By the way, thanks for all the compliments about the frame. It does have a few things wrong with it. I thought it might be worth sharing...
The dropouts I used mean that the tubes have to be a minimum width. This means that the seat stays and fork ends have to be slightly larger diameter than those that can be used with slot dropouts. This has no real effect on the seat stays, but it does mean that the fork blades are slightly thicker at the wheel end than they could have been, which means the fork is a little less compliant than I wanted.
By building to a very compact geometry I had not realised that I needed to thin down the seat and chainstays. As a result, although the rear triangle is quite long, again, it's not as compliant as I'd hoped.
If I was building lots of frames, version 2.0 would have thinner stays and possibly I'd build a curve into them.
I placed a braze on for a rear light on the top of the right seat stay, but you can't fit the light because it fouls the brake (doh!). It will work with an Ultralight 3 point rack though, so no real problems.
Finally, in the end I think the head tube is a bit too long. I'd trim about 1cm from the height if I was building it again.
Last niggle - I always intended to use a Zefal XPS as the pump and fitted a pump peg to take it fitted to the LH chainstay. When you get the pump, you realise it's sized like a slightly overlong minipump! That said, there's no way I'd hang it under the top tube!
As a final little design detail, I fitted my bottle bosses slightly higher than usual so that I could reach them more easily. In general, bottle bosses are fitted as low as possible to keep the CofG low, but since this isn't a racing bike I don't have to worry about things like that!
Keep an eye on these forums for regular updates and lovely pictures, plus loads of advice from proper framebuilders!
The VSalon Framebuilder ForumFrameforum - THE Handmade Bike Website!