Yes. I just want to point out to newbies that they don't have to choose the tourists start (90 hours)
agreed, 100%
I was much fitter and faster in 2003 than 2007, and the weather was a lot better, but I suffered more because of the start time. I was a good 7 hours faster in 2007 despite Pete and I taking a pretty relaxed attitude to the whole thing.
Having tried the 90h start, 84 is certainly appealing, for the rasons you guys give. Also, on paper it sounds so do-able:
I can scrape round a 600 in 40 hours, so this is 2 of those (on slightly easier terrain) with at least 4 hours to grab much-needed sleep at some stage.
But what I expect to happen is that after 3 hours I will give up hanging onto very fast wheels, and spend the next 81 riding solo. [I've done that on a UK 600 and enjoyed the attention at controls, but once was enough!]
Anyway, lots of time to decide ...