Author Topic: Waterfall  (Read 43093 times)

Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #100 on: August 05, 2015, 10:15:42 pm »
Milk please, no sugar.

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #101 on: September 10, 2015, 03:02:06 am »

P9080370 by Mr Larrington, on Flickr

This is not technically a waterfall but I DON'T CARE ;D

You can see the mountains, which means it's going to rain.
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #102 on: September 10, 2015, 10:57:11 am »
That's OK , it's a frozen waterfall  :D
the slower you go the more you see

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #103 on: September 10, 2015, 12:00:10 pm »
Or is it a frozenwater-fall?

A very proper addition to this collection of fine waterfall pictures anyway!

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #104 on: October 12, 2015, 01:59:18 pm »
Ruthie-I know Richmond falls so well that I didn't need the caption.
I never went canoeing on the Swale, but several members of the local canoe and outdoor clubs have gone over that drop in kayaks.

Here's one from our bike ride yesterday . Rutter falls , just outside Appleby.

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5833/21921588050_8029e95a82_z.jpg[/img]]

Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #105 on: October 12, 2015, 02:02:59 pm »
madcow - I recognise that!  I've been there with Crusty when we were on holiday once, but the water was much lower.  It's a lovely spot isn't it?
Milk please, no sugar.

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #106 on: October 12, 2015, 09:19:31 pm »
It is and the photo only shows the wet half of the falls. The left hand side was dry and if I had included that side, I would also have captured the photography nut and his wife .
He was setting up his tripod , no doubt for one of those long open shutter shots, whilst she was snapping using a compact digi something or other.

Andrij

  • Андрій
  • Ερασιτεχνικός μισάνθρωπος
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #107 on: October 19, 2015, 07:04:48 pm »
Kyoto Garden, Holland Park, London

DSC_0583.NEF by Andrij, on Flickr
;D  Andrij.  I pronounce you Complete and Utter GIT   :thumbsup:

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #108 on: December 05, 2015, 08:23:25 pm »
This is the same Richmond falls featured in Ruthie's pic upthread, exactly 5 months later. Amazing what a bit of rain can do.

[

River Swale in flood   

Richmond falls 2

click on last pic to go to the video on Flickr. Sound is a bit carp due to very strong winds but you will get the idea of the power of the Swale.

Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #109 on: December 05, 2015, 10:14:49 pm »
I just drove to Barnard Castle and back.

It's pretty scary out there, the river's probly even higher than that by now.
Milk please, no sugar.

peliroja

  • Mrs Woolly
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #110 on: December 05, 2015, 11:02:00 pm »
Kinder Scout, as seen on twitter. Crikey.

https://twitter.com/SettleWebsite/status/673250482979266560

Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #111 on: December 05, 2015, 11:12:58 pm »
Milk please, no sugar.

peliroja

  • Mrs Woolly
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #112 on: December 06, 2015, 06:10:03 pm »

Feanor

  • It's mostly downhill from here.
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #113 on: April 13, 2016, 07:21:17 pm »

Wombat

  • Is it supposed to hurt this much?
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #114 on: April 15, 2016, 09:58:19 am »
Feanor, you are in danger of having the Billplumtree epithet applied to you....  Git!

Brilliant photos from a brilliant location.
Wombat

Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #115 on: April 15, 2016, 10:15:39 am »
Yes.  Stunning.
Milk please, no sugar.

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #116 on: April 17, 2016, 06:16:37 pm »
looking through some photos came across this one ......  when I was in Canada ;D Kakabeka Falls, Oliver Paipoonge, ON, Canada


Ruthie

  • Her Majester
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #117 on: April 17, 2016, 06:21:24 pm »
Oh, lovely!   :thumbsup:
Milk please, no sugar.

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #118 on: April 20, 2016, 01:35:23 pm »
Pistyll Rhaeadr


Re: Waterfall
« Reply #119 on: April 20, 2016, 01:51:35 pm »
Very nice Si, didn't think it ever had blue sky above it!

Did you go for a ride over the hills while you were there?
OnOne Pickenflick - Tour De Fer 20 - Pinnacle Arkose cx - Charge Cooker maxi2 fatty - GT Zaskar Carbon Expert

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #120 on: April 20, 2016, 02:04:05 pm »
One from the River Etive from last week.

OnOne Pickenflick - Tour De Fer 20 - Pinnacle Arkose cx - Charge Cooker maxi2 fatty - GT Zaskar Carbon Expert

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #121 on: April 20, 2016, 02:55:06 pm »
Thanks bumper.

No riding when I was there, going to rectify that this year, mind you after the hike to the top of the falls then round Glan-hafon I wasn't fit for much

^^That's great, the water looks alive

LEE

  • "Shut Up Jens" - Legs.
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #122 on: April 20, 2016, 03:31:05 pm »
One from the River Etive from last week.



Looks great.

Got to love RAW's ability to get detail in shadows and highlights.  Since I became addicted to Camera RAW/Lightroom I started looking for what other users have done.

Nice work.
Some people say I'm self-obsessed but that's enough about them.

Re: Waterfall
« Reply #123 on: April 20, 2016, 05:39:31 pm »
I had nice weather last week but every time I used the camera, the sky was cloudy. Dehaze is good in LR, gives the sky a boost when lifting the shadows. The rock face on the bottom right was black, thank God for raw ;D
OnOne Pickenflick - Tour De Fer 20 - Pinnacle Arkose cx - Charge Cooker maxi2 fatty - GT Zaskar Carbon Expert

LEE

  • "Shut Up Jens" - Legs.
Re: Waterfall
« Reply #124 on: April 20, 2016, 05:58:09 pm »
I had nice weather last week but every time I used the camera, the sky was cloudy. Dehaze is good in LR, gives the sky a boost when lifting the shadows. The rock face on the bottom right was black, thank God for raw ;D

I started playing with manual HDR, using 3 images and saving as a 32bit TIFF.  That gives you 10 stops rather than 5 when opened in Camera Raw and almost eliminates any noise.

It allows you do find detail where even a regular RAW file wouldn't have much.

People say that "using Photoshop is cheating" but, in reality, your eyes could see the detail in the shadows of the rock. It's just that cameras can't generally resolve "reality" without a bit of help.
Some people say I'm self-obsessed but that's enough about them.