...
I'd suggest that might be a very good reason to go to the AGM, but for reasons discussed on other threads this isn't the place for overt criticism of individuals. Not that anyone is, just saying...
The future of LEL
The criticism is already out there. But I was looking for some explanation.
The "future of LEL" thread talks about Melita Luxton being 'appointed' to run LEL and LEL as AUK's 'flagship' event. On the other hand LEL seems to be run on much the same basis as other calendar events, i.e. the organiser is autonomous within the AUK franchise. In the later case, if the organiser brings in her own people, keeps her own accounts and runs a successful event, it's not really appropriate to publish criticism in the official AUK organ. No matter that said organiser has apparently upset some club stalwarts.
So, is this simply a clash of personalities based on a misunderstanding of the organiser's place in the LEL scheme? Or is someone out of order?