Author Topic: Performance log thread  (Read 2717 times)

Performance log thread
« on: 23 April, 2010, 04:39:17 pm »
Based on the posts in this thread: Rate my intervals I'm going to keep track of my performance now that I can over-analyse it to the extreme. The metrics will be simple based on these figures from Andrew Coggan:-

http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/powerprofiling.jpg

W/kg based on 5-sec, 1-min, 5-min and FT power peaks.

(If this is all gobbledegook then this is not the thread for you...)

I'll suggest a table like this, with a new table row when there are significant performance improvements:-

Code: [Select]
[table]
[tr]
[td]Date[/td]
[td]Weight (kg)[/td]
[td]5-sec peak[/td]
[td]1-min peak[/td]
[td]5-min peak[/td]
[td]FT[/td]
[td]Comments[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]22-APR-10[/td]
[td]84.0[/td]
[td]1042W = 12.40W/kg (low cat 5)[/td]
[td]345W = 4.11W/kg (below untrained!)[/td]
[td]237W = 2.82W/kg (mid upper untrained)[/td]
[td]184W = 2.19W/kg (mid untrained)[/td]
[td]New 5-sec peak record[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

One post per person and edit as required, no chat/comments in this thread please.
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #1 on: 23 April, 2010, 04:40:03 pm »
My record:-

Date/CommentsWeight (kg)5-sec peak1-min peak5-min peakFT
11-APR-1086.0kg (Lardy!)812W = 9.44W/kg336W = 3.91W/kg238W = 2.77W/kg183W = 2.13W/kg
First ride for 2 months!
1 lap of Richmond Park.
(below untrained!)(below untrained!)(mid untrained)(mid untrained)
22-APR-1084.0kg1042W = 12.40W/kg345W = 4.11W/kg237W = 2.82W/kg184W = 2.19W/kg
New 5-sec peak record(low cat 5)(below untrained!)(mid upper untrained)(mid untrained)
28-APR-1084.0kg1042W = 12.40W/kg397W = 4.73W/kg237W = 2.82W/kg196W = 2.33W/kg
New 1-min and 20-min
PBs from commute!
(low cat 5)(below untrained!)(mid upper untrained)(lower upper untrained)
29-APR-1084.0kg1190W = 14.17W/kg397W = 4.73W/kg237W = 2.82W/kg196W = 2.33W/kg
New 5-sec PB
from commute!
(low cat 4)(below untrained!)(mid upper untrained)(lower upper untrained)
06-MAY-1084.0kg1190W = 14.17W/kg397W = 4.73W/kg244W = 2.90W/kg200W = 2.38W/kg
New 5-min and FT
PBs from commute
(low cat 4)(below untrained!)(mid upper untrained)(mid upper untrained)
30-MAY-1084.0kg1190W = 14.17W/kg397W = 4.73W/kg267W = 3.18W/kg200W = 2.38W/kg
New 5-min PB
from RP 3 laps
(low cat 4)(below untrained!)(low cat 5)(mid upper untrained)
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

amaferanga

Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #2 on: 25 April, 2010, 07:24:01 am »
Date/CommentsWeight (kg)5-sec peak1-min peak5-min peakFT
25-APR-1068.0kg980W = 14.41W/kg448W = 6.59W/kg340W = 5.0W/kg295W = 4.34W/kg
5s and 1min clearly
need some work
(Cat 4)(Low Cat 5)(Low Cat 2)(Mid Cat 2)

Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #3 on: 01 July, 2013, 04:03:45 pm »
Starting again...

Date/CommentsWeight (kg)5-sec peak1-min peak5-min peakFT
24-JUN-1389.0kg637W = 7.18W/kg336W = 3.78W/kg237W = 2.66W/kg???
Restarting with 3 laps of RP(below untrained!)(below untrained!)(mid untrained!)(can't remember how I calculated FT)
01-JUL-1389.0kg712W = 8.00W/kg348W = 3.91W/kg245W = 2.75W/kg???
Another 3 laps of RP(below untrained!)(below untrained!)(mid untrained!)(can't remember how I calculated FT)
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

zigzag

  • unfuckwithable
Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #4 on: 22 July, 2013, 02:08:31 pm »
i had a go at wattbike 5s power test in march this year, iirc power/weight was 17-ish. first question they asked after the test was if i was an endurance cyclist ::-). yes, i suppose

Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #5 on: 22 July, 2013, 02:30:30 pm »
17W/kg puts you high Cat 3 low Cat 2 according to the chart in the first link.

Explains your Audax performances...
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

CrazyEnglishTriathlete

  • Miles eaten don't satisfy hunger
  • Chartered accountant in 5 different decades
    • CET Ride Reports and Blogs
Re: Performance log thread
« Reply #6 on: 23 July, 2013, 08:31:46 pm »
IMHO peak power is not possible under laboratory conditions.  It needs external stimulus such as the tractor regulated at 27mph swanning past me and the need to sprint at 30mph for sufficient time to get into it slipstream so that I can avoid the next five miles of headwinds......  I am convinced I can generate more Watts then than on a static bike in a test.  You have to realllllly mean it.    :sick:
Eddington Numbers 130 (imperial), 183 (metric) 574 (furlongs)  116 (nautical miles)