Yet Another Cycling Forum

General Category => The Knowledge => GPS => Topic started by: tiermat on 01 June, 2011, 09:22:11 am

Title: New Etrex
Post by: tiermat on 01 June, 2011, 09:22:11 am
Looks nice

Garmin announces redesigned line of eTrex GPS handhelds with enhanced geocaching -- Engadget (http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/garmin-announces-redesigned-line-of-etrex-gps-handhelds-with-enh/)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: TOBY on 01 June, 2011, 10:48:25 am
f#*k Yeah!
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Karla on 01 June, 2011, 10:54:32 am
What are the dimensions?  It looks smaller than the current models, or else the screen's got bigger - either would be good.
Will it be able to store more than 500 trackpoints at a punch?
Most importantly, have the improved the joystick knob?

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 01 June, 2011, 10:58:14 am
The screen is 2.2" although I think that's the eTrex 10. The 30 has a smaller screen...

Scant details though. I'd be more interested if it had ANT+ comms (to get HR and Power when cycling). Also a pic of any bike mount.

Can't find anything on Garmin's site about them yet.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 01 June, 2011, 11:07:55 am
The screen is 2.2" although I think that's the eTrex 10. The 30 has a smaller screen...

Scant details though. I'd be more interested if it had ANT+ comms (to get HR and Power when cycling). Also a pic of any bike mount.

Can't find anything on Garmin's site about them yet.

From the photo it looks compatible with the mount of the Dakota (which has ANT+ comms by the way!)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: TOBY on 01 June, 2011, 11:09:33 am
What are the dimensions?  It looks smaller than the current models, or else the screen's got bigger - either would be good.
Will it be able to store more than 500 trackpoints at a punch?
Most importantly, have the improved the joystick knob?



I don't know, and don't call me a knob!
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Karla on 01 June, 2011, 11:13:43 am
What are the dimensions?  It looks smaller than the current models, or else the screen's got bigger - either would be good.
Will it be able to store more than 500 trackpoints at a punch?
Most importantly, have the improved the joystick knob?



I don't know, and don't call me a knob!

In bikesNOBnyc terms, I think you'd be a 'Fred'  ;)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Oaky on 01 June, 2011, 11:29:27 am
...
Can't find anything on Garmin's site about them yet.

Looks like they're up there now:-

Garmin | eTrex® (http://sites.garmin.com/etrex/)

EDIT:  Not much information up yet though beyond what's on the engadget link upthread
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: DrMekon on 01 June, 2011, 11:48:19 am
Still AA powered?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Tewdric on 01 June, 2011, 11:53:07 am
Still AA powered?

That's what I was wondering..
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Chris N on 01 June, 2011, 12:06:32 pm
This garmin: etrex GPS (http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/16/view/14975/garmin-etrex-gps.html) suggests it will run on AAs.  I hope so. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 01 June, 2011, 03:12:04 pm
This might be good timing - I've been vascillating over a Vista or Oregon...the main pros/cons revolving around screen visibility, less routing options, and ANT+ support.

20/30 both have a 2.2" screen according to one/other of those links - assuming that's on the diagonal, that's a fraction larger than that of a Vista.

>Will it be able to store more than 500 trackpoints at a punch?

That's the squirrel-away-and-prune-data feature ? On the Oregon I think it can automatically log to the SD card, you'd hope that might carry over from one line to another..

<edit> - there's now a placeholder (well, slightly more) on the garmin website with some pretty pictures:
Garmin | eTrex® (http://sites.garmin.com/etrex/)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 01 June, 2011, 05:47:23 pm
Hmm, could be a good time to pick up another Vista HCx cheap ...

Perhaps the best thing about the new unit is it's lost the rubber band (or has it).  For the rest, it will probably be broadly similar to the 62 series, ie the 'new' Garmin OS (like Dakota etc) but hopefully with the option to switch back to old-style menus (like the 62 can).  The high-colour screen without the touch membrane to turn it to mush, should be great - though the terrain shading looks great in the pictures, I think most users soon turn it off.  And I expect it will run OS maps if you want to pay through the nose.
The mount works well enough and fits on stem as well as bars.

From this German Garmin press release (http://www.garminonline.de/common/pdf/pressemitteilung/Garmin_PMD_eTrex-Serie_2011.pdf) (pdf):

5.3 x 9.9 x 3.3 cm
142g inc bats
Display 5.6cm diagonal touchscreen (?!) 65000 colours 128x160 px, rotatable
...
Galileo-compatible
1.7Gb internal memory
microSD card

(30 adds ...)
3-axis compass
barometer
ANT+

the touchscreen reference is, I hope, a mistake! - and the resolution as well (current Etrex C is 176x220, Dakota is 160x240)

The big internal memory plus SD card means that like other new-generation Garmins it will handle multiple map files, which is a definite plus.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 06 June, 2011, 12:21:24 am
This looks really good  :)

My HCx has suddenly decided to shed its rubber surround  >:(

I'll have to replace it as it looks as if the new one is not out until late this year.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 06 June, 2011, 03:29:33 pm
My HCx has suddenly decided to shed its rubber surround  >:(

Free replacement unit on the way from Garmin - you can't beat that for good customer service  :)

The support person said that Garmin UK know no more than what is on the Garmin site, and that it might be at least 6 months before UK versions arrive.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: TOBY on 07 June, 2011, 11:46:14 am
My HCx has suddenly decided to shed its rubber surround  >:(

Free replacement unit on the way from Garmin - you can't beat that for good customer service  :)

The support person said that Garmin UK know no more than what is on the Garmin site, and that it might be at least 6 months before UK versions arrive.

mine's doing that (and getting a bit rusty inside) who/where at Garmin did you contact about this?

thanks,

Toby
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 07 June, 2011, 02:00:14 pm
http://www.garmin.com/uk/support/contact-support (http://www.garmin.com/uk/support/contact-support)

Good response to both email and (free)phone number in the past - there is a bit of a queue on the phone though.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: andygates on 07 June, 2011, 08:16:43 pm
Did they say Galileo compatibility?  Hell yeah.   :thumbsup:

The rubber band has turned into a moulded elastomer wrap.  That's going to be better than the dreaded rubber band, especially if they've listened to every damn owner every damn summer wailing about every damn sticky-icky rubber band. 

No upgrade fever here, too edgar, but should the unthinkable happen... :P
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: red marley on 07 June, 2011, 08:47:03 pm
Did they say Galileo compatibility?  Hell yeah.   :thumbsup:

Except that we won't get operational Galileo-based services until 2014 or possibly later. Receiver technology may have moved on a bit by then.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: andygates on 07 June, 2011, 09:42:04 pm
That's not all that far away, and this kit lasts longer than smartphones. 
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Bledlow on 07 June, 2011, 09:49:15 pm
Damn right. My next GPS must, absolutely must, be Galileo-compatible. Glonass & Beidou-2 (Compass) would also be nice to have.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 09 June, 2011, 10:15:55 am
I see some sites are listing the new Etrex as "available soon" but I'm sure we'll not get it until some months after it comes out in the US.
On the battery front, it's interesting that, for another new model, they've gone for  a dual battery solution - choose either the supplied rechargeable or AAs:

http://www.handtec.co.uk/product.php/4976/garmin-montana-650t (http://www.handtec.co.uk/product.php/4976/garmin-montana-650t)

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Bledlow on 09 June, 2011, 11:31:22 am
Same as the Satmap Active 10. Choice of AAs or proprietary battery pack. The AAs fit in a little holder, which has to be taken out to put the LiPOL battery in. A bit fiddly for changing on the road in the dark & wet, but no tools needed, so it is practical to use both.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 10 September, 2011, 12:58:14 am
Hmmm..after wondering if the Ant+ support only handled the chirp beacon things (and no mention of cadence/hrm up to now)- it looks like they've very recently updated the info pages:
http://www.garmin.com/uk/new-etrex-series
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=145&pID=87774&ra=true

...and the Accessories>Fitness Sensor tab now lists the HRM strap and speed/cadence sensor for the Etrex 30 :)
(I assume knobbled in s/w for the 20, since it still handles chirp..)

Some list prices here too:
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=143
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: bikey-mikey on 10 September, 2011, 12:05:53 pm
Can someone please tell me how these compare to the 705 or 800 Edge series, please?

