thereby proving that his syrup is by far the more intelligent partner in their symbiotic relationship.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi-Ff3YJPOQ
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on September 13, 2015, 07:32:27 pm
I'd rather look at and listen to Carly than Donald.   He's just pure sleaze and needs pouring back into the bottle.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 13, 2015, 08:02:56 pm
Priti Patel
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on September 13, 2015, 08:17:37 pm
Priti Patel
To be fair, she's just the parrot
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-called-jeremy-corbyn-6435223
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 13, 2015, 08:21:01 pm
Parrot is the word!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on September 13, 2015, 08:41:14 pm
I thought that clarion had nominated Gove again. As he didn't, I will.

Michael,the Thinking Man's Fuckwit, Gove.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on September 13, 2015, 08:43:09 pm
I thought that clarion had nominated Gove again. As he didn't, I will.

Michael,the Thinking Man's Fuckwit, Gove.

To be fair, he's just the parrot
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-called-jeremy-corbyn-6435223

Anyway, I think Pob has permanent tenure in this thread
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on September 17, 2015, 09:09:24 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-34284385

Absolute twat. I hope they go after his family for perjury as well.  Family award of twattishness. I note the judge specifically commented that it wasn't a case of the poor murdered lad being in the wrong place at the wrong time, it was entirely the fact that the murderer was a twat. Though he didn't use that word. At least not in public.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on September 17, 2015, 11:45:11 pm
I'd rather look at and listen to Carly than Donald.   He's just pure sleaze and needs pouring back into the bottle.

They had a debate between the front-runners for the Republican nomination last night.  The others decided that Trump is a twat and ganged up on him, to make him look like a twat.  His face went roughly the same colour as a Ferrari F1 car, the twat.

(http://sweasel.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/muntz.gif)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Morat on September 18, 2015, 12:46:56 pm
All those NuLabor apparatchiks who tried their level best to undermine Corbyn.

All those tory twunts who will now be very very concerned that what happened in Scotland with the SNP is gong to happen in England with Corbyn and Labour.    You'll get what you finally deserve, hopefully!!!

Is new-trad labour offering Englandshire independance from London?
Where do I sign?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on September 23, 2015, 10:25:09 am
Martin Shkreli.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on September 23, 2015, 10:32:05 am
Martin Shkreli.
I think he wins the thread for all time.

My (pacifist) wife's response to reading about him was "Someone will shoot him or inject him with AIDS-infected blood and he deserves it."
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on September 23, 2015, 10:49:26 am
Oh yes.  He gets Life Membership here for certain.  Sad thing is, there are loads more out there like him.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hellymedic on September 23, 2015, 03:15:33 pm
Martin Shkreli.

+ 1
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on October 04, 2015, 09:11:30 am
Amanda Platell. For this.

(click to show/hide)

Hidden for those who don't want to know who is left in the for the final of the Great British Bakeoff.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 04, 2015, 09:17:51 am
OFFS!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 04, 2015, 12:41:17 pm
I went to skool with an Ian Cumming but as he intended to go straight to Sandhurst on completing his sentence he's probably not going to be appearing on some cookery nonse as a "New Man", whatever one of those might be.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 05, 2015, 07:08:23 am
Alex Wild.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34439965
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 05, 2015, 08:37:35 am
Alex Wild.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34439965
Add Liam Fox as a footnote to that.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 05, 2015, 09:01:22 am
Amanda Platell. For this.

Jo. For the GBBO spoiler. Grrrr! ;)

Anyone who has following this series would know that Nadiya and Tamal have been consistently among the top bakers every week, while Ian has been less consistent but won star baker three weeks in a row. Flora's real problem is being 19 - her lack of experience has shown at times. I never thought she was going to win.

Amanda Platell being offensively moronic never comes as a surprise.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Legs on October 05, 2015, 09:51:35 am
Amanda Platell. For this.
Jo. For the GBBO spoiler. Grrrr! ;)
I think half a week is fair game for spoilers!  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 05, 2015, 10:08:33 am
I just Googled the oeuvre that is Amanda Platell. I wish I hadn't. Thanks guys.

(She might be right though, my friend was on the 'extra' version the other day and he's gay, so it must be a conspiracy. Chocolate and marmite, really John?)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 05, 2015, 10:51:11 am
I think half a week is fair game for spoilers!  ;)

I think I'm actually two episodes behind. I lose track. I watch it more for the actual baking than the competition element anyway, so I'm not that bothered about spoilers. Some people would string you up for it though.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: PeteB99 on October 05, 2015, 01:55:04 pm
Taxpayers alliance

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34439965 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34439965)

"Ministers should waste no time to make unpopular cuts to pensioner benefits, a think tank director has said.
Many of those hit by a cut to the winter fuel allowance might "not be around" at the next election, said Alex Wild of the Taxpayers' Alliance."

That's cynical even by the undemanding standards of that right wing pile of shite
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 05, 2015, 05:46:34 pm
See above.

The Taxpayers' Alliance are a shower of bastards and always have been.  They're basically our version of the Tea Party, a load of rich right--wingers whose motto is "screw everyone else".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 05, 2015, 06:37:20 pm
Wasn't one of their high priests shown to be an epic S-T when it was revealed that as a resident of France he didn't actually pay UK taxes?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 05, 2015, 07:45:05 pm
Jeremy Hunt.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 05, 2015, 08:04:52 pm
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/osborne-light-years-ahead-of-taxpayers-alliance-on-dead-pensioner-thing-20151005102611
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 06, 2015, 02:20:00 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34450057

Anyone changing their name to Augustus Sol Invictus is a twat before they get out of bed in the morning but he actually adds more twattery.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on October 07, 2015, 02:19:07 pm
Probably been mentioned before but has reared her ugly head again...

Theresa May

See also: Iain Duncan Shit
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: red marley on October 07, 2015, 02:40:37 pm
The Devil may have the best tunes, but the Tories do seem to have the shittiest shits, what with Platell, May and Duncan Smith. Kind of reminds of Bad Nazis (https://youtu.be/qv2XGQBcvxQ)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 07, 2015, 03:01:51 pm
Cameron.   Grand Poobah Super Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 07, 2015, 04:14:23 pm
Given the contents of the last three posts, should there be an Ultra-Twat thread?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 07, 2015, 04:25:08 pm
Given the contents of the last three posts, should there be an Ultra-Twat thread?

Where's the LIKE button?   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 07, 2015, 04:39:41 pm
Dan Hodges

Quote
David Cameron is the new leader of the British Left
It’s now impossible for anyone on the progressive Left to construct an intellectually coherent argument for voting Labour

By Dan Hodges
3:11PM BST 07 Oct 2015

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11917236/David-Cameron-is-the-new-leader-of-the-British-Left.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11917236/David-Cameron-is-the-new-leader-of-the-British-Left.html)

I know it's the Torygraph, but even so.

