Author Topic: Inoperable?  (Read 994 times)

Inoperable?
« on: 16 February, 2012, 11:15:00 am »
Does anyone know why primary, as opposed to metastatic, bowel cancer may be inoperable - with radiother/chemo the only option?  I know someone in this situation.
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Eccentrica Gallumbits

  • Rock 'n' roll and brew, rock 'n' roll and brew...
Re: Inoperable?
« Reply #1 on: 16 February, 2012, 12:45:38 pm »
Because the tumour might be so big, and so entwined into the non-cancerous tissue, particularly the blood supply, that there's no way to get it out without removing so much healthy tissue that the person can't survive.
My feminist marxist dialectic brings all the boys to the yard.


hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Inoperable?
« Reply #2 on: 16 February, 2012, 01:19:38 pm »
What Kirst said.
Think of a tree whose roots get so entwined in a house's foundations, cables and pipes that the tree can't come out without demolishing the house...

Paul

  • L'enfer, c'est les autos.
Re: Inoperable?
« Reply #3 on: 16 February, 2012, 06:10:42 pm »
My little brother's brain tumour is inoperable for the reasons above. It's quite difficult to come to terms with this. 'Inoperable' sounds like a death sentence (and it may be), but in my own experience the other treatments can be quite effective. Not curative, but we've had a lot more time than I thought we would when I first heard that word.

You okay?

 
What's so funny about peace, love and understanding?