My 705 does everything I want, and is pretty old - its recorded 23, 847 kms so far...  (fingers crossed for the G-pixies)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 10 September, 2011, 12:07:23 pm
If the new Etrex does power data (via ANT+) then I'd be sold, and I'd look to flog on my Edge 705...
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: dippy2 on 10 September, 2011, 12:19:08 pm
If the new Etrex does power data (via ANT+) then I'd be sold, and I'd look to flog on my Edge 705...

Excuse my ignorance but what is power data via ANT+
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Canardly on 10 September, 2011, 12:21:07 pm
Wireless cadence and stuff....
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: dippy2 on 10 September, 2011, 12:27:08 pm
Got it now, Thanks.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 10 September, 2011, 03:32:19 pm
I'd guess that they won't do power - I imagine they're really a variant on the Dakota and Oregon, which I gather are pretty similar to each other, and I don't *think* measure power. Even on the Dakota/Oregons that support HRM and cadence, whilst you can measure both, I don't beleive you can set up ranges of the sort that you can on the Edges..

<brief bit of googling..>

http://www8.garmin.com/train-with-garmin/power-meter.html

 - I think if you want power if need the Edges/Forerunner mentioned in the link.

I guess accurate info won't really be around 'til the new models hit the market and get reviewed.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 10 September, 2011, 06:11:58 pm
Wireless cadence and stuff....

No, that comes from a Garmin GSC-10.

Power data comes from SRM power cranks or, what I have, a PowerTap hub.

My Edge 705 can display and record the power data my PowerTap hub sends over ANT+.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: bikey-mikey on 10 September, 2011, 09:01:42 pm
I will probably move away from my powertaps to the new Vector pedal system next March - far easier to move your pedals, bike to bike, and THEN I can sell my Powertap Zipp Sub 9, .......and buy a house in the country.. 

The original pro+ PT  is being kept incommunicado with the rest of my accident victim Felt
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 11 September, 2011, 09:29:45 am
new Vector pedal system next March

Don't hold your breath. It's been "next march" for the Vectors for the last 2 or 3 years now...
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 25 September, 2011, 06:02:31 pm
Just noticed there are some proper specs now on the Garmin site...

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=145&pID=87774

Highlights include AA batteries  :thumbsup:  and GLONASS (in parallel to GPS) support  :o
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: andygates on 25 September, 2011, 07:27:55 pm
Quote
To improve development of the user segment, on August 11, 2010, Sergei Ivanov announced a plan to introduce a 25% import duty on all GPS-capable devices, including mobile phones, unless they are compatible with GLONASS. As well, the government is planning to force all car manufacturers in Russia to make cars with GLONASS starting from 2011. This will affect all car makers, including foreign brands like Ford and Toyota, which have car assembly facilities in Russia.[16]

Current GPS and phone baseband chips from major vendors ST-Ericsson,[17] Broadcom[18] and Qualcomm all support GLONASS in combination with GPS. Any import restriction is likely to have little change as most devices shipping worldwide will soon support GLONASS.

I have learned something today.

Now, can a unit run both its GPS and GLONASS systems together and average the location between them to get really good accuracy?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 25 September, 2011, 07:34:56 pm
Now, can a unit run both its GPS and GLONASS systems together and average the location between them to get really good accuracy?

The Garmin page suggests that the new eTrex does just that in order to obtain a faster fix.  No idea if the overall best-case accuracy is going to be better, but I'd assume that combining the two to give more satellites to play with is going to significantly improve performance when the view of the sky is restricted.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Frere on 25 September, 2011, 07:39:24 pm
available for sale?

Frere
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: rower40 on 25 September, 2011, 07:47:06 pm
Highlights include ... and GLONASS (in parallel to GPS) support
Kenyeshna Tovaritcsh.
But do the GLONASS satellites talk to the NASA-GPS satellites?  If not, there could be all sorts of parallax errors (viz: that Bond fillum with Jonathan Price as the media tycoon baddie).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 25 September, 2011, 08:03:57 pm
Highlights include ... and GLONASS (in parallel to GPS) support
Kenyeshna Tovaritcsh.
But do the GLONASS satellites talk to the NASA-GPS satellites?  If not, there could be all sorts of parallax errors (viz: that Bond fillum with Jonathan Price as the media tycoon baddie).

They don't need to talk to each other, the GPS receiver just needs to be able to receive both signals and handle them, but that's still not going to help that much.

<simplification begins>

GPS accuracy isn't all down to the number of satellites you can get a signal from (once you're past the requisitite minimum, although more satellites is always a better thing), it's to do with having access to the really accurate timing info (since it's the timing info that determines your distance from the satellite).

The main difference between military and civilian GPS systems is that the military systems have the encryption keys to decode the least significant bits (in a numerican sense) of the timing data that are encrypted by the satellites. That gets them the most accurate timing info and therefore the most accurate data for the location calculation. The most significant bits of timing data are not encrypted, and so civilian GPS systems can use that to get a reasonable fix for their location (in practice, down to ~3m accuracy). The encrypted bits on the end are ignored, or used in the calculation anyway (since the 'random' encrypted least significant bits will hardly affect the calculation).

Having another 5 sets of timing data and corresponding satellite data (from GLONASS) that's only accurate to a certain level only helps the fudged location calculation in the same way being able to see another 5 normal (Western) GPS satellites would. (My best is, I think, 12 visible satellites up at ~2000m in Southern Chile).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 25 September, 2011, 10:46:36 pm
So it is mainly going to be about speed of obtaining a fix and canyon performance?  Makes sense.  And, like the 'H' receivers, not to be sniffed at.  The "which way do I turn out of the station?" use-case isn't uncommon.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Chris N on 26 September, 2011, 09:25:17 am
available for sale?

Frere

Not yet. According to a bod in Cotswold, Garmin have delayed it by a month because of supply problems. Maybe by the end of October.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 26 September, 2011, 11:02:47 am
Some US retailers claim to have it
http://www.rei.com/product/825492/garmin-etrex-30-gps (http://www.rei.com/product/825492/garmin-etrex-30-gps)
but AFAIK no-one has actually laid hands on one yet.

When it arrives I confidently expect it to be a mixed bag with the plusses (no rubber band, bigger screen) somewhat outweighing the minuses (awful font rendering, fewer routing options).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 26 September, 2011, 11:44:43 am
Apart from the lack of touchscreen, it looks quite similar to the Dakota.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 26 September, 2011, 04:13:23 pm
All the current mapping handhelds seem very similar - just differ in screen size (the Montana being the biggest) and touchscreen or not.

The manual is now available for download.
http://static.garmincdn.com/pumac/eTrex_10-20-30_OM_EN.pdf (http://static.garmincdn.com/pumac/eTrex_10-20-30_OM_EN.pdf)
(It's down to Garmin's usual standard  :-\
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 26 September, 2011, 04:19:44 pm
The manual is now available for download.
http://static.garmincdn.com/pumac/eTrex_10-20-30_OM_EN.pdf (http://static.garmincdn.com/pumac/eTrex_10-20-30_OM_EN.pdf)

Thanks, looks like it confirms no support for PowerTap power meters so I'll stick with my Edge 705 for now. That's a shame as it looks like quite a nice piece of kit.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: toontra on 27 September, 2011, 03:03:01 pm
Looks like the bike mount will fit on the stem - that's a plus.  Looks a bit fugly though
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 27 September, 2011, 04:13:10 pm
Its the same mount as is already in use for the Dakota and Oregon amomg others.  Stem yes.  Bars yes.  Secure yes.  Fugly yes.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Aidan on 27 September, 2011, 04:50:32 pm
Hopefully they'll have some demo models at the BIke show, wouldnt mind a good play with one.  I am tempted
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: steveal on 27 September, 2011, 05:17:17 pm
Seems like lots of enthusiasm for the Etrex.
Can anyone explain to a beginner why it is better than, say, an Edge 500?

Steve
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 27 September, 2011, 05:23:51 pm
Two words:

"AA batteries"


They're also a bit more general-purpose than the Edge series, designed for handheld hiking use.  Which is obviously a no-brainer if you want something that's good off the bike, as well as on, but also because it makes fewer assumptions about what cyclists want a GPS receiver to do (you don't, for example, have to remember to press something to make it start logging).