Hodges has always been a twat but I think he's upgraded himself on this one.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 07, 2015, 04:48:03 pm
Dan Hodges

Quote
David Cameron is the new leader of the British Left
It’s now impossible for anyone on the progressive Left to construct an intellectually coherent argument for voting Labour

By Dan Hodges
3:11PM BST 07 Oct 2015

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11917236/David-Cameron-is-the-new-leader-of-the-British-Left.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11917236/David-Cameron-is-the-new-leader-of-the-British-Left.html)

I know it's the Torygraph, but even so.

Hodges has always been a twat but I think he's upgraded himself on this one.

Quote

A single speech cannot change the political landscape. But this wasn’t just a speech. David Cameron has just erected an impenetrable forcefield around the centre ground of British politics. It’s now impossible for anyone on the progressive Left to construct an intellectually coherent argument for voting Labour.


It is apparent from the Westminster bubble and their press-supporting mafiosa that they really don't believe that poor people, deprived and underprivileged people as well as sane, compassionate, intelligent people actually exist.  ???
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 07, 2015, 04:52:48 pm
 
Quote
David Cameron has just erected an impenetrable forcefield around the centre ground of British politics.


I can only assume that to Hodges british politics is like that shown below, with X marking the centre

|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X------------------|
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 07, 2015, 06:04:28 pm
I think that your "X" is slightly left by about 20 dashes of where I consider that it should be.

Cameron is beginning to make Thatcher look slightly left wing!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 07, 2015, 06:30:25 pm
I saw a pan shot of the Conservative audience the other day. It was basically fat jowly men, their bleached and embalmed wives, and the occasional ruddy-faced young toff. That was it.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 07, 2015, 06:46:32 pm
Tory party conference - shooting fish in a barrel for this thread.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 07, 2015, 09:27:15 pm
Well, I was thinking about Hell the other days, and I tell you that audience was Hell's Very Own Welcoming Committee. I was kind of looking forward to finally taking the escalator of inevitability Downtown until this realisation kicked in like a meth-fueled bronco. Even Satan must look across that chorus of shit and think fuck, there's the damned and truly damned. I'm going to volunteer to drive a diabolical steam roller over their souls. I think there might be a queue.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 07, 2015, 11:07:57 pm
Well, I was thinking about Hell the other days, and I tell you that audience was Hell's Very Own Welcoming Committee. I was kind of looking forward to finally taking the escalator of inevitability Downtown until this realisation kicked in like a meth-fueled bronco. Even Satan must look across that chorus of shit and think fuck, there's the damned and truly damned. I'm going to volunteer to drive a diabolical steam roller over their souls. I think there might be a queue.

 ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 08, 2015, 10:31:54 am
It is apparent from the Westminster bubble and their press-supporting mafiosa that they really don't believe that poor people, deprived and underprivileged people as well as sane, compassionate, intelligent people actually exist.  ???

Just you wait for them to decide that people on benefits don't get to vote.

Somewhere, in some committee or thinktank, entirely staffed by Satan's droppings, this proposal has been made by people who are so twattish that the act of typing their name into this thread would incinerate all other entries in a whiff of sulpher.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 08, 2015, 10:51:35 am
Last night was super-awful. They panned across a jolly group of posing Conservative Youth. No one should have to see that while eating their supper.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: PeteB99 on October 08, 2015, 11:18:36 am
Anyone who was ever bullied at school will recognise the tory cabinet and party instantly.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on October 08, 2015, 12:48:26 pm
Tory party conference - shooting fish in a barrel for this thread fun.
FTFY.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on October 08, 2015, 01:56:46 pm
Can we club together and hire a Pig that's willing to stuff it's Dick in the Open wound that is Cameron's mouth?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 08, 2015, 02:16:32 pm
I think pigs have more taste and discernment than that
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on October 08, 2015, 10:30:46 pm
Matthew Hancock.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 08, 2015, 11:23:44 pm
Matthew Hancock.


Mr Useful Work himself!

I would like to nominate Ian Duncan Smith again. Any objections?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 09, 2015, 01:42:47 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34474467
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: tiermat on October 09, 2015, 10:25:42 am
Probably been mentioned before but has reared her ugly head again...

Theresa May

See also: Iain Duncan Shit

I just came in here to nominate those exact two.

How long before there is a run on black shirts?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 09, 2015, 10:39:57 am
Rupert Murdoch  :sick:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on October 09, 2015, 10:58:25 am
Surely an honorary and permanent fixture on this thread ?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Clare on October 09, 2015, 11:31:02 am
Amanda Platell again.

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 09, 2015, 12:24:21 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 09, 2015, 01:13:02 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?



Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 09, 2015, 02:24:48 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?

Jorg Haider, just at the moment when he realised he should have had his car serviced by a main dealer rather than the Klagenfurt branch of Kwik-Fit?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on October 09, 2015, 03:06:27 pm
Have we had Ben Carson (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/09/ben-carson-claims-jewish-people-might-have-stopped-holocaust-if-they-had-guns) yet?

Fucking ignorant wankstain.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 09, 2015, 03:15:59 pm
Have we had Ben Carson (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/09/ben-carson-claims-jewish-people-might-have-stopped-holocaust-if-they-had-guns) yet?

Fucking ignorant wankstain.
Its truly incredible that he is intelligent enough to become a well regarded surgeon.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on October 09, 2015, 03:19:04 pm
...and, incidentally, a candidate for president of USania.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Clare on October 09, 2015, 03:30:34 pm
WTF?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on October 09, 2015, 03:34:30 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?

Jorg Haider, just at the moment when he realised he should have had his car serviced by a main dealer rather than the Klagenfurt branch of Kwik-Fit?

Josef Fritzl?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on October 09, 2015, 03:44:41 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?

No, the other famous Austrian. Not Mozart.

Oh, yeah, Ben Carson, nutty Christian fundamentalist, very big on the evils of 'socialist healthcare' – he actually compared affordable healthcare with slavery then claimed he didn't, those nasty liberals made him say it.

Hates the gays, doesn't believe in evolution, and thinks climate change is irrelevant, it's merely a cyclic thing.

Conclusive proof that in the war between Rocket Scientists and Brain Surgeons, the Rocket Scientists won't have to try too hard.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fuzzy (retd.) AAGE on October 09, 2015, 03:53:28 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?

No, the other famous Austrian. Not Mozart.

Oh, yeah, Ben Carson, nutty Christian fundamentalist, very big on the evils of 'socialist healthcare' – he actually compared affordable healthcare with slavery then claimed he didn't, those nasty liberals made him say it.

Hates the gays, doesn't believe in evolution, and thinks climate change is irrelevant, it's merely a cyclic thing.

Conclusive proof that in the war between Rocket Scientists and Brain Surgeons, the Rocket Scientists won't have to try too hard.

