Author Topic: Royal Wedding!  (Read 62099 times)

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #375 on: 30 April, 2011, 03:43:36 pm »
Edit - am I the only one who doesn't think the sister looks particularly attractive?
Nope.

her_welshness

  • Slut of a librarian
    • Lewisham Cyclists
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #376 on: 30 April, 2011, 04:31:06 pm »
Edit - am I the only one who doesn't think the sister looks particularly attractive?
Nope.

She was very orange, whereas Kate had normal-looking skin tone.

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #377 on: 30 April, 2011, 05:25:16 pm »
According to the BBC

Quote
Some royal wedding guests said they were feeling a little jaded today.

Not Pippa?  He's old enough to be her father.

Apparently she is often seen in these parts.
It is simpler than it looks.

Justin(e)

  • On my way out of here
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #378 on: 30 April, 2011, 06:12:13 pm »
Edit - am I the only one who doesn't think the sister looks particularly attractive?
Nope.

On Australian TV, the two Fergie girls were described as looking like they were straight from a fairy tale. 

(click to show/hide)

Rig of Jarkness

  • An Englishman abroad
Aero but not dynamic

jogler

  • mojo operandi
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #380 on: 30 April, 2011, 06:34:07 pm »
Edit - am I the only one who doesn't think the sister looks particularly attractive?
Nope.
nope too
In fact miss Middleton the bride wouldn't get a second look.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #381 on: 30 April, 2011, 06:41:16 pm »
nope too
In fact miss Middleton the bride wouldn't get a second look.
I demand to see photos of your ideal woman.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

jogler

  • mojo operandi
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #382 on: 30 April, 2011, 06:43:58 pm »
My wedding pics  feature such a lady 8)

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #383 on: 30 April, 2011, 07:00:52 pm »
nope too
In fact miss Middleton the bride wouldn't get a second look.
I demand to see photos of your ideal woman.

How could actual photos of an ideal exist?
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]

Snakehips

  • Twixt London and leafy Surrey
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #384 on: 30 April, 2011, 07:49:39 pm »
My wedding pics  feature such a lady 8)
Very tactful answer. Wife looking over your shoulder ?
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur?

David Martin

  • Thats Dr Oi You thankyouverymuch
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #385 on: 30 April, 2011, 09:15:47 pm »
TODM was very impressed that Ms Middleton copied her wedding dress design.
"By creating we think. By living we learn" - Patrick Geddes

Rig of Jarkness

  • An Englishman abroad
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #386 on: 02 May, 2011, 04:41:00 pm »
Treated ourselves to the souvenir issue of Hello! today.  £2 well spent  :thumbsup:

(Is that sad ?)
Aero but not dynamic

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #387 on: 02 May, 2011, 04:43:56 pm »
Treated ourselves to the souvenir issue of Hello! today.  £2 well spent  :thumbsup:

(Is that sad ?)
Yes.
Yes it is.

;D

(I did see said mag in the village Co-op, but I felt that the purchase of the component parts of chicken sarnies took precedence :) )

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #388 on: 02 May, 2011, 08:18:09 pm »
I have this nagging feeling of class war in the back of my head, something to do with David Cameron bigging it up and saying what a great place Britain is on the back of the wedding.  That'll be the millionaire David Cameron, descended from William IV*, then.

Kate Catherine doesn't have to worry about money or hard work for the rest of her life, but I suppose she does have tremendous pressure to pop out a (preferably male, to put off the tricky gender equality question for another generation) sprog asap, since she's knocking on a bit for a royal bride.


*an illegitimate line, of course
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #389 on: 02 May, 2011, 08:20:03 pm »
I have this nagging feeling of class war in the back of my head

De Rigeur for YACF these day isn't it?

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #390 on: 02 May, 2011, 08:25:59 pm »
Actually, I think highly of the Queen but there are too many hangers-on and "Hons".
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

itsbruce

  • Lavender Bike Menace
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #391 on: 02 May, 2011, 08:34:24 pm »
Actually, I think highly of the Queen

Esteem for one individual isn't a valid argument for any system of government, though.  Not that disdain for one would, by itself, be an argument against.
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked: Allen Ginsberg
The best minds of my generation are thinking about how to make people click ads: Jeff Hammerbacher


Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #393 on: 03 May, 2011, 10:32:56 am »
Well my 'avoid the Royal wedding' sailing trip round Mull was going acording to plan until yesterday. Picked the yacht up Thursday night and spent each night in one remote achorage after another - a magic trip and good weather :thumbsup:

Stopped at Crinan harbour for lunch on monday before handing the yacht back to the charter base at Ardfern and what should come nosing into Crinan accompanied by a small patrol boat but the Hebridean Princess? - a small luxury cruise liner with a track record of being chartered by the royal family - and with what the guys with the binoculars assured me was what looked like a recently married royal couple sitting on the promenade deck aft.

I did wonder what a photo might have been worth but 1 - my camera was down below on my bunk and 2 - I would have felt bad about it anyway - I don't think anyone took any pictures - we'll never make paparazzi :facepalm:   
“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something that has clearly happened.”
― Douglas Adams

simonp

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #394 on: 03 May, 2011, 11:41:27 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/osd8GSVDFB0&rel=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/osd8GSVDFB0&rel=1</a>

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #395 on: 11 May, 2011, 07:58:40 am »
Of all the mind-numbing, vomit-inducing bollocks I've failed to ignore during this whole cloying saga, this has to take the biscuit.

Sarah Ferguson tells Oprah Winfrey: 'Diana and I both weren't there' | UK news | The Guardian

Quote
The Duchess of York said that although she found it difficult to cope with not being invited to the royal wedding she isn't bitter about being snubbed and takes solace in the fact that Prince William's mother was also absent.

"I really love the feeling that sort of Diana and I both weren't there," said Sarah Ferguson in a television interview with Oprah Winfrey, during which Prince Andrew's former wife suggested that there was no one to blame but herself for her lack of an invite.

And the word "invite" is not a noun.
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #396 on: 11 May, 2011, 08:41:47 am »
Did they not send his mother an invite?  Shocking bad manners, that.
Getting there...

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #397 on: 11 May, 2011, 03:09:26 pm »
The royals would be much more interesting if they married more people like Fergie, and less like Di.
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #398 on: 11 May, 2011, 03:11:30 pm »
The royals would be much more interesting if they married more people like Fergie, and less like Di.

Don't be so ridiculous!  Can't you see how wrong that is?







It's 'fewer'

;D
Getting there...

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #399 on: 11 May, 2011, 10:45:07 pm »
The royals would be much more interesting if they married more people like Fergie, and less like Di.

Don't be so ridiculous!  Can't you see how wrong that is?







It's 'fewer'

;D

Not in Fergie's case, its more and less.
[Quote/]Adrian, you're living proof that bandwidth is far too cheap.[/Quote]