Author Topic: Poppadoms vs crisps  (Read 1194 times)

Poppadoms vs crisps
« on: 19 January, 2024, 05:32:08 pm »
Quite an entertaining read. As the article says, “there reaches a point where one has to start, at the very least, respecting the creativity of Walkers’ lawyers”.

https://www.ft.com/content/a6a54008-6059-4052-99ae-282f148f24e0

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Poppadoms vs crisps
« Reply #1 on: 19 January, 2024, 06:07:23 pm »
Or https://archive.is/j07WT for folks stuck outwith the paywall.
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Poppadoms vs crisps
« Reply #2 on: 19 January, 2024, 07:19:19 pm »
"Ontological arguments about potatohood"...  :D
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

ian

Re: Poppadoms vs crisps
« Reply #3 on: 19 January, 2024, 08:51:42 pm »
Marvellous lawyering.


Quote
Nominative determinism is not a characteristic of snack foods: calling a snack food “Hula Hoops” does not mean that one could twirl that product around one’s midriff, nor is “Monster Munch” generally reserved as a food for monsters.