Will have something soft to aim at.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on October 09, 2015, 04:16:45 pm
Conclusive proof that in the war between Rocket Scientists and Brain Surgeons, the Rocket Scientists won't have to try too hard.
They'd just have to write a news article saying something like:
"Liberals claim that guns are dangerous and that pointing a gun at yourself and pulling the trigger is proof. PROVE A LIBERAL WRONG TODAY!"
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 09, 2015, 06:05:44 pm
Conclusive proof that in the war between Rocket Scientists and Brain Surgeons, the Rocket Scientists won't have to try too hard.
They'd just have to write a news article saying something like:
"Liberals claim that guns are dangerous and that pointing a gun at yourself and pulling the trigger is proof. PROVE A LIBERAL WRONG TODAY!"
;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 09, 2015, 06:22:23 pm
Continuing my theme of watching BBC snippets of the Conservative Party Conference with the sound off, I caught Cameron doing his chop-socky gesticulation. He did remind me of a certain gentleman of Austria extraction.

Arnie? Or someone else?

No, the other famous Austrian. Not Mozart.

Ah.  Niki Lauda.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 09, 2015, 06:25:21 pm
...and, incidentally, a candidate for president of USania.

It's a sad indictment of USAnian politics that someone can put themselves forward for the top job while making Donald Trump look not less of a Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on October 09, 2015, 06:46:40 pm
...and, incidentally, a candidate for president of USania.

It's a sad indictment of USAnian politics that someone can put themselves forward for the top job while making Donald Trump look not less of a Super-Twat.

It's a dirty, dirty job, but someone's got to do it.  :demon:

Though it makes me wonder if there is something that the folks at CERN aren't telling us regarding the LHC...

Quote from: The Restaurant At The End of the Universe
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened.



Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 09, 2015, 06:50:42 pm
Messrs Cox & Ince took "The Infinite Monkey Cage" to USAnia earlier this year but I fear they were just preaching to the converted chiz.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: asterix on October 09, 2015, 07:53:54 pm

Quote from: The Restaurant At The End of the Universe
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

Somewhere in it is Douglas Adams, still laughing at us. Git.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bloom on October 12, 2015, 02:36:01 pm
Labour MP, Helen Goodman. Racist
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: nicknack on October 12, 2015, 08:00:11 pm
Labour MP, Helen Goodman. Racist
I thought it was a perfectly reasonable response to Hunt's asinine comment.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 16, 2015, 09:09:28 pm
Bernie Ecclestone (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/34552570)

IMO a truly vile person.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on October 16, 2015, 09:39:11 pm
Any other stance from Mr €¢¢£€$ton€ would be hypocritical in the extreme, what with his chums with pots of money and no notion of human rights and his BFF Mr V Putin...

Though it was in an interview with Russian TV so it's possible there was a goon off-camera waiting to hit him over the head with a board if he deviated from the script.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 16, 2015, 09:47:16 pm
He has a very long history of being vile IMO.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on October 16, 2015, 10:54:57 pm
There are rumours of him being in a plane whilst a business rival was cut up and distributed over the Essex marshes. But that was alleged, and surely a made up story.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 19, 2015, 10:04:17 am
Ecclestone's out of the same mould as that Hoogstraten cnut
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on October 23, 2015, 03:24:39 pm
Martin Shkreli.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/low-cost-alternative-launched-to-the-aids-drug-hedge-funder-martin-shkreli-hiked-5000-a6705456.html

;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on October 23, 2015, 05:02:16 pm
 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on October 24, 2015, 05:21:25 pm
Germaine fucking Greer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34625512

One interesting thing about TERFs like her is that they never, ever seem to consider the existence of trans men. As I have posted elsewhere, I will take being told that I neither look like, sound like nor behave like La Greer as an honour and a compliment.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on October 24, 2015, 07:44:42 pm
You beat me to it Steph.   
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 28, 2015, 06:04:10 pm
Having just seen a trailer for "Bear Grylls: Born Survivor" I moved to add the arrogant super-twat to this list, only to find that he was actually the first to whom this glorious accolade was awarded  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on October 28, 2015, 06:15:47 pm
Having just seen a trailer for "Bear Grylls: Born Survivor" I moved to add the arrogant super-twat to this list, only to find that he was actually the first to whom this glorious accolade was awarded  ;D

Well, if multiple nominations are good enough for the politicians, I see no reason why assorted slebs and people off the TV should get off lightly.  ;)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 28, 2015, 11:14:27 pm
Having just seen a trailer for "Bear Grylls: Born Survivor" I moved to add the arrogant super-twat to this list, only to find that he was actually the first to whom this glorious accolade was awarded  ;D


Does this make him the alpha and omega of Super Twats?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 29, 2015, 06:59:27 am
More like one of those annoying floaters that won't flush.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on October 29, 2015, 07:03:35 am
The Daily Mash getting in on the act.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-entertainment/andrew-lloyd-webber-pens-musical-about-what-a-twat-he-is-20151028103354
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 29, 2015, 08:07:50 am
Well, if multiple nominations are good enough for the politicians, I see no reason why assorted slebs and people off the TV should get off lightly.  ;)

Dan Snow
Dan Snow
Dan Snow
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Efrogwr on October 29, 2015, 09:28:21 am
More like one of those annoying floaters that won't flush.

 ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on October 29, 2015, 09:39:30 am
Having just seen a trailer for "Bear Grylls: Born Survivor" I moved to add the arrogant super-twat to this list, only to find that he was actually the first to whom this glorious accolade was awarded  ;D


Does this make him the alpha and omega of Super Twats?

You have to admire the longevity of his twattishness I suppose.

Some people would have shown weakness over 7 years and given in, doing something untwatty.  Not Bear "Not my real name" Grylls though.  He continues to twattishly show us just how much fun it can be to be to look exactly like the bastard love-child of David Cameron and George Osbourne.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on October 29, 2015, 10:19:28 am
Well, if multiple nominations are good enough for the politicians, I see no reason why assorted slebs and people off the TV should get off lightly.  ;)

Dan Snow
Dan Snow
Dan Snow

Now say that  in front of a mirror, at midnight...  :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: menthel on October 29, 2015, 10:47:21 am
Mr J Twunt. Every single day for the rest of his oxygen wasting, mouth breathing life.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on October 29, 2015, 10:48:07 am
Well, if multiple nominations are good enough for the politicians, I see no reason why assorted slebs and people off the TV should get off lightly.  ;)

Dan Snow
Dan Snow
Dan Snow

Now say that  in front of a mirror, at midnight...  :demon:

Daren't. I might end up in a sealed room with his "informative" documentaries being played at me with extreme prejudice for ever. :hand:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 01, 2015, 03:53:32 pm
Philip Davies
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 04, 2015, 03:38:25 am
Nigel Graham. And Motorised Moron as well.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34680289
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 04, 2015, 09:48:10 am
David & Philip Davies MPs and all their ilk who think that kidnap and imprisonment for thirteen years without charge does not deserve compensation.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on November 05, 2015, 09:42:01 pm
Rupert Murdoch,   Dennis Potter was right.   

