Author Topic: A Raleigh to lust after?  (Read 2654 times)

A Raleigh to lust after?
« on: 20 November, 2011, 08:29:22 pm »
http://road.cc/content/news/48030-raleigh-2012-bikes-steel-clubman-breaks-cover

That Clubman looks great. Shame about the ugly chainset, but otherwise it looks a cracker.

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #1 on: 20 November, 2011, 08:35:54 pm »
 :sick:

It can't make up its mind whether it wants to be compact or traditional, so it ends up looking minging.

It would look OK if it had a horizontal top tube. And didn't say Raleigh on it!
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #2 on: 20 November, 2011, 08:40:38 pm »
I'm with bobb on this one.
Getting there...

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #3 on: 20 November, 2011, 08:48:57 pm »
Raleigh's just a brand name now, and buried somewhere in the text is the price: £950!

dasmoth

  • Techno-optimist
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #4 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:03:36 pm »
In general I actually like sloping top tubes, but have to agree that one's not quite right.  I guess it's a victim of the headset-spacers-are-bad meme...

Edit: What does look nice is the Sojourn.  Now trying to work out why the top tube on that looks great, while a similar angle on the Clubman is horrid.  Maybe the clubman tubing is a bit too skinny?
Half term's when the traffic becomes mysteriously less bad for a week.

Karla

  • car(e) free
    • Lost Byway - around the world by bike
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #5 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:14:55 pm »
I prefer the look of the Dawes by the same name.

Rhys W

  • I'm single, bilingual
    • Cardiff Ajax
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #6 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:17:55 pm »
:sick:

It can't make up its mind whether it wants to be compact or traditional, so it ends up looking minging.

It would look OK if it had a horizontal top tube. And didn't say Raleigh on it!

I've said it before and I'll say it again. And again. Classic looks, retro graphics - spoilt by a sloping top tube. See: Pinarello Catena, that cheap Halfords Viking, and a load of others.

You're right bobb - minging.

And a Chinese Raleigh is not worth the heron head tube badge.

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #7 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:21:27 pm »
I guess it's a victim of the headset-spacers-are-bad meme...

A cock length of headset spacers look just as ridiculous. Just build the sodding frame with the correct proportions in the first place and be done with it...
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #8 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:26:21 pm »
I quite like it actually...   :)

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #9 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:39:40 pm »
I'm not so bothered by it being a girls bike the sloping top tube as I am by the levers.  :sick: they're completely out of character - bar end/down tube or even Campag - anything but those monstosities.  >:(

I'm with DrMekon on the chainset tooo.
If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is...

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #10 on: 20 November, 2011, 09:42:38 pm »
Quote
I guess it's a victim of the headset-spacers-are-bad meme...

The "problem" is the modern fashion for very long exposed seatposts, ie having the saddle a very long way out of the seat tube and top tube joint.

You simply can't have high-ish bars (level or just below the bars), a very long exposed seatpost, and a horizontal top tube without a huge stack of spacers or an upward pointing stem.

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #11 on: 20 November, 2011, 10:01:38 pm »
I think I'll stick with my 1948 Raleigh Clubman... 8)

Ray 6701

  • SO @ T
    • Tamworth cycling club
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #12 on: 20 November, 2011, 10:20:43 pm »
I think I'll stick with my 1948 Raleigh Clubman... 8)

Any chance of a photo to perv over erm admire  ;)
SR 2010/11/12/13/14/15
RRTY. PBP. LeJoG 1400. LEL.




Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #13 on: 20 November, 2011, 11:09:27 pm »
http://road.cc/content/news/48030-raleigh-2012-bikes-steel-clubman-breaks-cover

That Clubman looks great. Shame about the ugly chainset, but otherwise it looks a cracker.

Yes I like it, I agree about the ugly chainset, and the levers are wrong as well, I also like the Dawes Clubman.
I have very fond memories of very many miles on a 531 Raleigh Clubman from many years ago, I also have fond memories of a 531 Dawes from about the same time. I also have not so fond memories of a gas pipe Aveo from not so long ago.

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #14 on: 21 November, 2011, 08:50:20 am »
I think I'll stick with my 1948 Raleigh Clubman... 8)

Any chance of a photo to perv over erm admire  ;)
I haven't got a decent picture of my actual bike, but it looks like pretty much this (but without the decals at the moment):

Biggsy

  • A bodge too far
  • Twit @iceblinker
    • My stuff on eBay
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #15 on: 21 November, 2011, 09:00:15 am »
We only think horizontal top tubes look better because that's what we've grown up with.  My Tifosi CK7 has a similarly sloping top tube to the Raleigh.  I don't care what it looks like any more.

The chainset looks nasty though - because probably it really is nasty.
●●●  My eBay items  ●●●  Twitter  ●●●

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #16 on: 21 November, 2011, 12:23:57 pm »
ROFL that Raleigh looks like my Custom Racer they Copied my Design!!

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #17 on: 21 November, 2011, 02:22:19 pm »
I like sloping top tubes and I don't mind modern components on a 'traditional' or even genuinely old frame, but that Raleigh looks wrong because of the combination of sloping top tube with long head tube. At least, I think that's the reason. And that chainset is just fugly. But the colour's nice, and it doesn't have unicrown forks, which I personally don't like aesthetically.

Not going to buy it though.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #18 on: 21 November, 2011, 06:30:35 pm »
We only think horizontal top tubes look better because that's what we've grown up with.  My Tifosi CK7 has a similarly sloping top tube to the Raleigh.  I don't care what it looks like any more.

The chainset looks nasty though - because probably it really is nasty.
Hmm ... maybe ... but there is something pleasing about parallel lines vs not-quite-parallel.
toptube - ground - wheel centres - quill stem top. Having them all parallel just looks right. On that bike everything is at some angle to everything else.

I think the chainset and those shifter-levers are just hideous on any bike!
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #19 on: 25 November, 2011, 06:14:28 pm »
That a new Tiagra chainset on the Raleigh? if so is damn ugly and cheap looking.
Get a bicycle. You will never regret it, if you live- Mark Twain

Re: A Raleigh to lust after?
« Reply #20 on: 25 November, 2011, 09:39:12 pm »
I can't work Raleigh out. They seem to launch a range of nice bikes, build a reputation, get new management, change strategy to sell only BSOs, then go back into the quality market and go round the loop again. They've been doing that for as long as I can remember.