I reckon the eTrex is a lot more in line with the needs of a touring cyclist than the Edge.  Obviously if you're into logging training sessions the Edge wins on the basis of sensor support.  For audax type riding, it's a lot less clear cut - the Edge is more bike-oriented, but power becomes an issue.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Hot Flatus on 27 September, 2011, 05:38:04 pm
I have owned two AA using GPS units but way prefer my internal batteried 705. It is smaller (because it can be), can be stem mounted, and most importantly doesn't turn off when you go over a bump, unlike the other two. Battery can see me round a 300k, and the plug in external for 400k and longer also charges the iPhone.

It would take a lot for me to be interested in this unit, but I'd be pleased if someone buys one and reports back.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 27 September, 2011, 05:42:30 pm
Its the same mount as is already in use for the Dakota and Oregon amomg others.  Stem yes.  Bars yes.  Secure yes.  Fugly yes.

On a black stem it doesn't stand out that much. As for being secure, yes to a point, if you crash hard, it will fly away but it has not been an issue for me as i always secure it to the brake cables with the lanyard.

I know that not everybody share this view but I think that the dakota is 10 times better than the old etrex as it is much easier to use and IMO this matters at 3am in the middle of Wales under the rain. The new etrex seems similar to the Dakota but more energy efficient so assuming that they haven't built in some drawbacks to protect the marketshare of their more expensive units, I think it will become the "preferred" option for audaxers. Also, the OSM maps looks really good on these units.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 27 September, 2011, 05:59:55 pm
I have owned two AA using GPS units but way prefer my internal batteried 705. It is smaller (because it can be), can be stem mounted, and most importantly doesn't turn off when you go over a bump, unlike the other two.

I've owned three eTrexes (Yellow, Legend and Vista HCx), and never had a battery contact issue.  And that includes when I used to do a lot of mileage on Sustrans paths without the aid of suspension.  *shrug*

Agreed about the size and stem-mounting though.  The Edge is better designed for being mounted on a bike.  As you'd expect it to be, really.


At the end of the day, they have a lot more in common then they have differences.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Hot Flatus on 27 September, 2011, 06:05:51 pm
Everyone has their preferences, but if I could see any advantage to using an eTrex I would use one. I really struggle to see why people use them except for touring with no access to an electricity socket for a few days. I know the Edge units are more expensive, perhaps that is a major factor for some?

You are correct about the similarities, although the 705 has a whole bunch of training facilities and ANT wireless connections to power meters, neither of which I use.

Training? Moi?

 :sick:

 ;D


Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 27 September, 2011, 06:17:10 pm
Everyone has their preferences, but if I could see any advantage to using an eTrex I would use one. I really struggle to see why people use them except for touring with no access to an electricity socket for a few days. I know the Edge units are more expensive, perhaps that is a major factor for some?

Overlooking the significant inertia factor of being an established eTrex user before I got back into cycling, I'd say you've summed up my main reasons for using them.  At the end of the day, removable batteries are convenient for touring, and I didn't see the point in paying vastly more (and while I'm not averse to spending money on good kit, I don't have a lot of it to spend) for an Edge in order to gain some power/waterproofing angst and a load of training features I'd (also) never use.  Size and stem mounting never bothered me, but then my proper bikes are both heavy tourers.  I expect that's a significant factor for many users.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: urban_biker on 27 September, 2011, 06:25:11 pm
I'm now very interested. Its about time I upgraded from my Gecko. I had been looking at the Dakota but the etrex seems to do as much but for less money. I'm not that interested in an electronic compass so the etrex20 looks ideal.

I'll be adding to my xmas list though , so I guess it will be a while before I can review it.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Andrij on 27 September, 2011, 09:21:24 pm
As mentioned in another, older, thread, I'm interested in a GPS unit of some sort.  I'm pretty sure I'll be getting the new etrex, but probably not until I visit the US in February.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Greenbank on 27 September, 2011, 10:57:43 pm
You are correct about the similarities, although the 705 has a whole bunch of training facilities and ANT wireless connections to power meters, neither of which I use.

Training? Moi?

Some of us mere mortals need it (training).

I've no emotional attachment or cognitive bias towards the Edge series. If Garmin did a GPS that took AA batteries that could record shit from an HR strap and PowerTap hub over ANT+ I'd ditch my Edge 705 and buy it.

I wouldn't even care if it didn't do maps and I had to do the old school 'sparse route' with routepoints named '01 L@', my Edge 705 would be on eBay.

The internal battery thing of the Edge 705 is an annoying limitation that I have to live with. External battery packs are not foolproof and have let me down.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: andygates on 27 September, 2011, 11:22:39 pm
It's a multi-use thing for me: I hike and bike and generally bugger around.  That means my GPS isn't handy, its safety kit*, and spare batteries go from nice to essential.  All of which means I'll cheerfully hike on the moors in midwinter white-outs for a jolly (it really is liberating, having trustworthy kit: you can get lost and get home again, so I'm always bumbling off the track because hey, a pretty stone!).

That plus the sheer physical robustness of the Etrexes (sea kayaking with it tied to the deck by string? How many times must I kill you, boy?) plus the low cost are all very attractive.

That they're hackable means it's happy nerds all round.  The whole OpenStreetMap thing is a lovely piece of citizen nerdery that tickles my tickly bits; they work on most Garmins.  They work trivially easily on Etrexes.

I won't upgrade until my current one gets eaten by a dinosaur, but I'm definitely keeping an eye on the new models.

The specific training stuff, well, that's specific training stuff.  My bike training is usually on the "miles / hours / pies" level of sophistication, so I'm not one to comment!



* Yes, yes, paper map and lodestone and powder of sympathy in a ziploc baggie too.  Primary GPS user != dolt.  :)  Reception during LEJOG has downgraded my trust in phone signal when I need it.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 27 September, 2011, 11:26:56 pm
Exactly.  Let's not overlook how spectacularly unimaginably awesome the original yellow eTrex was.  These days they're giving GPS receivers away with posh bike computers.   :D
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 28 September, 2011, 12:21:21 am
Powertap is an expensive niche product anyway.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 28 September, 2011, 04:16:12 am
ISTR HRMs seemed pretty flash 20 yrs ago..
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: zigzag on 28 September, 2011, 04:04:04 pm
etrex30 looks like a worthy replacement for vista hcx. the only slight niggle is that memory card is under the batteries - not very convenient to remove/reinsert when you want to upload your active log files.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Hot Flatus on 28 September, 2011, 06:13:18 pm
You are correct about the similarities, although the 705 has a whole bunch of training facilities and ANT wireless connections to power meters, neither of which I use.

Training? Moi?

Some of us mere mortals need it (training).

<totally off topic>

Do I detect a mocking tone in your comment?  Well, allow me to retort...    ;)

Depends what you call training. I dont call riding around occasionally exerting myself training. Training as far as I'm concerned is anything  whereby you hugely exceed your normal exertion rates to the point of failure.

An hour or so of intervals that lead you to have blurred vision are what I'm talking about and you won't get me doing that. I ride for fun.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: fuaran on 28 September, 2011, 06:59:17 pm
etrex30 looks like a worthy replacement for vista hcx. the only slight niggle is that memory card is under the batteries - not very convenient to remove/reinsert when you want to upload your active log files.
For the Vista HCx, you can just plug in the cable then set it to mass storage mode. Then you can read the tracks off the card without actually taking the card out of the Vista.
It looks like the new eTrex models will work in mass storage mode as standard, for both the internal memory and the memory cards. So you shouldn't need to remove the card very often.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 29 September, 2011, 09:35:34 am
Breaking news, some people in the States have got their new Etrexes in hand.
naughty cross-forum link, scroll down (http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?s=b6f799a0c6cfe64e39385327a32fedf1&showtopic=282370)

Looks sweet - one pic shows 17 bars up on the satellite screen  :o
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: urban_biker on 29 September, 2011, 09:42:25 am
Strangely enough the Dakota 20 is now available for around £160 about the predicted price of the etrex 20. Although the Dakota as a slightly larger screen and and electronic compass. This makes the decision much harder.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 29 September, 2011, 10:00:37 am
It seems to be 176x220px (ie same as current Etrex C, that's a bit sad!) vs Dakota 160x240.  The Etrex will be brighter though (non-backlit).  The taller Dakota screen is a much better shape for displaying map with data fields together.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 29 September, 2011, 12:07:00 pm
It comes down to whether you like a touchscreen or not IMO. Compass is unecessary on a bike, altimeter is useful though.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 29 September, 2011, 02:27:01 pm
Breaking news, some people in the States have got their new Etrexes in hand.
naughty cross-forum link, scroll down (http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?s=b6f799a0c6cfe64e39385327a32fedf1&showtopic=282370)

Looks sweet - one pic shows 17 bars up on the satellite screen  :o

Looking at the uk view of the Garmin site you can now order them, quoted 1-3 days to dispatch (I think)

>It seems to be 176x220px (ie same as current Etrex C, that's a bit sad!) vs Dakota 160x240.
If that's anything like the screen on the Bryton rider 50 (same resolution/dimensions), that seemed pretty decent (if a little small). I must admit to being a little underwhelmed by the display on a mate's Oregon 550, size was great but contrast wasn't IMO.