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/nov/03/national-geographic-layoffs-21st-century-fox-merger
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 06, 2015, 01:33:39 am
Nigel Graham. And Motorised Moron as well.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34680289

He's an even bigger twat than I suspected, not only using his father in law as an excuse but going to a tribunal to complain about the damage to F-I-l's health due to the stress. The F-i -L had died well before the ticket was issued.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on November 15, 2015, 10:26:40 am
Just stumbled accidentally into another Katie Hopkins rant.   That woman is massively overpaid and overrated.    :sick:  :sick:  :sick:  :sick:  :sick:  :sick: ...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 15, 2015, 10:37:34 am
Step forward former rally co-driver, motorsport boss of Peugeot and Ferrari and now head of the FIA M. Jean Todt!  Yes, Jean, more people may well have been killed in road accidents on Friday than in the Paris attacks but it is a spectacularly crass and insensitive thing to say right now.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on November 19, 2015, 01:08:51 pm
Phil the Greek

Quote
A train announcer was stood next to me and he said 'Do you announce in a Brummie accent?'" he said.
"She said no. And he responded saying: 'I suppose you've got to announce in an English accent so everyone can understand you.'"

Quote
Queen officially reopens New Street station on Birmingham tour
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-34865657 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-34865657)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 19, 2015, 04:39:39 pm
David 'Jetset' Cameron
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on November 19, 2015, 05:21:19 pm
You are being too hard Clarion. Apparently they have discovered public sector areoplanes fly more cheaply than private sector ones (and they can hide the rest of the cost in the defence budget). Will Britannia be making a reappearance me wonders.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on November 19, 2015, 06:10:29 pm
He thinks that he's a president and needs an equivalent to Airforce 1.   He's just a total arse and needs a reality check instead.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 19, 2015, 06:25:33 pm
Actually, the proposal is a minor adaptation of an aircraft that already exists and is in service. If it gets more use out of an asset that is underused at present, I have no difficulty with it. And it'll reduce the likelihood that I have to fly him anywhere.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 19, 2015, 08:21:51 pm
Actually, the proposal is a minor adaptation of an aircraft that already exists and is in service. If it gets more use out of an asset that is underused at present, I have no difficulty with it. And it'll reduce the likelihood that I have to fly him anywhere.
On the figures presented, it would take several decades to be cheaper than chartering.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Legs on November 19, 2015, 08:28:57 pm
Probably been on before but needs a re-nom.  If not for that awful syrup, then for spouting sh1t like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fdjHjzvZoI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fdjHjzvZoI)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34873057 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34873057)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 19, 2015, 09:24:07 pm
"Asked if that may include registering Muslims in a database or using special ID cards, he [ludicrous wig-sporting arsereptile Donald Trump] did not rule it out."

You could force them to sew yellow crescent moons to their clothes too, Donny, you clueless fuckhammer.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Eccentrica Gallumbits on November 19, 2015, 09:29:17 pm
Actually, the proposal is a minor adaptation of an aircraft that already exists and is in service. If it gets more use out of an asset that is underused at present, I have no difficulty with it. And it'll reduce the likelihood that I have to fly him anywhere.
If you do ever fly him anywhere, please turn the seatbelt signs off and then do a loop the loop.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Jurek on November 19, 2015, 09:34:17 pm
^ Choice.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on November 19, 2015, 09:35:07 pm
Actually, the proposal is a minor adaptation of an aircraft that already exists and is in service. If it gets more use out of an asset that is underused at present, I have no difficulty with it. And it'll reduce the likelihood that I have to fly him anywhere.
If you do ever fly him anywhere, please turn the seatbelt signs off and then do a loop the loop.

The last words on the cockpit voice recorder were "Sorry about the collateral damage".
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on November 19, 2015, 10:16:29 pm
Amber Rudd
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on November 20, 2015, 05:39:36 pm
Actually, the proposal is a minor adaptation of an aircraft that already exists and is in service. If it gets more use out of an asset that is underused at present, I have no difficulty with it. And it'll reduce the likelihood that I have to fly him anywhere.
On the figures presented, it would take several decades to be cheaper than chartering.

The figures I heard were something like 13 years until break-even. That is presumably based on the refurb/adaptation cost being no greater than the £10m quoted (ha ha), but also on those costs only being set against the costs of ministerial travel: if the newly modded plane was used for other purposes too (I dunno, flying generals somewhere), then presumably some of the cost should be amortised against their budgets too. £10m didn't seem an inordinate amount to me.

As an aside, the report I heard suggested that charter costs for an airliner were about £6 or £7k an hour - that seemed pretty cheap.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on November 20, 2015, 05:45:01 pm
What is not mentioned anywhere is the running costs of the converted aircraft.   I think some presidential aspirational fog has been allowed to cloud judgement. 
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on November 20, 2015, 11:55:45 pm
No, the report I saw reckoned £6-£7k per hour commercial charter vs £2k per hour for the newly converted tanker.

Assuming a £4.5k ph saving, that gives 2222 hours to break even on £10m, which over 13 years is 171 flying hours per year. That doesn't seem very many, but I guess CMD probably doesn't go to foreign parts *that* much.

It does make sense to me that ministerial transport should be set up with secure comms links and the like (which probably either aren't available on a commercial charter or have to be fitted every time then stripped out again), and whether or not he's suffering presidential delusions I can think of far greater things to get worked up about.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 21, 2015, 12:09:37 am
The aeroplane would not be converted. It would still fulfil its role as a tanker and freight/passenger transport, but as in the days of the old 10 Sqn VC10s, it would have a VIP fit for those occasions when it was to be used for carrying CMD and other senior politico's around. This isn't a new thing, it's been done for years and years. It's really only been in the Iraq 2/Afghanistan era that the RAF hasn't been able to spare any of the large, long-range tanker-transport aircraft for VIP duties.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: jsabine on November 21, 2015, 12:23:23 am
Converted, upgraded, modified - whatevs ...

