It's not controlled at all. There's no repeatability in the process - they're not purging with vacuum, they don't have precise control over the positioning of the shield or the duration of post-shielding, they're not measuring weld temperatures, they're not measuring the O2 and N2 levels in the purged area. A typical manufacturer of titanium frames has absolutely no idea as to the quality and consistency of their welds and is just making a best effort at shielding and hoping for the best.
I think you are quite correct, and I suspect the reason for this rash of cracked frames lies in the increased popularity of ti frames engendered by their decreasing retail price, in turn made possible by outsourcing production to Chinese people who don't give a shit.
I own/have owned 3 Ti frames, one made by Opera (Pinarello), and two from XACD. The difference in quality is startling. The road XACD frame was infinitely better than the track frame (although I sold the road frame on). I love the track frame, partly because I got the geometry spot on, but it isn't a tidy looking job. The fact that the BB threads were mashed, presumesbly from clamping whilst welding, does not lead me to suspect that much care would have been taken with the actual welding process. I don't expect this frame to outlive me, but then I only paid £250 for it.
The Opera is in a different league entirely and oozes quality. I would be surprised it it was built in the Pinarello factory rather than outsourced to somebody like Billato with the expertise.
I believe that the brand 'Setavento' went bust because they couldn't afford to honour the warranty they offered with their Chinese made (XACD, apparently) frames. I would hazard a guess that companies like Sabbath, maybe VN and Burls use similar sourcing.