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Jamie on 30 September, 2011, 11:39:57 am
Looking at one of these as my first GPS.  Anyone know of a suitable bike mount is available?  I think a stem mount would be best for m
Also, will it work with Mac's?
Thanks
Jamie
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Frere on 30 September, 2011, 11:42:04 am
Looking at one of these as my first GPS.  Anyone know of a suitable bike mount is available?  I think a stem mount would be best for m
Also, will it work with Mac's?
Thanks
Jamie

same questions here from me :)

Frere
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 30 September, 2011, 11:47:21 am
The standard Garmin mount works well on a stem.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 30 September, 2011, 01:11:23 pm
The standard Garmin mount works well on a stem.

For the Edge maybe.  The standard eTrex mounts clamp round the handlebars, and wouldn't fit a stem.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 30 September, 2011, 01:22:33 pm
I meant the standard mount for the new generation (Dakota, new etrex...)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: urban_biker on 30 September, 2011, 01:28:57 pm
It comes down to whether you like a touchscreen or not IMO. Compass is unecessary on a bike, altimeter is useful though.

Not too worried about not having a touchscreen - the basic Garmin touchscreen is a bit pants anyway - and supposedly the etrex has an improved UI. The compass might be useful as I would intend to use it for walking too  - but its easy to carry a real magnetic compass and sensible to use as a backup anyway.

On the other hand the new etrex can also talk to the new Russian satellite network which is supposed to deliver quicker satellite acquisition and more accuracy. I think on balance I'd prefer to go for the newer technology.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 30 September, 2011, 01:52:59 pm
I meant the standard mount for the new generation (Dakota, new etrex...)

Ah, I didn't know that.  That's an improvement!
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 30 September, 2011, 02:11:14 pm
Hmmm....I wonder how long it'll take for the price to come down to something more reasonable ?
(Well, at handtec at any rate) I've currently got a 15% discount thing at Cotsworld which runs out today, that brings it down below anything any one else is quoting, but that's still mebbe 40 quid than I'd expect it to be longer-term...
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 30 September, 2011, 03:54:35 pm
I meant the standard mount for the new generation (Dakota, new etrex...)
Ah, I didn't know that.  That's an improvement!

It is if your stem happens to be set at the right angle, and if you're not a sweaty person.  (Moi?)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 12 October, 2011, 04:28:45 pm
Impressive out of the box - had a lock within 2 minutes from cold, indoors.

Then I took it for a walk up the road ...

(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/sats_all.jpg)   :o

the top row are the usual GPS sats, no37 I think is the EGNOS satellite, then the high-numbered ones are the GLONASS ones.
The manual does say that polling both sets is a battery hit, and let's face it they're not needed unless you ride in urban canyons or off-road in forest. 

(PS the manual is stored as pdf, in 10 languages, in the unit's internal memory, taking up about 25Mb ...  :facepalm:
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 12 October, 2011, 05:45:14 pm
No dodgy pixels, I hope ?

I guess it's a bit early to ask, but any inkling yet what it's like re routing options eg wrt the etrex 'delivery' mode ? - I gather that dropped off the feature list on the Oregon/Dakota.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 12 October, 2011, 07:02:53 pm
None that I can see.  8)

The screen is exactly the same size and resolution as the old Etrex, seems maybe a bit brighter (but IME there's a lot of sample variation anyway with these screens) but the available colour schemes are all rather low-contrast, muddy colourways which doesn't help at all.  The screen font is good though - more classical like the old Etrex, not like the Dakota for example, which uses an awful LCD-style font.
Weighs about 20g less, nice bar-of-soap shape and the buttons feel very good.

Routing - no Delivery mode, just Car, Bicycle or Pedestrian.  But it does have have a 'Prompted' setting like the old Etrex (which my Dak didn't - maybe newer firmware has added this, I don't know). 
Generally though there is some stuff that I didn't see on my (early) Dakota - much better 'Tones' handling for example - and some stuff missing - the 'dashboards' aren't so good.  The maps menu (to turn maps on and off) is a bit limited - it can't separate out the layers of my combined WorldMap*/Metroguide/OSM/Contours file (the Dakota can, so can the old Etrex) - a different approach will be needed.  Pros and cons, as ever.

* The included basemap is as good as WorldMap anyway (not saying a lot!)

(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/rout_setup.jpg)   (http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/be.jpg)   (http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/be_inseine.jpg)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Jamie on 13 October, 2011, 01:47:11 pm
frankly frankie, where did you get your new  Etrex from?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: smurphboy on 13 October, 2011, 03:08:33 pm
Just got one of these from Go Outdoors and used it when I was down in Devon. Only disappointing thing about it is that Garmin Connect doesn't recognise it as a device when you upload the files because (I assume) it is using GPX and not FIT as a format. The only consequence is that you have to set the activity type manually (Edge's pick up that you are cycling and I'm assuming Forerunners can tell it the sport type).

As said earlier, fix times are excellent and GLONASS is a nice feature.

Screen is the same size as the Edge so the maps looks a little small but the battery life seems excellent. I didn't swap the batteries once in the three days I was walking and I had it on a good six hours per day (2900 mAh NiMH batts). Still getting the hang of figuring out which part of the tracklog is which event - I'm used to pushing start on the Edge!

Map compatibility is good - I just swapped the card out of my Edge and it all worked. I have 1:50000 OS maps and two OSM maps (Talkytoaster and Richard F's old cyclemap - is there an update to this anywhere???) on there. You get a Birdseye card in the box which allows you to download 600 sq km of OS maps (down to 1:25000) which is nice to augment the 1:50k card that I have. The basemap is rubbish, but you all probably know that.

Device is nice and rugged, it is certainly Devon rainproof but I haven't mounted it on the bike yet - has anyone got the mount?

The compass is handy and pretty accurate (3-axis I think) and has a nice sighting mode that I used to figure out a few landmarks on the Coast path.

It has a nice geocache mode that I'm going to have a play with tomorrow if I can fettle a mount to the bike - or I'm walking to a few caches. Looks interesting, but I've no geocaching experience so I can't really comment on that.

All the s/w works fine on a Mac. Both Basecamp and the updater detected the Etrex and I even got a firmware update. It doesn't work with Garmin Training Centre as it isn't a fitness device - although you can bind a HR monitor and cadence sensor... so I'm not sure how I'd upload to TC - I'm assuming I could upload the GPX but that would lose the other data.... not sure how that works.

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 13 October, 2011, 03:14:42 pm
Device is nice and rugged, it is certainly Devon rainproof

Have they used something other than rubber band technology for the buttons/grip?  It's not entirely clear from the photos.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Jamie on 13 October, 2011, 03:25:16 pm
Interesting, thanks Smurphboy. 

Interestingly. I was told by Go Outdoors that they are not in stock yet.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: smurphboy on 13 October, 2011, 03:26:07 pm
Device is nice and rugged, it is certainly Devon rainproof

Have they used something other than rubber band technology for the buttons/grip?  It's not entirely clear from the photos.