(I hadn't realised that the tankers were dual role - I'd always had a mental picture of the entire fuselage sloshing with fuel. I was quite surprised to see windows on the one they showed on the telly the other night. You may gather that I don't have a particularly strong interest in military aircraft ...)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 21, 2015, 12:32:36 am
With the pure tanker VC10s, you'd have been about right! The ex-passenger deck housed several additional fuel tanks to raise the capacity to something useful. But the Tristar, which has just retired, and the Airbus A330, which is the subject of this current teacup tornado, carry sufficient fuel in the normal tanks to function perfectly well as tankers whilst simultaneously carrying either a few hundred troops, 20 or 30 tonnes of freight, or a couple of political egos.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on November 24, 2015, 02:31:09 am
What is not mentioned anywhere is the running costs of the converted aircraft.   I think some presidential aspirational fog has been allowed to cloud judgement.
I am puzzled. Apparently, according to CMD and Gideon, the most efficient and cost-effective way to supply public services is to sell all the assets, sack all the staff and hire in TasercoG4S as outsource suppliers. Except when it involves CMD ego transport, where using existing public employees and assets, kept in-house, is more efficient and cost-effective.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: TimC on November 24, 2015, 07:45:58 am
Not so, Steph. Well, not entirely, anyway. The A330s are owned by by AirTanker Ltd, and operated on behalf of the RAF using a mix of RAF and civilian crews under a (something like) 20-year lease agreement. A number of the aircraft are used for civilian charter when the RAF demand allows. These aircraft have joint civil/military registration. They tried to interest me in working for them, but going back to military spare-time training and occasional living in tents for half my current pay didn't appeal (and they'd have deducted my military pension from that pay). That was before the VIP role was added to the list. But we've (Virgin) had that PM transport contract for several years now; I've managed to avoid getting involved.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2015, 10:04:00 am
Can I put in a word here for George Osborne?  He seems to have tried so hard to be nominated yesterday, and hasn't been rewarded for those efforts.

Tax Credit Cuts/Not Cuts/Actually Sneaky Cuts Really
Tampon Tax to subsidise 'women's things'
Defining an 'affordable' house as approximately ten times the average wage
Planning (half-heartedly) for less than half of the houses required to deal with the housing shortage
Setting aside a tiny fraction of a per cent of the amount needed to deal with potholes.
it goes on...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on November 26, 2015, 10:05:29 am
And Jeremy Hunt, for his rubbish brinksmanship, for a massive u-turn he didn't have to set himself up for, and for writing to the wrong person regarding talks.  Bravo, sir!  Incompetence and Twattishness of the highest order.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Kim on November 26, 2015, 12:23:06 pm
Tampon Tax to subsidise 'women's things'

Cringeworthy though it is, I sympathise that EU law means they can't zero-rate sanitary products.  (For the same reason they can't zero-rate anything else.)  If it weren't for that, I expect it would have gone through promptly just to stop everyone talking about periods.

Ringfencing the tax for something worthy is a rubbish PR exercise.  Mandating that sanitary products be provided free of charge in places that provide bogroll would be a better one.



None of which really detracts from his general over-qualification for the thread...
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 26, 2015, 01:39:22 pm
Tampon Tax to subsidise 'women's things'

Cringeworthy though it is, I sympathise that EU law means they can't zero-rate sanitary products.  (For the same reason they can't zero-rate anything else.)  If it weren't for that, I expect it would have gone through promptly just to stop everyone talking about periods.

Um, what? Lots of things are zero rated. PPE for one. Children's shoes.
It's also perfectly normal for different tax rates to apply for the same goods in different EU countries.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SteveC on November 26, 2015, 01:43:01 pm
The rule is that you can't reduce the rate to zero for something which has previously attracted VAT. The items you mentioned have never been subject to VAT.
Of course when we entered the Common Market far more of our MPs were male and they wouldn't discuss periods in public.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on November 26, 2015, 02:02:50 pm
ty for the clarification.

Of course, that doesn't rule out the whole EU making a change. But then a lot of male MPs would have to discuss periods. In front of each other.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Legs on November 27, 2015, 08:32:03 am
Donald Trump again: the gift that keeps giving.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34931215 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34931215)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on November 27, 2015, 01:36:42 pm
He is an insensitive twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Aidan on November 27, 2015, 04:33:28 pm
He is an insensitive twat.
No, he's a nasty , bullying , evil shitpile of a person
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 27, 2015, 06:29:37 pm
If Osborne goes on about fiscal rectitude any longer I may be tenpted to give him rectal fistitude.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: andrewc on November 27, 2015, 07:00:16 pm
If Osborne goes on about fiscal rectitude any longer I may be tenpted to give him rectal fistitude.

He'd probably enjoy that sort of thing  ;D
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on November 27, 2015, 07:02:38 pm
If Osborne goes on about fiscal rectitude any longer I may be tenpted to give him rectal fistitude.

He'd probably enjoy that sort of thing  ;D
De rigeur at St Paul's and Magdalen College*, probably.

*SO went there.  Ozzy's gormless Father Dougal expression was still legendary, apparently, even though he'd graduated a few years previously.  It's his default face.  Was called "povvo" by the Eton kids because he'd only been to St Paul's.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Deano on December 01, 2015, 11:24:29 pm
David Aaronovitch - most recently, for his smug performance on Newsnight.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: sojournermike on December 02, 2015, 12:17:49 am
Donald Trump again: the gift that keeps giving.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34931215 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34931215)

Given that he appears to be leading the race, it's really not funny any more
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 02, 2015, 10:43:38 am
I am afraid I have to drag David Cameron into this thread, for labelling more than half the British population as 'terrorist sympathisers'.

Utter Wazzock beyond all measure.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 02, 2015, 10:48:51 am
Anybody who seriously believes and who has not learned the lessons of Iraq, Libya, etc. that going to bomb Syria is a good idea, is a twat of the highest possible order and wins the thread.

Cameron, Osborne, May, Benn, ...   
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on December 02, 2015, 11:32:24 am
And don't forget Fallon, the twat who says bombing alone won't defeat  Daesh but it will make it less likely they commit a terrorist attack in the UK. As if dropping a multi-million £ bomb on a second-hand 4x4 in a country 2000 miles away will make the angry nutters of Luton think twice ::-)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 02, 2015, 01:29:05 pm
Or Farron, who said that he didn't think that bombing would be the right course of action...

Quote from: Turncoat Tim
If we have got troops operating in Syria and we are part of air raids, then there is no mandate for that. Indeed, there was a vote in parliament two years ago that denied that mandate. I am sure Isis are aided by the involvement, certainly on the ground, of what are perceived to be western military personnel. Their whole message is that it is them against the west. If you want to make them martyrs and play into their hands, you do this.

“If you want to defeat them, you encircle them by other means and use regional actors. It is really important that British Muslims are reminded that Isis is about murdering other Muslims, and the minute we give Isis the ability to paint through their propaganda a picture of this being the evil west against this Islamic state, then we have absolutely let them have a coup.”
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/17/farron-calls-for-progressive-left-groups-to-unite-on-key-issues



...so now he's voting for it.
http://www.libdems.org.uk/position_on_syria#
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 03, 2015, 09:09:20 am
Anybody who seriously believes and who has not learned the lessons of Iraq, Libya, etc. that going to bomb Syria is a good idea, is a twat of the highest possible order and wins the thread.

