Author Topic: New audax.uk site  (Read 11735 times)

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #175 on: December 05, 2018, 12:32:23 pm »
(what is AUK's ability to walk away? Do they own the source code?)

The question of who owns the code came up at he reunion presentation, and was expertly ignored.

quixoticgeek

  • Mostly Harmless
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #176 on: December 05, 2018, 12:37:03 pm »
(what is AUK's ability to walk away? Do they own the source code?)

The question of who owns the code came up at he reunion presentation, and was expertly ignored.

How would one go about finding out an official answer to this question?

J
--
Beer, bikes, and backpacking
http://b.42q.eu/

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #177 on: December 05, 2018, 01:43:36 pm »
Searching cyclinguk for "awards" gives... https://www.cyclinguk.org/search/site/awards

On audax.uk, strange to see the url listed at all really, normally the url appears when one hovers over the search result heading...
"an inordinate fondness for beetles"

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #178 on: December 05, 2018, 02:03:28 pm »
How would one go about finding out an official answer to this question?

You can have a dig through the reports here, although there's a lot of documents to go through and a lot of them are pretty vague on important details:
http://www.aukweb.net/official/minutes/

You could also try emailing it@audax.uk .

whosatthewheel

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #179 on: December 14, 2018, 08:34:56 am »
I guess this put AUK woes in perspective

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46561779

Bianchi Boy

  • Cycling is my doctor
  • Is it possible for a ride to be too long?
    • Reading Cycling Club
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #180 on: December 14, 2018, 09:51:20 am »
The out source company are not called "Crapita" for no reason.
I guess this put AUK woes in perspective

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46561779

Sent from my H8216 using Tapatalk

Set a fire for a man and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he is warm for the rest of his life.

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #181 on: December 19, 2018, 12:07:50 am »
(what is AUK's ability to walk away? Do they own the source code?)

The question of who owns the code came up at he reunion presentation, and was expertly ignored.

How would one go about finding out an official answer to this question?

Fairly sure that when he was asked at the Reunion, Richard Jennings said that we own the code.

In any case, unless I've misunderstood or misheard several presentations to the board, we own the code.

Manotea

  • Where there is doubt...
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #182 on: December 19, 2018, 11:44:20 pm »
Ownership takes many forms. For example, how many AUKs have access to the code, or the tools necessary to access / navigate through the code, or would understand what they were looking at if they could?

Regardless, this should not be an issue of debate; what does it say in the contract?

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #183 on: December 20, 2018, 07:07:24 am »
The contract says AUK owns the code but it is not written in straightforward language.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #184 on: December 20, 2018, 09:57:16 am »
The contract says AUK owns the code but it is not written in straightforward language.

Code seldom is ;)

FifeingEejit

  • Not Small just Far Away at the back
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #185 on: December 20, 2018, 10:16:54 am »
Ownership takes many forms. For example, how many AUKs have access to the code, or the tools necessary to access / navigate through the code, or would understand what they were looking at if they could?

Regardless, this should not be an issue of debate; what does it say in the contract?

If I remember the stack right its a CMS on top of a .net based backend
Which on the face of it sounds like it should be fairly easy to get people who can work on it.

But then according to the press release at work we picked up a code set that was written for us on the basis that we owned the code and tidied it up for release... the reality is rather different.
Likewise some of the diabolical architectural messes my predecessors wrote are only fit for rewriting from scratch if we want to do anything with them.

frankly frankie

  • I kid you not
    • Fuchsiaphile
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #186 on: December 20, 2018, 06:01:43 pm »
I've lost track of the details but the language used is (I quote) "similar to C#".  That sounds pretty rarified to me, compared with good ol' PHP (as used for the old site and this forum).  So I'm not convinced ownership will help us all that much.
"This is a complex subject, with a need for more than one highlighter pen."

Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #187 on: December 20, 2018, 06:11:05 pm »
I've lost track of the details but the language used is (I quote) "similar to C#".  That sounds pretty rarified to me, compared with good ol' PHP (as used for the old site and this forum).  So I'm not convinced ownership will help us all that much.

My assumption would be it's C#, if it's .NET.

FifeingEejit

  • Not Small just Far Away at the back
Re: New audax.uk site
« Reply #188 on: December 20, 2018, 07:35:10 pm »
I've lost track of the details but the language used is (I quote) "similar to C#".  That sounds pretty rarified to me, compared with good ol' PHP (as used for the old site and this forum).  So I'm not convinced ownership will help us all that much.

My assumption would be it's C#, if it's .NET.

Aye so would I, though "C# Like" could mean Java complied to the .Net CLR...
I've worked with a couple of "VB.Net Like" languages in the past, fairly easy to pick up if you're actually a capable procedural/OO developer in the first place. 

Watching people who've never done set based programming before trying to understand a RDBMS is somewhere between amusing and cringeworthy, but then so is the term "NoSQL" in relation to non-relational data stores...  .

Have started looking at the job market again as it's been all but confirmed I've been wasting my time the last 3 years listening to the promises of more relevant modern development techniques; I see considerably less adverts for LAMP stack development than I used to with most stuff being this months flavour of front end on top of Java or .Net backends or microservices, Ruby on Rails seems to be another rarity now.