Hard to describe but it is a hard texturised ABS type compound (not like the Edge which has a rubberised back) all around the unit (the black strip) with buttons being covered by it (but thinner) and depressed through it. So the buttons are sealed and the grip is good and not too soft. The USB port is covered in a similar way to the Edge with a rubberised cover that is replaceable. It is pretty well sealed and claimed to be IPX7 rated. The battery compartment is sealed with a rubber grommet over the hatch and significant overlap between the case and the batt compartment. That is held shut by a quarter turn connector. If you want pics of a part just ask and I'll post some.

I'd rate it as pretty solid and easy to hold and there is a place to attach a lanyard at the bottom for more security.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: smurphboy on 13 October, 2011, 03:26:54 pm
Interesting, thanks Smurphboy. 

Interestingly. I was told by Go Outdoors that they are not in stock yet.

I walked into the Bristol branch and asked for one, the chap brought it out of the back room and I paid. Simples. This was Monday. YMMV
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 13 October, 2011, 04:05:14 pm

Routing - no Delivery mode, just Car, Bicycle or Pedestrian.  But it does have have a 'Prompted' setting like the old Etrex (which my Dak didn't - maybe newer firmware has added this, I don't know). 
Generally though there is some stuff that I didn't see on my (early) Dakota - much better 'Tones' handling for example - and some stuff missing - the 'dashboards' aren't so good.  The maps menu (to turn maps on and off) is a bit limited - it can't separate out the layers of my combined WorldMap*/Metroguide/OSM/Contours file (the Dakota can, so can the old Etrex) - a different approach will be needed.  Pros and cons, as ever.

* The included basemap is as good as WorldMap anyway (not saying a lot!)

Thanks ! - that's just the sort of useability stuff I'm curious about - I'll have a read up on layering...
(I must admit I'm still a little tempted with remanufactured Vista HCxs at about 120)

(And thanks Smurphboy)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 13 October, 2011, 05:28:56 pm
(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/screens1.jpg)

Afternoon sun, no backlight.  In shade the comparison was much the same.  Same map, but it renders differently on the new GPSs.  So I'd say there's nothing between the screens, that couldn't be accounted-for by sample variation and the yellowness typical of maps on the old models.  The new screen does have more colour depth, allowing smaller smoothed fonts in the data fields - OK if your eyes are up to it (mine aren't).

The map is with the topographic shading turned off BTW.  Out of the box this feature is set to 'auto' which means it would be off at close zoom levels like this anyway.  It kicks in at 5km zoom which is well above my normal range.  On, it just turns everything muddy green and makes the map almost invisible.

Although generally it's a thumbs-up all round I'm beginning to really dislike the page navigation.  The 'back' key has lost a lot of functionality and you spend a lot of time fiddling with the front joystick just to go from one page to another.  [edit] no no I take it all back, it's all there, just needed unlocking.

Bike mount - Wiggle sell the 'Oregon bike mount', it's the same thing.  Expensive for what it is, but then what choice is there.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Frere on 14 October, 2011, 10:10:05 pm
is the eTrex30 worth the price differential over the eTrex20?

Frere
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: fuaran on 14 October, 2011, 10:26:44 pm
If you care about monitoring/logging your heart rate or cadence, then yes. Though that would require buying the sensors separately.

The barometric altimeter is nice to have. Though it needs to be calibrated to be accurate. Just the GPS elevation is good enough most of the time IME (see the other thread on altitude measurement).
I think the compass is of limited use for cycling. Though can be handy for things like geocaching.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 16 October, 2011, 11:54:51 am
Agreed the differences are pretty much on the same scale as "is it worth paying extra for a carbon seat post?"

The compass is very nice to stabilise the map when/if you come to a halt at a junction and peer at the screen thinking "where now?" as though it's a paper map - but NB for an experienced GPS user this should never happen.

The e30 has lost the ability to manually switch the compass on/off and also, as far as I can see, has lost the fine-tuning of the compass thresholds in the menu.  You simply have menu settings of 'auto' or 'off', and you don't have the Vista's manual switch (top right button) which I find very useful, given that Garmin say the compass is a battery hit.

Out of the box the compass was spot-on for direction - for road cycling use I don't see any point in ever calibrating either compass (which will always be within 10 degrees or so) or altimeter (which will simply track the GPS for accuracy but with fewer spikes).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 17 October, 2011, 05:18:34 pm
Is the compass threshold stuff useful in terms of power consumption, or wrt what's being displayed ? - from a quick browse of one datasheet I'd guess that the current draw (<1mA in that particular case) is sufficiently low that as far as power useage is concerned, it might not be worth the hassle putting it into the gui.

BTW - I found your hint/tips page :) - does that pretty much sort out your user interface annoyances, or is there anything else that's still a bit of a nuisance ?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 17 October, 2011, 05:36:12 pm
Presumably 'auto' means the compass chip is on when the GPS speed is within a gnat's crotchet of zero...

Does it manage to work in the presence of significant chunks of metal?  I've always found the Vista's to be uselessly random when mounted on handlebars, even in a horizontal orientation.

Not that I'm bashing the magnetic compass in general.  If you're going to use it for anything other than cycling, it's well worth having.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 25 October, 2011, 01:24:12 pm
BTW - I found your hint/tips page :) - does that pretty much sort out your user interface annoyances, or is there anything else that's still a bit of a nuisance ?

Pretty much sorts it out.  Once in the menus, the E30 does suffer a bit because the whole UI is really optimised for touchscreen, and requires a lot of scrolling, but that's not really a major problem, and sharing a common UI and menu structure across all the various Garmin models more than compensates.

I'm also finding the buttons rather stiff - possibly still a bit 'new', but also the replacement for the rubber band is much more rigid so they do need more of a push, and while cycling I'm finding that a bit cack-handed - but I'll put all that down to unfamiliarity.

Having played with (and used) the E30 for a couple of weeks - I'm ready to pronounce verdict ...

For a GPS new adopter - there's absolutely no problem, if this model (Etrex 20 or Etrex 30) appeals to you then it's at least as good as any other Garmin you might be considering, and in one useful respect is cutting-edge.  (Though that advantage only lasts until Garmin roll out their next updated model ... )

For someone looking for a more modern version of their old Etrex - no real problem, that's exactly what this is, for good and ill.   Rather like moving to a more modern OS on your computer, you'll find that some things that seemed useful before, are no longer available - but that's usually a price we are prepared to pay, in order to move on.  You will need a new bar mount as well!

For anyone who doesn't use Windows - definitely now avoid buying the older Etrex (HCx) series, as this one will prove much easier to work with.

But ...

For anyone who is completely comfortable with the way their present Legend or Vista HCx works, and especially if they appreciate the options available in the Setup Routing menu - and/or if they are comfortable working in Mapsource* - then I would suggest seriously consider buying another one as stocks run down and maybe cut price, and before they disappear for ever.  Also consider buying a spare bar mount because all current ('new') Garmin models now use a different mount altogether, I can't see the old mount remaining available for long.

* the E30 doesn't seem to play well with Mapsource.  Mapsource can see it OK, but most of the transfer options seem broken.  All you can do is save as GPX then dump the file in with File Manager.  Significantly, Mapsource isn't mentioned in the Manual.

For me - I pretty much fall into the last category - but when I go on a long tour I always take a spare GPS anyway.  (Actually, it's not so much a 'spare', as one I can lend out to another member of the group - so I always take a spare mount as well.)  I can see myself sticking with my trusty old Legend (or maybe picking up a cheap Vista), and packing the E30 as the travelling spare.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 27 October, 2011, 02:57:20 pm
Thanks FF - one final (?) question (or so) - you wrote:

>The maps menu (to turn maps on and off) is a bit limited - it can't separate out the layers of my combined WorldMap*/Metroguide/OSM/Contours file (the Dakota can, so can the old Etrex) - a different approach will be needed.

 - and I gather from your 'Adding Contours..' page the contours are just an overlay rather than a separate map as such.

Presumably on the new Etrex if you wanted access to maps with and without contours you'd have to have to generate 2 sets of OSM based maps (ie with/without), lob them both on the sdcard and select between them ? Does the day/night contour colouring still work ? (Dunno how useful that is, I'm just curious..)