Cameron, Osborne, May, Benn, ...

397 super twats I believe was the final headcount.

A day of shame, a day for those victims of past and present atrocities to recoil at the barbarity of britain.   I don't know why we are so-called great britain because there's been very little great about us in our dealings in the world, historical or present, as far as I can see.   Bullying in the political junior ranks is just training for what comes later.   These people need to have a 'don't give a fuck' attitude, a hardened heart, a lack of conscience and reason.   

I feel quite sick today and ashamed to be british.   I understand why these people will retaliate and fight as best as they can because I am one of the small non-establishment plebs of britain who has been bullied throughout his insignificant life by the self-appointed establishment.   Their idealism is no better nor worse than that of our establishment overlords imo. 

Oh well, pro bono law clinic today.   I can at least help a few people in a small way on their hazardous journey through life.       

I wonder:  should this have been in the rant thread?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 07, 2015, 07:32:38 pm
Tyson Fury - world heavyweight Super-Twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on December 08, 2015, 12:45:29 am
Donald Trump, the weapons-grade stone-bonking gift that keeps on giving.

Quote
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has called for a "total and complete" halt to Muslims entering the US, in the wake of the deadly California shootings.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35035190
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on December 08, 2015, 07:05:34 am
Is he perhaps a Democratic mole ?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Wombat on December 08, 2015, 08:18:35 am
If he's a mole of any sort, I wish he'd burrow his way to the centre of the earth and vapourise his pathetic little brain in a puff of smoke.  I just cannot get my head round real people actually thinking he has anything worthwhile to say.  An idiotic knob-end of the worst order.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: benborp on December 08, 2015, 10:02:33 am
In my opinion he's crossed beyond twatishness to being actively dangerous. This isn't just words that fell out of his mouth but a considered statement issued by his campaign team.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hatler on December 08, 2015, 10:12:49 am
I'm tempted to say that no-one could be that stupid, daft, insensitive and a whole array of other, possibly stronger, terms. But I think benborp's right. This looks like a considered position. Heaven help the US.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on December 08, 2015, 10:49:04 am
Hillary Benn.

His father would be spinning in his grave if he hadn't been cremated.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 08, 2015, 10:58:25 am
Tyson Fury - world heavyweight Super-Twat.
Renominated, because when challenged over his statement
Quote
women belong on their back
statement, he refused to back down and doubled up by saying
Quote
women belong on their back or in the kitchen
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 08, 2015, 11:04:52 am
There's someone called Tyson Fury?

I think the US will be closing its borders to people called Donald Trump the next time he leaves the country. Assuming he can find a border.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 08, 2015, 11:30:17 am
Hillary Benn.

His father would be spinning in his grave if he hadn't been cremated.

A Blairite traitor but you cannot blame the father for the sins of the son.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: fboab on December 08, 2015, 11:33:32 am
Tyson Fury - world heavyweight Super-Twat.
Renominated, because when challenged over his statement
Quote
women belong on their back
statement, he refused to back down and doubled up by saying
Quote
women belong on their back or in the kitchen

Presumably his request that 'critics'
Quote
suck my b***s
is only directed at the female critics, given his embrace of homosexuality.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Regulator on December 08, 2015, 12:08:46 pm
Hillary Benn.

His father would be spinning in his grave if he hadn't been cremated.

A Blairite traitor but you cannot blame the father for the sins of the son.

I wasn't.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 08, 2015, 12:57:39 pm
I can't help but hope that when he gets his one-to-one chat on the SPOTY show Mr Fury is interviewed by Clare Balding :demon:

Although it'd also be nice if Gary Lineker called him a cunt on live TV.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on December 09, 2015, 01:36:50 pm
Adrian Hogarth of Cumbrian Properties for tripling their new tennant fee just as half of Carlisle was flooded.

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/fees-hike-estate-agent-apologises-for-error-in-judgement-1.1231546
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on December 09, 2015, 05:14:56 pm
To be fair to him, he does sound quite contrite now.  So that's a second thing Facebook is good for, besides stalking.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: offcumden on December 09, 2015, 07:58:20 pm
I can't help but hope that when he gets his one-to-one chat on the SPOTY show Mr Fury is interviewed by Clare Balding :demon:

Although it'd also be nice if Gary Lineker called him a cunt on live TV.

Wonder if Clive Myrie will be there?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on December 09, 2015, 09:43:48 pm
To be fair to him, he does sound quite contrite now.  So that's a second thing Facebook is good for, besides stalking.

...still should be shot through the lungs. If only for being a lizard estate agent.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on December 10, 2015, 12:53:13 pm
Wonder what Trump's stance on Estate Agents is?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 11, 2015, 08:07:26 pm
I am amused that Hopkins says that she would feel unsafe walking through muslim areas.   

Hmmm, I wonder why exactly...   
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 11, 2015, 09:35:31 pm
If I ever get wind of the egotistical windbag planning a hile through my area then she'd better be afraid of atheists too.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: benborp on December 12, 2015, 12:20:43 pm
I just encountered Bear Grylls for the first time. My step-father's non-selective comfort viewing of a weekend starts with Saturday Morning Kitchen on which Bear Grylls was a guest, hosted by James Martin. I find the TV ear poundingly loud from two rooms away, there has been no escape. Dear God...

Edited 'cos even I struggle to understand myself most of the time.

P.S. Seemingly BBC + XMAS = Constant James Martin.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Zipperhead on December 12, 2015, 04:32:47 pm
I find James Martin an extremely annoying twat for all sorts of reasons - but he did once bring pleasure to me.

There was a program on the telewotsit about the modern day Mille Miglia, starring him, and he had bought an old car, paid for its restoration and was then going to drive it in the event and then sell it for a large profit. He was so incredibly up his arse about the car that he wouldn't even let the camera crew put a go-pro on the bonnet with a sucker (and I'm sure that if it had come off and caused any damage the damage would be covered by the film crews insurance).

So how did this bring me pleasure? Well on day one of the event the engine blew up, big time, trashed totally. After watching his reaction to that the rest of the program concentrated on the other cars.

A  nice big kick in the nuts from Madame Karma.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ElyDave on December 13, 2015, 02:20:19 pm
Graham effing Norton.

Just no.

