Author Topic: Super-Twat  (Read 406196 times)

Rhys W

  • I'm single, bilingual
    • Cardiff Ajax
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #700 on: May 20, 2013, 09:24:49 pm »
He's totally misunderstood the term "gay bashing" hasn't he?

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #701 on: May 21, 2013, 06:54:20 am »
He's totally misunderstood just about everything.
Getting there...

Never tell me the odds.

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #703 on: May 23, 2013, 11:35:43 am »
Tim Cook.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/21/apple-wants-single-digit-corporate-tax
We've seen invasions driven by the desire to control the production of oil. I wonder how long before 'military intervention' is driven by the desire to chase missing tax revenues?
<i>Marmite slave</i>

Pingu

  • Put away those fiery biscuits!
  • Mrs Pingu's domestique
    • the Igloo
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #704 on: June 24, 2013, 09:29:40 pm »
Boris fucktard Johnson

David Martin

  • Thats Dr Oi You thankyouverymuch
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #705 on: June 24, 2013, 10:55:08 pm »
Have you ever seen Boris Johnson and Donald trump in the same place? Just saying, like..
"By creating we think. By living we learn" - Patrick Geddes

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #706 on: July 08, 2013, 06:02:37 pm »
Gove - utter utter  twat
CMD - Murray deserves a knighthood , really? Twat!

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #707 on: July 08, 2013, 07:28:12 pm »
Katie rentagob homewrecker face like a horse's arse Hopkins.  No, dear, of course "India" isn't a chavvy location-based child's name like Brooklyn.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/katie-hopkins-branded-an-insufferable-snob-after-this-morning-debate-on-childrens-names-8690468.html
Never tell me the odds.

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #708 on: July 25, 2013, 08:44:20 pm »
As I'm depressingly predictable, I would like to nominate Danny Alexander again.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #709 on: July 25, 2013, 09:58:21 pm »
Lynton Crosby seems to be creating a new category of Mega-twat right now.
Getting there...

RJ

  • Droll rat
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #710 on: July 25, 2013, 09:59:09 pm »
Raise you giga ...

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #711 on: July 25, 2013, 10:03:06 pm »
Fair.  Very fair.

But RJ never lobbied me on the issue. ;D
Getting there...

RJ

  • Droll rat
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #712 on: July 25, 2013, 10:05:04 pm »
No need - clarion's vote was safely in the bag already  ;)

Rhys W

  • I'm single, bilingual
    • Cardiff Ajax
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #713 on: July 25, 2013, 10:38:30 pm »
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #714 on: July 26, 2013, 01:15:21 am »
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Speaking of Wonga.

Papiss Cisse.

Classy.

For those that don't know; he refused to go on a club tour wearing a football shirt with the sponsor "Wonga" because he claims that, as a Muslim, he's against gambling and shouldn't be seen promoting it.

Fair enough.

Photos of him then surface of him at a casino gambling. Oh....he's a regular. Oh.

Funnily enough; it's "resolved" now: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23455637

Wonderfully understated BBC article.

Here's the other bit (also on the BBC):- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-23424012
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

Regulator

  • That's Councillor Regulator to you...
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #715 on: July 26, 2013, 07:30:44 am »
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Strictly speaking they don't invest in Wonga.  They invest in a capital fund which has provided funding to Wonga.

It's almost impossible to invest totally 'ethically' and good on the C of E for at least trying.
Quote from: clarion
I completely agree with Reg.

Green Party Councillor

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #716 on: July 26, 2013, 08:21:24 am »
But Wonga are Super-Jizzbadgers though.
If you don't like your democracy, vote against it.

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #717 on: July 26, 2013, 08:22:37 am »
Archbishop of Canterbury. Picks a fight with Wonga, then remembers his church invests in them. Twat.

Strictly speaking they don't invest in Wonga.  They invest in a capital fund which has provided funding to Wonga.

It's almost impossible to invest totally 'ethically' and good on the C of E for at least trying.
I thought that too. There is no what the archbishop could have known.
<i>Marmite slave</i>

Guy

  • Left-Wing Moonbat Green NAZI
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #718 on: July 26, 2013, 08:31:08 am »
Paul "Vagina Monologue" Dacre.

And another vote for the Rt Hon Jeremy mis-spelled surname MP
What duck?

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #719 on: July 30, 2013, 09:36:21 am »
Astonishingly, Eric Pickles seems to have avoided mention in this thread for a year or so.

Not sure how.

But now, in an attempt to re-assert his pre-eminent supertwattery in a constellation of supertwats, he has put forward a proposal aimed securely at the shopkeeper and motorist vote, which has been instantly rejected by a Transport Minister, all the major motoring organisations, shopkeepers, and even minor supertwat and professionally obnoxious controversialist Quentin Willson! 

Good shot, sir!
Getting there...

LEE

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #720 on: July 30, 2013, 04:48:32 pm »
Have you ever seen Boris Johnson and Donald trump in the same place? Just saying, like..

No, but if I ever do, I'll call in an immediate Air Strike.

Rhys W

  • I'm single, bilingual
    • Cardiff Ajax
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #721 on: July 30, 2013, 10:57:04 pm »
Toby Young - the thinking man's twat. On Newsnight now.

Pingu

  • Put away those fiery biscuits!
  • Mrs Pingu's domestique
    • the Igloo
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #722 on: July 31, 2013, 09:39:14 pm »
+1 to that ^^^

Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #723 on: August 07, 2013, 04:43:30 pm »
Godfrey Bloom.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Super-Twat
« Reply #724 on: August 07, 2013, 04:48:30 pm »
I knew what name would be added before I opened the thread. ;D
Getting there...