I'm rather assuming that whilst your contours how-to mentions mapsource, but since the E30 and mapsource won't play together properly that might be the sticking point regardless. Anyone know if the same sort of thing's possible with basecamp ? (I guess that's the alternative.)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Euan Uzami on 27 October, 2011, 03:09:10 pm
Can anyone who's got a new etrex say whether it can display a route/track without icons/symbols for each routepoint?
The icons are the only thing that annoys me about my current one and no amount of fiddling e.g. turning declutter off, changing detail level, etc. seems to get it to not display the icons.
When there's lots together, they obscure the line and the roads, it would be nice if they had recognised this as a problem and sorted it out.

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 27 October, 2011, 04:13:12 pm

Presumably on the new Etrex if you wanted access to maps with and without contours you'd have to have to generate 2 sets of OSM based maps (ie with/without), lob them both on the sdcard and select between them ? Does the day/night contour colouring still work ? (Dunno how useful that is, I'm just curious..)


The dakota stack maps, so if you get the contours on their own, you can choose to have them on or off by selecting or not the contour map to be displayed.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 27 October, 2011, 04:55:53 pm
The dakota stack maps, so if you get the contours on their own, you can choose to have them on or off by selecting or not the contour map to be displayed.

But it's not a Dakota ;) - frankly frankie's already said he can't turn layers on/off in the same way, I'm wondering it he's found a workaround or whether the only option is two discrete maps, with/without contours.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 27 October, 2011, 05:00:24 pm
I must have been asleep when he said it!
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 28 October, 2011, 10:03:39 am
Yes the map handling is just a bit different, but it's no problem.  You simply need to create a separate .img file for each map you want to have on board.  Then you can select any combination you like. 
So for example I have a  gmapmetr.img (Metroguide europe), a gmapsosm.img (OSM local), and a gmapcont.img (UK and France/Alps contours) and I can use it with either metroguide or OSM switched off, leaving the contours overlayig the other one.  (On the old Etrex, I have all these combined in one gmapsupp.img file and that works fine.)
[edit]  I have also turned the basemap 'terrain shading' off - the display is pretty awful with it on (the default is 'auto' which is OK, means it's off at normal working zooms).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 28 October, 2011, 11:24:14 am
NB these screenshots are a bit larger than actual size, on a typical desktop monitor.

(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/routing_ar11.jpg)        (http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/routing_dr11.jpg)        (http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/routing_tr11.jpg)
1. Following a Route 'On Road'.       2. Following a Route 'Off Road'.       3. Following a Track (with waypoints).

The middle screenshot shows the waypoint pushpins.  This is threading through suburban sideroads so is an artificially bad case.  I can't find a way to turn them off, though to be fair I haven't tried very hard yet.  The waypoint icon is actually set to Garmin's 'City Medium' in the Route, which should be a small unobtrusive dot.  Some other icon choices (such as the red 'Bike Trail' symbol) do transfer correctly, and override the pushpin.

Pic 1 shows autorouting, which looks quite decent, no complaints there*.  There is no 'turn preview' any more, and I have turned the 'guidance' text off as it rarely says anything useful IMO.  There are no actual waypoints within the bounds of this screenshot - if there were, they would have pushpins.
* however the autorouting setup options are a bit limited, compared with the older Etrexes.  The worst omission is no options relating to off-route recalculation.

Pic 2 is routing 'off road'.  Note that the recorded track is showing up as cyan colour, which is the default out of the box.  This can be changed, though actually I think it's a good choice.  There are also options to record but not display, or to not record at all.
The problem in this mode is that the 'Waypoint at Next' data field is not showing the waypoint name (which in this particular example should be K005-L).  It's actually showing the waypoint 'comment' field.  Once you know this, you can use it to your advantage (eg, by just putting LEFT or L << in that field, because comments don't have to be unique) but as it stands it's an annoying bug.  The Dakota has a similar but not identical behaviour, so I imagine most other modern Garmins do as well.

Pic 3 is routing along a track (in this case, back along the track recorded in pic 2 - the pointer is actually in almost the same place in both shots).  In this mode, any waypoints that happen to be on or near the track, are picked up and used as a 'next' point - even though they are not actually part of that track file at all.  And in this mode, the 'Waypoint at Next' data field is correctly showing the next waypoint Name.  So this all works rather well, except that in this mode you do not get prompts (audio and backlight) as the waypoint approaches.  (You might get prompts for track-generated turns, I'm not sure about that, can't say I noticed any in 10k of wiggly road.)

Note also how small the font is in the 'Next' box (these pix are probably oversize on your screen) - it's far too small for me to read.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 28 October, 2011, 12:25:02 pm
There is no 'turn preview' any more, and I have turned the 'guidance' text off as it rarely says anything useful IMO.

Does this mean it won't automagically light up and show you the turn in large, friendly arrows (at a junction-appropriate level of zoom) as you approach it?  Or just that it draws the turn on the map?

The former is my main reason for using auto-routing, as it makes the display a *lot* easier to see when the eTrex is mounted on the boom of a recumbent.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 28 October, 2011, 06:33:56 pm
I mean it lacks the Routing Setup option for 'Next Turn Pop-up' and as far as I can tell it behaves the same as the Etrex HCx would if that option were turned off.

There is autozoom and if that is enabled, it does zoom in as you arrive at a turn.  And of course it lights and bleeps, and the backlight and tones options are much the same as the HCx.   

Other missing Routing options are: Off route recalculation (always on), Calculation method, all the motorised vehicle types except 'Car/Motorcycle', and Colour (anything you like as long as its magenta).
Routing is the most dumbed-down settings area but as such it's in line with other newish models, and to be fair the settings that are available give quite usable options, though personally I consider off route recalculation to be trappy, if you're trying to follow a set route.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 28 October, 2011, 07:10:30 pm
I mean it lacks the Routing Setup option for 'Next Turn Pop-up' and as far as I can tell it behaves the same as the Etrex HCx would if that option were turned off.

 :(

I don't use autozoom because if you can't read the scale indicator, you've no idea what the scale is.  The next turn popup was an excellent compromise between seeing what was going on at junctions and having a sensibly wide view the rest of the time.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 28 October, 2011, 07:42:14 pm
You simply need to create a separate .img file for each map you want to have on board.  Then you can select any combination you like. 
So for example I have a  gmapmetr.img (Metroguide europe), a gmapsosm.img (OSM local), and a gmapcont.img (UK and France/Alps contours) and I can use it with either metroguide or OSM switched off, leaving the contours overlayig the other one.  (On the old Etrex, I have all these combined in one gmapsupp.img file and that works fine.)
[edit]  I have also turned the basemap 'terrain shading' off - the display is pretty awful with it on (the default is 'auto' which is OK, means it's off at normal working zooms).

I probably wasn't clear enough but I think this is how the Dakota works which IME is straightforward.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 29 October, 2011, 11:31:02 am
As I recall, the Dakota works OK either way - ie it can sort out a combined map file, and/or it can deal with several map files.  Best of both worlds.
The old Etrex can only do the former, the new one can only do the latter.  But it's no big deal and the new method is, as you say, straightforward.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Panoramix on 29 October, 2011, 12:14:51 pm
The old Etrex can only do the former, the new one can only do the latter.  But it's no big deal and the new method is, as you say, straightforward.

Yes, I didn't know that there were 2 methods and didn't even feel the need to look for an alternative! I still use the contour map you gave me.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Euan Uzami on 29 October, 2011, 05:45:01 pm
Those screenshots look pretty vivid compared to my current etrex vista. Is that just because they're screenshots of an emulator, or are they actually photos of it? The track looks nice and thick, as well, on my current one it's a very thin line.

How much easier is it to read a track on the map on the screen when out on the road in broad daylight?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 30 October, 2011, 04:26:28 pm
All the pictures from message #79 onwards are direct screen dumps of the GPS in use (you just press a button and it saves the current screen into memory, for later retrieval).  Except of course #89 which is a photo of old and new Etrexes side by side as so is the better comparison, really.

The problem with the screen dumps on this model is that the screen resolution is actually higher than yer average desktop monitor (certainly higher than any of mine) so when reproduced on a pixel-for-pixel basis (as these are) the images are larger than actual size.  They are also hugely backlit on the desktop so look nothing like the actual thing.

When following a Track (as opposed to just having it display on screen) it highlights in magenta so is fairly easy to see.

