Author Topic: Wayne Rooney  (Read 3514 times)

Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #25 on: 23 October, 2010, 03:15:07 pm »
'S obvious innit, Citeh have offered him 250 grans per week.


IGMC


Surely he prefers 'em younger than that?
Let right or wrong alone decide
God was never on your side.

Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #26 on: 24 October, 2010, 09:24:32 am »
'S obvious innit, Citeh have offered him 250 grans per week.


IGMC


Surely he prefers 'em younger than that?

Err. No. Grandmother Denies Sex With Rooney | Home | Sky News
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #27 on: 24 October, 2010, 10:28:41 am »

   After all, they made a loss of £80m this past year and somebody has to pay the bills. 


Don't loose sight of the act that this loss is an artificial one brought about by the leveraged buyout and that, at heart, the business is still sound although much less so than it was before.
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]

Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #28 on: 24 October, 2010, 10:35:18 am »
Perhaps with the economic and environmental nightmare that looms people will get back to caring about things that actually matter.



Caring about something else? How could they when, whatever else may be important, football is more important than that?
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #29 on: 25 October, 2010, 10:53:29 am »
sales of Rooney related merchandise/image rights
WTF would you want those for?  Bird scarers?
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Wayne Rooney
« Reply #30 on: 25 October, 2010, 08:43:22 pm »
sales of Rooney related merchandise/image rights
WTF would you want those for?  Bird scarers?

Halloween
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]