I do like James Martin's approach to cream and butter, just need to get him to drop the sugar.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Guy on December 14, 2015, 08:57:42 am
Daniel Erickson-Hull AKA Reverend D
Quote
Children's TV show Rainbow 'contained hidden messages to homosexualise all children
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/childrens-tv-show-rainbow-contained-7008220#rlabs=4%20rt$category%20p$3 (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/childrens-tv-show-rainbow-contained-7008220#rlabs=4%20rt$category%20p$3)
??? :o :facepalm:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Kim on December 14, 2015, 12:27:52 pm
Daniel Erickson-Hull AKA Reverend D
Quote
Children's TV show Rainbow 'contained hidden messages to homosexualise all children
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/childrens-tv-show-rainbow-contained-7008220#rlabs=4%20rt$category%20p$3 (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/childrens-tv-show-rainbow-contained-7008220#rlabs=4%20rt$category%20p$3)
??? :o :facepalm:

Certainly deserves some sort of award for being late to the party.  And probably one for misunderstanding cause and effect.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 15, 2015, 08:08:48 am
Philip Davies MP for filibustering (this time) a plan to make first aid a part of the curriculum.  Yes, I know it didn't have much chance of making law, and perhaps his puerile display will bring the suggestion more publicity than it would otherwise have had,p but that just makes him more of a nobber.  And, indeed,  a Supertwat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 15, 2015, 08:26:57 am
He has form (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-who-blocked-law-to-scrap-hospital-parking-charges-for-carers-says-he-was-speaking-up-for-a6716816.html).

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 15, 2015, 12:27:49 pm
Yes.  Hence 'this time'.

He is a wazzock.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: SoreTween on December 15, 2015, 12:58:47 pm
Lord Lawson (http://road.cc/content/news/173223-lord-lawson-says-cycling-most-damaging-thing-london-blitz)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 15, 2015, 01:05:52 pm
Lord Lawson (http://road.cc/content/news/173223-lord-lawson-says-cycling-most-damaging-thing-london-blitz)
Quote
Lawson the demented“Is it not also hugely age discriminatory? There is a huge section of the population of a certain age, well represented in this House — I declare an interest — for whom cycling is not a practical option.”

“I suggest to my noble friend that it is never too late to start,” was Lord Ahmad’s laconic reply.
f
I'm rather liking this lord ahmad
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: menthel on December 15, 2015, 02:16:37 pm
And Jeremy Hunt, for his rubbish brinksmanship, for a massive u-turn he didn't have to set himself up for, and for writing to the wrong person regarding talks.  Bravo, sir!  Incompetence and Twattishness of the highest order.

Yep, he is a supermassive fuck knuckle.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 15, 2015, 05:04:10 pm
Philip Davies MP for filibustering (this time) a plan to make first aid a part of the curriculum.  Yes, I know it didn't have much chance of making law, and perhaps his puerile display will bring the suggestion more publicity than it would otherwise have had,p but that just makes him more of a nobber.  And, indeed,  a Supertwat.

Russell Howard seems to be having a go at the massive sodbonce every week, and rightly so.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: spesh on December 17, 2015, 03:32:16 pm
Martin Shkreli.

I'm not saying that the following is proof of the existence of God, gods and/or weakly godlike entities but sometimes the universe moves in mysterious ways - Shkreli was arrested this morning for securities fraud.   :thumbsup:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35120668
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-martin-shkreli-securities-fraud/

It's worth noting that since he became notorious for jacking up the price of Daraprim by 5,000%, the suppurating boil on humanity's barse acquired a majority stake in KaloBios Pharmaceuticals (http://gawker.com/pharmaceuticals-rapscallion-martin-shkreli-now-playing-1745408324), in a manner which stank of market manipulation, and also planned to hike up the price of another drug (http://gawker.com/vile-human-martin-shkreli-plans-to-hike-up-the-price-fo-1747692796).


What a day, what a lovely day!  :D

Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on December 18, 2015, 12:17:22 am
BBC News 24. for using obscene images by letting George Osborne's face be seen on national television and going even further by letting him open his mouth and make Sounds with it!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: offcumden on December 18, 2015, 09:06:41 am
^^^^

Aargh! You!  You mentioned his name!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: clarion on December 18, 2015, 10:24:23 am
Just thought I would mention my pleasure that George Osborne was bood on the red carpet at Star Wars.

Warms the cockles.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Peter on December 18, 2015, 10:26:47 am
I read that as "blood on the carpet", which would have warmed the cockles even more.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Bledlow on December 18, 2015, 10:43:13 am
Martin Shkreli.

I'm not saying that the following is proof of the existence of God, gods and/or weakly godlike entities but sometimes the universe moves in mysterious ways - Shkreli was arrested this morning for securities fraud.   :thumbsup:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35120668
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-martin-shkreli-securities-fraud/

It's worth noting that since he became notorious for jacking up the price of Daraprim by 5,000%, the suppurating boil on humanity's barse acquired a majority stake in KaloBios Pharmaceuticals (http://gawker.com/pharmaceuticals-rapscallion-martin-shkreli-now-playing-1745408324), in a manner which stank of market manipulation, and also planned to hike up the price of another drug (http://gawker.com/vile-human-martin-shkreli-plans-to-hike-up-the-price-fo-1747692796).


What a day, what a lovely day!  :D
He's a classic example of the 'Why does anyone give their money to this arsehole to manage?" problem. However incompetent, if you're boastful enough & entirely without shame, there are always suckers who think that you'll make money for them. Unfortunately, people like this tosser, when given money, don't just rip off the idiots who gave it to him.

"He also denied the charges regarding the MSMB entities, which he said involve complex accounting matters that prosecutors and the SEC fail to understand . . ."
Yeah - a classic sign of a scam: the accounts are highly obscure, so as to make it hard to follow the money.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rafletcher on December 18, 2015, 02:14:01 pm
Levi Jud Nelson "Celebrated vlogger" and, well...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-35120892
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: LEE on December 21, 2015, 05:24:32 pm
Chris Evans.

If it looks like a twat and spends 25 years acting like a twat, then it's probably a twat.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pingu on December 21, 2015, 05:33:36 pm
Iain Duncan Smith
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rogerzilla on December 21, 2015, 09:45:40 pm
Liam "definitely not gay" Fox.  Does anyone care what he thinks about Europe?  He believes we do, but we think he's just a portly right-wing super-twat who was probably wedgied every day at school.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 21, 2015, 11:28:53 pm
No-one believed Father Ted when he said the money was just resting in his account so why Super-Twat Sepp Blatter thinks anyone will give credence to his Super-Twattery is a mystery worthy of Dirk Gently, or the very shit Glam Metal Detectives.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: hellymedic on December 22, 2015, 12:06:16 am
Liam "definitely not gay" Fox.  Does anyone care what he thinks about Europe?  He believes we do, but we think he's just a portly right-wing super-twat who was probably wedgied every day at school.

I worked with his wife around 1990.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on December 22, 2015, 12:34:41 am
Liam "definitely not gay" Fox.  Does anyone care what he thinks about Europe?  He believes we do, but we think he's just a portly right-wing super-twat who was probably wedgied every day at school.

