It's very hard to know how, by whom, and why the story actually broke. Did he break it, or was unearthed by a journalist?
There are a gamut of possible motivations for him breaking it, such as payment, revenge, a desire for exposure, a desire to help others as well as the fact that somebody else may have leaked the story and forced him to talk about it on the best terms he could for himself.
Peters may be telling the truth, or he may not. It could be redolent or symptomatic of a dishonest and unethical team, of the type that lead Wiggins and his doctor to cheat the TUE system, or we may just have two examples of two individuals acting more or less individually. We don't know yet.
The only thing I think about all of these issues is that unlike Veloman et al (sorry to impune your good character and reputation again) who view this as an open and shut, black and white issue, I think we are still in a process. I don't think we know all there is to know about what has been going on.