I wouldn't say the actual screen brightness and contrast is any significant improvement on previous models.  This one is good, but in my considerable experience of Etrexes theres a lot of sample variation with the screens, you can be lucky, or not.  There are some definite screen pros and cons though:
Map rendering is much clearer, a big improvement.  The map background is pale cream, rather than yellow.
Map legends (eg street names) however are simply awful.
Distances and other figures in the data fields are OK, but not quite as clear as the older version.
Text in the data fields is dreadful, far too small a point size.
The data fields themselves take up slighly less space, so the option to show a map with 4 fields becomes a little bit more realistic.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: PloddinPedro on 31 October, 2011, 07:59:26 am
......................... When following a Track (as opposed to just having it display on screen) it highlights in magenta so is fairly easy to see. ........................
At the risk of sounding pedantic, can I ask if you are talking here of "following" in the sense that you are "navigating" the Track, as opposed to simply displaying the Track as a mere overlay on the map?

I've never used any of the Etrexes but have a Map62 and with mine, you can choose from a range of colours if you wish to simply display the Track(s) as an overlay (the "Show on map" option). If, however, I select the Track, hit "View" and then "Go", the Map62 displays the Track as a magenta overlay and all the navigational data such as "Estimated time of arrival", "Distance to destination" etc. is available, which is not the case with the mere "Show on map" option.

Although the simple "Show on map" method doesn't give the additional navigation data, it does allow the display of several Tracks in different colours, which can be useful if I wish to have alternative routes readily available or distinguish between sections of a journey, although the Track line is thinner than the magenta one shown with the "navigation" option and isn't as easy to see, depending on which colour you choose.

I should perhaps add that neither of the above-mentioned methods provides the pop-up turn instructions which come when navigating a Route as opposed to a Track.

I assume this is in fact all the same in the new Etrexes?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 31 October, 2011, 09:30:15 am
Just the same - thanks for clarifying.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: stat on 09 November, 2011, 10:58:39 am
I am interested in the new Etrex 30 and have come across this offer.
http://navi-technology.co.uk/store/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=186 (http://navi-technology.co.uk/store/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=186)
which includes Topo map 1:50000 of UK. Alternatively one can choose Europe 1:100000 but they say it is not so good.
Does anyone have experience of this Topo map and whether it is inferior to OS at same scale? Not sure I would purchase OS for UK as I would probably use OSM. OS at 25000 might be of more use for walking.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 09 November, 2011, 01:30:19 pm
Comparison with OS would depend on what your priorities are.  I mean, most of us think of OS as the Best Maps In The World (though I have a personal soft spot for the Swiss Landeskarte equivalent).  For actual richness of detail the Topo map does not compare.

But in the GPS I would say the Garmin Topo is a better fit for a 2x1.5" screen.  Plus I think it is routable (sort of - not as good as City AIUI) whereas OS on its own isn't (though NB the pricey Garmin mash-up of OS does include a hidden routable layer).
Though TBH I'm not sure exactly what map they're referring to - 'Topo GB' is essentially scale-less and ultimately far more accurate than a 1:50000 map can be - you can zoom it in for detail and out for overview, almost infinitely.  So I'm not sure what the 1:50000 refers to.

You can view Garmin's maps online, to assess coverage and detail and so on.
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=255&fKeys=FILTER_REGION_EUROPE (https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=255&fKeys=FILTER_REGION_EUROPE)
roll down to Topo GB (or whatever it is you're looking at) click on that then click the 'Coverage Details' tab
then 'Click to view a detailed, interactive map' -
It's clunky, but this map is zoomable and scrollable the render is quite similar to what you actually see on the GPS (though in a bigger window) be sure to select 'more' detail.  Actually, looking at it, I think the render in the E30 will be better than this - especially the minor roads should be better.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: smurphboy on 22 November, 2011, 03:40:03 pm
I've got a dead pixel (stuck on, medium brightness white) on my new Etrex 30. It is halfway to the left hand edge just below the centreline of the display - so not dead centre but not in the middle)

Forums seem to suggest I have to live with it or take it back to Go Outdoors and ask for a replacement. Has anyone else had a dead pixel? Is it common??? I've never had one on my previous Garmins (Edge 305, Edge 800)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 23 November, 2011, 11:18:52 am
Dunno if it's common, but it's not unknown - there's a few cases reported on the groudspeak forums, and ISTR that someone reported that Garmin thought the odd faulty pixel was ok..IMO that might be fair enough on a large flat panel, but on a display that small that's a bit of a cop-out.

http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?s=3ad88d6095365204311d932db2d09a44&showforum=11
(might need to be registered to search, but try the assorted etrex 20/30 threads in the last month or two)

<edit> here y'go:
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=283211

I've just ordered a 30 from GoOutdoors, I'll have to see what the display's like when it turns up..

I *hope* if retailers get enough returns  they'd take it up with Garmin UK, who get the message to pull their socks up !
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 23 November, 2011, 03:47:04 pm
Mine's OK but I agree a stuck pixel is poor on a screen so small - OTOH if it's medium-white is it actually visible on any of your normal 'working' screens?  I use map or trip computer 99.9% of the time and these both have a near-white background.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 23 November, 2011, 06:23:34 pm
Admittedly I'm going by the sort of defect levels you'd expect to see on flat-panels - it seems there's an ISO standard for that (but in reality manufacturers seem to do somewhat better and have a clear policy) eg:

http://www.viewsoniceurope.com/uk/assets/037/13942.pdf
http://www.tested.com/news/we-uncover-the-dead-pixel-policies-for-every-major-lcd-maker/1337/

- but it doesn't look like it applies to smaller/smartphone displays

Without doing an exhaustive search, judging by this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/archive/index.php/t-1065935.html
then various smartphone manufacturers seem to have a permitted defective level of 1, or 3, duff pixels (although I expect the level will vary with size and pixel density)

BTW  - GoOutdoors have a 20% discount code operating at the moment (just for being on their mail list): D20NVB  - says 'limited time' but no idea for how long - and you need to pay 5 quid for their discount card (which you can do all in one hit).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: smurphboy on 23 November, 2011, 08:20:07 pm
Mine's OK but I agree a stuck pixel is poor on a screen so small - OTOH if it's medium-white is it actually visible on any of your normal 'working' screens?  I use map or trip computer 99.9% of the time and these both have a near-white background.

Sadly - it being winter - I'm mostly riding in the dark so I can see it as Garmin's night scheme makes the background dark. Ho hum.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Kim on 24 November, 2011, 01:32:54 am
I never liked the night colourscheme - it makes text hard to read.  I much prefer the daytime colours at minimum backlight.  Of course, that's on a HCx, not the new eTrex (which may be different).
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 25 November, 2011, 03:36:52 pm
Ooer !

The 30's just arrived, and having temporarily perloined some batteries and a map card from a mate's Oregon, it's all looking good  - and no obviously duff pixels either :) Picked up about 14 satellites fairly quickly...
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: fhills on 25 November, 2011, 05:25:06 pm
Sorry if this is made clear in another post of yours, but can I ask you where you bought it from, and why from them?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: bryn on 25 November, 2011, 05:29:38 pm

BTW  - GoOutdoors have a 20% discount code operating at the moment (just for being on their mail list): D20NVB  - says 'limited time' but no idea for how long - and you need to pay 5 quid for their discount card (which you can do all in one hit).

A big thanks for posting that.  Immediately reserved the last available Etrex30 from the Basingstoke store then collected it today, with a saving of £40+.  I then of course spent several times the saving on other items of outdoor clothing that I hadn't even realised I needed until I got in the door.  This is called retailing I think.

--
Bryn
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 25 November, 2011, 06:00:26 pm
Their cunning plan worked ;)

fhills - as reposted by bryn, price/availability - I'd rather expected to get one from Cotsworld with a ctc discount otherwise, until GoOutdoors issued the 20% discount - runs out on sunday, btw.
I think they've just come in stock at handtec too.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: De Sisti on 25 November, 2011, 07:19:36 pm
This is a review of someone who bought a unit from GoOutdoors:

Quote
(I previously had the etrex vista) and decided to upgrade to this newer version.
Be warned, Garmin will force you to pay for all your mapping again, as only one map is
unlocked to one unit. Although this is tucked away in their T & C's, it has just cost me an
additional £140 to repurchase all my maps. I am now waiting a week for the DVD's to
arrive before the unit is fully functional. I feel as if Garmin have ripped me off as I only
bought the 2012 Europe map back in May when it was released, and less than 6 months
old it is rendered useless and I'm out of pocket.