I worked with his wife around 1990.
What did you do with the rest of the evening?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Steph on December 22, 2015, 12:44:51 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/35126635

I was wondering if we can have a collective noun for a group of supertwats, and I propose the "Hunt".  Not reloated to this case, which refers to a complete Hunt of twats.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Pedaldog on December 23, 2015, 01:22:31 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/35126635

I was wondering if we can have a collective noun for a group of supertwats, and I propose the "Hunt".  Not related to this case, which refers to a complete Hunt of twats.

I propose "A Sasson" of Super Twatten, named after the legendary "Olfactory Assault", from five miles out of Mumbai on a good (?) day and  the right (?) direction of approach. I was in hospital for a week or so. back when Bombay was the place to be drunk on Righteous Injun' Wh,AAAA.iskey!
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on December 29, 2015, 11:47:58 pm
The Racist Oliver Letwin
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/oliver-letwin-blamed-black-peoples-7090286
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 30, 2015, 01:13:12 am
But he's absolutely right that

“Riots, criminality and social disintegration are caused solely by individual characters and attitudes [...] So long as bad moral attitudes remain, all efforts to improve the inner cities will founder.”

He just neglected to mention that the bad moral attitudes mostly belonged to officers of the Metropolitan Police :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Torslanda on December 30, 2015, 10:02:42 am
Fucking scumbag oxygen thieves (http://singletrackworld.com/2015/12/calderdale-premier-dealer-flooded-robbed/)
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 30, 2015, 04:10:12 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Canardly on December 30, 2015, 07:00:13 pm
Is good to see leadership in action, strewth.....
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 30, 2015, 07:11:10 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

Crisis?  What crisis?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 31, 2015, 04:36:41 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

What actually was he going to do? Hold back the rain? Suck all the water up through a giant straw and piss it over the moon?

It's that Daily Mail/Taxpayer Alliance-stylee nonsense. How dare he take a holiday? At Christmas. Is there a lot of point paying a couple of thousand in air fares to bring him back right the? They have phones and teleconferences.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on December 31, 2015, 04:58:31 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

What actually was he going to do? Hold back the rain? Suck all the water up through a giant straw and piss it over the moon?

It's that Daily Mail/Taxpayer Alliance-stylee nonsense. How dare he take a holiday? At Christmas. Is there a lot of point paying a couple of thousand in air fares to bring him back right the? They have phones and teleconferences.
And if he had come back early there would have been wailing and nashing of teeth from the wail and taxpayers' alliance about the cost of the walk on fare.
So it all boils down to a public sector worker daring to have a holiday.

Whatever they pay him I'm not sure a sane person would take that job, if must be up there with child protection social work in the dammed if you do, dammed if you don't stakes.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on December 31, 2015, 05:03:55 pm
By the way

Taxpayers' alliance

Who do they represent, not any taxpayer I know.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: citoyen on December 31, 2015, 05:15:55 pm
Dear Oliver Letwin, Simon Danczuk, George Osborne and anyone involved with the Financial Conduct Authority...

May I take this opportunity to wish a terminally painful new year to you all. You appalling specimens.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on December 31, 2015, 05:25:07 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

What actually was he going to do? Hold back the rain? Suck all the water up through a giant straw and piss it over the moon?

It's that Daily Mail/Taxpayer Alliance-stylee nonsense. How dare he take a holiday? At Christmas. Is there a lot of point paying a couple of thousand in air fares to bring him back right the? They have phones and teleconferences.
It's not nonsense. It's leadership (or lack of).
He's paid 100k per year for a couple of days a week of work.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 31, 2015, 05:28:42 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

What actually was he going to do? Hold back the rain? Suck all the water up through a giant straw and piss it over the moon?

It's that Daily Mail/Taxpayer Alliance-stylee nonsense. How dare he take a holiday? At Christmas. Is there a lot of point paying a couple of thousand in air fares to bring him back right the? They have phones and teleconferences.
It's not nonsense. It's leadership (or lack of).
He's paid 100k per year for a couple of days a week of work.

It's that entitlement thing again.   Politicians, uncivil servants*, business owners, etc., etc., etc.

Horrific, isn't it.   Paid not to do his job, to be there when expected.   

There seems to be a view that 'they' are somehow more equal than us mere plebs.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 31, 2015, 05:30:00 pm
Sir Philip Dilley, head of the Environment Agency, going on holiday to the carribean while his staff work straight through, sometimes in appalling conditions, sleeping (literally) where they could on the street.

What actually was he going to do? Hold back the rain? Suck all the water up through a giant straw and piss it over the moon?

It's that Daily Mail/Taxpayer Alliance-stylee nonsense. How dare he take a holiday? At Christmas. Is there a lot of point paying a couple of thousand in air fares to bring him back right the? They have phones and teleconferences.
It's not nonsense. It's leadership (or lack of).
He's paid 100k per year for a couple of days a week of work.

I dunno, did he in some way fail? Rivers flood, there's only so much the EA can do, and they're mostly long term engineering projects. We should look at that, of course, and whether there was more than could have done, and how that could could and should be delivered. As it stands we've probably paid a further couple of grand to fly him back to look at reports he could have done just as adequately where he was. Perhaps we should forget all this 'leadership' nonsense then we wouldn't have to doll out large salaries for people to be leaders.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 31, 2015, 05:38:06 pm
Does that include "thought leadership" :demon:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: ian on December 31, 2015, 05:39:29 pm
I would turn back the waters with the mighty forces of Powerpoint. Canute never dreamed of such a thing.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on December 31, 2015, 05:43:30 pm
I would turn back the waters with the mighty forces of Powerpoint. Canute never dreamed of such a thing.
No PowerPoint is so last year, real thought leaders use infographics they are so much more powerful.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Polar Bear on December 31, 2015, 05:46:49 pm
... Perhaps we should forget all this 'leadership' nonsense then we wouldn't have to doll out large salaries for people to be leaders.

Especially as they patently fail to lead most of the time, definitely.   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 31, 2015, 05:58:06 pm
I would turn back the waters with the mighty forces of Powerpoint. Canute never dreamed of such a thing.
No PowerPoint is so last year, real thought leaders use infographics they are so much more powerful.

(Googles)

(Wonders how that differs materially from Powerpoint)

Also it appears to lack sarcastic sea otters.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: rr on December 31, 2015, 08:28:49 pm
I would turn back the waters with the mighty forces of Powerpoint. Canute never dreamed of such a thing.
No PowerPoint is so last year, real thought leaders use infographics they are so much more powerful.

(Googles)

(Wonders how that differs materially from Powerpoint)

Also it appears to lack sarcastic sea otters.
Fewer words, more twee graphics and less contrast
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Mr Larrington on December 31, 2015, 08:36:42 pm
So, Powerpoint but shitter.
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: Zipperhead on January 01, 2016, 10:21:05 am
So, Powerpoint but shitter.

C 'est  possible?
Title: Re: Super-Twat
Post by: mcshroom on January 01, 2016, 10:52:22 am