But until there is hard evidence then everything is supposition and folk are all tarred with the same brush. On the basis that hard evidence is the exception, I don't think we can rely on opinion without any evidence.
How much more evidence do you need? There's plenty just in Wiggins' own writings and utterances.
He lied about taking the Triamcinolone until he had to admit it following the Fancy Bears unearthing of the truth.
In his autobiography, he wrote that he was 100% healthy and winning all his races in the lead-up to the 2012 Tour de France. Therefore any application for a TUE cannot have been for an emergency or exceptional circumstances, which are the two principal available mandatory criteria for being granted a TUE. Sky's application was therefore dishonest and incorrect, and as such contravened the rules. That the TUE was granted shows Zorzoli/UCI was either duped by the dishonest application or complicit, and negligent in either case. And of course, UCI negligence/complicity/corruption does not absolve the dishonest application.
After being caught out, Wiggins then stated that the TUE was required to level the playing field so he could compete at the highest level - he didn't say it was needed for an emergency or exceptional circumstances. His argument was that his specialist medical advisor told him it would cure his lifelong allergy and respiratory problems, i.e. circumstances so exceptional that he'd, by his own admission, managed to remain 100% healthy throughout the entire lead-up to the Tour, and won all the races too.
So....clearly banged to rights (well, compelling evidence at least) that the Triamcinolone TUE was dishonestly applied for, inappropriately authorised and therefore obtained and administered in contravention of the rules. Ergo, Wiggins won the 2012 Tour using Triamcinolone as a performance-enhancing drug, but under the guise of a TUE due to Sky dishonesty and UCI negligence/corruption. Why anyone would continue to hope/believe that Wiggins and Sky are honest, genuine and correct on the TUE matter, given all this, defies logic.....especially having seen and heard Brailsford's compulsive bullshitting on Sky medical and '100% clean zero-tolerance' matters, and the shifty, bullshitting performances of Sky management in front of the select committee, and the admissions/accusations of ex-Sky riders.