I didn't realise this, so am holding back at the moment.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 26 November, 2011, 09:29:31 am
Garmin's locked maps are a well-known gotcha.  To be fair they're probably bound by their own licencing agreements with the map data suppliers. 

The real problem is that the maps seem expensive, and the reason for this is you are buying huge areas of mapping you'll never need.  In fact, per area and detail, the maps are incredibly good value.  But what is needed is an equivalent to the old "buy an OS sheet when you plan to go there" way of doing things.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 26 November, 2011, 11:33:07 am
As far as routable maps are concerned, that could change - the main providers were Navteq  - owned by Nokia, which Garmin use, and Tele Atlas, owned by TomTom. However, google are now doing their own routable stuff. My OH recently bought an HTC desire hd which she's been using over the last month as a satnav, and has found it pretty decent - admittedly without comparing it to other satnavs, but has also found it easy to use having not used one before. So Tele Atlas/Navteq *might* be under some pressure to drop licencing prices. But there's probably no getting away from the fact that decent off-road/walking map data is going to be from Ordnance Survey for the UK. Whilst I think they're pretty much self-funded, so need to maintain income, I wonder if there's scope for a more flexible payment form. Unfortunately, whilst Garmin are in the loop, I doubt that'll happen.

I think *my* main beef is less about pricing (well, that too, to a degree) but the maps either aren't device-locked (sd card, which isn't updateable afaia ?) or are.  It wouldn't be quite so bad if it allowed two devices to be supported, but then I guess their argument is you'd get people sharing licences.

Still, that's getting a bit off-topic I s'pose..

Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Richard Fairhurst on 28 November, 2011, 10:12:33 pm
But there's probably no getting away from the fact that decent off-road/walking map data is going to be from Ordnance Survey for the UK.
Or OpenStreetMap. :) I'm serious - have a look at OSM coverage of Evesham and pan west to Worcester, Malvern and the like. Really imprssive amount of footpath coverage - easily of Landranger quality. It's not nationally consistent yet, of course, but you can see which way the wind is blowing.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 29 November, 2011, 11:43:29 am
I don't entirely disagree - the few areas I've checked out on OSM vs OS look pretty comparable (and that was off-road stuff), so I've been more than happy to lob it onto my new Etrex..I'm certainly not in a hurry to buy maps from Garmin ;)
My comment was really in reference to pricing/licensing agreements - ie Garmin aren't going to be offering anything other than OS-based mapping because there isn't an altogether complete alternative.

I guess as OSM improves that might produce some squeezing of pricing, but it's still likely to lag behind OS.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: fhills on 29 November, 2011, 05:53:43 pm
Ordered the Etrex 20 from Go outdoors on Saturday.

They are still waiting to pick it apparently! - they sound kind of lost in the warehouse.

Got the discount highlighted in this thread - thanks folks.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: De Sisti on 29 November, 2011, 06:53:48 pm
Ordered the Etrex 20 from Go outdoors on Saturday.

They are still waiting to pick it apparently! - they sound kind of lost in the warehouse.

Got the discount highlighted in this thread - thanks folks.
Have you decided which maps to buy for it?
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: fhills on 29 November, 2011, 07:05:55 pm
[
Have you decided which maps to buy for it?
No - will probably try and fiddle with OSM cycle. But the plan is to use it around Europe sometime so I was maybe thinking of Garmin City Navigator Europe as a back-up.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 13 January, 2012, 01:15:18 pm
Took me a while to find this.  I thought this display (available on some other models) had been lost in the E30 - but no, here it is.
Predictive profile (when following a Track).

(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/map-ele-b.jpg)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: bryn on 14 January, 2012, 08:51:30 pm
Took me a while to find this.  I thought this display (available on some other models) had been lost in the E30 - but no, here it is.
Predictive profile (when following a Track).

Absolutely amazing Francis!  As a new user, both to GPS and the E30, I am struggling with the seemingly infinite range of menus and options - I haven't dared put it on the bike yet, I'm quite enough of a hazard when walking round with it trying to find the right button :)

Could you briefly indicate your process (a) to get the planned track onto the machine in the first place (is this the same as a route??) and (b) split the screen with elevation above it?  Many thanks.

BTW for other newbies, there are a host of how-to-do-it GPS videos on youtube, including a couple I found last night of how to adjust the size of a scanned paper map by overlaying transparently on GoogleEarth so that it can then be downloaded into your GPS.

--
Bryn
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: frankly frankie on 15 January, 2012, 11:20:15 am
Could you briefly indicate your process (a) to get the planned track onto the machine in the first place (is this the same as a route??) and (b) split the screen with elevation above it?  Many thanks.

I have to say it's more of a party piece than a practical display - I'd rather have a map with 2 data fields any day and you can't have all three at once (map, altitude plot, data fields) though you can have any 2 of those together ...

To answer (b) first - from the map screen go:
Menu* > Setup Map > Data Fields > Dashboard > Elevation Plot* ... and then Back* to return to the map page.
* 'Menu' is the l-h button.  * Elevation Plot is the bottom option, scroll down to see it.   * 'Back' is the top right button.

All 3 scales (map, and x and y axes) are independently adjustable.  To adjust the graph scales, go:
Menu > Elevation Plot > Menu > Adjust Zoom Ranges > waggle joystick to adjust > Back > Back to return to split map.

(http://www.aukadia.net/gps/e30/map-ele-b.jpg)

To answer (a).
To get the 'predictive' effect you would need a planned Track with elevation data included.  Typically this would simply be a Track that had been previously recorded on a GPS.   Otherwise you'd just see a flat line in the blue area above.
Drawing or autorouting a track in a planning aid such as Mapsource or some of the online services, generally results in a very good track (in terms of following the road) but no elevation info.  A few online services do include elevation, but I don't know which.
It is possible to add elevations to any 'dumb' GPX file using this online service http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/elevation (http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/elevation) where you simply upload the file and straightaway download a replica with elevations written in.  The result is a bit coarse but a lot better than nothing.

The Track, however it is derived, has to be saved out as a GPX file.   I then copy this into the [SD Card]\Garmin\GPX\ directory on the GPS.  For some reason, I have more success with files transferred onto the card, rather than direct onto the GPS itself - though in theory either should work equally well.

Then you simply use Where To? and choose Tracks then select your Track, to follow it in a navigational mode.  (NB if you just colour the Track and display it on the map, but don't use Where To? - again you won't get the predictive effect.  Or if you use data fields you won't get navigational hints.  Using Where To? with a Track is a more powerful way to do it on these newer models.)
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: bryn on 15 January, 2012, 07:06:30 pm
Many thanks, truly an impressive party piece. ;D

--
Bryn
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Andrij on 13 February, 2012, 06:12:19 pm
Does anyone know what the size limit, if any, is for the MicroSD card the 30 will take?  I haven't seen any reference to a maximum size, but I don't feel safe in assuming that equates to no limit.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: tiermat on 13 February, 2012, 07:07:21 pm
Does anyone know what the size limit, if any, is for the MicroSD card the 30 will take?  I haven't seen any reference to a maximum size, but I don't feel safe in assuming that equates to no limit.

If the specs only say SD, then the limit is 2Gb (the limit for SD spec) if it says SDHC, then you are (usually) safe upto about 16Gb, although larger cards area available.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: Andrij on 13 February, 2012, 07:39:43 pm
I should have looked a bit harder.  :facepalm:

https://support.garmin.com/support/searchSupport/case.faces?caseId={e1f8cf10-260f-11e1-73d0-000000000000}

Says I can put in up to 32GB.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: henshaw11 on 14 February, 2012, 11:51:26 am
Ah, beat me to it. SDHC goes up to 32GB, SDXC handles up to 2TB - I've got a 16G Kingston in mine, since that seemed to be the price sweet-spot a few months ago.
Title: Re: New Etrex
Post by: wilbt on 16 February, 2012, 10:31:26 pm
Just got ETREX20 for £135 from BIKEINN.

I have two other GPS units both using the Garmin UK TOPO map. The licence allows for two units.

However I've loaded the openstreetmaps on to this new unit which covers UK.