Author Topic: Lincolnshire Poacher  (Read 3744 times)

Lincolnshire Poacher
« on: 26 June, 2009, 06:47:21 pm »
Hummm...

On-One | The Lincolnshire Poacher

Don't like the headtube logo though. A bit heavy too maybe?
Frenchie - Train à Grande Vitesse

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #1 on: 26 June, 2009, 06:48:50 pm »
Looks rather classy.
Getting there...

border-rider

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #2 on: 26 June, 2009, 06:55:17 pm »
No front fork guard eyes :(

I wonder what it's made of...

Chris N

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #3 on: 26 June, 2009, 06:56:05 pm »
For £375 it'd better be good.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #4 on: 26 June, 2009, 06:58:36 pm »
It's an expensive way to create a facsimile of a 531 bike that you can get from ebay for less than the price of a Lincolnshire Poacher frame...
Getting there...

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #5 on: 26 June, 2009, 07:02:51 pm »
No front fork guard eyes :(

I wonder what it's made of...

Cro-mo.  Probably the same stuff they make the pomp and Kaff out of.  £250 extra just to have those lugs.

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #6 on: 26 June, 2009, 07:25:31 pm »
No front fork guard eyes :(

They seem to imply one can fit rear guards but I can't see where...
Frenchie - Train à Grande Vitesse

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #7 on: 26 June, 2009, 08:00:18 pm »
Mudguard mounts on the inside of the seatstays.
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #8 on: 26 June, 2009, 08:57:46 pm »
It also looks like they may have done the same on the front forks.

Treewheeler

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #9 on: 26 June, 2009, 09:00:26 pm »
No front fork guard eyes :(

I wonder what it's made of...
Victorian Lead Gaspipe...?
 I always wanted a frame sticker that advertised that this frame was made of such.
A good wind up for the geeky bike saddle sniffers.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #10 on: 26 June, 2009, 09:13:06 pm »
I like it...it looks almost exactly like mine (which really is a 50s clubman frame).



Problem with the Lincolnshire Poacher: track ends are hopeless for use with mudguards.

It's not really heavy; a medium d/b steel frame is 4.5lb, which makes the fork 1.7lb.  That's about right.

Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #11 on: 26 June, 2009, 09:25:35 pm »
Track ends may be a slightly bit fiddly with 'grds, but not "hopeless" IME.
Let right or wrong alone decide
God was never on your side.

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #12 on: 26 June, 2009, 10:19:57 pm »
Track end is what I would want on such a frame. Not hopeless with guards (unless the Pompino is as well, which I haven't experienced), though I wouldn't probably put guards on if I owned one. WRT weight 2.8 kg is not that big [sorry I don't do lbs!], true, in particular considering the tubing and lugs, but heading for 2.5kg to 2.6kg would be nice for a good steelie. Having said that one would be very, very hard pushed to get anything similar from Mercian and the likes at such a price; even an off-the-peg. So yes weight-wise (I was harsh) and price-wise it ain't that bad. I still find the headtube logo ugly though!
Frenchie - Train à Grande Vitesse

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #13 on: 26 June, 2009, 10:29:49 pm »
Just had a view - it's really rather pretty! But then I like red.

I expect the headtube logo will remove, Frenchie - so don't let that deter you!

If I still fixed I'd be very tempted....

OTOH, Pompino frames in the On One bargain bin at the moment.
Let right or wrong alone decide
God was never on your side.

border-rider

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #14 on: 26 June, 2009, 11:33:32 pm »
Track ends may be a slightly bit fiddly with 'grds, but not "hopeless" IME.


agreed

I've got a several of bikes with that combo, and it works fine

Indeed, if you are of a fatter tyre persuasion, it often works rather better than forward-facing dropouts.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #15 on: 27 June, 2009, 07:58:50 am »
Don't you have to run the mudguard rather a long way from the tyre?
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

plug

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #16 on: 27 June, 2009, 08:07:29 am »
Just mount the secuclips things from a front mudguard.  Then pop it out when needed.

PS your rear guard looks wonky at the back, Roger. What happened there?

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #17 on: 27 June, 2009, 08:09:58 am »
Optical illusion from the reflector.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #18 on: 27 June, 2009, 09:40:20 am »
"Just mount the secuclips things from a front mudguard.  Then pop it out when needed."

Or just leave 1" or so of stay protruding, slacken eye bolt and raise the rear of the 'grd.

Let right or wrong alone decide
God was never on your side.

border-rider

Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #19 on: 27 June, 2009, 05:25:01 pm »
Don't you have to run the mudguard rather a long way from the tyre?

No.  What Plug said. Close as you like.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Lincolnshire Poacher
« Reply #20 on: 27 June, 2009, 06:08:25 pm »
In that case, I'd buy one when my frame finally cracks (which, at 50 years and 4lb 2oz, it surely will).  The only thing it's missing is a set of braze-ons for a SA hub gear, but everyone used to use band-on pulleys and fulcrum clips back in the day.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.