Author Topic: The cricket...  (Read 262626 times)

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1175 on: 06 January, 2016, 06:27:14 pm »
South Africa coming right back into the game and hence the series....but still a good result for the tourists. Should be plenty more interesting stuff to come.

It always feels a bit strange listening to the winter series in SA because the time difference is so small compared to what we're used to, it can feel like TMS as normal, finishing late afternoon, only in January.
Garry Broad

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1176 on: 06 January, 2016, 09:34:29 pm »
Whoa!

I'm guessing it's to make way for De Villiers, who was making noises about retiring.

It was a decent match in the end, only day three was dull (and the Indian lad scoring 1000 livened that day a bit).

Fascinating game.  I thought for a day that SA were going to bore England to death and it almost turned out to be true.  But that's England's fault for not bowling them out.

Not so sure about the India thing:  Obviously it's astonishing but he actually only batted for about 6 hours, though it's still definitely "well done, that man".  But to take 1400 off a team you can get out for 31 isn't what I call cricket!

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1177 on: 06 January, 2016, 09:35:40 pm »
Dropped catches, Peter, that's what cost England.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1178 on: 06 January, 2016, 09:38:24 pm »
Yes, you're right, of course.  I'd half wanted SA to win, not just to put a smile in Steve GT's face but because I get sick of Geoffrey Boycott's smug "no chance" again and again.  The arrogant bugger was right again!

Steve GT

  • Crediamo in te, bici!
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1179 on: 14 January, 2016, 07:43:33 am »
The South Africans have lost their wicketkeeper for the game, bad news from a South African point of veiw.

Steve GT

  • Crediamo in te, bici!
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1180 on: 14 January, 2016, 10:24:34 am »
Does anyone else like to score each session using boxing’s ’10 point must’ system?

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1181 on: 15 January, 2016, 11:09:32 pm »
Looking like a tight match. I'm just catching up, but winning the toss may give SA the edge.

Meanwhile: Ben Stokes has scored 368 runs from 334 balls in this series. That's just preposterous.

Does anyone else like to score each session using boxing’s ’10 point must’ system?

No, but I might from now on!

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1182 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:16:33 am »


Meanwhile: Ben Stokes has scored 368 runs from 334 balls in this series. That's just preposterous.



And it's now 426 from 388!

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1183 on: 16 January, 2016, 08:15:03 am »
It's a bit lively out there this morning.
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1184 on: 16 January, 2016, 10:02:40 am »
OK, let's see what the England bowlers can do now...
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1185 on: 16 January, 2016, 11:04:05 am »
The SA innings was a statistical wonder; lowest test score (313) with all 11 players reaching double figures!

Also 2nd highest score ever without a 50 anywhere.
[I *think* I've got those right ... ]

There's a list of similar feats here:
http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/highest-test-totals-without-a-century-and-half-century

This all intersts me cos it debunks one of the classic commentator myths;
"a couple of players need to push on and make big centuries"
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1186 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:00:36 pm »
Stunning! 31 for 4

I'm supposed to be working  ;D
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1187 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:06:37 pm »
I'm looking forward to seeing that catch!
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

mcshroom

  • Mushroom
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1188 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:12:44 pm »
I looking forward to seeing Broad's spell. Ripping them apart at the moment!
Climbs like a sprinter, sprints like a climber!

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1189 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:13:11 pm »
Broad 5-14  ;D
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1190 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:33:15 pm »
6 down.  Vilas what a catch...
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1191 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:33:35 pm »
Taylor brilliant
It is simpler than it looks.

Basil

  • Um....err......oh bugger!
  • Help me!
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1192 on: 16 January, 2016, 12:39:09 pm »
Crikey!  I've just read today's additions to this thread, quickly switched the radio on and Bang. 7  :D
Admission.  I'm actually not that fussed about cake.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1193 on: 16 January, 2016, 01:18:30 pm »
Right, I have to get out for that bike ride - otherwise I'll never go...   :)
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1194 on: 16 January, 2016, 01:59:39 pm »
I've just come back and the buggers are all out  :o

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1195 on: 16 January, 2016, 02:04:59 pm »
I've just come back and the buggers are all out  :o

That's a coincidence: so are the South Africans!
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1196 on: 16 January, 2016, 02:07:12 pm »
I do hope England don't cock up here...
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1197 on: 16 January, 2016, 03:50:09 pm »
Get in.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Not sure how long Compton and Hales will be in the side...
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1198 on: 16 January, 2016, 04:36:12 pm »
Stuart Broad. Again. What a performance.
 :thumbsup:
Garry Broad

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1199 on: 16 January, 2016, 06:14:12 pm »
No relation.